Craig Donlon Bojan R. Bojkov Sentinel-3 Mission Scientist, ESA/ESTEC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Breakout Session 1b: Inter-calibration Scenario - Stephen Ungar Hosted by the European Commission At the Joint Research.
Advertisements

Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
1 GlobModel The GlobModel study, initial findings and objectives of the day Zofia Stott 13 September 2007.
GSICS Partnerships: CEOS WGCV IVOS, X-CAL, GRUAN
Space-based Architecture for Climate Mary Kicza NOAA’s Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services May 19, 2011.
Working toward high accuracy and consistency of essential climate variables from multiple satellite ocean color missions …a joint CEOS/IOCCG initiative…
Traceability to SI temperature standards: A prerequisite for Climate Data Records of SST Peter J Minnett Meteorology & Physical Oceanography Rosenstiel.
Working Group on Calibration and Validation Working Group on Cal/Val Update Albrecht von Bargen (DLR) SIT-30 Agenda Item 10 CEOS Work Plan Deliverables.
WGCV issues for SIT decision/information Satish Srivastava (CSA), WGCV Chair Albrecht von Bargen (DLR), WGCV Vice-Chair Eric Arsenault (CSA), WGCV Secretariat.
WGClimate Work Plan for John Bates, Chair WGClimate 4th Working Group on Climate Meeting.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda item 31 Satish Srivastava (CSA,WGCV Chair), Albrecht von Bargen (DLR, WGCV Vice Chair),
Determining the accuracy of MODIS Sea- Surface Temperatures – an Essential Climate Variable Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Meteorology and Physical.
2010 CEOS Field Reflectance Intercomparisons Lessons Learned K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2 1 NASA/GSFC, 2 National Physical Laboratory.
CEOS SST-VC- Status and Issues Craig Donlon and Kenneth S. Casey on behalf of the SST-VC members ESA and NOAA CEOS SIT-29 Meeting CNES, Toulouse, France.
Sentinel-3 Validation Team (S3VT) Meeting ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, th November 2013 General Presentation Template for S3VT meeting Project name.
GHRSST, V1, CGMS 41 July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group.
Anticipated Outcomes from CEOS WGs in 2010 Strategic Discussion on what the WGs should seek to achieve 1 23 rd CEOS Plenary I Phuket, Thailand I 3-5 November.
Slide: 1 CEOS SDCG-3 Meeting|Sydney, Australia| 7-9 February 2013 Space Data Coordination Group Land Surface Imaging Virtual Constellation Ake Rosenqvist,
CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) Report Agenda item: 17 Presented by: Pascal Lecomte.
23 rd WGCV, March , 2005 IVOS (15 th ) IVOS Working Meeting CONAE, 10&11. March 2005.
Overview of CEOS Virtual Constellations Andrew Mitchell NASA CEOS SIT Team / WGISS NASA ESRIN – Frascati, Italy September 20, 2013 GEOSS Vision and Architecture.
The CEOS Carbon Task Force Report SIT th – 28 th March 2012, La Jolla Takashi Moriyama (JAXA) & Diane Wickland (NASA) Carbon Task Force Co-Chairs.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
EUM/SAF/VWG/02/0010, Rev. 3, May 2003 Page 1 The SAF Network Concept and Status Juha-Pekka Luntama, EUMETSAT GRAS Mission Scientist
JCOMM Services Program Area Working together beyond GODAE for Operational Oceanography Dr. Craig Donlon JCOMM Service Programme Area Coordinator The Met.
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
WGCV Report and Actions Pascal Lecomte – Chair Greg Stensaas – Vice chair Marie-Claire Greening - Secretariat 1 23 rd CEOS Plenary I Phuket, Thailand I.
The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) must deliver timely, quality, long- term, global information to meet the needs of its nine societal.
Overview of progress towards a data quality assurance strategy to facilitate interoperability WGISS – May 11 th, 2009.
Page 1 Validation Workshop, 9-13 th December 2002, ESRIN ENVISAT Validation Workshop AATSR Report Marianne Edwards Space Research Centre Department of.
ASIC 3 May Broadband Breakout Group Recommendations Big 3 Crosscutting Earth Radiation Budget.
WGISS Response to CEOS Actions Assigned to WGISS Richard Moreno CNES – WGISS chair WGISS-40 Harwell – United Kingdom 28 th September 2015 Committee on.
September, 2008 TASK DA Data Quality Assurance Strategy GEO Task DA-06-02: “This task is led by CEOS and IEEE” GOAL: “Develop a GEO data quality.
Land Surface Imaging VC: Terms of Reference Julio Dalge, P.G. Diwakar, John Faundeen INPE ISRO USGS CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA March 12,
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
Information on a potential CEOS Sea Surface Temperature Virtual Constellation (SST-VC) Craig Donlon (ESA) Kenneth S. Casey (NOAA) CEOS Plenary, Rio De.
QA4EO Update on the Quality Assurance Framework For Earth Observation Joint GSICS GDWG-GRWG meeting.
The International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group International Network for Sensor Inter- comparison and Uncertainty assessment for Ocean Color Radiometry.
Sustained Coordinated Processing of Environmental Satellite Data for Climate Monitoring SCOPE-CM Sustained, Co-Ordinated Processing of Environmental Satellite.
1.Bob Iacovazzi (NOAA) - Road to Pre-operational Phase Presentation 2.All – Discussion & Feedback 3.Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) – Reminders: Korea, Conference,
Earth Observation Science CEOS Guidelines for the validation of satellite SST Observations David T Llewellyn-Jones &Gary K Corlett Space Research Centre.
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
FRM4STS: Fiducial Reference measurements for validation of Surface Temperature from Satellites (ceos cv8) Nigel Fox NPL (ESA Project) WGCV Plenary #
Albrecht von Bargen, Chair CEOS WGCV DLR Agenda Item # 6 GSICS-EP 17
The Joint CEOS/CGMS Working Group on Climate
WGISS-WGCV Joint Session
Towards achieving continental scale field validation and multi-sensor interoperability of satellite derived surface reflectance in Australia Medhavy Thankappan1,
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Status of Carbon Action Items
WGCV Overview K. Thome WGISS#45 / WGCV#43
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Capacity Building for WGCV
CEOS/CGMS Working Group Climate
Action Item Status / CEOS Work Plan Status
Geoscience Australia Report
National REMOTE SENSING Validation Workshop
Recent Activities of Ocean Surface Topography Virtual Constellation (OST-VC) Remko Scharroo (EUMETSAT)
Atmospheric Composition SG report
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Recent activities of OCR-VC
Closure of WGCV actions (CV-01; CV-09; CV-13; CV-16)
Working Group on Cal/Val Update
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
RadCalNet/Landnet process for adding new sites
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Recent Activities of Ocean Surface Topography Virtual Constellation (OST-VC) Remko Scharroo (EUMETSAT)
CEOS Working Group on Climate (WGClimate)
WG Calibration and Validation
DEM related topics K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 45 CSIRO, Perth
Presentation transcript:

