7 March 20075 th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Observing prominence dynamics with STEREO David Alexander, Rui Liu, and Holly Gilbert Rice University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Advertisements

Coronal Prominence Cavities: Magnetism and Dynamics Sarah Gibson, Giuliana de Toma, Therese Kucera, Kathy Reeves, Donald Schmit, and Alphonse Sterling.
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of CMEs’ Source Regions Yingna Su Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Adriaan van Ballegooijen,
A solar eruption driven by rapid sunspot rotation Guiping Ruan, Yao Chen, Shuo Wang, Hongqi Zhang, Gang Li, Ju Jing, Xing Li, Haiqing Xu, and Haimin Wang.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Sarah Gibson October 2005 Twisted magnetic flux ropes: A breeding ground for CMEs? Sarah Gibson Collaborators: Yuhong Fan, Joan Burkepile, Giuliana de.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Jan 13, 2009ISSI1 Modeling Coronal Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A Collaborators:
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
3D Reconnection in Prominences. Gibson & Fan 2006 Negative Points: Pros and Cons of the Flux-Rope-Dip Model 4. Flux ropes are a basic element of low 
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
Low-Energy Coronal Sources Observed with RHESSI Linhui Sui (CUA / NASA GSFC)
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
Evolution of the Filament’s Shape. Fig. 1a shows the filament (in absorption) almost one hour before eruption. Once the filament begins to erupt, it takes.
Abstract On 2004 November 10, TRACE observed an X2.5 flare in NOAA Active Region The observations were taken at very short cadence (~3.7 s) in the.
Erupting flux rope, rising X-ray source and CME on 16 April 2002 C. Goff 1, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,2,3, L. K. Harra 1, S. A. Matthews 1, and C.H. Mandrini.
Holly Gilbert: NASA GSFC. SDO AIA composite made from three of the AIA wavelength bands, corresponding to temperatures from.7 to 2 million degrees (hotter.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Observational Evidence for Cross-field Diffusion of Neutral Filament Material Holly Gilbert & Gary Kilper Rice University 10/29/07.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Hinode and the Flare/CME Connection: Events of 19 th May, 2007 J. L. Culhane University College London Mullard Space Science Laboratory UK Laura Bone,
NEWS, RESOURCES, AND MOST RECENT SOLAR WORKING DRAFTS (1) Mauna Loa Solar Observatory Newsletter Feb 2009 (2) Introduction to the Solar and Space Weather.
DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
Direct Evidence of Emergence of a Helical Flux Rope under an Active- Region Prominence Joten Okamoto Kyoto Univ. / NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow Saku Tsuneta,
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
CME Initiation: The Matrix Reloaded David Alexander, Rice University.
Living in a Star Sarah Gibson High Altitude Observatory / NCAR.
Intriguing Observations of a Failed Eruption? We present observations of a (partially) failed eruption of a magnetic flux rope following an M9.3 flare.
Probing Energy Release of Solar Flares M. Prijatelj Carnegie Mellon University Advisors: B. Chen, P. Jibben (SAO)
Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.
Sarah Gibson January 2006 Sigmoids, filaments and cavities: how do they connect?
AGU Dec 2000 The Structure and Evolution of a Sigmoid Observed During Whole Sun Month 3 Lyndsay Fletcher Sarah Gibson, and the WSM3 sigmoid structure working.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
New STEREO/SECCHI Processing for Heliospheric Transients David F. Webb ISR, Boston College, MA, USA New England Space Science Consortium.
FMT-Peru H α center 18:14 UT A 3-Dimensional View of the Filament Eruption and Coronal Mass Ejection associated with the 2011 March 8 Solar Flare Raúl.
Reconnection & Flares Part II movie courtesy of G. Stenborg.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Spectroscopic Detection of Reconnection Evidence with Solar-B II. Signature of Flows in MHD simulation Hiroaki ISOBE P.F. Chen *, D. H. Brooks, D. Shiota,
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
Strong rotation of an erupting quiescent polar crown prominence W. T. Thompson Adnet Systems, Inc. NASA/GSFC.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
RHESSI Hard X-Ray Observations of an EUV Jet on August 21, 2003 Lindsay Glesener, Säm Krucker RHESSI Workshop 9, Genova September 4, 2009.
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
1 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; K. E. J. Huttunen, Y. Li, J. Luhmann, B. Lynch, UCB/SSL; Angelos Vourlidas & R. A. Howard, NRL;
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Relationships between flares and CMEs FRIDAY 9:00 am – 12:00 pm SHINE 2009.
Marina Battaglia, FHNW Säm Krucker, FHNW/UC Berkeley
Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DERIVING PROMINENCE MASS FROM SOHO/EIT Fe XII (19
Sakai, J. I., Nishi, K., and Sokolov, I. V. ApJ, 2002, 576, 1018
Presentation transcript:

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Observing prominence dynamics with STEREO David Alexander, Rui Liu, and Holly Gilbert Rice University

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting 2007 Student opportunities Support is available for a small number of international students Contact: David Alexander July 29 - August 3, in Whistler, BC, Canada. for latest information

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting The ‘Failed’ Eruption: 25 May 2002 A series of TRACE EUV (Fe XII/XXIV 195A) images shows the morphological evolution of the filament. Note the apparent kinking of the filament, the stagnation of the eruption, and the draining of material. No CME detected, but an M2 flare 18:00:2118:03:0618:04:3218:05:32 18:06:3218:07:3218:08:3218:22:14 Alexander, Liu & Gilbert, 2006

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting keV RHESSI hard X-ray contours. The yellow arrows indicate the coronal sources and the red arrow points to the projected crossing point of the two filament legs. Note that Source 2 lies close to this crossing point, where one might expect the two legs to interact via reconnection. Source 2 Source 1 Presence of Current Sheets

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Simulations The figure shows current density iso- surfaces during the evolution of the kink instability. The helically deformed flux rope (red), the helical current sheet (purple), and the vertical current sheet (yellow) are visible. Details are described in Torok & Kliem (2004). purple red yellow

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Mass Flows: 25 May 2002 Velocity information provided by MLSO/CHIP instrument in HeI 1038nm Max. velocity = 100 km/s Initial expansion followed by mass draining and twisting motions Velocity information important for determining whether structure is kinked or not.

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Partial Eruption: 31 Oct 2005 Liu, Alexander & Gilbert, 2007a Kinking structure associated with partial eruption of prominence cavity Kinking inferred from dynamic motions in intensity and velocity signatures Reconnection between filament channel and polar crown arcade mediated eruption

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Velocity: 31 Oct 2005 For this orientation, velocity information is crucial to determine configuration.

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Cavity Eruption: 31 Oct 2005 Partial eruptions can involve all, some, or none of the prominence mass.

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Kinking and Partial Eruptions Gilbert et al. (2001) – kinking not considered Gibson and Fan (2006) – kinking crucial

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Kinking and Partial Eruptions Both simulations and observations indicate that the degree of kinking is not only important for driving eruption but also determines the nature of the eruption.

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting STEREO/SECCHI The stereoscopic viewpoints of EUVI, COR-1, and COR-2 are crucial for this study. Filaments/Prominences are relatively easy to visualize in 3D We will be able to a.Determine whether the filament is kinked or not b.Follow the evolution of the kinked structure into the corona c.Provide ‘true’ 3D velocity d.Help disentangle the Doppler signals from MLSO/CHIP

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting STEREO/SECCHI

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting 25 May 2001 see Rui directory Potential for EUVI/COR-1/COR-2 Liu, Alexander & Gilbert, 2007b

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Velocity information provides additional dynamical context

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Other issues Importance of kink instability vs. kinked configuration  Possibly different initiation mechanisms (dynamic vs. triggered) Role of reconnection – where and when?  Current sheet formation, flare production, implications for hard X-ray production in filament-driven flaring. Role played by mass in filament eruptions  Possibly different initiation mechanisms (dynamic vs. triggered) Effect of composition (H/He) on eruptive process (Gilbert & Kilper, 2007)  Absorption observed by EUVI can play a role.