Designing an Effective Organisational Infrastructure Jim Petch – Co Director eLRC Institute of Education Learning Technologies Unit 18 th January 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business Alignment Using Enterprise Architecture
Advertisements

Using reference models to drive business transformation in the HE sector Dr Samia Oussena Thames Valley University.
Business Architecture
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
More CMM Part Two : Details.
1 State of Michigan Achieving Software Process Improvement with Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
Building an Operational Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture Best Practices Presented by: Ajay Budhraja Copyright 2006 Ajay Budhraja,
Supporting education and research E-learning tools, standards and systems Sarah Porter Head of Development, JISC.
Establishing a service oriented composite applications development process for supporting work- based learning and competency progression management Hilary.
Entrenching SOA in the organisation
© 2004 Visible Systems Corporation. All rights reserved. 1 (800) 6VISIBLE Holistic View of the Enterprise Business Development Operations.
© 2006 IBM Corporation IBM Software Group Relevance of Service Orientated Architecture to an Academic Infrastructure Gareth Greenwood, e-learning Evangelist,
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
SE 470 Software Development Processes James Nowotarski 12 May 2003.
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) in SW design
FREMA: e-Learning Framework Reference Model for Assessment David Millard Yvonne Howard IAM, DSSE, LTG University of Southampton, UK.
Software Process CS 414 – Software Engineering I Donald J. Bagert Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology December 17, 2002.
Organizational Project Management Maturity: Roadmap to Success
Enterprise Architecture
System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.
Training of master Trainers Workshop 10 – 15 November 2012 e-Services Design and Delivery Module VI Emilio Bugli Innocenti.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
Chapter : Software Process
Information Security Governance 25 th June 2007 Gordon Micallef Vice President – ISACA MALTA CHAPTER.
OPR100: Overview of Enterprise Project Management & Project Management Maturity Models Melinda Curtis Product Manager, Microsoft Office Project.
Software Engineering II Lecture 1 Fakhar Lodhi. Software Engineering - IEEE 1.The application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the.
Org Name Org Site CMM Assessment Kick-off Meeting Dates of assessment.
1 IBM Software Group ® Mastering Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with UML 2.0 Module 1: Best Practices of Software Engineering.
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
1 Chapter 2 The Process. 2 Process  What is it?  Who does it?  Why is it important?  What are the steps?  What is the work product?  How to ensure.
©Ian Sommerville 1995 Software Engineering, 5th edition. Chapter 31 Slide 1 Process Improvement u Understanding, Modelling and Improving the Software Process.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012 Project Management Chapter 3 Project Management for Strategic Goal Achievement.
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
By Ritesh Reddy Nagaram.  Organizations which are developing software processes are facing many problems regarding the need for change of already existing.
Quality Concepts within CMM and PMI G.C.Reddy
Lecture Topics covered CMMI- - Continuous model -Staged model PROCESS PATTERNS- -Generic Process pattern elements.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
@2002 Copyright, Itreya Technologies CMMI kick off July 2005.
Sandra Kingston, Project Manager Centre for International ePortfolio Development Enterprise SIG, University of Nottingham 20 April 2007 ADoM and DELIA.
Michael Campe U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command NDIA TID Technical Information Division Symposium Royal Sonesta Hotel, New Orleans, LA August 2003.
ANKITHA CHOWDARY GARAPATI
Ch-1 Introduction The processes used for executing a software project have major effect on quality of s/w produced and productivity achieved in project…
Level 1 Level 1 – Initial: The software process is characterized as ad hoc and occasionally even chaotic. Few processes are defined, and success depends.
® IBM Software Group © 2004 IBM Corporation Developing an SOA with RUP and UML 2.0 Giles Davies.
PMI is a registered trademark of the Project Management Institute Knowledge Exchange Forum October 28, 2003 Assessing Project Management in Your Organization.
Technical Support to SOA Governance E-Government Conference May 1-2, 2008 John Salasin, Ph.D. DARPA
COMP 6710 Course NotesSlide 3-0 Auburn University Computer Science and Software Engineering Course Notes Set 3: Software Process Maturity Computer Science.
The Service Monitoring and Control Toolkit 1 Protect your business with an effective alert management system and high service availability.
Software Engineering Lecture 10: System Engineering.
Castlebridge associates | | Castlebridge changing how people think about information How to Implement the.
MITA -- A Vision of Evolving Medicaid Systems The View from CMS Rick Friedman Director, Division of State Systems Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Aligning Business Process Architecture and Enterprise Architecture: A Model Driven - Service Oriented Approach Chris Capadouca Business Solutions Architect.
Capability Maturity Model. CS460 - Senior Design Project I (AY2004)2 Immature Organisations Software processes are often rigorously followed. Organisation.
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Process 4 Hours.
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
BIL 424 NETWORK ARCHITECTURE AND SERVICE PROVIDING.
State of Michigan Achieving Software Process Improvement with
CS4311 Spring 2011 Process Improvement Dr
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Software Engineering Lecture 16.
Software Engineering I
JISC and SOA A view Robert Sherratt.
SOA Strategies for Enterprise X
Data Governance & Management Skills and Experience
Bridging the ITSM Information Gap
Presentation transcript:

Designing an Effective Organisational Infrastructure Jim Petch – Co Director eLRC Institute of Education Learning Technologies Unit 18 th January 2006 London

eLRC Manchester Position E-Learning is a driver……for… Organisational change driven by need to industrialise Redesign of teaching and learning provision

Organisational Change The commercial sector is experiencing radical and far reaching changes in thinking about how enterprises are run and how the challenges of technology-led business operations can be met The emerging requirements point to an end-to-end view of business processes and to a service view of what an organisation offers.

