Bringing Down the Monster:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
Advertisements

Moving from Good Intentions to Intentional Action and Collaboration: The Grantmaker’s Role in Collective Impact.
Collective Impact – an overview
Boston | Geneva | Mumbai | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington FSG.ORG Collective Impact October 24, 2012.
Jewish Funders Network February 16, 2012 Collective Impact.
Annual Conference April 2015 Jill Schumann – LeadingAge Maryland.
Building Local Information Support to Ontario Newcomers (BLISON) Building Local Information Support to Ontario Newcomers (BLISON) InformOntario Symposium.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing PSU AS CATALYST FOR EDUCATIONAL GROWTH Imagining the Creation of an Intellectually Rich and.
Some problems are simply too complex to solve with any single approach. Why collaborate? Isolated interventions and single programmes will never be able.
Competency Models Impact on Talent Management
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT HUB Lake Babine Nation Crystal Harwood.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Key Requirements for Transforming to Community Impact Lessons from the Impact Transformation Partnership (ITP) – October 2005.
Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Collective Impact 1 1 Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovations Review,
Collective Impact “an approach to large-scale social change requiring broad cross-sector coordination”
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Summary of the U.S. Task Force on United Way’s Economic Model & Growth.
Collective Impact Building Understanding Part 2 May 30, 2014 East Texas Human Needs Network Christina Fulsom.
MCESA Re-Engaging Disconnected Youth Summit II “Successes of a Developed Collective Impact Model” Chekemma Fulmore-Townsend President and CEO Philadelphia.
CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: Update on Evaluation Planning for the Strategic Plan.
GREAT RIVERS CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 19, 2015 MARK STEWART, PRESIDENT UNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY CHRISTINE MACNAUGHTON COMMUNITY IMPACT MANAGER LENAWEE.
SMR-PPT © JESNA 2011 Collective Impact: Implications for Jewish Education JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: EDUCATION FUNDERS March 2012.
Mobilizing your Community into Collaborative Action Liz Weaver Vice President, Tamarack – An Institute for Community Engagement
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
April 29 - May 1, 2015 Mapping a Route to Community Impact for a Smaller United Way.
BLENDING CCIs, PROJECTS, COLLECTIVE IMPACT, AND EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES TO ACHIEVE SYSTEM AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES Hiram E. Fitzgerald, PhD. Robert Brown,
{ Collective Impact- Building More Effective Partnerships Amanda Mancuso, MPH Strategy Management & Collective Impact Consultant Insightformation.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Boston | Geneva | Mumbai | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington FSG.ORG Building Backbone Organizations for Collective Impact October 24, 2012.
Presented by: Steve Litke, Fraser Basin Council Winnipeg, Manitoba June 18, 2012 Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Governance – Lessons from BC.
Presentation to: Presented by: Date: Developing Shared Goals in Public Health, Coalition Building, and District Partnership Success Chronic Disease University.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
Collaboration and Coalition Building Presented by Prevention Services of ETP Inc. and DMHAS’ Prevention Unit.
Boston | Geneva | Mumbai | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington FSG.ORG Collective Impact July 2013 Session for: United Way of San Diego County.
Collective Impact General Overview December 2012.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
Applying Collective Impact to a Healthy Start CAN/CI Initiative Peer Learning Network Call #8 Backbone and Reflection January 2016.
Applying Collective Impact to a Healthy Start CAN/CI Initiative Peer Learning Network Call #5 Mutually Reinforcing Activities October 2015.
Applying Collective Impact to a Healthy Start CAN/CI Initiative Peer Learning Network Call #7 Action Planning & Continuous Communication December 2015.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Resource Review for Teaching Resource Review for Teaching Victoria M. Rizzo, LCSW-R, PhD Jessica Seidman, LMSW Columbia University School of Social Work.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Collective Impact The Best Chance We Have at Addressing Wicked Problems By Trevor Cook.
1 Connecting The Dots The Importance of Collaboration May 24, 2016 Nancy Schultz Family Living Educator.
Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
NSF INCLUDES “NSF should implement a bold new initiative, focused on broadening participation of underrepresented groups in STEM, similar in concept.
Working Group Planning Session
9/11/2018 Collective Impact Prosper Lincoln June 24, 2016.
KP to add NSF Logo and Grant #
Collective Impact Fall 2017.
Collective Impact Fall 2017.
Introduction to the Hedland Collective
An Overview of Collective Impact: Principles & Perspectives
Thank CARS for all of their support in helping with the Strategic Planning Process! Especially thank Kerrilyn (out on maternity leave at the moment) and.
How do you start a collaborative response?
Collective Impact: Starting with the end in mind
Collective Impact1 1Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact.
Creating Working Partnerships that Increase Power
Collective Impact Let’s Build It
COLLECTIVE IMPACT.
Thank CARS for all of their support in helping with the Strategic Planning Process! Especially thank Kerrilyn (out on maternity leave at the moment) and.
Presentation transcript:

