EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT with RELAP5 and RELAP/PARCS Codes WP5.1 Progress Meeting Empresarios Agrupados - Madrid, November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(1) Die Kooperation von Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH und Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 0 | Transient Analysis for the EFIT 3-Zone Core P. Liu, X.-N. Chen,
Advertisements

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Bologna, May 28-29, EFIT-Pb Transient Analysis.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Madrid, Nov EFIT Design and Transient.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory SCWR Preliminary Safety Considerations Cliff Davis, Jacopo Buongiorno, INEEL Luca Oriani, Westinghouse.
Relevant Thermal-Hydraulic Aspects in the Design of the RRR A. Doval, C. Mazufri F.P. Moreno Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina.
Author: Cliff B. Davis Evaluation of Fluid Conduction and Mixing Within a Subassembly of the Actinide Burner Test Reactor.
DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, First safety approach of the DHR system of XT-ADS B. Arien.
Jiří Duspiva Nuclear Research Institute Řež, plc. Nuclear Power and Safety Division Dept. of Reactor Technology 11 th International QUENCH Workshop Karlsruhe,
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR), Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), primary loop, reactivity, reactivity control, reactivity.
Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison.
Thermal-Hydraulic Transient Analysis of the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) TRTR Annual Meeting September 17-20, 2007 Dr. Robert C. Nelson1,
Preliminary T/H Analyses for EFIT-MgO/Pb Reactor Design WP1.5 Progress Meeting KTH / Stockholm, May 22-23, 2007 G. Bandini, P. Meloni, M. Polidori Italian.
EUROTRANS – DM1 RELAP5 Model Evaluation with SIMMER-III Code and Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Reactor WP5.1 Progress Meeting KTH / Stockholm,
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with CATHARE G. Geffraye, D. Kadri – CEA/Grenoble G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna.
HTTF Analyses Using RELAP5-3D Paul D. Bayless RELAP5 International Users Seminar September 2010.
Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis Results of a Seismically-Induced Loss of Coolant Accident Involving Experiment Out-of-Pile Loop Piping at the Idaho.
Transmutation and ADS Safety EUROTRANS WP1.5 Meeting, Nov 27-28, Karlsruhe Simulation of EFIT Steam Generator Tube Rupture Accident (U-10) M. Flad, S.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Lyon, Oct Temperature Limits for XT-ADS.
EUROTRANS WP 1.5 Meeting FZK – Karlsruhe, November 27-28, 2008 FPN-FISNUC / Bologna EUROTRANS – DM1 EFIT Transients Analysis with RELAP5, SIMMER-III and.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Lyon, October Sophie.
Transmutation and ADS Safety Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Transient Analysis for EFIT (ENEA 384MWth 3-Zone core) Safety and.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – Safety approach Madrid, November Sophie EHSTER.
EUROTRANS: WP1.5 Technical meeting, Karlsruhe, November 27 – 28, XT-ADS DHR Conceptual Design L. Mansani
EUROTRANS: WP1.5 Technical meeting, Bologna, May 28-29, L. Mansani WP1.2 EFIT and XP-ADS Data.
“Design and safety analysis of ALFRED”
1 Safety studies for MYRRHA B. Arien, S. Heusdains, H. Aït Abderrahim on behalf of the MYRRHA Team and Support IP-Eurotrans Workshop DM1-WP1.5Brussels,
EUROTRANS - Helium cooled EFIT Probabilistic assessment of different DHR designs Karlsruhe, November Sophie EHSTER, Laurent VINCON.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Karlsruhe, Nov 27-28, EFIT-Pb Transient Analysis.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Madrid, Nov XT-ADS Transient Analysis.
