Water Quality and Management National Program (NP 201) Overview and Highlights USDA-Agricultural Research Service Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Advertisements

Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Research Integrate the existing Drinking Water and Water Quality research programs into one holistic program that.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Gulf Restoration Network Decision. Nutrients Nitrogen (N) Phosphorus (P) Sources include: NPS: fertilizer/manure runoff, septic tank overflow Point sources:
Caird E. Rexroad, Jr. Wilbert H. Blackburn.  ARS is a matrix organization comprised of National Program Staff who establish national research program.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
The Agricultural Research Service Steven R. Shafer Deputy Administrator Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
City of Edmonton Strategic Approach to Environmental Management Office of the Environment.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): -Adoption of.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Impacts of Agriculture on Water Quality: The role.
Environment and Natural Resources Stewardship: Opportunities and Issues Jim Pease and Matt Helmers.
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
Overview of ARS National Programs Steven Kappes Deputy Administrator Animal Production & Protection National Program Staff Agricultural Research Service.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) USDA Agricultural Research Service E. John Sadler, Coordinator M. A. Weltz, National Program Leader.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
EPA’s Role in Source Water Protection
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Sections 2 and 3 Nutrient Management Regulations.
THE ARS WATERSHED RESEARCH PROGRAM Watershed Processes National Program Component AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED RESEARCH History Facilities.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
New Scientists and Project Plans Building a Plan for Success OSQR.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
The state belongs to all of us - "Kansas Don't Spoil It"
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Policy workstreams Craig Mallett Miriam Eagle.
Texas Water Resources Institute
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Stakeholder Meeting: August 15, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality and Management National Program (NP 201) Overview and Highlights USDA-Agricultural Research Service Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems National Program Staff Mark A. Weltz, National Program Leader, Watersheds and Remote Sensing, Co-Leader USDA-Agricultural Research Service Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems National Program Staff

NP 201 Vision and Mission Statements Vision A Safe, More Water Efficient Society Mission To conduct fundamental research on the processes that control water availability and quality for the health and economic growth of the American people: To develop new and improved technologies for managing the Nation's agricultural water resources.

The Agricultural Research Service Develops Scientifically Sound Solutions with a variety of Public and Private Partnerships to meet their needs from Concerns to Concepts to Conservation practices. Approach of NP 201

Scope of NP research units (38 locations) 85 projects (57 majority coded) ≈ 225 scientists (≈157 SYs) ≈ $55.8 M annual budget (NTL) ≈ $7.1 M budget increase from 2000 to 2005

Water Quality and Management National Program Research Locations NP 201 Research Locations

Background of NP 201 National customer workshops were held in 1998, 1999, and NP 201 addresses 9 of the 14 high priority issues related to the USDA-NRCS science and technology needs developed in NP 201 also addresses 19 of the 27 high priority research issues related to water availability and water use listed in two recent reports by the Water Science and Technology Board of the National Research Council (NRC 2001, 2004). ARS does not perform research on water institutions and water law that are listed in the NRC reports.

NP 201 Components and Accomplishment Report  NP 201 has three components: Agricultural Watershed Management, Irrigation and Drainage Management, and Water Quality Protection and Management   NP 201 accomplishments are presented in terms of outcomes in the Accomplishment

Agricultural Watershed Management Techniques for rehabilitating aging hydraulic structures In 2001, ARS released the SITES 2000 Water Resource Site Analysis Program to NRCS for use in designing and evaluating earthen flood-control structures. SITES 2000 model was developed in response to the enactment of the Small Watershed Amendments of 2000 (PL , Section 313). The model is available to the public through a web site maintained by NRCS and is supported by ARS scientists.

Agricultural Watershed Management Designing the best possible conservation buffer A 9-year study showed that restored riparian wetland buffer retained or removed at least 60 percent of the nitrogen and 65 percent of the phosphorus that entered from the adjacent manure application site. Additional studies have found the buffers can be an effective way to prevent harmful bacteria from manure applications, like Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and Salmonella, from reaching streams. However, macropores, which are created by animals burrowing through the soil or by cracks in the soil that occur in drier years, can allow contaminants to bypass the buffer system.

Water Quality Protection and Management Reducing phosphorus loadings to the nation’s streams ARS led the development and refinement of a P Index to rank the vulnerability of fields to P loss in runoff and identify those at greatest risk for loss. The NRCS has adopted the use of the P index in 47 States as the basis for development of CNMPs, and over 2000 NRCS field agents and nutrient management consultants across the U.S. have received training. These efforts have resulted in the Phosphorus Indexing Research Group receiving the USDA Secretary’s Plow Honor Award for Group Achievements and the ARS Technology Transfer Award.

