L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Efficiency and Equity
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
John Rawls. Most important pol phil of 20 th cent? No ? The most important lib. Represented academic left vs people like Isaiah Berlin and Robert Nozick.
"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.
Contrasting Cold War Terms United States v. Soviet perspective.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
L Social Atomism: as rational, self-interested individuals, we are interested in promoting the social good through a contract because it benefits us personally.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
Nov 20: The justification of political authority Natural Law (Pufendorf), Social Contract (Hobbes), Natural Rights (Locke) Nov 27: The role of government.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
RAWLS 2 CRITIQUES OF RAWLS.
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
FREEDOM, ORDER, OR EQUALITY?
Macroeconomics I ECON 309 S. Cunningham
Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.
Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.
Human Rights - incorporates not only liberties associated with being a member of a free political society but also entitlement to a fair distribution.
AP/SOSC 2340/ o Intermediate Business & Society Lecture 4: Libertarianism.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Definition of Justice (Dreptatea) To act justly means to act in accordance to moral norms or act according to certain values. Moral norms vs. Legal norms:
CHAPTER EIGHT: SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Justice Paradox of Justice Small volcanic island has two villages, “South Town” (Pop 300) and “North Village” (Pop 500). Threat of devastating volcanic.
Ideas about Justice Three big themes Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
1. Give an example not in your book that would illustrate the concept of “compensating differential.” Less desirable places to live Low wage advancement.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Egalitarian Liberalism: Justice in the Modern State
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
The Entitlement Theory of distributive justice
Rawls & Nozick Liberalism & Libertarianism Warwick Debating Society Training, 11/05/2011.
Equity and Sustainability. Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional:
The Moral Principles By: Ronald F. White, Ph.D Professor of Philosophy
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
The System of Social Justice Principles in the Contemporary Law Tradition of the West dr. Jolanta Bieliauskaitė Brno, 2015.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
History of Philosophy.
Political theory and law
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
John Rawls’ theory of justice
Chapter 3 – Liberalism, Pt 3
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Missing in Action: Egalitarian Justice and Care Ethics
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Presentation transcript:

l To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism: Rawls) l To protect the right to own that which one is entitled to (libertarianism: Nozick) l To foster a sense of community rather than individualism (communitarianism: Sandel) What Is the Purpose of Government?

John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l In a just society, rational individuals under a veil of ignorance about their original position in the society should endorse a theory that: l gives everyone as much liberty as possible l allows for the unequal distribution of wealth only when the existence of such inequalities benefits everyone and is accessible to everyone

u We are entitled to use our property as we see fit. The State’s legitimate power is limited to preventing harm and protecting property rights u Taxation for anything other than protection (e.g., to impose a pattern redistributing wealth) is unjust because it ignores how goods are acquired fairly through trade, labor, gifts, etc. Libertarianism (Entitlement/Minimal State Theory): Robert Nozick

Communitarianism: Michael Sandel u We do not form governments to promote our individual self-interests; such a view treats our sense of community only instrumentally (Hobbes) or sentimentally (Rawls) u The purpose of government is to encourage us to recognize how we are constituted in our communal relations to one another