WP 1.5 Progress Meeting ENEA – Bologna, Italy, May 28-30, 2008 FPN-FISNUC / Bologna EUROTRANS – DM1 Analysis of EFIT Unprotected Accidental Transients.
ANALYSIS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES OF EXERCISE 1 OF THE OECD/NRC BWR TT BENCHMARK 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Bedirhan Akdeniz and Kostadin Ivanov Pennsylvania.
Nuclear Fundamentals Part II Harnessing the Power of the Atom.
Investigation into the Viability of a Passively Active Decay Heat Removal System In ALLEGRO Laura Carroll, Graduate Physicist Physics & Licensing Team,
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Thermal hydraulic analysis of ALFRED by RELAP5 code & by SIMMER code G. Barone, N. Forgione, A. Pesetti, R. Lo Frano CIRTEN Consorzio Interuniversitario.
Thermal Hydraulic Simulation of a SuperCritical-Water-Cooled Reactor Core Using Flownex F.A.Mngomezulu, P.G.Rousseau, V.Naicker School of Mechanical and.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
LEADER, Task 5.5 ETDR Transient Analyses with SPECTRA Code LEADER Project JRC, Petten, February 26, 2013 M.M. Stempniewicz NRG-22694/
Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR
1 IAEA INPRO - PGAP Project – 5 th Consultancy Meeting – Vienna (Austria), December, 2011 RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF 2400 MWTH GAS-COOLED FAST REACTOR.
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Reactor Dynamics and Fuel Management Group Comparative Analysis of PWR Core Wide and Hot Channel Calculations.
ALFRED System Configuration Luigi Mansani
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
EUROTRANS – DM1 ENEA Activities on EFIT Safety Analysis ENEA – FIS/NUC Bologna - Italy WP5.1 Progress Meeting Tractebel / Brussels, March 17, 2006 G. Bandini,
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
IAEA Meeting on INPRO Collaborative Project “Performance Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (PGAP)” December, 2011, Vienna A.K. Nayak, PhD.
Safety Analysis Results of the DEC Transients of ALFRED LEADER Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor G. Bandini (ENEA), E. Bubelis, M. Schikorr.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
1 Parametric Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of TBM Primary Helium Loop Greg Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ESTIMATION OF THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LOADING FOR VVER-1000 UNDER SEVERE ACCIDENT SCENARIO Barun Chatterjee 1, Deb Mukhopadhyay.
LEADER Project Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 and CATHARE Giacomino Bandini - ENEA/Bologna Genevieve Geffraye – CEA/Grenoble.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 MELCOR Severe Accident Simulation for a “CAREM-like” Integral Reactor M. Caputo, J. M. García, M. Giménez, S.
Page 1 Petten 27 – Feb ALFRED and ELFR Secondary System and Plant Layout.
Analysis of Representative DEC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 LEADER Project: Task 5.5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
Modeling a Steam Generator (SG)
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
KIT TOWN OFFICE OSTENDORFHAUS Karlsruhe, 21 st November 2012 CIRTEN Consorzio universitario per la ricerca tecnologica nucleare Antonio Cammi, Stefano.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 OECD Benchmark Exercise on the TMI-2 Plant: Analysis of an Alternative Severe Accident Scenario G. Bandini (ENEA),
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment Advanced Physics Technology Division Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna, Italy.
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Design WP5.1 Progress Meeting AREVA / Lyon, October 10-11, 2006 G. Bandini, P. Meloni, M. Polidori.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Thermodynamics Thermal Hydraulics.
Group 1 Best Group.
Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), Egypt
Presentation transcript:

EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT with RELAP5 and RELAP/PARCS Codes WP5.1 Progress Meeting Empresarios Agrupados - Madrid, November 13-14, 2007 G. Bandini, P. Meloni, M. Polidori FPN-FISNUC / Bologna

OUTLINE  RELAP5 Thermal-Hydraulic Model Improvements and EFIT Parameters  List of Transients to be Analyzed by ENEA  Sensitivity Study to Pump Inertia (ULOF)  Definition of Reactor Trip Set-Points  Results of Protected Transients with RELAP5  Analysis of Unprotected Transients with RELAP/PARCS Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting

RELAP5 Model Improvements Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting RELAP5 Nodalization Scheme  Update of steam generator model and secondary side boundary conditions  Primary mechanical pump model added  effect of pump inertia in LOF transients  Core pressure drop (grid spacer model added)  Target loop and power removal added  Upper plenum mesh refinement  recirculation flows according to SIMMER-III results

Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting  Primary circuit layout from ANSALDO presentation at the last EUROTRANS - DM4 Technical Review Meeting (March 2007):  Reactor core with 3 fuel zones  4 primary pumps, 8 steam generators, 4 secondary loops  4 DHR units (3 out of 4 in operation in transient analysis)  Primary circuit parameters:  Reactor thermal power = MW  Lead mass flowrate = kg/s  Core inlet / outlet temperature = 400 / 480 C  Total primary circuit pressure drop = 1.1 bar (core = 0.45 bar, SG = 0.35 bar, Pump + others = 0.3 bar )  Secondary circuit parameters:  Total feedwater flow rate (4 SGs) = kg/s, Temperature = 335 C  Steam pressure = 140 bar  Steam temperature = 452 C (Superheating of 115 C) EFIT Design and Parameters

Nominal Conditions: RELAP5 Steady-State Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Maximum temperature (°C) Inner zone (Fax = 1.14) Middle zone (Fax = 1.16) Outer zone (Fax = 1.17) Hot FA 1/42 Fr = 1.12 Average FA 41/42 Hot FA 1/66 Fr = 1.13 Average FA 65/66 Hot FA 1/72 Fr = 1.24 Average FA 71/72 Central fuel Surface fuel Internal clad External clad Lead ParameterInner zone Middle zone Outer zone Reflector + by-pass TargetTotal Thermal power (MW) Lead mass flow rate (kg/s) By- pass outlet Target outlet

List of Transients to be Analyzed by ENEA (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting TRANSIENT TO BE ANALYZED FOR PB-COOLED EFIT DESIGN NumberTransientDescriptionBOCEOC ENEA RELAP5 (X-S) RELAP/PARCS (X-C) SIMMER PROTECTED TRANSIENTS P-1PLOF Total loss of forced circulation in primary system (4 pumps) xx X-S (reactor trip on core outlet temp. threshold) P-1.1PLOF-1 Loss of 1 out of 4 primary pumps (pump rotor seizure) xx X-S (reactor trip on core outlet temp. threshold) P-4PLOH Total loss of secondary loops (4 loops) xx X-S (reactor trip on core outlet temp. threshold) P-4.1PLOH-1 loss of 1 out of 4 secondary loops xx X-S (reactor trip on core outlet temp. threshold) P-5 PLOF + PLOH (station blackout) Total loss of forced circulation and secondary loops xx X-S (reactor trip at 0 s) X (reactor trip at 0 s) P-10 Spurious beam trip beam trip for 1,2,3 ….. 10 s intervals xxX-C P-11SGTR Steam generator tube rupture (1 to 5 tubes) x X (reactor trip at 0 s)

List of Transients to be Analyzed by ENEA (2) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting TRANSIENT TO BE ANALYZED FOR PB-COOLED EFIT DESIGN NumberTransientDescriptionBOCEOC ENEA RELAP5 (X-S) RELAP/PARCS (X-C) SIMMER UNPROTECTED TRANSIENTS U-1ULOF Total loss of forced circulation in primary system (4 pumps) xxX-CX U-2UTOP (?) pcm jump in reactivity at HFP xxX-C U-4 DECULOH Total loss of secondary loops (4 loops) xxX-C U-5 DEC ULOF + ULOH Total loss of forced circulation and secondary loops xxX-C U-11 Beam Overpower to (?)% at HFP xxX-C U-12 Beam Power Jump to 100% at HZP xxX-C

Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Preliminary Analysis of Protected Transients  P-1 – PLOF: Total loss of forced circulation in primary system (4 pumps)  P-1.1 – PLOF-1: Loss of 1 out 4 primary pumps (pump rotor seizure)  P-4 – PLOH: Loss of all secondary loops  P-4.1 – PLOH-1: Loss of 1 out of 4 secondary loops  P-5 – PLOF + PLOH (Station blackout): Total loss of forced circulation and secondary loops and beam trip  REACTOR TRIP: Proton beam switch-off if average core outlet temperature > Threshold set-point (primary pump trip??, actions on secondary side??)