Irrigation and Drainage Management Controlled drainage can reduce nitrogen loadings to the Gulf of Mexico Scientists in Ohio showed that controlled subsurface drainage systems can increase corn and soybean yields and reduce nitrate losses by 30 to 40 percent. Researchers in Louisiana, found that improvements in water quality with controlled surface and subsurface drainage systems requires deep chiseling. Scientists in Iowa found that wood chips and other types of biological materials placed above drainage tile can also decrease nitrate losses.

All Three Components BMPs found to improve water quality and ecology in the Mississippi Delta. Major findings include: (1) BMPs reduced sediment; (2) total phosphorus in lakes decreased; (3) pesticides were decreased in ground water; (4) conservation tillage and cover crops reduced herbicide loss in runoff; and (5) riparian areas mitigated the transport of sediment in runoff and enhanced the degradation of pesticides.

All Three Components RUSLE2 developed for soil erosion predictions. ARS scientists guided development of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE2) model project since RUSLE2 has been implemented in all NRCS field offices and has been adopted by the USDI Office of Surface Mining (OSM) and USBLM.

All Three Components Helping States to slow sediment movement ARS scientists have recently developed a two-pronged approach to identify sediment movement in streams and other water bodies. The AnnAGNPS watershed model first evaluates loadings within a watershed and the effect farming and other activities have on pollution control. Next, the Conservational Channel Evolution and Pollutant Transport Systems (CONCEPTS) model predicts channel evolution and pollutant loadings. The combined decision support system is primarily being used by NRCS, USACE, and USEPA.

All Three Components SWAT is used worldwide to assess environmental benefits SWAT stands for Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Over the past 4 years, the USEPA and ARS have made SWAT available to State agencies and consultants throughout the nation in BASINS for TMDL evaluations. NRCS used SWAT model in its 1997 Resource Conservation Appraisal. In 2003, NRCS and ARS again decided to use SWAT to quantify the environmental benefits of conservation practices at the national scale for the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP).

All Three Components Quantifying the benefits of Farm Bill funded conservation practices The purpose of CEAP is to provide the farming community, the conservation community, the general public, the OMB, legislators, and others involved with environmental policy issues an accounting of the environmental effects or benefits obtained from USDA conservation program expenditures. ARS is working with NRCS on both the national and watershed assessment components. The centerpiece of the watershed assessment program is the ARS "benchmark" watersheds.

All Three Components MOU between the United States-USDA and the Chinese- Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) Under this agreement, five cooperative projects related to soil erosion by water and wind were developed with the U.S.- China Center for Soil and Water Conservation and Environmental Protection. Results from these projects will be integrated into the ARS erosion and waters quality models for use in the United States as well as China.

Systems of Wastewater Treatment Technologies ARS researchers are developing a combination of practices to conserve nutrients, and control atmospheric emissions and proliferation of pathogens at animal production and manure storage facilities. This system features improved liquid/solid separation; reduced ammonia volatilization, immobilization and capture of phosphorus; destruction of pathogens; and reuse of wastewater. Contributions from other Programs

Effectiveness of Conservation Practices Irrigation Water Management and Security Drainage Water Management Systems Integrated Erosion and Sedimentation Technologies Water Availability and Assessments Water Quality Protection Systems Agricultural and Urban Ecosystem Management and Restoration NP 201 Proposed Problem Areas:

Summary ARS research in NP 201 focuses on solving water quality and quantity problems. ARS scientists over the last 5 years have made significant progress in addressing critical gaps in knowledge/theory and developing specific technologies, methods, tools or management practices that benefit a wide array of customer needs. ARS managers, administrators, and scientists are looking forward to even greater progress in the next 5 years.

We appreciate and welcome our customers, stakeholders, and partners Water is fundamental to life and is a basic requirement for all our agricultural, industrial, urban, and recreational activities, as well as for the sustained health of the natural environment.

Timeline for National Program 201 Action Plan and Peer Review Activities October 2005 – LD/RL/Lead Scientists comment on draft NP 201 Action Plan November 2005 –Action Plan to Customers for review November 1 to December 7, 2005 – NPS provides Program Direction and Resource Allocation Memo (PDRAM) to Area Director December 7, 2005, to February 14, 2006 – LD/RL/Lead Scientists prepare Prospectuses March 2006 – NP 201 Action Plan finalized and posted on NPS Website June 2006 – Project Plans due to OSQR (Specific dates can be modified by Area Directors August 2006 – Peer Review Panel meet April 2007 – Project Termination