Åke Nordlund & Anders Lagerfjärd Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen Bob Stein Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, MSU, East Lansing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Turbulent Convection in Stars Kwing Lam Chan Hong Kong University of Science and Technology “A Birthday Celebration of the Contribution of Bernard Jones.
Advertisements

Numerical Simulations of Supergranulation and Solar Oscillations Åke Nordlund Niels Bohr Institute, Univ. of Copenhagen with Bob Stein (MSU) David Benson,
1 The Sun as a whole: Rotation, Meridional circulation, and Convection Michael Thompson High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
IHY General Assembly, Paris, January 2006 Photospheric flows around sunspots and pores Michal Sobotka Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences.
Helioseismic data from Emerging Flux & proto Active Region Simulations Bob Stein – Michigan State U. A.Lagerfjärd – Copenhagen U. Å. Nordlund – Niels Bohr.
Emerging Flux Simulations Bob Stein A.Lagerfjard Å. Nordlund D. Benson D. Georgobiani 1.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Initial Analysis of the Large-Scale Stein-Nordlund Simulations Dali Georgobiani Formerly at: Center for Turbulence Research Stanford University/ NASA Presenting.
Solar Convection: What it is & How to Calculate it. Bob Stein.
TIME-DISTANCE ANALYSIS OF REALISTIC SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR CONVECTION Dali Georgobiani, Junwei Zhao 1, David Benson 2, Robert Stein 2, Alexander Kosovichev.
Solar Turbulence Friedrich Busse Dali Georgobiani Nagi Mansour Mark Miesch Aake Nordlund Mike Rogers Robert Stein Alan Wray.
Data for Helioseismology Testing: Large-Scale Stein-Nordlund Simulations Dali Georgobiani Michigan State University Presenting the results of Bob Stein.
Convection Simulations Robert Stein Ake Nordlund Dali Georgobiani David Benson Werner Schafenberger.
Solar Magneto-Convection: Structure & Dynamics Robert Stein - Mich. State Univ. Aake Nordlund - NBIfAFG.
Excitation of Oscillations in the Sun and Stars Bob Stein - MSU Dali Georgobiani - MSU Regner Trampedach - MSU Martin Asplund - ANU Hans-Gunther Ludwig.
From detailed magneto- convection simulations to modelling the convection zone-corona system Mats Carlsson Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University.
Super-granulation Scale Convection Simulations Robert Stein, David Benson - Mich. State Univ. Aake Nordlund - Niels Bohr Institute.
Stokes profiles Swedish 1m Solar Telescope, perfect seeing.
Supergranulation-Scale Simulations of Solar Convection Robert Stein, Michigan State University, USA Aake Nordlund, Astronomical Observatory, NBIfAFG, Denmark.
Summary of workshop on AR May One of the MURI candidate active regions selected for detailed study and modeling.
SSL (UC Berkeley): Prospective Codes to Transfer to the CCMC Developers: W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, G.H. Fisher, B.T. Welsch, and Y. Fan (HAO/NCAR)
Data for Helioseismology Testing Dali Georgobiani Michigan State University Presenting the results of Bob Stein (MSU) & Åke Nordlund (NBI, Denmark) with.
Solar Surface Dynamics convection & waves Bob Stein - MSU Dali Georgobiani - MSU Dave Bercik - MSU Regner Trampedach - MSU Aake Nordlund - Copenhagen Mats.
ob/data.html 1. Emerging Flux Simulations & proto Active Regions Bob Stein – Michigan State U. A.Lagerfjärd – Copenhagen U.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Simulating Solar Convection Bob Stein - MSU David Benson - MSU Aake Nordlund - Copenhagen Univ. Mats Carlsson - Oslo Univ. Simulated Emergent Intensity.
Detection of Emerging Sunspot Regions in the Solar Interior Stathis Ilonidis, Junwei Zhao, and Alexander Kosovichev Stanford University LoHCo Workshop.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 17 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Characterizing Photospheric Flows David Hathaway (NASA/MSFC) with John Beck & Rick Bogart (Stanford/CSSA) Kurt Bachmann, Gaurav Khatri, & Joshua Petitto.
Stratified Magnetohydrodynamics Accelerated Using GPUs:SMAUG.
Sunspots: the interface between dynamos and the theory of stellar atmospheres Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) 70 yr Guenther.
Modeling Magnetoconvection in Active Regions Neal Hurlburt, David Alexander, Marc DeRosa Lockheed Martin Solar & Astrophysics Laboratory Alastair Rucklidge.
