LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 20111 UFOs in the LHC Tobias Baer LBOC June, 14 th 2011 Acknowledgements: N. Garrel, B. Goddard, E.B. Holzer, S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
Advertisements

LHC UFO Study Working GroupSeptember 15 th UFOs since TS#4 LHC UFO Study Group Tobias Baer September, 15 th 2011 Acknowledgements: B. Goddard, S.
LIBD MeetingNovember 29 th MKI UFOs LIBD Meeting Tobias Baer November, 29 th 2011 Acknowledgements: M. Barnes, C. Bracco, N. Garrel, B. Goddard,
UFO Study Working GroupAugust 12 th Update on UFO Studies Tobias Baer August, 12 th 2011 Acknowledgements: G. Arduini, W. Bartmann, M. Barnes, C.
LSWG day, Sept. 2, 2014, B. Auchmann for the BLMTWG Collaboration of many teams: OP, RF, BI, Collimation, LIBD, FLUKA, etc. T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi,
Eva Barbara Holzer IEEE NSS, Puerto Rico October 26, Beam Loss Monitoring System of the LHC Eva Barbara Holzer, CERN for the LHC BLM team IEEE Nuclear.
An Example Use Case Scenario
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, CERN, Collimation of encountered losses D. Wollmann, R.W. Assmann, F. Burkart, R. Bruce, M. Cauchi,
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets, B.Dehning 1 B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco,
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
LHC progress Report LHCC Wednesday 23 rd March 2011.
1 CC & MP - CC10 - CERN Crab LHC J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department for the LHC Machine Protection Panel.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Scrubbing Run: TDI, MKI and MKE interlocks Chiara Bracco, Jan Uythoven ABT/BTP Acknowledgments: T. Baer, M. Barnes, E. Carlier.
Monday h34: beam (1020b) lost after 10 Hz RF trim. Fill h56: XPOC to be reset by expert. 08h18: Masked QPS_STATE SIS interlocks for RB.A12.
‘Review’ of the machine protection system in the SPS 1 J. Wenninger BE-OP SPS MPS - ATOP 09.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
LHC Collimation Working Group – 02 April 2012 Results from Beam-Based Collimator Alignment G. Valentino, R. W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi,
Eva Barbara Holzer July 16, LHC MPP Eva Barbara Holzer for the BLM team LHC MPP CERN, July 17, 2010 Proposal on Threshold Corrections for RC Filters.
Bernhard Auchmann, Scott Rowan 11/12/2014 UFO Interactions at 6.5 TeV.
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency LHC Beam Operation Committee, G. Valentino, R.W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, S.
MKI failure event 17-April-11 Recall from logbook: MKI D (1st one seen by the beam) had a real flashover between the two sets of 36b during the 3rd 72b.
Chamonix 2006, B.Dehning 1 Commissioning of Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning CERN AB/BDI.
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Production running 1 pb-1Lost to Mon h2062e32EOF studies Tue h17.152e32UFO Q8.L5 Tue h e32OP request Thu h e32OP.
Summary of MKI UFO MD 7/17/20121MKI UFO MD LSWG Meeting Maria Hempel T. Baer, M. Barnes, S. Bart Pedersen, S. Cettour Cave, B. Dehning, E. Effinger,
LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJuly, 24 th update on UFOs: 2012 Observations, Studies and Extrapolations LBOC Tobias Baer July, 24 th 2012 Acknowledgements:
Thursday 27 th October 00:57 fill 2257 dumped during squeeze (RQTF.A67B1) 03:52 stable beams fill #2258 4:33 Dumped, problem of LBDS dilution kicker power.
Monday 19 th March 07:33 Lost (another) beam in the squeeze, beyond 2 m, B2 hits 1/3 resonance. 08:30 Start (another) ramp  Try to correct coupling and.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
LHC Collimation Working Group Monday, 21 March 2016 Analysis of collimator BPMs in the 2015 run A.Valloni, G. Valentino with input from R. Bruce, A. Mereghetti,
Overview of LHC Beam Loss Measurements
Use of a Diamond BLM System in the LHC Ring
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium (NSS)
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Use of a Diamond BLM System in the LHC Ring
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
macroparticle model predictions
Status-Quo and Future Direction
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
MD25 ns - 14/12/2012 G. Arduini, H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Summary of Week 11: 14 – 21 March
Remote setting of LHC BLM thresholds?
Monday – recovery from MKI flashover
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Summary of Week 26 Main aims: G. Arduini, B. Holzer, M. Lamont
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Collimation margins and *
Scrubbing progress - 08/12/2012
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency
Monday 6th 07:39 Dump fill #1854, RQ6.L2 tripped, followed by access
Wednesday 26 October 2011.
What systems request a beam dump? And when do we need them?
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
Presentation transcript:

LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th UFOs in the LHC Tobias Baer LBOC June, 14 th 2011 Acknowledgements: N. Garrel, B. Goddard, E.B. Holzer, S. Jackson, M. Misiowiec, E. Nebot, A. Nordt, J. Uythoven, J. Wenninger, C. Zamantzas

2LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Content 1. UFO Dumps2. Below Threshold UFOs3.UFOs at MKIs4.Outlook

3LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Content 1. UFO Dumps2. Below Threshold UFOs3.UFOs at MKIs4.Outlook

4LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFO Dumps 18 beam dumps 18 beam dumps due to UFOs in UFOs are fast beam losses (loss duration some 10 turns) UFOs occur often at unconventional loss locations (e.g. in the arc) 11 beam dumps 11 beam dumps due to UFOs in in injection region (2010: 2) 1 dump at 450 GeV. ( )

5LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Content 1. UFO Dumps2. Below Threshold UFOs3.UFOs at MKIs4.Outlook

6LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFOs Detection in : 113 UFOs below threshold found in logging database. (E. Nebot) 2011: Online UFO detection from live BLM data. Losses (RS 4) of two BLMs in 40m are above 1E-4 Gy/s. RS 2 / RS 1 > 0.55 (UFO average : 0.89). RS 3 / RS 2 > 0.45 (UFO average: 0.79). Over 8000 triggers Over 8000 triggers so far. From subset of about 300 manually verified triggers: About 65% are UFOs, 15% ambiguous cases, 20% are false triggers. For most analysis additional cut. E.g.: Only flat top UFOs, loss of UFO BLM (RS05) > 2∙10 -4 Gy/s (≈ 2 ‰ of threshold). 74 events remain of subset, of which 71 are clear UFOs (96%) and 3 are ambiguous cases.

7LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Events Below Threshold “threshold” = lowest threshold in standard arc cell. Most events are much below threshold. nominal threshold 7 TeV 628 candidate UFOs at 3.5 TeV. Signal RS05 > 5∙10 -4 Gy/s.

8LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Spatial UFO Distribution 3.5 TeV 3.5 TeV 1096 candidate UFOs. Signal RS05 > 5∙10 -4 Gy/s. The UFOs are distributed all around the machine. About 7% of all UFOs are around the MKIs. 53 candidate UFOs at MKI for Beam 2. gray areas around IRs are excluded from UFO detection. 450 GeV 450 GeV 591 candidate UFOs. Signal RS05 > 5∙10 -4 Gy/s. Mainly UFOs around MKIs

9LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th UFOs/hour On average: 10 UFOs/hour UFO Rate in candidate UFOs during stable beams. Signal RS05 > 2∙10 -4 Gy/s. Data scaled with 1.76 (detection efficiency from reference data) 228 b 36 bpi336b 36 bpi336b 72 bpi480b 36 bpi336b 72 bpi 480b 36 bpi480b 72 bpi624b 72 bpi 768b 72 bpi228 b 36 bpi480b 72 bpi768b 72 bpi 768b 108 bpi912b 108 bpi 1092b 108 bpi1092b 144 bpi

10LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Peak Signal No clear dependency of peak loss on intensity. (cf. E.B. Holzer at Evian Dec. 2010) No clear dependency of peak loss on bunch intensity. courtesy of E. Nebot

11LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Loss Duration T loss T loss : Given by fitting single function (Gaussian up to t=T loss, 1/t afterwards) to data. Loss duration Loss duration: UFOs have the tendency to become faster with increasing intensity. (cf. E.B. Holzer at Evian Dec. 2010) courtesy of E. Nebot

12LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Peak Signal vs Loss Duration Tendency that harder UFOs are faster. courtesy of E. Nebot

13LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Content 1. UFO Dumps2. Below Threshold UFOs3.UFOs at MKIs4.Outlook

14LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Beam dump on GeV. UFO at MKI in Pt. 2, at 450 GeV. MKIs TCT

15LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Beam dump From fit to losses (BLMEI.05L2.B1E10_MKI.D5L2.B1): 7.73 Gy/s Amplitude: 7.73 Gy/s (Threshold: 2.3 Gy/s) Width: 0.77 ms 0.47 m/s resulting speed of transiting dust particle = 0.47 m/s. (assuming ϵ n =2.2µm·rad) (cf. T. Baer 86 th LMC)

16LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Peak Losses 450 GeV Peak loss for MKI UFOs at 450 GeV. Threshold (RS1 = 2.3 Gy/s) 336 candidate UFOs at 450 GeV. Signal RS01 > 2∙10 -4 Gy/s. + 1 event with 3.5Gy/s (dump )

17LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFOs around Injection Region 679 UFOs 9 beam dumps. 679 UFOs around the MKIs caused 9 beam dumps. Most of the UFOs around the MKIs occur before going to stable beams.

18LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 MKI UFOs During Scrubbing Typical scenario for MKI UFOs during scrubbing: Loss spikes occur in first few minutes after an injection and go away then. 2 hours

19LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFOs at MKIs per fill Flashover Flashover of MKI D Pt.8 before Fill 1721 (vacuum valves moved in). Fill 1721: 21 MKI UFOs in Pt.8 2 MKI UFOs in Pt.2 Flashover

20LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Correlation with Vacuum Despite a large vacuum spike, there is no clear correlation with UFOs

21LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFOs at MKIs – in total 460 fast loss events around MKIs. (104 around MKI in IP2, 336 around MKI in IP8). Distribution of first BLM which sees the loss: Left of IP2 Right of IP8 Beam direction

22LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Content 1. UFO Dumps2. Below Threshold UFOs3.UFOs at MKIs4.Outlook

23LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Next Steps Improve diagnostics. Acquisition of BLM Study Buffer for UFO events. Successful test during technical stop. Better localization of MKI UFOs. Additional BLMs during next Technical Stop. MD on MKI UFOs. MD on MKI UFOs. Better understanding of Quench Limit. Additional Simulations (F. Zimmermann, Y. Levinsen) Mitigation: Further increase of BLM thresholds... But: For higher energies thresholds need to be decreased.

24LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Summary 11 UFO related beam dumps 11 UFO related beam dumps in 2011 so far (18 in 2010). Over 5000 UFOs Over 5000 UFOs below dump threshold detected in 2011 so far. Most events at 3.5 TeV. UFO rate constant at 10 UFOs/hour at 3.5 TeV. Many UFOs around injection kicker magnets During scrubbing: increased UFO rate after each injection. Increased UFO rate after MKI Flashover. UFO MD Next steps: UFO MD, Improve the diagnostics, better understanding of quench limits, learn from simulations.

25LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Thank you for your Attention Tobias Baer CERN BE/OP Office: Further information: T. Baer, “UFOs in the LHC”, Joint DESY and University of Hamburg Accelerator Physics Seminar, May J. Wenninger, “Analysis attempt of dump UFOs”, LHC Machine Protection Panel, Geneva, March M. Sapinski, “Is the BLM system ready to go to higher intensities?”, Workshop on LHC Performance, Chamonix, Jan E.B. Holzer, “Losses away from collimators: statistics and extrapolation”, LHC Beam Operation Workshop, Evian, Dec

26LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Backup slides

27LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFOs in beam dumps 18 beam dumps due to UFOs. (since ) 113 UFOs below threshold found in logging database. (E. Nebot) ( ) UFO rate proportional to intensity. No dependency of peak signal on intensity. (cf. E.B. Holzer at Evian Dec. 2010) Loss duration has tendency to become faster with higher intensity. (cf. E.B. Holzer at Evian Dec. 2010) J. Wenninger

28LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Event Rate 113 events below threshold found in (E. Nebot) UFO rate UFO rate: proportional to beam intensity. courtesy of E. Nebot

29LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Calibration of T loss Correlation of T loss and width of Gaussian fitted to post mortem turn-by-turn data. courtesy of E. Nebot

30LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Fast Loss Event Rate 4.1 times less beam dumps After the increase of the BLM Threshold by a factor of 3 there were about 4.1 times less beam dumps due to fast loss events.

31LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFO Algorithm 1.Losses (RS 4) of at least two BLMs within 40m are above 1E-4 Gy/s. 2.A BLM is not taken into account if It is at a TCT It is in IP3, IP6 or IP7 RS 2 / RS 1 > 0.55 (UFO average : 0.89). RS 3 / RS 2 > 0.45 (UFO average: 0.79). 3.The acquisition is skipped for a few seconds after injection warning and beam wire scan timing event.

32LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 LHC UFO Buster LHC Console Manager -> Fixed Displays -> BLM -> UFO Buster

33LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFO Detection For 2010: 113 UFOs below threshold found in logging database. (E. Nebot) UFO Buster. For 2011: Online UFO detection by UFO Buster. Detects UFOs in BLM concentrator data (1Hz) UFOs 5000 UFOs below threshold found so far. Most events are much below threshold. “threshold” = lowest threshold in standard arc cell. nominal arc threshold 7 TeV 4905 candidate UFOs at 3.5 TeV.

34LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Dump on Dump of BLMQI.04L2.B1E20_MQY on RS 3, 4 and 5 Dump of BLMQI.04L2.B1E20_MQY on 320µs, 640µs and 2.5ms integration time

35LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Dump on From fit to losses (BLMEI.05L2.B1E10_MKI.D5L2.B1): Amplitude: 0.63 Gy/s Width: 0.29 ms

36LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Correlation with Vacuum

37LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Dynamics of Dust Particles From simulations: Dust particle will be positively ionized and be repelled from the beam. Beam intensity: 2.3∙10 12 protons, Al object. Loss duration of a few ms. Losses become shorter for larger beam intensities. courtesy of F. Zimmermann

38LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Correlation with Wire Scanner From wire scans: linear dependency of BLM signal on beam energy courtesy of M. Sapinski (cf. Chamonix 2011)

39LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Layout of MKI Region

40LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFO size Two extreme cases: UFO much larger than beam: the beam is imaging the UFO. UFO much smaller than beam: the UFO is imaging the beam. Most UFO shapes are Gaussian, thus most UFOs are expected to be smaller than the beam. From FLUKA simulations: size ≈ 1 μm. (cf. M. Sapinski, F. Zimmermann at Chamonix 2011) courtesy of J. Wenninger (cf. MPP )

41LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 UFO Speed UFO speed: From free fall: The UFO speed corresponds to the expected speed for a free fall from the aperture. v u : UFO speed, σ b : transverse beam size, σ u : UFO size, σ T : temporal width of loss. 22 mm free fall ε norm = 2.5 µm·rad β = 150 m

42LHC Beam Operation CommitteeJune, 14 th 2011 Known Dust Particle Sources Distributed ion pumps (PF-AR, HERA). Electrical Discharges (PF-AR). Movable Devices. Particles frozen or condensated at cold elements. (ANKA)