Sensitivity Study to Pump Inertia (ULOF) (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Pump Velocity Pump Mass Flow Rate  Unprotected Loss of Flow accident analysis (4 pumps lost)  Pump inertia varying in the range 20 – 200 kg*m2  Primary pumps stop in few seconds  High pump reverse flow is induced by free level movements

Sensitivity Study to Pump Inertia (ULOF) (2) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Inlet Core Mass Flow Rate Maximum Clad Temperature  Core mass flow rate oscillations induced by free level movements  Lowest undershoot for pump inertia in the range 50 – 100 kg*m2  No significant effect of pump inertia on maximum clad temperature peak  Largest value of pump inertia is not favorable

Definition of Reactor Trip Set-Points (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting  Threshold set-point on measured lead temperature (top assembly, upper plenum  average core outlet, pump inlet) Clad safety limits for categories DBC II – DBC IV (PDS-XADS): Tclad max ≤ 823 K with time ≤ 600 s at 823 – 873 K time ≤ 180 s at 873 – 923 K ULOH Temperature  Threshold set-point at 773 K on average core outlet temperature limits the maximum clad temperature at 823 K

Definition of Reactor Trip Set-Points (2) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting ULOF Temperature ULOF (1 Pump) Temperature  The clad safety limit of 823 K is exceeded by 15 K in case of 1 pump trip event and threshold set-point at 773 K on average core outlet temperature  In case of all primary pumps trip the high clad temperature peak cannot be limited by lead temperature threshold on average core outlet temperature

Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting  Actions on Primary and Secondary sides are in general needed after automatic proton beam trip to bring the plant in safe conditions and avoid lead overcooling Actions Following Proton Beam Trip ULOH (1 Loop) Temperature  Primary pump trip  Turbine and feedwater trip  The results of different actions and timing have been evaluated for the initiating event of loss of 1 secondary loop  Beam trip at 120 s when core outlet temperature > 773 K

Actions Following Beam Trip (Short Term) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting ActionPrimary pump tripTurbine and feedwater trip 1Never 2At proton beam tripNever 330 s after beam tripNever 430 s after beam trip Maximum Clad TemperatureInlet Core Temperature Loss of 1 Secondary Loop

Actions Following Beam Trip (Long Term) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting ActionPrimary pump tripTurbine and feedwater trip 1Never 2At proton beam tripNever 330 s after beam tripNever 430 s after beam trip Maximum Clad TemperatureInlet Core Temperature Loss of 1 Secondary Loop

Preliminary Analysis of Protected Transients Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting INITIATING EVENTS:  PLOF-1: Loss of 1 out 4 primary pumps  PLOF: Total loss of forced circulation in primary system  PLOH-1: Loss of 1 out of 4 secondary loops  PLOH: Loss of all secondary loops  PLOF + PLOH (Station blackout): Total loss of forced circulation and secondary loops and beam trip REACTOR TRIP:  Proton beam trip if average core outlet temperature > 773 K  Primary pump trip at beam trip  No actions on secondary side

PLOF-1: Loss of 1 Primary Pump (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Primary Pump Mass Flow Rate Inlet Core Mass Flow Rate Pump 2,3,4 stop (Reactor trip) Pump 2,3,4 stop (Reactor trip) Pump 1 lost  Steady-state at 5000 s (primary pump 1 lost with reverse flow)  Pump 2, 3, 4 stop at reactor trip after about 10 s

PLOF-1: Loss of 1 Primary Pumps (2) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Lower and Upper Plenum Temperature Maximum Lead Temperature Reactor trip (T > 773 K) T max = 839 K (hot channel of outer core)  Reactor trip 10 s after pump 1 stop (T > 773 K)  Maximum lead temperature is 839 K in the hot channel of outer core zone

PLOF-1: Loss of 1 Primary Pumps (3) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting T max = 869 K (hot channel of outer core) T max = 1620 K (hot channel of middle core) Maximum Fuel TemperatureMaximum Clad Temperature  Maximum clad temperature exceeds the limit of normal conditions (823 K) but is below the clad safety limit for DBC1- 4 transient conditions (923 K)  Limited fuel temperature increase (below 1620 K)