Craig Donlon Bojan R. Bojkov Sentinel-3 Mission Scientist, ESA/ESTEC Head Sensor Performance, Products and Algorithms, ESA/ESRIN

Miami 3 (2009) for SST (10 global participants) using QA4EO guidelines SST/LST Comparison Campaign Introduction and Background Cal/Val sensor comparison campaign in support of SST and LST measurements from space (support action for VC-SST and WGC) (follows similar highly successful Tuz Golu campaign for surface reflectance and Miami 3 (2009) for SST (10 global participants) using QA4EO guidelines Proposal 4th of ~5 yearly (‘Miami’ 1,2,3) WGCV comparisons for radiometers including black bodies Phase1 (2014-2015): Laboratory based vs. SI traceable standards (radiometers and black bodies) (Land and Ocean applications) Phase 2A (2014 – 2018): Series of ship/ocean based radiometer campaigns Phase 2B (2015 – 2017): Field-based calibration of radiometers Participation open to all Background Essential Climate Variables Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and Land Surface Temperature (LST) are both dependent on global satellite observations of surface emitted thermal radiation Heritage long-time series of data from multiple sensors exists New sensors soon to be launched e.g. Sentinel 3, JPSS-1 International comparisons are essential to provide confidence in data, test innovation and facilitate capacity building and training

Project 1: SST/LST Comparison Campaign Introduction and Background (continued) ESA has agreed to provide funding to support the organisation, logistics and analysis of the comparison (For all phases 1 through to 2B) It will require: CEOS member agencies to support the participation (travel/subsistence ~2-3 wks to UK) and instruments transport of appropriate Cal/Val teams from their region of influence. For Phase 2A, this will require radiometers to be deployed on ships for a few months (no cost for ship but for radiometer transport). For Phase 2B, this will require support for radiometers and personnel (travel/subsistence ~2 wks) for appropriate teams from their region of influence to be deployed) to a field-site potentially in Namibia. Benefits to CEOS agencies: Knowledge to remove and correct instrument biases enabling harmonised global satellite Cal/Val Potential to learn and improve from peer interactions Establishment of best-practises for instrument and product Cal & Val

Project 2: SST (pilot) ‘Operational Validation Project’ Proposal Background: For SST validation (Operational and Climate) require network of high performance drifting Ocean Buoys for continuous monitoring of Ocean Temps, in addition to Ship borne radiometers analogous to ‘test-sites’ such as Aeronet and new LandNET Key part of strategy to bridge ‘data gaps’ between sensors for climate White paper drafted by VC-SST, GHRSST, WGCV-IVOS detailing background available Existing networks not sufficient in number for necessary coverage Perform a study, funded by ESA, to evaluate what is achievable in terms of accuracy and relative benefits of both improved Ocean Buoys: performance and number and similarly for Ship borne radiometers in the context of Satellite derived SST products and CDRs Lead to a potential future proposal to CEOS agencies based on an update of the existing white paper with more rigorous cost-benefit analysis.

