Detecting Temporal Trends In Species Assemblages With Randomization Procedures And Hierarchical Models Nick Gotelli University of Vermont USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Population Ecology. Population Demographics Demographics are the various characteristics of a population including, Population Size, Age Structure, Density,
Advertisements

1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western /Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Null models in Ecology Diane Srivastava Sept 2010.
Community and gradient analysis: Matrix approaches in macroecology The world comes in fragments.
Chi square.  Non-parametric test that’s useful when your sample violates the assumptions about normality required by other tests ◦ All other tests we’ve.
“ Specimen-based modeling, stopping rules, and the extinction of the the ivory-billed woodpecker Campephilus principalis Nicholas J. Gotelli Department.
Inference about the Difference Between the
Chapter 53 Reading Quiz 1.A bunch of populations living close together and possibly interacting is called a ____. 2.Which type of interspecific interaction.
15 The Nature of Communities. 15 The Nature of Communities Case Study: “Killer Algae!” What Are Communities? Community Structure Interactions of Multiple.
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
Sample size computations Petter Mostad
Molles: Ecology 2 nd Ed. Announcements 1. Homework due Wed. 2. Extra credit due next Friday – if you want it back by final exam. 3. Extra credit opportunity.
9/17/071 Community Properties Reading assignment: Chapter 9 in GSF.
Goodness of Fit Test for Proportions of Multinomial Population Chi-square distribution Hypotheses test/Goodness of fit test.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Ecosystems and Biodiversity Definitions: Define ecosystem: Define biodiversity:
Community Attributes Kenneth M. Klemow, Ph.D. Wilkes University Kenneth M. Klemow, Ph.D. Wilkes University.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Choosing Statistical Procedures
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
Day 7 Model Evaluation. Elements of Model evaluation l Goodness of fit l Prediction Error l Bias l Outliers and patterns in residuals.
Weed mapping tools and practical approaches – a review Prague February 2014 Weed mapping tools and practical approaches – a review Prague February 2014.
Population and Community Ecology. Complexity POPULATION ECOLOGY.
POPULATION ECOLOGY. ECOLOGY Study of living organisms as groups Interactions between living organisms (predator-prey, parasitism etc) Interactions between.
Patterns in Communities & Succession. Species Richness Species richness: number of species in a community Species evenness: relative abundance of species.
Accuracy and power of randomization tests in multivariate analysis of variance with vegetation data Valério De Patta Pillar Departamento de Ecologia Universidade.
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial Population Goodness of.
Probability Distributions and Dataset Properties Lecture 2 Likelihood Methods in Forest Ecology October 9 th – 20 th, 2006.
1 Species Abundance and Diversity. 2 Introduction Community: Association of interacting species inhabiting some defined area.  Community Structure includes.
Advanced Higher Statistics Data Analysis and Modelling Hypothesis Testing Statistical Inference AH.
Community Ecology BDC321 Mark J Gibbons, Room 4.102, BCB Department, UWC Tel: Image acknowledgements –
1 In this case, each element of a population is assigned to one and only one of several classes or categories. Chapter 11 – Test of Independence - Hypothesis.
Determination of Sample Size: A Review of Statistical Theory
Ecology Exam Review. Get in a seat, and get out your HW While I check HW define the following words… –Edge –Community –Population –Census –Biome –Habitat.
Introduction – Landscape Ecology
ANOVA Assumptions 1.Normality (sampling distribution of the mean) 2.Homogeneity of Variance 3.Independence of Observations - reason for random assignment.
1/71 Statistics Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence.
Kruskal-Wallis H TestThe Kruskal-Wallis H Test is a nonparametric procedure that can be used to compare more than two populations in a completely randomized.
Biodiversity and Measuring Abundance Lab Manual Chapters 3, 7, and 13.
Ch. 52 Warm-Up 1. Name examples of biotic and abiotic factors in the environment surrounding BHS. 2. Which biomes can be found in Georgia? 3. Define the.
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Environmental Resources Unit A Natural Resources.
Analyzing Statistical Inferences July 30, Inferential Statistics? When? When you infer from a sample to a population Generalize sample results to.
Species richness The number of species is an important biological variable that scientists try to quantify.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Why use landscape models?  Models allow us to generate and test hypotheses on systems Collect data, construct model based on assumptions, observe behavior.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
Ecological Techniques Quadrats, Transects and Measuring Abiotic Factors.
Capture-recapture Models for Open Populations “Single-age Models” 6.13 UF-2015.
 1 Species Richness 5.19 UF Community-level Studies Many community-level studies collect occupancy-type data (species lists). Imperfect detection.
Chapter 6: Population and Community Ecology. Key Ideas There are clear patterns in the distribution and abundance of species across the globe. Understanding.
Identify techniques for estimating various populations (quadrats, transects, mark- recapture) Understand the carrying capacity of ecosystems; factors.
Hypothesis Tests u Structure of hypothesis tests 1. choose the appropriate test »based on: data characteristics, study objectives »parametric or nonparametric.
Monitoring and Estimating Species Richness Paul F. Doherty, Jr. Fishery and Wildlife Biology Department Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO.
U.S Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Designing an Integrated Monitoring Program for Coniferous Forests: beyond the forest and the trees.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Biological structure of Fisheries Resources In Space And Time.
Chloe Boynton & Kristen Walters February 22, 2017
St. Edward’s University
Chapter 4. Inference about Process Quality
BUG’S LIFE A Comparison of the Insect Species Richness Between Forest and Pasture Ecosystems in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Probability & Statistics Probability Theory Mathematical Probability Models Event Relationships Distributions of Random Variables Continuous Random.
An Early Detection and Rapid Assessment Network for Plant Invasions
Gerald Dyer, Jr., MPH October 20, 2016
Summary of Tests Confidence Limits
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Presentation transcript:

Detecting Temporal Trends In Species Assemblages With Randomization Procedures And Hierarchical Models Nick Gotelli University of Vermont USA

Collaborators! Robert Dorazio University of Florida USA Aaron Ellison Harvard Forest USA Gary Grossman University of Georgia USA

Causes of Temporal Change in Communities

Pathways of Temporal Change Abiotic Change Changes in abundance Changes in abundance of competitors, predators, prey

Conspicuous Drivers of Temporal Change Keystone Species Foundation Species Ecosystem Engineers Invasive Species

Subtle Drivers of Temporal Change Habitat alteration, succession Long-term climate change Hunting, overexploitation “Shifting Baseline”

But not all apparent patterns of temporal change reflect “true” changes in population or community structure!

Most indices of species diversity and population size are sensitive to “sampling” effects

How can we account for sampling effects when assessing temporal changes in populations and communities?

Data Structure Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5Sample 6 Species A Species B Species C Species D Species E i = 1 to S species j = 1 to T consecutive temporal samples y ij = count of individuals of species i recorded in sample j

Freshwater fishes in a central U.S. stream Grossman, G. D., Moyle, P. B., and J. R. Whitaker, Jr Stochasticity in structural and functional characteristics of an Indiana stream fish assemblage: a test of community theory. Am. Nat. 120: i= 1 to 55 species j = 1 to 15 ~ annual samples (1963 – 1974) N = 14,142 individuals sampled by seining

Insects in a central U.S. grassland (KBS) Isaacs, R., J. Tuell, A. Fiedler, M. Gardiner, and D. Landis Maximizing arthropod- mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: The role of native plants. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: i= 1 to 9 species common species (Chrysopidae, Lampyridae ) j = 1 to 14 annual samples (1989 – 2002) N = 5614 individuals sampled by sticky traps

Null model test for temporal trends in community structure Metric to summarize pattern of temporal change (TC) Specify distribution of TC under sampling H 0

Abundance Trends For A Single Species

Community Trends in Abundance StationaryNon-Stationary Null hypothesis for measurement of temporal trends at community level

Metric to summarize pattern of temporal change TC is the sample variance of trend line slopes for all species in the assemblage

Community Trends in Abundance StationaryNon-Stationary

Specify distribution of TC under sampling H 0 Assign each of individuals N to different time periods based on t j, the proportion of the total collection made at time j (good and bad sampling intervals) Assign each of the N individuals to a different species based on p i, the proportion of the total collection represented by species i (common and rare species)

Assumptions of Null Model Multinomial sampling, conditional on total abundance (N) Species differ in commonness and rarity Time periods differ in suitability for detection No species interactions

Incorporating Undetected Species Observed S is a biased under-estimator of total S Undetected species should be included in the null distribution Estimate the number of missing species using non-parametric Chao2 estimator (Chao 1984)

Non-parametric Estimator for Undetected Species Chao, A Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11: T = number of censuses Q 1 = number of “singletons” (species detected in exactly 1 census) Q 2 = number of “doubletons” (species detected in exact;u 2 censuses)

Estimating Relative Abundance

Undetected Species

Estimating Relative Abundance Undetected Species Assumption: Relative frequency of undetected species = 0.5 x relative frequency of rarest observed species

Temporal Trends of Stream Fishes Total Abundance ( )

Temporal Trends of Stream Fishes Individual Species ( ) Null Distribution

Temporal Trends of Grassland Insects Total Abundance ( )

Temporal Trends of Grassland Insects Individual Species ( ) Null Distribution

Estimating Temporal Trends For Individual Species Assumes model of exponential growth Poisson distribution for population size Detection probabilities differ among species, but are constant across sampling dates Growth rates for individual species estimated from common distribution Model cannot be fit for species that are very rare (< 10 occurrences)

Estimated Growth Rates of Stream Fishes

Estimated Growth Rates of Grassland Insects

Summary Temporal changes in community structure generated by abiotic forces and species interactions Multinomial sampling model as a null hypothesis for temporal trends Heterogeneous patterns for stream fishes and grassland insects Hierarchical model to estimate trends for individual species