Proposed Amendments to the Area Designations Public Consultation Meeting August 13, 2002 Steve Gouze (916) 323-6627

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Granville County Board of Commissioners Donnie Redmond July 5, 2005.
Advertisements

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 3 Air Quality.
Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
How Will Georgia-Florida Wildfires Affect Regional Air Quality Planning? Wes Younger Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
Public Workshop August 29, Logistics Presentation available on-linePresentation available on-line
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Yolo-Solano AQMD Regulatory Update Mat Ehrhardt, P.E. October 8, 2014.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process
Treatment of Natural Events WESTAR Planning Committee & WESTAR NEP Workgroup March 28, 2006.
Exceptional Events Meredith Kurpius US EPA Region 9.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Status of the Particulate Matter (PM) Air Quality Standards November 28, 2012.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
State Implementation Plans Could Rule Your Life or why NAAQS Are Important Chuck Sams R9 Air Quality Program Manager.
Chapter 20 Air Pollution.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
EPA’s New National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Sunil Kumar MWAQC July 28,
Air Quality Control. An Overview of Air Pollution Problems  Stationary-source air pollution  Mobile-source air pollution  “Criteria” pollutants  Toxic.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
1 Agricultural Programs for Controlling Particulate Matter Pollution Ira Domsky, Deputy Director Air Quality Division presented to Western State Air Resources.
Exceptional Events: A California Perspective Karen Magliano, Chief Air Quality Data Branch Planning and Technical Support Division.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Air pollution in Stuttgart ? NO 2 O3O3 PM 10. Stuttgart.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Pinal County Air Quality July 23, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Fire impacts – Natural event data exclusions/ozone monitoring Colleen Delaney, Utah Division of Air Quality March 11, 2004.
Pinal County Air Quality August 30, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Department of Air Quality Exceptional Event Streamlining, Standardization & Coordination CDAWG November, 2015 Clark County.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards ITEP Air Quality Training Kodiak 2015 Bob Morgan Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
Daily Screening for Wildfire Impacts on Ozone using a Photochemical Model A Proposal to the Texas Near-Nonattainment Areas Greg Yarwood
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Monitoring Data Sets and Analysis Tools for the VIEWS/TSS Web Sites
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Amendments to the Area Designations Public Consultation Meeting August 13, 2002 Steve Gouze (916)

2 Outline n Designation Criteria and Terminology n Proposed Area Redesignations n Questions & Answers

3 Designation Criteria n Affected Pollutants n Data to Use n Data Availability n Size of Designated Areas n Review of Designations n Highly Irregular or Infrequent Events n Designation Categories

4 Affected Pollutants n Nine Pollutants*: OzoneParticulate Matter OzoneParticulate Matter Carbon MonoxideSulfates Carbon MonoxideSulfates Nitrogen DioxideLead Nitrogen DioxideLead Sulfur DioxideHydrogen Sulfide Sulfur DioxideHydrogen Sulfide Visibility Reducing Particles Visibility Reducing Particles * CCR, Title 17, Section 70200

5 Data to Use n “Data for Record” – Meet siting & QA procedures – Monitoring by ARB, Districts, and Others n Use most recent 3-year period: Provides stability

6 Data Appropriateness n At Least 75% of the data are available for the high concentration period – For each pollutant – High concentration period varies from site to site

7 Size of Designated Areas n Air Basin: Ozone, NO 2, PM 10, Sulfates, & Visibility Reducing Particles n County: CO, SO 2, Lead, & H 2 S n Smaller areas if justified

8 Review of Designations n Area designations: Annually, based on 3 recent years of data Annually, based on 3 recent years of data n Designation criteria: Periodic reviews Periodic reviews

9 Exceedance vs. Violation n Exceedance: Concentration higher than the level of State standard n Violation: An exceedance Not excluded as affected by a “Highly Irregular or Infrequent Event” n NOT all exceedances are violations

10 Highly Irregular or Infrequent Events n Beyond reasonable regulatory control n Exceedances get excluded n All exceedances remain in data base n 3 Types of events

11 Highly Irregular or Infrequent Events : n Extreme Concentration Event n Exceptional Event n Unusual Concentration Event

12 Extreme Concentration Event n May or may not have an identifiable cause n Based on a statistical calculation n Expected Peak Day Conc. (EPDC): Concentration expected to recur less frequently than once per year

13 Exceptional Event n Must have identifiable cause n Based on U.S. EPA Guidelines n Examples: – forest fires – unusually high winds

14 Unusual Concentration Event n Anomalous exceedance n Attainment or Unclassified areas only n Requires specific findings

15 Designation Categories n Nonattainment n Nonattainment-Transitional –Ozone –Other Pollutants n Attainment n Unclassified

16 Nonattainment – 1 or more Violations at any site in the last 3 years

17 Nonattainment-Transitional n Ozone: – 3 or fewer Exceedances at each site during the last year – By “Operation of Law” – Designated Area = District – Data Representative & Complete for high site(s)

18 Nonattainment-Transitional n For Pollutants Other Than Ozone: – 2 or fewer Violations at each site during the last year

19 Attainment n Attainment: –No Violations in the last 3 years – High Site(s) Data Complete & Representative

20 Unclassified n Insufficient data

Proposed 2002 Area Designations See Separate Handout

Questions --- General Discussion