A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
TIME-05 Workshop, 3-7 October 2005, Zurich 1 Probabilistic Data Association Filter for the fast tracking in ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker Dmitry Emeliyanov,
RAL Summer School September, 2004 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis High Level Trigger Studies for the.
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
Jornadas LIP, Dez P. Martins - CFTP-IST The NA60 Silicon Vertex Telescopes Dimuon measurements Dimuon measurements Vertex telescope used in: Vertex.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
G. Eigen, LISHEP2011, Rio de Janeiro, July 5 th, Outline Introduction Introduction ATLAS detector and performance Vertex and impact parameter resolution.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
Primary Vertex Reconstruction in the ATLAS Experiment at LHC K. Prokofiev (University of Sheffield) (in part supported by EU FP6 Research Training Network.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
Dmitry Emeliyanov, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Tracking for Triggering Purposes in ATLAS
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Presentation transcript:

A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS2 Physics rates at the LHC l LHC pp colider, collision energy 14 TeV l Bunch crossing every 25ns - 40MHz rate l Data storage capability ~200Hz Reduction of ~ : 1 needed! l Peak luminosity: 2x10 33 cm -2 s cm -2 s -1 l Between ~5 and ~25 (soft) pp interactions per bunch crossing Interesting high p T interactions complicated by “pile-up” l ATLAS will use a Three Level, Trigger… l Pipelined, hardware LVL1 l LVL2 and Event Filter farms

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS3 LVL1 LVL2 EF > Latency: 2.5  s (max) > Hardware based (FPGA, ASIC) > Calo/Muon (coarse granularity) > Latency: ~10 ms (average) > Software (specialised algs) > All sub-dets, full granularity > Match different sub-det info > Work in Regions of Interest > Latency: few sec (average) > Offline-type algorithms > Full calibration/alignment info > Access to full event possible ATLAS Trigger-DAQ overview

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS4 The ATLAS Detector Calorimeter Muon Detector Inner Detector

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS5 The ATLAS Inner Detector TRT Pixel Detector SemiConductor Tracker

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS6 Tracking in the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger l High-pT electron/muon identification - Match Inner Detector tracks to information from outer detector (calorimeter, muon detector) B Physics (at low lumi) - Exclusive reconstruction of golden decays (e.g. B   ) l Inclusive b-jet tagging (e.g. in MSSM H  hh  bbbb) l LVL2 is the earliest stage where … l Data from tracking detectors is available, l it is possible to combine information from different sub-detectors l Precision tracking at ATLAS predominantly from the Inner Detector: l 3 layer Pixel Detector (3 layers in the end caps) l 4 Layer Semi-Conductor Tracker, SCT (9 layers in the end caps) l Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT) l Two approaches for the Silicon tracking … l Pixel only using Lookup tables - SiTrack, l Complete (all layer) silicon tracking - IdScan.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS7 LVL2 processing in Regions of Interest (RoI’s) l Most LVL1 accepted events are still uninteresting for physics studies l Decision can be made by further processing only those sections of the detector that LVL1 found interesting l Minimise data transfer to LVL2 processors l Minimize processing time at LVL2 l Average RoI data size ~2% of total event l On average, ~1.6 RoI’s per LVL1 accepted event

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS8 H  

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS9 One bunch crossing One pp interaction

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS10 Dealing witrh “Pileup” events l Exploit differences between interesting (high-p T ) and uninteresting (low-p T ) interactions l Each has a vertex at different z positions along the beamline. l The interesting pp collision should have more high-p T tracks, at least inside the RoI that generated the LVL1 RoI. l Ideally, we would want to l Find the z position of the interesting pp interaction before any track reconstruction l Select only groups of space points consistent with that z l Only then get into combinatorial tracking.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS11 LVL2 Tracking IdScan Algorithm overview l IdScan (Inner Detector Scan) Algorithm in four stages l Z Finder to find event vertex - histogramming algorithm l Hit Filter for hits compatible with this z - histogramming l Find hit combinations consistent with single tracks. l Track fitting with hits from previous stages - Kalman Filter Fitter, extrapolate to the TRT (See talk by Dmity Emelyanov) ZFinder Space Points Pattern recognition track candidate Tracks Track fitting track candidate z-coordinate

