L1Calo – towards phase II Mainz upgraders : B.Bauss, V.Büscher, R.Degele, A.Ebling, W.Ji, C.Meyer, S.Moritz, U.Schäfer, C.Schröder, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Advertisements

JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Uli Intro / overview / issues Draft, will change !!!! Some questions flagged.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Phase-0 Topological Processor Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Programmable logic devices / tools Programmable logic devices are digital logic devices, providing combinatorial logic (gates, look-up tables) and flip-flops.
High-speed optical links and processors for the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger upgrade B.Bauss, V.Büscher, R.Degele, A.Ebling, W.Ji, C.Meyer, S.Moritz,
ATLAS L1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade - Uli Schäfer, MZ -
GOLD Status and Phase-1 Plans Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Phase-0 topological processor Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Level-1 Topology Processor for Phase 0/1 - Hardware Studies and Plans - Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Phase-1 with new JEP Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
JEM upgrades and optical data transmission to FEX for Phase 1 Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 S-L1Calo upstream links architecture -- interfaces -- technology.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options Upgrade will always be in 5 years time.
Phase-1 with new JEP Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options.
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger updates for Phase 1.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University L1Calo upgrade hardware planning + Overview of current concept + Recent work, results.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options Uli, Sam, Yuri.
Uli Schäfer 1 CP/JEP backplane test module What’s the maximum data rate into the S-CMM for phase-1 upgrade ?
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger upgrade for Phase 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University L1Calo upgrade discussion Overview Issues  Latency  Rates  Schedule Proposed upgrade strategy R&D.
Uli Schäfer 1 FPGAs for high performance – high density applications Intro Requirements of future trigger systems Features of recent FPGA families 9U *
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. Jet processing Phase-0 jet system consisting of Pre-Processor Analogue signal conditioning Digitization Digital signal processing.
FEX Uli Schäfer, Mainz 1 L1Calo For more eFEX details see indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=73&sessionId=51&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=
Uli Intro / overview / issues
CMX (Common Merger eXtension module) Y. Ermoline for CMX collaboration Preliminary Design Review, Stockholm, 29 June 2011.
Topology System Uli Schäfer 1 B.Bauß, V.Büscher, W.Ji, U.Schäfer, A.Reiß, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge, V.Wenzel.
L1Topo Status & Plans Uli Schäfer 1 B.Bauß, V.Büscher, W.Ji, S.Krause, S.Moritz, U.Schäfer, A.Reiß, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge, V.Wenzel.
1 1 Rapid recent developments in Phase I L1Calo Weakly 25 Jul 2011 Norman Gee.
L1Calo Intro Cambridge Group, Dec 2008 Norman Gee.
L1Topo-phase0 Uli Schäfer 1. Topo GOLD successfully used to explore technologies and initially verify 6.4Gb/s link integrity over moderate length electrical.
JFEX baseline Uli Schäfer 1 Uli. Intro: L1Calo Phase-1 System / Jets Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM.
April CMS Trigger Upgrade Workshop - Paris1 Christian Bohm, Stockholm University for the L1 calorimeter collaboration The ATLAS Trigger Upgrade.
Alan Watson ATLAS Overview week, Prague, 17/09/2003 Rx   Calorimeters (LAr, Tile) 0.2x x Mb/s analogue ~75m 0.1x0.1 RoI Builder L1 CTP.
S. Rave, U. Schäfer For L1Calo Mainz
Uli Schäfer 1 From L1Calo to S-L1Calo algorithms – architecture - technologies.
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
Algorithms and TP Y. Ermoline et al. Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger Joint Meeting, Heidelberg, January 11-13, 2010.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1. Constraints & Numerology Assumption: one crate, several modules. Each module covers full phi, limited eta range Data sharing with.
The ATLAS Global Trigger Processor U. Schäfer Phase-2 Upgrade Uli Schäfer 1.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. L1Calo Phase-1 System Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge WP6: L1Calo Upgrade.
Upgrading the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger using Topological Information Yuri ERMOLINE, Michigan State University TWEPP 2010, Aachen, Germany,
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. L1Calo Phase-1 System Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo.
Calorimeter Digitisation Prototype (Material from A Straessner, C Bohm et al) L1Calo Collaboration Meeting Cambridge 23-Mar-2011 Norman Gee.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
L1Topo post review Uli Schäfer 1 Observations, options, effort, plans Uli.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
Samuel Silverstein, SYSF ATLAS calorimeter trigger upgrade work Overview Upgrade to PreProcessor MCM Topological trigger.
CMX: Update on status and planning Yuri Ermoline, Wojciech Dan Edmunds, Philippe Laurens, Chip Michigan State University 7-Mar-2012.
Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz R&D activities. Uli Schäfer 2 MZ R&D BLT has been built and tested (backplane transmission only). A few minor issues were found. Possible.
Upgrade Intro 10 Jan 2010 Norman Gee. N. Gee – Upgrade Introduction 2 LHC Peak Luminosity Lumi curve from F.Zimmermann : Nov Upgrade Week ? ?
Samuel Silverstein, Stockholm University For the ATLAS TDAQ collaboration The Digital Algorithm Processors for the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
L1Calo Upgrade Phase 2 ● Phase 2 Functional Blocks? – Thoughts on L1 “refinement” of L0 ● Simulation framework ● Phase 1 Online SW Murrough Landon 2 February.
Phase2 Level-0 Calo Trigger ● Phase 2 Overview: L0 and L1 ● L0Calo Functionality ● Interfaces to calo RODs ● Interfaces to L0Topo Murrough Landon 27 June.
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
L1Calo Upgrade Phase 2 Introduction and timescales
L1Calo Phase-1 architechure
L1Calo upgrade discussion
ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade
Run-2  Phase-1  Phase-2 Uli / Mainz
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
ATLAS: Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger
(Not just) Backplane transmission options
Presentation transcript:

L1Calo – towards phase II Mainz upgraders : B.Bauss, V.Büscher, R.Degele, A.Ebling, W.Ji, C.Meyer, S.Moritz, U.Schäfer, C.Schröder, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge Uli Schäfer :31 Current L1Calo Some technicalities : Latency and data duplication Strawman for phase 2

Prologue: the L1Calo trigger rates… Simulations suggest horrible increase of calorimeter trigger rates with rising luminosity for current trigger scheme. What can we actually do about that ? Uli Schäfer 2

ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 3 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1

Current and future L1Calo Analog signals transmitted off the detector (0.1×0.1) η,φ Pre-Processor: ADCs, digital filters, baseline/gain/linearity, bunch crossing identification Digital processors: Sliding windows for jet and em cluster extraction, data consolidation by thresholding and counting objects Global results determined by summation on daisy-chained merger modules (CMMs) Final results of object count and total and missing E T sent to Central Trigger Processor Phase 0/1 (i.e. from 2013/14 !): Improve pre-processing (new MCMs) Increase digital processor backplane bandwidth to extract topology, replace mergers (CMM++) Add topological processor stage, include muon data Phase 2 : complete replacement of L1Calo Uli Schäfer 4 sliding window

Latency, data duplication, data paths … Total latency currently limited to c. 2.5 μsec Cables Serialisation / de-serialisation on module/chip boundaries Processing Sliding windows algorithms require duplication of data across processor module and crate boundaries  All L1Calo real-time data transmitted electrically : analogue, 480 Mb/s serial, 40/80/160Mbps parallel  Data duplication by mixture of forward duplication (zero latency) and cross-module communication (1.x BX +) Uli Schäfer 5

The horror lurks behind… Uli Schäfer 6 Jet/Energy processor Pre-processor Jet/En. processor

Upgrade : Go optical Phase 0/1/2 upgrades will be based on optical interconnect Latency issues will not disappear by miracle Accept inherently higher latency per high speed link  Increase system density by use of FPGA-internal Multi- Gigabit Transceivers (MGTs)  Partition the system such that excessive de- serialization/re-serialization is avoided  Optimize the data replication scheme  Explore options for latency reduction on the FPGA Uli Schäfer 7

Data replication Forward data replication only: Duplication at source Mirror a link Assemble a different stream optimised for the replication Optical splitter (fibre coupler) Uli Schäfer 8 Do not share any data between modules of same subsystem to avoid additional SerDes latency source sink

Phase 2 Latency impact on Phase 2 design… 3.2 μs latency insufficient for track trigger Probably needs seeding Current favoured solution is a two stage system L0 and L1 Level 0 low latency, synchronous (“real-time”) trigger system input to L0Calo goes digital (LAr and Tile) includes Topo processing + muons send RoIs to region-based track trigger L0 accept at ~500 kHz (?) Level 1 includes calorimeter, muon and track trigger might run asynchronously higher latency (to be defined) possibility of HLT-like algorithms Uli Schäfer 9

…some old slide on… Phase 2 ! Uli Schäfer 10 « Once the calorimeter readout is replaced … in 20xx … » High granularity trigger data provided on optical links New sliding windows processor with optical interfaces only Synchronous low-latency L0 plus asynchronous L1 Murrough Landon, 2010

…as of last week (R.Middleton) Uli Schäfer 11

Cont’d… Uli Schäfer 12

From 2013/4 ? Uli Schäfer 13

Some (almost) final words ibId=2&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId= And some initial questions (in random order, more to come) How do we get muons into topo processors? What data volume ? Timeline ? Sector logic MuCTPi How to define the boundary between topo processors and CTPs ? … Uli Schäfer 14

Some current upgrade activities in Mainz Simulations of topological algorithms at high luminosities (10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) Simulation and implementation of new algorithms in VHDL Improvements on VHDL code for current processors Design of demonstrator modules for phases 0/1 and 2  Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Topological processor (0/1/2) Phase-2 Level-0 sliding windows processor Latency optimization Data replication schemes FPGA on-chip MGT operation modes and fabric interfaces Uli Schäfer 15