Bringing Down the Monster: Addressing Complex Social Problems through Collective Impact Diane R. Bessel, PhD, LMSW, CNM National Association of Social Workers - New York State Annual Conference 2015

Community Problems As social workers, we learn about a wide array of problems through our engagements with individuals, families, organizations, and communities. Poverty Homelessness Interpersonal Violence Violence in Communities Inequality in Education, Employment, Opportunity Isms and Intersectionality

Nature of Community Problems Simple Clear cause and effect relationship that can be mastered using basic skills Complicated Requires expertise, coordination, & communication; reasonable certainty about result especially when replicated Complex No clear rules to guarantee success – unique, changing circumstances; trial and error; varied interaction X Most problems are treated as Simple or Complicated Interdependent Factors and Actors Source: Getting to Maybe (Wesley, Zimmerman, and Patton 2007)

Nature of Complex Problems Difficult to define because they are rooted in systems Involve complicated, ever-changing web of cause-effect relationships No clear pathways and no clear solutions Wide array of organizations and actors seeking to address them Organizations and actors often work in isolation Actors rely on own experiences, perspectives, and understandings when developing strategies Efforts are typically limited in scope, may lack appropriate focus, and/or are so resource intensive that they are unsustainable That which cannot be sustained, cannot be effective

Collective Impact Seminal Piece Published in Winter 2011 Large Scale Social Change Attracts Attention from: Foundations Researchers/Think Tanks Federal Government United Ways Proliferation of Related Work

What is Collective Impact? No single organization, actor, or entity, alone, has the ability to solve the world’s most challenging problems. Collective Impact occurs when actors from different sectors commit to a common agenda in order to solve a specific, often very complex, community problem.

Today’s Session Focus on the role Collective Impact strategies can play in addressing complex, even monstrous, social problems. At the end of today’s session, participants will: Understand the theory behind Collective Impact and its five necessary conditions. Draw on knowledge of successful initiatives to determine whether Collective Impact may be right for their community. Become aware of Collective Impact resources including research and tools.

Tale of Two Impacts Isolated Impact Collective Impact Organizations work separately and compete for resources Funders select individual grantees based on identified parameters Large scale change is assumed to depend on scaling Evaluation attempts to isolate a particular organization’s impact Corporate & government sectors are disconnected from foundations and non-profits All players bring their unique skills to work toward same goal Organizations actively coordinate their actions, measure same things, and share lessons learned Process orientation with continuous improvement focus Cross-sector alignment occurs with government and corporate sectors as essential partners Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Collective Impact (Winter, 2011)

Nature of Collective Impact Supports changes in individual and organization behavior that create an ongoing progression of alignment, discovery, learning, and emergence. In many instances, the progression greatly accelerates social change without requiring breakthrough innovations or vastly increased funding. Previously unnoticed solutions and resources from inside or outside the community are identified and adopted. Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Embracing Emergence: How Collective Impact Addresses Complexity (Winter, 2013)

Nature of Collective Impact Existing organizations find new ways of working together that produce better outcomes. Leaders come to recognize and accept continual unfolding of newly identified opportunities for greater impact, along with setbacks. Develop new way of seeing, learning, and doing that marries emergent solutions with intentional outcomes. Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Embracing Emergence: How Collective Impact Addresses Complexity (Winter, 2013)

Five Conditions of Collective Impact Backbone Support Common Agenda Shared Measurement Mutually Reinforcing Activities Continuous Communication Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Collective Impact (Winter, 2011)