Multiscale magnetic pattern in the quiet photosphere Francesco Berrilli (1) Dario Del Moro (1), Silvia Giordano (2), Stefano Scardigli (1) 1.Department.
SLIDE SHOW 3 B changes due to transport + diffusion III -- * * magnetic Reynold number INDUCTION EQUATION B moves with plasma / diffuses through it.
Decay of a simulated bipolar field in the solar surface layers Alexander Vögler Robert H. Cameron Christoph U. Keller Manfred Schüssler Max-Planck-Institute.
The multiscale magnetic pattern and the roots of solar activity F. Berrilli, S. Scardigli, D. Del Moro Department of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata,
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 1: Interior and Photosphere.
Modelling photospheric magnetoconvection in the weak field regime Paul Bushby & Steve Houghton (University of Cambridge) Acknowledgements: Mike Proctor,
Invited speakers (afternoon): David Alexander (Rice University) Chip Manchester (University of Michigan) Brad Hindman (JILA/University of Colorado)
Magneto-Hydrodynamic Equations Mass conservation /t = − ∇ · (u) Momentum conservation (u)/t =− ∇ ·(uu)− ∇ −g+J×B−2Ω×u− ∇ · visc Energy conservation /t.
Local Helioseismology LPL/NSO Summer School June 11-15, 2007.
Photospheric MHD simulation of solar pores Robert Cameron Alexander Vögler Vasily Zakharov Manfred Schüssler Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung.
Karen Meyer University of St Andrews Scotland 1 st year PhD student (3 months in)
Acoustic wave propagation in the solar subphotosphere S. Shelyag, R. Erdélyi, M.J. Thompson Solar Physics and upper Atmosphere Research Group, Department.
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
Emerging Flux Simulations & proto Active Regions Bob Stein – Michigan State U. A.Lagerfjärd – Copenhagen U. Å. Nordlund – Niels Bohr Inst. D. Georgobiani.
Emerging Flux Simulations & semi-Sunspots Bob Stein A.Lagerfjärd Å. Nordlund D. Georgobiani 1.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 22 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Magnetic field transport in turbulent compressible convection Nic Brummell (303) JILA, University of Colorado Steve.
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Moving Magnetic Features as Prolongation of Penumbral Filaments The Astrophysical Journal, 632: , 2005 October 20. Sainz Dalda 1 Telescope Heliographique.
Prograde patterns in rotating convection and implications for the dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen  Stockholm) Taylor-Proudman problem Near-surface.
Show 1 -- photosphere & sunspots SUN COURSE - SLIDE SHOW 4 Show 2 -- corona & solar cycle Today: Sun today + waves + prominences +UFO’s Show 3 -- SOHO.
Photospheric Flows and Structures Mark Rast Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences University.
Simulations of Solar Convection Zone Nagi N. Mansour.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Solar Convection Simulations Robert Stein, David Benson - Mich. State Univ. Aake Nordlund - Niels Bohr Institute.
Simulated Solar Plages Robert Stein, David Benson - Mich. State Univ. USA Mats Carlsson - University of Oslo, NO Bart De Pontieu - Lockheed Martin Solar.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.
Radiative Transfer in 3D Numerical Simulations Robert Stein Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University Åke Nordlund Niels Bohr Institute.
What happens in a star when convection stops? G th October 2007 Jonathan Braithwaite CITA, Toronto.
CHARACTERISTICS OF TURBULENT PROCESS IN THE SOLAR PHOTOSPHERE
Numerical Simulations of Solar Magneto-Convection
Structure and Flow Field of Sunspot
Solar Surface Magneto-Convection and Dynamo Action
October 14, Wednesday 12. Solar Convection
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Helioseismic data from Emerging Flux & proto Active Region Simulations
Supergranule Scale Convection Simulations
Presentation transcript:

Åke Nordlund & Anders Lagerfjärd Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen Bob Stein Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, MSU, East Lansing

 What is the (still un-observed) structure of sunspots?  Sub-resolution surface structure?  Sub-surface structure?  What controls their birth, evolution, and decay?  How do they fit into a larger context?

