October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck ATLAS Trigger & Data Acquisition Requirements and Concepts Hanspeter Beck LHEP - Bern for the ATLAS T/DAQ Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F.Pastore II Workshop sulla fisica di ATLAS e CMS Oct Trigger di primo livello per gli esperimenti ATLAS & CMS ad LHC F.Pastore INFN Sezione.
Advertisements

G ö khan Ü nel / CHEP Interlaken ATLAS 1 Performance of the ATLAS DAQ DataFlow system Introduction/Generalities –Presentation of the ATLAS DAQ components.
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Clara Gaspar on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration, “Physics at the LHC and Beyond”, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 2014 Challenges and lessons learnt LHCb Operations.
Highest Energy e + e – Collider LEP at CERN GeV ~4km radius First e + e – Collider ADA in Frascati GeV ~1m radius e + e – Colliders.
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Kostas KORDAS INFN – Frascati XI Bruno Touschek spring school, Frascati,19 May 2006 Higgs → 2e+2  O (1/hr) Higgs → 2e+2  O (1/hr) ~25 min bias events.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
17th Sep JapanTau04 - International workshop on Tau Lepton Physics1 Discovery Potential of the SM Higgs at the LHC Junichi Tanaka ICEPP, University.
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
March 2003 CHEP Online Monitoring Software Framework in the ATLAS Experiment Serguei Kolos CERN/PNPI On behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ Online Software.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
K. Honscheid RT-2003 The BTeV Data Acquisition System RT-2003 May 22, 2002 Klaus Honscheid, OSU  The BTeV Challenge  The Project  Readout and Controls.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Niko Neufeld, CERN/PH-Department
1 Modelling parameters Jos Vermeulen, 2 June 1999.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
The Data Flow System of the ATLAS DAQ/EF "-1" Prototype Project G. Ambrosini 3,9, E. Arik 2, H.P. Beck 1, S. Cetin 2, T. Conka 2, A. Fernandes 3, D. Francis.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Overview of DAQ at CERN experiments E.Radicioni, INFN MICE Daq and Controls Workshop.
2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics La Jolla, California Giovanna Lehmann - CERN EP/ATD The DataFlow of the ATLAS Trigger.
LHCb DAQ system LHCb SFC review Nov. 26 th 2004 Niko Neufeld, CERN.
CHEP March 2003 Sarah Wheeler 1 Supervision of the ATLAS High Level Triggers Sarah Wheeler on behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ High Level Trigger.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Experience with multi-threaded C++ applications in the ATLAS DataFlow Szymon Gadomski University of Bern, Switzerland and INP Cracow, Poland on behalf.
Status of the ATLAS first-level Central Trigger and the Muon Barrel Trigger and First Results from Cosmic-Ray Data David Berge (CERN-PH) for the ATLAS.
Kostas KORDAS INFN – Frascati 10th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle & Radiation Detectors (IPRD06) Siena, 1-5 Oct The ATLAS Data Acquisition.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
New Trigger Strategies Discussion Perimeter Institute HL-LHC Workshop June 8, 2015 Eva Halkiadakis, Matt Strassler, Gordon Watts.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
DAQ Systems and Technologies for Flavor Physics FPCP Conference Lake Placid 1 June 2009 Beat Jost/ Cern-PH.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
LECC2004 BostonMatthias Müller The final design of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ Readout-Buffer Input (ROBIN) Device B. Gorini, M. Joos, J. Petersen, S. Stancu,
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
ANDREA NEGRI, INFN PAVIA – NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM – ROME 20th October
1 Nicoletta GarelliCPPM, 03/25/2011 Overview of the ATLAS Data-Acquisition System o perating with proton-proton collisions Nicoletta Garelli (CERN) CPPM,
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
5/14/2018 The ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition Architecture & Status Benedetto Gorini CERN - Physics Department on behalf of the ATLAS TDAQ community.
LHC experiments Requirements and Concepts ALICE
RT2003, Montreal Niko Neufeld, CERN-EP & Univ. de Lausanne
Operating the ATLAS Data-Flow System with the First LHC Collisions
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
12/3/2018 The ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition Architecture & Status Benedetto Gorini CERN - Physics Department on behalf of the ATLAS TDAQ community.
1/2/2019 The ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition Architecture & Status Benedetto Gorini CERN - Physics Department on behalf of the ATLAS TDAQ community.
LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics
Design Principles of the CMS Level-1 Trigger Control and Hardware Monitoring System Ildefons Magrans de Abril Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna.
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Presentation transcript:

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck ATLAS Trigger & Data Acquisition Requirements and Concepts Hanspeter Beck LHEP - Bern for the ATLAS T/DAQ Group DAQ 2000 Workshop on Network-Based Data Acquisition and Event-Building at the Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 2 OverviewOverview LHC characteristicsLHC characteristics The ATLAS experimentThe ATLAS experiment Requirements for Trigger DAQRequirements for Trigger DAQ T/DAQ architectureT/DAQ architecture Networking for DAQ tasksNetworking for DAQ tasks Project StatusProject Status LHC characteristicsLHC characteristics The ATLAS experimentThe ATLAS experiment Requirements for Trigger DAQRequirements for Trigger DAQ T/DAQ architectureT/DAQ architecture Networking for DAQ tasksNetworking for DAQ tasks Project StatusProject Status

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 3 The Large Hadron Collider at CERN Startup of LHC: 2005

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 4 LHCCharacteristics LHC Characteristics Interaction rate (ATLAS, CMS)  10 9 Hz LHC circumference26.7 km ~100 m underground Center of mass energy14 TeV (i.e. 7 TeV per beam) Protons per bunch0.17 ·10 11 (1.67 ·10 11 for high Luminosity) Number of bunches3564(of which 2835 are filled) Size of a bunchradius σ x = σ y = 16  m length = 56 mm Spacing between bunches7.48 m  ns  40 MHz Interactions per bunch23 minimum-bias events (high Luminosity) ExperimentsALICE, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 5 ATLAS Luminosity  Peak  cm -2 s  (“low luminosity”)  Peak  cm -2 s  (“high luminosity”)    dt  10 fb -1 per year at low luminosity    dt  100 fb -1 per year at high luminosity 3Bunch crossing: 25 ns 3~ 23 minimum-bias /crossing at high luminosity (pile-up) 3Detector speed 3Radiation hardness 3Trigger selection and data acquisition

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 6 The ATLAS Experiment

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 7 ATLAS Main Components 1600 ReadOut Links2.2 Mbyte Event Size

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 8 Physics Motivations Origin of masses and EW symmetry breaking –Look for a Standard Model Higgs –Final word about SM Higgs mechanism Physics beyond the Standard Model –SUSY : explore up to masses of ~ 3 TeV –Final word about low-energy SUSY –Other scenarios: leptoquarks, technicolor,... –Additional /q/w/z, etc. Up to m ~ 5 TeV Precision measurements –W, TGC, top –QCD –B-physics and CP violation

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 9 ATLAS Three Trigger Levels Calorimeter + Muon coarse trigger data Region of Interest full granularity Full event reconstruction access to latest calibration and alignment tables Rate [Hz] 25 ns ss mssec LVL140 MHz LVL275 kHz (100 kHz) Event Filter O(1) kHz Storage O(100) Hz Jets b    /K   W, Z t H   < 2.5  s ms seconds Processing Time [s]

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 10 FE channels ReadOut Buffers FE Links ReadOut Links O(1) GB/s 40 MHz 1 GHz O(1) kHz 75 kHz (100 kHz) EF Farm Event Building SF I O(100) Hz Level-2 Trigger System Full Event Building ROD <2.5  s RoI pointers RoI Data L2 Acc/Rej ~10 ms Event Filter Farm ~sec O(100) GB/s ATLAS DAQ and Trigger SFO O(100) MB/s ReadOut Drivers O(100) GB/s Request/Receive Mass Storage ROS ROB ReadOut System

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 11 Read Out Buffers TRGEBIF Local Controller LVL2 Read Out Buffers TRGEBIF ROI builder EVENT BUILDER Event Filter Mass Storage.. SFISFO... SFISFO Online s/w RunControl Configure Monitoring LVL1 Detector 1Detector 2Detector n Local Controller LVL2 ROI builder TRG.. LVL2 ROI builder.. Detector 1Detector 2Detector n Read Out Buffers Read Out Buffers LVL1 RoI LVL2.. EBIF EVENT BUILDER TRG Read Out Buffers TRG Read Out Buffers EVENT BUILDER SFI Event Filter SFI SFO Event Filter Mass Storage SFO

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 12 LVL2 DataFlow Worst case assumption according B-Physics selection at LVL2; intended for low Luminosity only.