Organisational Change To achieve these qualities the enterprise needs a certain approach, and informed thinking indicates a service-oriented, component-based architecture

Organisational Change The IT strategy should be aligned with the business strategy neither bolted on to it nor driving it. A service-oriented, business requirements driven approach ensures greater alliance between IT and the business.

Object Management Group Main Ideas –MDA Model driven approach –SOA Service Oriented Architectures To which we add the idea of –QoS Quality of Service Framework To which we add the idea of – maturity (CMM model) and benchmarking (eMM)

Model Driven Architecture

The eLearning Lifecycle Practices (activities) Phases (time) InceptionElaborationConstructionTransition time

Practices 1.Business Modelling 2.Business Analysis and Planning 3.Requirements Analysis 4.Activity Planning 5.Project Management 6.Change Management 7.Design 8.Development 9.Deployment 10.Evaluation 11.Testing 12.Teaching 13.Learning 14.Environmental Refinement 15.Staff Development 16.Research Phases Organisation along Time InceptionElaborationConstructionTransition initial elab #1 elab #2 cons #1 cons #2 cons #n trans #1 trans #2 Organisation along Content

The Lifecycle and Linked Processes In order to control the lifecycle one has to build into the model the things that influence and change it. This kind of domain model (or enterprise metamodel) acts as a blueprint for modelling a specific enterprise. Modelling the response to changes arising from the influence of the linked processes

End-to-End Process Model

Reminder!! NB the models are of technologies, artefacts, people, …. NOT technology alone!!

Layered Architecture for SOA in e-Learning

COVARM: The Manchester Validation Process

High level alignment of processes

Canonical Models Moving from use cases to models of use to synthesised models to canonical models 2 approaches –Empirical modelling –Cross domain mapping

Checklists and Cross Domain Mapping Checklists provide fullest available articulation of processes Extensive checklists are readily available Examples later

Growing the World of Web ‘Service’ Components JISC Reference Model Projects –LADIE – activity design –FREMA – assessment –COVARM – Course validation –eP4LL – e portfolio –XCRI – exchanging course information

Course validation Activity design production design Course info. planning Assessment Student record E-portfolios recruitment marketing registration Delivery

Key Issues about the map They map is defined by the reference model components not by a higher principle The reference models are not joined up What is this a map of? An enterprise?

Some Uncomfortable assumptions Reference models are developed using a common method and with common tools There is an agreed level of granularity There is a map that is known It is a map of the enterprise

Service Oriented Architectures

QoS Framework Application Architecture eLearning Services QoS Framework Services General Purpose Services Mechanisms and Utilities Execution Environment and Data Management Profile ePortfolio Registration Unstructured Data Course Information Learning Activity Personal Folder WorkflowSchedule Event Structured Data IDEVLE Student AssessmentValidation Authentication Contract Directory Services Repository Data Warehouse Legacy Adapter Archive WizardMentorChecklist Pattern Process DirectorAgent Operating System XML manager

Service B Service A QF GP EE QF DL MU DL QF GP MU EE Services composed of components from the framework DL GP MU Reuse GP Deployment to different platforms

Service Autonomous Business Components and Services Unit Student Course Record VLE Business components

But how? Moving to a new enterprise architecture is a process affecting organisational as well as technical aspects. The new roles, concepts and techniques may form a barrier to successful transition and it is necessary to help people adopt and use the architecture by providing a framework of guidelines, best practices, templates and tools. These are actively integrated into the work processes rather than being merely reference documents. The Framework is essentially a quality assurance tool that addresses the end-to-end business processes, their context, requirements and implementation.

The Framework must provide a coherent set of mechanisms by which business requirements are modelled, their logic is turned into a flow of activities, which is then executed by a set of components, and their performance is monitored and evaluated.

The QoS Framework Elements QA mechanisms Metadata builders Models and Patterns Standards Guidelines and Best Practice

Process Driven Knowledgebase

PDK: Planning Student Support

Adding Idea of Bridging Principles

Maturity and Bechmarking

Capability Maturity Model- eMM Level 1: Initial Level 2: Repeatable Software configuration management Software quality assurance Software subcontract management Software project tracking and oversight Software project planning Requirements management Level 3: Defined Peer reviews Integration co-ordination Software product engineering Integrated software management Training program Organisation process definition Organisation process focus Level 5: Optimising Process change management Technology change management Defect prevention Level 4: Managed Software quality management Quantitative process management Disciplined processes Standard, consistent processes Predictable processes Continuously improving processes

Capability Maturity Model- eMM

Benchmarking - Strategic Objective A driver for joined-up design of organisations Focus on metrics Focus on ‘evaluation systems’ – that is systems that are designed for change- that is learning organisations

So what?

The Concept Gap Getting people to understand Communicating Aligning Sharing process and therefore knowledge and power

The Strategy Gap Where to go? From which place? How to get there?

The Implementation Gap