Monochromatization for Higgs production A.Faus-Golfe IFIC - LAL 22-27 March1FCC Week 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing LEP3 zero M. Koratzinos TLEP3 day, 9 January2013.
Advertisements

Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
WIN'05, June A. Klier - Muon Collider Physics1 Physics at a Future Muon Collider Amit Klier University of California, Riverside WIN’05 – Delphi,
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
08/06/ FCC-ee with kinks Can we conserve polarized beams?
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Plans for Polarized Beams at VEPP-2000 and U-70 Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk P S IN 2006.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Plan for Review of FCC- ee Optics and Beam Dynamics Frank Zimmermann FCC-ee Design Meeting 31 August 2015.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
An e+e- storage ring Higgs factory at Fermilab Tanaji Sen FNAL Accelerators for a Higgs Factory Workshop Nov 14-16, 2012.
Problems of charge compensation in a ring e+e- higgs factory Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk 5 rd TLEP3 workshop, FNAL, July 25, 2013.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Beam dynamics in crab collision K. Ohmi (KEK) IR2005, 3-4, Oct FNAL Thanks to K. Akai, K. Hosoyama, K. Oide, T. Sen, F. Zimmermann.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Please check out: K. Ohmi et al., IPAC2014, THPRI003 & THPRI004 A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, IPAC2014, THPRI008 Work in progress FCC-ee accelerator.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
1 FCC-ee as Higgs Factory Jörg Wenninger CERN Beams Department Operation group - LHC 23/07/2014 Future Circular Collider Study Acknowledgments to my FCC-ee.
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
Note presentation: Performance limitations of circular colliders: head-on collisions M. Koratzinos TLEP ACC meeting no. 8, 25/8/2014.
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
The Strong RF Focusing:
Status of CEPC lattice design
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Progress of SPPC lattice design
SuperB ARC Lattice Studies
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Study on Emittance Reduction with a Robinson Wiggler in HEPS
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Radiation Damping - Low emittance lattices
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

Monochromatization for Higgs production A.Faus-Golfe IFIC - LAL March1FCC Week 2015

 Objectives  Monochromatization principle  Energy Resolution and Monochromatization  Monochromatization factor  Standard scheme  Optimized scheme  Monochromatization implementation in FCC-ee Higgs production  Standard and Optimized scheme implementation  Conclusions and Further studies Outline March2FCC Week 2015

Objectives Mars 20153FCC week The aim is to monochromatize the FCC-ee beams at E CM = GeV for the production of e+e ---> H(125.2) in the s-channel, just like a muon collider, but with hopefully much higher luminosity -- and lower cross-section. The Higgs width is 4.2 MeV and the FCC-ee energy spread is about 5x10 -4 at these energies, so one needs to gain a factor 10 in energy spread. We also need to keep the beams polarized to keep track of the beam energy precisely. From previous study we could conclude that there is no fundamental reason against monochomatization, but given the FCC-ee optics configuration (IP dispersion can be generated independently for the two beams since there are two separate e+ / e- channels) horizontal dispersion at the IP (opposite sign) is the more natural option. Based on this option and the related trade-off between horizontal focusing and horizontal dispersion, we have studied the impact on luminosity and the options to avoid losses.

Energy Resolution: Monochromatization principle Energy resolution and Monocromatization Mars 20154FCC week Monochromatization [7] To increase energy spread bending radius longitudinal partition number

Monochromatization: dispersion has opposite sign in the IP Monochromatization principle Energy resolution and Monocromatization Mars 20155FCC week Standard collision: dispersion has the same sign in the IP Enhancement of energy resolution, and sometimes increase of the relative frequency of the events at the centre of of the distribution.

Monochromatization principle Monochomatization factor Mars 20156FCC week 1) Case with: D* x,y =0 2) Case with: D* x+ = - D* x- =D* x D* y+ = - D* y- =D* y Monochromatization factor  Opposite dispersions at the IP enhance energy resolution without detriment of the differential luminosity while dispersion which have the same sign degrade both differential and total luminosity  When   y <<<   x is more efficient to produce dispersion in the vertical plane trying to keep it zero horizontally

23-27 Mars 20157FCC week Monochromatization principle “Standard” Scheme D* x+ = D* x- = 0 D* y+ = - D* y- =D* y   y <<<   x Implementations historical Studies:  VEPP4: one ring, electrostatic quads [3 ][12]  SPEAR: one ring, electrostatic quads, ~8 [9]  LEP: one ring, electrostatic quads (limited strength) and alternative RF magnetic quads, ~3 (optics limitations) [2] [10]  Superconducting RF resonators [33]  Tau-Charm factory: two rings, vertical dipoles,, ~7.5 [3] [4] [6] ]8] [11] [13] [32] Never tested experimentally !!!!!!

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Standard” Scheme for FCC-ee Higgs factory: choosing Monochromatization factor Luminosity Standard deviation of w

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme D* y+ = D* y- = 0 D* x+ = - D* x- =D* x Optimizing the beam parameters we could gain in energy resolution keeping the luminosity constant and the beam-beam in the standard limits !!!!!! Rewriting some formulas: with horizontal invariant dispersion with dominant term

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme The new condition for an optimized scheme with: The beam-beam parameter could be maximized in the plane where dispersion is zero, keeping lower value in the plane where dispersion is different from zero

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme for FCC-ee Higgs factory: choosing keeping

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme for FCC-ee

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme for FCC-ee

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme for FCC-ee

23-27 Mars FCC week Monochromatization principle “Optimized” Scheme for FCC-ee

Conclusions Mars FCC week There is no fundamental reason against monochomatization. Implementation of a “standard” and even an “optimized” scheme seems not so difficult. But monochomatization has never been tested experimentally these means a flexible lattice with two modes of operation with/without is mandatory.

Drawbacks: Mars FCC week  D x * gives rise quantum excitation which increase horizontal emittance  Residual coupling  Aperture limitation  Dynamic Aperture reduction  Beam-Beam including parasitic crossings  Estimations of the broad band and the narrow band impedances and the current limits  Touschek lifetime  Polarization ring  Background and masking Further studies

New design of the OTR for ATF-ATF2 References 18

New design of the OTR for ATF-ATF2 References 19 [32] A. Faus-Golfe and J. Le Duff, Versatile DBA and TBA lattices for a Tau-Charm Factory with and without beam Monochromatization. NIM A 372 (1996) [33] A. Zholents, Shopisticated Accelerator Techniques for Colliding Beam Experiments. NIM A 265 (1988) Mars 2015FCC week

Thanks for your attention Mars FCC week