Background The Copernicus Programme is developing four Sentinel-3 satellites that all carry an Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) instrument For the Sentinel-3/SLSTR instruments, we will need to: Verify the radiance responsivity, the radiometric uncertainty and the long-term stability of each instrument Maintain the traceability of the instruments throughout the lifetime of the missions following GEO/CEOS QA4EO principles Quantify discrepancies between instruments within multi-mission time-series (i.e. maintain interoperability) Verify the atmospheric models and algorithms used to transform the satellite measured radiances into water leaving radiances

Background (ii) To properly address the tasks on the previous slide, we will: Verify the performances of the Level-1 products globally and temporally using CEOS endorsed calibration and inter-comparison techniques and follow the principles outlined in the GEO/CEOS QA4EO Use select land, ocean and atmosphere Level-2 products to diagnose by proxy the Level-1 performance (but no tuning!) Within the frame of the EU-ESA “Copernicus delegation agreement”, ESA is responsible for the following tasks: The maintenance and evolution of the Sentinel-3 optical instruments Level-1 products (section 6.1.2) The Cal/Val infrastructure necessary to meet the Sentinel mission requirements (section 3.2.2.3) In the case of Sea Surface Temperature, FRM required for validation are provided by (a) ship mounted infrared radiometers and (b) ocean moorings. In an operational context, drifting buoy and Argo floats complement the FRM for validation. For Land Surface Temperature, FRM are provided by infrared radiometers

Background (iii) – the Sentinel-3 Validation Team (S3VT) To support independent Sentinel-3 validation efforts (Level-1, land, ocean, atmosphere), ESA and EUMETSAT jointly formed the Sentinel-3 Validation Team (S3VT) in 2012 - Including a dedicated SST sub-group representing 14 specific projects S3VT ToR relevant to Fiducial Reference Measurements (FRMs): Provision of expertise and activities to scientifically validate SLSTR products utilising both offline and NRT data streams and analyses Provision of fiducial reference measurements that can be regarded and employed as a standard reference and characterized by detailed instrument uncertainty budgets with SI traceability as well as detailed quantification of measurement uncertainties, including environmental observation conditions Maintenance, update and implementation of optical measurement protocols, methodologies and guidelines for field instrument calibration and characterization, for in situ measurements, measurement processing, and validation procedures. Cooperation on protocols with organizations such as GHRSST and CEOS SST-VC/WGCV Characterization and calibration of field instruments, participation in inter-calibration round robins, aiming at establishing SI traceability of instrument calibration Sharing of information and results through S3VT web portal, wiki, blogs, e-mails Coordination of activities Fiducial reference measurements are those measurements regarded or employed as a standard reference that are essential to independently verify and monitor the performance of SLSTR measurements.

24 Months/500K€ Establish and maintain SI. traceability of Fiducial Reference Measurements (FRM) for satellite derived surface temperature product validation. OBJ-1: Design and implement a laboratory-based comparison of the calibration processes for FRM TIR radiometers (SST, LST, IST and others) OBJ-2: Design and implement a laboratory-based comparison to verify TIR blackbody sources used to maintain calibration of FRM TIR radiometers. OBJ-3: Design and implement field inter-comparisons using pairs of FRM TIR radiometers to build a database of knowledge over a several years. OBJ-4: Conduct field-campaigns for TIR FRM in collaboration with CEOS and the international community. OBJ-5: Conduct a full data analysis, derivation and specification of uncertainties, following agreed NMI protocols on all data collected as part of FRM4-CEOS. OBJ-6: Publish all outcomes and results in an open and transparent manner using peer reviewed and other grey literature. The activity is also open to other thermal infrared radiometers used as FRM over other surfaces such as lakes. OBJ-7: Develop a route to traceability for not-recoverable in situ infrastructure (e.g. drifting buoys, Argo floats)

Implementing Consortium

Tasks Task 1: Outreach, Communication and Promotion, Task-2: Requirements Review and Preparation for Technical Implementation (Definition of protocols and procedures) Task 3: CEOS SI. inter-comparison experiment for TIR Fiducial Reference Measurement SST/LST/IST Radiometers and Reference Blackbody calibrators. Task 4: CEOS TIR FRM Field Inter-comparison Experiment (FICE) and Framework and Pilot Study (SST and LST) Task 5: Study of SI Traceability for SST, LST and IST measurements collected using instruments other than FRM TIR radiometers. Task 6: International Workshop and Final Reporting.

Schedule KO 30th April 2015

Participation ESA will support the cost of radiometer inter-calibration work via the FRM4TIR (CEOS) project CEOS Agencies are requested to provide support to their national teams to participate in the radiometer and black body calibration exercise in 2016 Cost of T&S for national teams, shipping of gear etc. This approach has worked well in the past for previous activities held in the USA. Looking forwards to a useful outcome.