Five Conditions for Collective Impact Common Agenda All participants have a shared vision for change including a common understanding of the problem and a joint approach to solving it through agreed upon actions Shared Measurement Collect data and measure results consistently across all participants ensuring efforts remain aligned and participants hold each other accountable Mutually Reinforcing Activities Participant activities must be differentiated while still being coordinated through a mutually reinforcing plan of action Continuous Communication Consistent and open communication is needed across the many players to build trust, assure mutual objectives, and appreciate common motivation Backbone Support Requires a separate organization(s) with staff and a specific set of skills to serve as the backbone for the entire initiative and coordinate participating organizations and agencies

Backbone Organizations Effective backbone support is critical to Collective Impact work. Backbone organizations offer a unique vantage point, reach, and a skill set not possessed by many other organizations. Requires vision, relationship building skills, focus, adaptation, results-orientation, and charisma. Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Understanding the Value of Backbone Organizations in Collective Impact (Winter, 2012)

Nature of Backbone Organization Backbone organizations bring a wide range of people together to work on the issues. Backbone organizations understand community issues as well as the types of activities that are already going on and how to align them. Backbone organizations facilitate a natural progression from partnership-focused activities toward broader externally focused, community level activities. Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Understanding the Value of Backbone Organizations in Collective Impact (Winter, 2012) Champions for Change: Leading a Backbone Organization for Collective Impact (2013)

Nature of Backbone Organization Backbone organizations build partner capacity to contribute to and use data in shared measurement system. Backbone organizations communicate the value of the effort and progress being made. Backbone organizations must balance the tension between coordinating and maintaining accountability, while staying behind the scenes to foster collective ownership. Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Understanding the Value of Backbone Organizations in Collective Impact (Winter, 2012) Champions for Change: Leading a Backbone Organization for Collective Impact (2013)

Six Common Activities of Backbone Organizations Guide Vision and Strategy Support Aligned Activities Establish Shared Measurement Practices Build Public Will Advance Policy Mobilize Funding Externally Focused Community Level Activities Partnership Focused Activities Source: Stanford Social Innovation Review: Understanding the Value of Backbone Organizations in Collective Impact (Winter, 2012)

Six Common Activities of Backbone Organizations Guide Vision and Strategy Bring various stakeholders together to discuss pressing social issues; develop a collective agenda; and determine key strategies to be employed Support Aligned Activities Identify available resources and facilitate dialogue among key players to ensure coordination of activities toward goals Establish Shared Measurement Practices* Develop systems to measure outcomes and use data to make meaningful decisions Build Public Will Ensure that community members are increasingly aware of the issues, express support for the initiative, and are empowered to take action Advance Policy Ensure that policymakers and influencers are aware of initiative and advocate for system changes that are aligned with goals Mobilize Funding Funders redirect funds to support this activity and provide new public and private resources

Shared Measurement Practices Source: Champions for Change: Leading a Backbone Organization for Collective Impact (2013) Goal: Identify metrics for use in tracking progress toward a common agenda across organizations, and to provide scalable platforms to share data, discuss key learning, and improve strategy and action. Partner Outcomes - Effective? - Sustainable? Initiative Outcomes - Working Effectively Together? - Funding Flows? - Policy Change? Community Outcomes - Movement on Key Indicators?

Collective Impact in Action  

Collective Impact in Action  

Collective Impact Tools Readiness Assessment No Awareness Denial/Resistance Vague Awareness Preplanning Preparation Initiation Stabilization Expansion/Confirmation Professionalization  

Collective Impact Tools Collective Impact Readiness Tool   Partnership Information Sharing Networking Learning Collaboration Shared Goals Advocacy Coalition Building Collective Impact Shared Understanding Shared Agenda Shared Strategy

Collective Impact Tools Backbone Organization Assessment Tool  

References Communities of Practice,” Vibrant Communities. Accessed June 2013. http://tamarackcommunity.ca/g2_CofP.html Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., and Kramer, M. (2012). "Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work". Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 2011. Kania, J. and Kramer, M. (2011) "Collective Impact". Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter 2011. Kania, J., and Kramer, M. (2013). “Embracing Emergence: How Collective Impact Addresses Complexity.” Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 2013. Turner, S., Merchant, K., Kania, J., and Martin, E. (2012)."Understanding the Value of Backbone Organizations in Collective Impact” Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2013.  

Questions/Comments Diane R. Bessel, PhD, LMSW, CNM Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Program Director Social Work & Sociology Daemen College 4380 Main Street Buffalo, NY 14226 Email: dbessel@daemen.edu Phone: 716-566-7876