PLOF-1: Loss of 1 Primary Pumps (4) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Primary Pump 2, 3, 4 Trip 30 s after Beam Trip Pump 2,3,4 stop (30 s after reactor trip) T max = 838 K Pump 1 lost Primary Pump Mass Flow Rate Maximum Clad Temperature  Clad temperature peak is limited by delaying primary pump shutdown (30 s) with respect to proton beam switch-off Beam trip

PLOF: Loss of All Primary Pumps (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Primary Pump Mass Flow RateInlet Core Mass Flow Rate  Pump mass flow rate reverses just after stopping (negligible effect of pump inertia)  Initial oscillations of inlet core mass flow rate are due to free level movements and stabilization

PLOF: Loss of All Primary Pumps (2) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Reactor Trip  Reactor trip about 10 s after pump trip (average lead temp. at core outlet > 773 K)  Large temperature peak due to initial core mass flow rate undershoot  The maximum lead temperature remains well below the boiling point (1476 K) Lower and Upper Plenum TemperatureMaximum Lead Temperature T max = 995 K (hot channel of outer core)

PLOF: Loss of All Primary Pumps (3) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting T max = 1700 K (hot channel of middle core) T max = 1080 K (hot channel of inner core) Maximum Fuel Temperature Maximum Clad Temperature  Maximum clad temperature exceeds for few seconds the limit of 923 K for DBC1 – 4 transient conditions  The maximum fuel temperature is 1700 K in the hot channel of middle core zone

PLOH-1: Loss of 1 Secondary Loop (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Inlet Core Mass Flow Rate Upper and Lower Plenum Temp. Core and SG Power Reactor trip (T > 773 K) Pump trip at beam trip  Reactor trip at 120 s (T lead > 773 K, beam and pump trip)

Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting PLOH-1: Loss of 1 Secondary Loop (2) Maximum Fuel Temperature Maximum Clad Temperature Maximum Lead Temperature  Lead and clad temperature peaks can be avoided with pump trip delay  Maximum clad temperature peak is within the safety limit for DBC1 – 4 transient conditions T max = 860 K T max = 865 K

PLOH: Loss of All Secondary Loops (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Inlet Core Mass Flow Rate Lower and Upper Plenum Temperature  Reactor trip (proton beam switch-off and pump stop) after 43 s (T lead > 773 K)  Large oscillation of lead mass flow rate at core inlet due to free level movements Reactor trip (T > 773 K) Pump trip

PLOH: Loss of All Secondary Loops (2) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Lower and Upper Plenum TemperatureCore and DHR Power  Maximum DHR performance (3 units) = 20 MW is attained after about 5000 s  Maximum lead temperature stabilizes after about 5000 s at 723 K

PLOH: Loss of All Secondary Loops (3) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Maximum Vessel TemperatureMaximum Clad Temperature  Maximum clad temperature is 877 K in the hot channel of outer core zone (no peak with delayed pump trip)  Vessel temperature (maximum after about 3000 s) remains below the safety limit (723 K) T max = 877 K (hot channel of outer core) T max = 722 K

PLOF + PLOH: Station Blackout (1) Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting Core and DHR Mass Flow Rate Core and DHR Inlet/Outlet Temp. Core and DHR Power  Natural circulation mass flow rate in primary system and DHR power removal confirmed by SIMMER-III 2-D results  DHR mass flow rate in good agreement with ANSALDO specifications at 3600 s (2985 kg/s)

Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting PLOF + PLOH: Station Blackout (2) Maximum Fuel Temperature Maximum Lead Temperature T max = 844 K Maximum Clad Temperature T max = 848 K  Maximum clad temperature is within the safety limit for DBC1 – 4 transient conditions (time ≤ 600 s at 823 – 873 K)

Empresarios Agrupados – Madrid, November 13-14, 2007, EUROTRANS – DM1 – WP1.5 Progress Meeting PLOF + PLOH: Station Blackout (3) Maximum Clad Temperature Maximum Vessel Temperature Maximum Lead Temperature T limit = 723 K T max = 715 K  Maximum lead and clad temperatures stabilize around 730 K  Maximum vessel temperature remains below the safety limit