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS12 ZFinder space point selection l Designed to be fast, without the need for detailed tracking High p T tracks are (almost) linear in  –z. Use ( ,z) from pairs of space points from a track for simple linear extrapolation to determine track z 0 l Search for hits consistent with high p T tracks Hits from high p T tracks will lie in a restricted region of  bin hits in thin slices of , (in bins of degrees) l treat each slice (almost) independently l Take all pairs of hits and histogram their extrapolated intersection with beam line. l Fast - reduces hit combinations from lower momentum tracks

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS13 Use narrow phi slices ( degrees)  improves selection of high p T tracks and significantly reduces combinatorial multiplicity. p T ~ p T ~ 20 GeV  ~ 0.3 degrees p T ~ 1 GeV  ~ 5 degrees Curvature in the transverse plane

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS14    From total ~200 hits, only ~7 good electron hits Single electron RoI (0.2x0.2)

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS15 ZFinder – Jet RoI Jet RoI fromWH event

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS16 Zfinder Performance - Single electrons l Resolution for single 25 GeV electron events (with no pile-up) ~200  m, varies with  l Efficiency approaches 100% l In low luminosity events (with pile up) efficiency approaches 95-97%

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS17 The HitFilter All Space Points on a track originating from a given z 0 have the same  when calculated with respect to z 0 … Put all hits in a 2D histogram in ( ,  ) - (currently use 0.005, 2.4 degrees) l Accept hits in a bin if it contains hits in at least 4 (out of 7) layers l Reject all other hits (at high lumi, ~95% of hits are rejected!) l Limits number of combinations l Latency behaviour, approximately linear with number of hits.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS18   - z view x-y view  -  histogram  z   Pattern Recognition in Pile-up events l If correct vertex is found, track finding efficiency approaches 100%.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS19 Group Cleaner l A group from the Hit Filter may contain hits from more than one track, and maybe some random hits In Group Cleaner, we exploit the (p T,  0 ) information to select final track candidates Similar to Hit Filter: make a 2d-histogram in 1/p T and  0 Select triplets of Space Points, calculate (1/p T,  0 ), fill the 2d-histogram l Track candidates consist of bins with Space Points in at least 4 (out of 7) layers l If two track candidates share a significant number of Space Points, keep only the longest candidate (“clone” removal) (d 0 =0, z V, 1/p T,  0 ) are good starting parameters for the Kalman fitter l Fitter also performs some outlier removal and can extrapolate tracks into the TRT.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS20 Performance l Single p T = 40 GeV electron RoI at high Luminosity l Mean number of space points ~ 200 l Mean execution time ~ 1ms 1 ZFinder resolution ~ 200  m l Efficiency ~95% l B physics (low Luminosity), full Silicon Tracker reconstruction l Mean execution time ~10ms 1 CPU speed of 1GHz Execution Time (ms) Number of space-points Linear scaling with occupancy 0

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS21 Performance - Monte Carlo data l 25 GeV electrons, design (high) luminosity with pileup. l Vertex residual for u- and b-jet events.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS22 Resonance reconstruction Fully reconstructed mesons from the D s   channel.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS23 ATLAS Combined Test Beam Transition Radiation Tracker First Muon Chambers Hadronic Calorimeter Electromagnetic Calorimeter Beam Line

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS24

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS25 Test beam performance l 40 GeV muons in magnetic field, 100A solenoid current. l Vertex residual with respect to offline kalman filter algorithm. l Full alignment proceedure still in development stage, l resolution around 200 microns l Efficiencies approaching 100%

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS26 Summary and Outlook l Tracking in the ATLAS Trigger is essential to achieve the physics goals of the LHC, yet must function in a very demanding environment. l Reconstructing the primary interaction coordinate in z to aid subsequent pattern recognition works well … l Latency performance seems acceptable, l Performance in high luminosity, high occupancy data seems acceptable. l Level 2 tracking algorithms successfully operational in test beam l First look at online tracking performance with real data very encouraging. l Work is always ongoing to improve the Level 2 Tracking. l ATLAS will see its first collisions in in 2007 … l Detector and Trigger well on target for readiness within this challenging schedule.

TIME th October, Zurich M.Sutton - A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for ATLAS27 And finally … l A big THANK YOU to the organising committee for the excellent choice of venue for the conference dinner.