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 13 LVL2 DataFlow LVL1 TriggerReadOut System EventBuilding Online SoftwareLVL2 Selection RoI & LVL1 data Event data Event data request LVL2 decisions RunControl configure monitoring Event data requests LVL2 decisions RoI & LVL1 data Requested event data LVL2 accept LVL2 DataFlow Context Diagram

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 14 LVL2 DataFlow For prototype implementations testbed measurements and modeling activities for the LVL2 dataflow: See the talks of Denis Calvet and Micheal Le Vine later this afternoon.

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 15 EventBuilding DataFlow

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 16 EventBuilding DataFlow Event Building TriggerROS Online SoftwareSFI Accept Event Control Event fragments RunControl configure monitoring EventBuilding Context diagram Event fragments Control

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 17 Event Builder Model DFM ROS SFI Local Controller Trigger Data transfer End of Event, Busy/NonBusy Destination assignment Run control DFM DataFlow Manager EoE, B/B

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 18 DataFlow - Two-layer Approach DataFlow - Two-layer Approach Split Functionality and Technology Upper layer: OS and technology independence functionality:LVL2 DataFlow + Event Building data + control messages Lower layer: technology dependent functionality:data transfer Decoupling of upper and lower layer: with technology independent API and different technology implementations ATM / AAL5 TCP / IP... Message Passing Appl Baseline candidate technology is Fast+Gigabit Ethernet using various protocols on it, from raw frames (MESH) up to TCP/IP. (Other technologies have been studied and could still be resurrected, e.g. ATM, FC)

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 19 EventBuilder Testbeds Fast Ethernet & ATM Gigabit Ethernet

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 20 EventBuilder Event Rates Simulation (Ptolemy model) Measured Performance (Gigabit Ethernet TCP/IP)

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 21 Status of the Project DAQ/EF -1 ( ) Prototype implementing a full slice of DAQ system (excluding LVL2 trigger). Emphasis on system aspects, i.e. full functionality incl. configuration and monitoring from ROB, EB, SFI, EF to SFO and storage. Was successfully used for ATLAS testbeam this year. Pilot Project ( ) Based on previous demonstrator programs, it aimed on proving the principle of function of LVL2. Emphasis on trigger aspects i.e. implications of RoI concept and exploiting the full performance potential of networks i.e. usage of raw frames, drivers... In the past few years DAQ aspects have been studied separately from LVL2 (trigger and dataflow). Two groups were since working in parallel, exploiting feasibility of their respective system aspects:

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 22 Status of the Project The outcome of both projects enabled us to define the architecture of the final TDAQ system (March 2000). HLT, DAQ and DCS Technical Proposal (LHCC/ ) Currently, the fusion of the DAQ/EF -1 prototype and the Pilot project into an integrated prototype is in planning. A testbed running the full TDAQ architecture is expected to be exploited by summer next year. The Technical Design Report (TDR) will be based on the assessments of this integrated prototype. Only then, the final TDAQ system will be built according to the needs of the assembly of the ATLAS detector.

October 20 th, 2000Lyon - DAQ2000HP Beck 23 SummarySummary The experiments at LHC will allow us to shed light on the particle mass generation mechanism; to do precision measurements on many parameters of the Standard Model; and to peek into new physics domains beyond the current Standard Model of particle physics. The high luminosity at LHC and the size of the ATLAS detector require the development of a sophisticated data acquisition system, with online event selection. The efficient use of high performance (low latency, high throughput) networks will play a key role in the success of LHC.