 Sunspots and active regions represent only the top of the iceberg!  They are just the largest flux concentrations in a power law distribution of emerging magnetic flux  Complex spatial distribution of magnetic flux extends also to ’Quiet Sun’ (misnomer)

 ’Quiet’ Sun  48x48x20 Mm simulation boxes  grid sizes down to 10 km vertically, 24 km horizontally  Zero mean field with 1/2 ~ 50 – 150 G  Plage Region  24x24x20 Mm simulation boxes  grid sizes down to 6 km  Mean vertical field B ~ 600 G  Active Region with Sunspots  48x48x10 Mm simulation box, horizontal grid size 24 km  Zero mean field with 1/2 ~ 1.5 G

MDI doppler (Hathaway) TRACE correlation tracking (Shine) MDI correlation tracking (Shine) 3-D simulations (Stein & Nordlund) V ~ k V~k -1/3 Velocity spectrum: v(k) = (k P(k)) 1/2 Velocity spectrum: v(k) = (k P(k)) 1/2 “supergranulation” “mesogranulation” “granulation”

 24 2 x20 Mm simulation box  Up to x500 grid size  Initially zero magnetic field, hierarchical convection  A 1 kG horizontal field enters through the bottom  Spontaneously develops a multi- scale, ~self-similar magnetic field  Structure development followed for ~ 30h solar time at x500  Emergence studied for  ~ 3h at x500,  ~1h at x500  ~15m at x500

 Vertical transport  scaling of magnetic field fluctuations with depth  B rms ~  1/2  Spontaneous creation of a hierarchy of emerging magnetic flux structures  Even though the boundary condition injects a smooth magnetic field! slope = ½

 Here’s another case:  24 2 x20 Mm simulation box  Up to x500 grid size  A 3 kG horizontal field enters through the bottom  Initially prefilled magnetic field, consistent with density scaling  Pre-filling the simulation box speeds up development of the hierarchical magnetic field  Structure development followed for ~ 8h solar time at x500  Emergence studied for  ~2h at x500  ~15m at x500

Strong magnetic field Weak magnetic field Line-of-sight velocity B > 200 G mask with enhanced contrast

 12 2 x20 Mm simulation box  Up to x500 grid size  Non-zero mean vertical magnetic flux  Initial condition  Initially uniform magnetic field evolved for several solar h  Field strength then slowly increased until ~ 600 G  Ensures realistic initial structure  Synthetic diagnostics  LILIA / NICOLE, 3-D synthesis version  Compared with SST/CRISP observations of small scale plage magnetoconvection by Narayan & Scharmer (astro-ph 2010) Narayan & Scharmer ( astro-ph 2010) x 500 simulation Line-of-sight velocity

 48 2 x 10 Mm AR model  Grid size x 500 (running on 2016 Pleiades cores at NASA/Ames)  Initial conditions, flux emergence  Initially 20 Mm deep box, with injection of 20 kG horizontal field at the lower boundary  For technical reasons cut down to 10 Mm before the magnetic flux reaches the surface  Gradual increase of surface field strength to 1/2 ~ 1.5 G

Size: 48 2 x10 Mm Mesh: x 500

 Convection is in general a destructive agent, with respect to ascending flux tubes  Obvious from first principles  Verified in a number of investigations with ’planted’ flux tubes trying to survive  But: Convection can also generate structure!  It does so by stretching B along paths with upflows in the middle and downflows in the ”legs”

 Computer capacity has now reached a level where we can begin to model solar active regions ab initio, without imposing any shapes or structures through initial or boundary conditions  Comparison between models and observations is in that situations best done with forward modeling Narayan & Scharmer ( astro-ph 2010) x 500 simulation Line-of-sight velocity

 Emerging solar magnetic field structures, including sunspots, are not only influenced by turbulent convection, they are created and shaped by the convective motion scale hierarchy