Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: 2015-05-10 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
MAC Header Compression
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0376r0 Slide 1Tatsumi Uwai, Radrix co. ltd March 2015 UL-MU MAC Throughput under Non-Full Buffer Traffic Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0064r1 January 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Consideration on UL-MU overheads Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /1120r0 Submission Buffer Status Report Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /1288r1 Submission November 2010 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Frame Format for GroupID Management Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0376r2 Slide 1Tatsumi Uwai, Radrix co. ltd March 2015 UL-MU MAC Throughput under Non-Full Buffer Traffic Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission HE A-Control field Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1098r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 ACK/BA frame for UL MU under cascading structure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0881r1 July 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL- OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0854r2 July 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 DL OFDMA Signalling Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Further considerations on WUR frame format
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Further considerations on WUR frame format
Regarding UL MU protection
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Further considerations on WUR frame format
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Random Access UL MU Resource Allocation and Indication
Reception Status of Frames Transmitted in Random Access RUs
Regarding HE fragmentation
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 2 Abstract This presentation questions what kind of info should be specified in the trigger frame for UL MU and what kind of info should be collected ahead at an AP. It was considered that one of the useful info to be collected should be on STAs’ TX demands, and to collect this, a passive way at the AP was proposed.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 3 A trigger frame for UL MU On March, TGax approved to add the following to SFD [1]: x.y.z The spec shall define the following mode of operation: An UL MU PPDU (MU-MIMO or OFDMA) is sent as an immediate response (IFS TBD) to a Trigger frame (format TBD) sent by the AP. But for an AP to send such a trigger frame, it needs to collect information in advance. Information depends on what will be specified in the trigger frame. Not to waste resource, at least it is better for the AP to figure out which STAs have TX data.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 It was shown in [2] that asking STAs one by one to find out their TX demands gives large overhead and a need of a more rough way to grasp or estimate STAs’ TX demands was suggested. Slide 4Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015 Recalling initial phase methods in [2]

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Approach to gathering TX demands Even if an inquiring sequence is immediately before the trigger frame, lifetime may expire for some of the frames and it cannot be always accurate. Then a rough estimate may be useful. Slide 5Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015 AP STA 1 STA 2 Inquiry Resp. (YES!) trigger Inquiry Resp. (YES!) Inquiry STA 3 STA 4 Resp. (YES!) Resp. (YES!) Inquiry NO… lifetime expires UL MU multi-STA BA/ACK

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 When a STA has data to transmit… It will try to access the medium by itself, anyway. If the STA is able to transmit a frame, the frame can be used to notify the AP of other remaining data in its queues. – STA-oriented notification The idea is something similar to the use of a More Data field. Slide 6Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Outline of STA-oriented notification Slide 7Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015 STA 1 to AP data BA/ACKData … AP recognizes STAs 1, 3, 4, and 6 have MSDUs to transmit* AP sends the trigger frame to STAs 1, 3, 4, and 6 * may also need to consider group IDs for selecting STAs notification of remaining data in MAC header collected by AP STA 3 to AP data BA/ACKData … notification of remaining data in MAC header same from STA 4 and 6

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 “More Data” field level enough? The More Data field is only 1 bit length. If the proposed field is just the same with the More Data field, then notification will be limited very simple. 1: Yes, I have remaining data. 0: No, I don’t have remaining data. If there are other kinds of information needed to be collected to generate the trigger frame, the concept may be extended to collect those, too. Slide 8Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 What should be specified in trigger frame? Parameters on target STAs (partial MAC Address? AID? Group ID?) resource allocation (in space/frequency) PPDU duration? (maximum?) To be able to specify PPDU duration at the AP, the AP may want parameters such as amount of buffered data from STAs beforehand. access category? ac has a loose restriction (“primary AC”) for DL-MU-MIMO. Slide 9Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Summary The trigger frame should specify necessary info to have STAs start UL MU TX. AP needs to collect info to generate such specifying info, so the specifying info in the trigger frame was questioned. Info on STAs’ TX demands is suggested to be at least one of those collected and STA-oriented way of notification was considered. TX demand shown in a field something like a More Data field. Slide 10Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 References [1] /0365r0 “UL MU procedure for 11ax system” [2] /0064r1 “Consideration on UL-MU overheads” Slide 11Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Straw Poll 1 What kind of information should be specified in a trigger frame? target STAs (TBD, could be MAC address/AID/Group ID) Y:N:A= (no objections) Slide 12Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Straw Poll 2 What kind of information should be specified in a trigger frame? resource allocation per STA (also vote yes if you think it will be addressed by Group ID) Y:N:A= (no objections) Slide 13Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Straw Poll 3 What kind of information should be specified in a trigger frame? PPDU duration (TBD, may be exact or maximum) Y:N:A= (no objections) Slide 14Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Straw Poll 4 What kind of information should be specified in a trigger frame? access category Y:N:A=5:17:many Slide 15Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 Straw Poll 5 For an AP to send the trigger frame for UL MU TX, do you think it is useful if a STA is able to notify the AP of its TX demand by a field something like a More Data field in a frame sent from its side? Y:N:A= (no objections) Slide 16Tomoko Adachi, Toshiba May 2015