SWPC CME Imaging Requirements for the post-SOHO era Douglas Biesecker 3/25/2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Advertisements

Chapter 8 The Sun – Our Star.
May 4, 2015Kyle R. Bryant Tutorial Presentation: OPTI521 Distance 1 MTF Definition MTF is a measure of intensity contrast transfer per unit resolution.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
How Far is far ? Measuring the size of the Universe.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
SECCI/COR2 Status Report SECCHI CONSORTIUM MEETING D. Socker, S. Plunkett, A. Vourlidas.
E. Robbrecht – SIDC- Royal Observatory of Belgium 8 March 2007 The statistical importance of narrow CMEs Open questions to be addressed by SECCHI Eva Robbrecht,
Star-Formation in Close Pairs Selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Overview The effect of galaxy interactions on star formation has been investigated.
Space Weather How fast does solar activity affect Earth?
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
2008/10/21 J. Fontenla, M Haberreiter LASP – Univ. of Colorado NADIR MURI Focus Area.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
5 th SECCHI Tam Meeting.1 COR2 Status Angelos Vourlidas.
Slide 1 Light and telescopes Just by analyzing the light received from a star, astronomers can retrieve information about a star’s 1.Total energy output.
DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 LET Performance Requirements Presenter: Richard Mewaldt
Astronomy190 - Topics in Astronomy Astronomy and Astrobiology Lecture 19 : Extrasolar Planets Ty Robinson.
Observation of Solar Wind Charge Exchange Emission from Exospheric Material in Earth's Magnetosheath S. L. Snowden, M. R. Collier, T. Cravens, K. D. Kuntz,
Lens ALens B Avg. Angular Resolution Best Angular Resolution (deg) Worst Angular Resolution (deg) Image Surface Area (mm 2 )
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC.
Essential Question: Why do objects seem to move across the sky?
1 Interpreting SECCHI White Light Images: FOV Sensitivity & Stereo Viewing Paulett Liewer, JPL; Russ Howard & Dennis Socker, NRL SECCHI Consortium Meeting.
7/12/20011 Observing Sequences in View of the SECCHI Science Goals From the EUVI Perspective J-P. Wülser.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
18-April-2006XRT Team1 Initial Science Observations Solar-B XRT Ed DeLuca for the XRT Team.
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
1 Statistical Distribution Fitting Dr. Jason Merrick.
Multi-slit spectroscopy In sky-noise dominated conditions (most interesting!) the use of slits is essential: eg: Faint object, extra-galactic, surveys:
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
The Birth of the Universe. Hubble Expansion and the Big Bang The fact that more distant galaxies are moving away from us more rapidly indicates that the.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
Faraday Rotation: Unique Measurements of Magnetic Fields in the Outer Corona Justin C. Kasper (UM), Ofer Cohen (SAO), Steven Spangler (Iowa), Gaetan Le.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
Stars: Binary Systems. Binary star systems allow the determination of stellar masses. The orbital velocity of stars in a binary system reflect the stellar.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
1 Machine Learning and Data Mining for Automatic Detection and Interpretation of Solar Events Jie Zhang (Presenting, Co-I, SCS*) Art Poland (PI, SCS*)
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Atmospheric phase correction at the Plateau de Bure interferometer IRAM interferometry school 2006 Aris Karastergiou.
Digital Aperture Photometry ASTR 3010 Lecture 10 Textbook 9.5.
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
XRT SOT Alignment DeLuca With comments from Tarbell & Metcalf 21-Jan-2006.
How massive is a CME? The greater accuracy offered by STEREO Eoin Carley R.T. James McAteer, Peter T. Gallagher Astrophysics Research Group, TCD.
Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using Stereoscopy STEREO CMES of 16Nov2007 and 31AUG2007 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; R.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
April / 2010 UFOAnalyzerV2 1 UFOAnalyzerV2 (UA2) the key of accuracy UA2 inputs video clip files and outputs meteor trajectories. UA2 does following steps.
Solar Probe Plus Payload Requirements Document Peer Review
NOAA L1 Status and Studies
UFOAnalyzerV2 (UA2) the key of accuracy
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
Lessons learnt from the STEREO Heliospheric. Imagers: Tracking
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
COR1 Current Status and Future Plans
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
GOES Lunar Calibration
The Solar System Dimensions
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
The Moat Flow Observed in Two Different TRACE-Filters
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Presentation transcript:

SWPC CME Imaging Requirements for the post-SOHO era Douglas Biesecker 3/25/2014

CME General Requirements RequirementThresholdGoal Data Continuity67% duty cycle in any 45 minute window ContaminationAll requirements shall be met during the following conditions: >10 MeV integral proton fluxes <= 1x10 5 pfu (S5 Radiation Storm) Spectral ResponseAny white-light bandpass, that is, lie within Angstroms Polarized BrightnessThe use of polarization techniques to separate the K-corona signal from other signals may be provided Pointing KnowledgeLine of sight 25 arcsec Direction of solar north 1 deg Flux resolution≤1x B/Bsun/pixel at outer radius ≤2x B/Bsun/pixel at inner radius StraylightMeasured at the midpoint of the FOV shall not exceed 5x10 -11

CME Measurement Requirements RequirementThresholdGoal Sampling Frequency*1 total brightness image per 15 minutes1 total brightness image per 10 minutes Inner/Outer FOV cutoff*3-17 solar radii Maximum CME speed3400 km/s† # of CME images34 Measurement Range1x – 1x10 -8 B/Bsun/pixel1x – 5x10 -8 B/Bsun/pixel Flux Measurement Accuracy10% Data Latency15 minutes10 minutes *note, there is a direct correlation of sampling frequency and FOV. Should one be made larger, the other must be made larger as well. The driver’s are how many CME images you need and what’s the fastest plane of sky speed you can expect. †CDAW LASCO CME catalog for 10 Nov 2004 ΔFOV(in solar radii) = (# of CME images)(CME speed)(sampling frequency)(60)/(695980km) e.g. ΔFOV = (3*3400km/s*15min*60s/min)/695980km = 13.2 solar radii

Data Continuity 67% duty cycle in any 45 minute window The worst case scenario means we need at least 2 images of every CME. The proposed requirement is specific to the current set of requirements – A duty cycle of 67% means getting 2 of 3 images in any 45 minute period. I realize there’s a 1 image ambiguity (intentional) It really only takes 30 minutes to get 3 images Can this be generalized?

Contamination No more than 10% of pixels in an image shall have a count rate more than 5 sigma above the background during a solar radiation storm reaching the S5 level. The need is to be able to identify the CME edges – A rough study by Biesecker (also Thernisien) showed that if 20% of an image is significantly contaminated, then resolving the edges becomes difficult – Since the normal mode of viewing is difference images, this limits the contamination per image to 10%. – We use the threshold of an S5 event, which has never been observed 5 min avg, ≥10 MeV ions, reaching 10 5 particles/sec/sr/cm 2 – Alternatively, Llebaria et al 1998 showed that if fewer than 30% of pixels are contaminated, then the image can be corrected

Spectral Response The bandpass selected shall be ‘white-light,’ that is, lie within angstroms Based on the fact that all forecasting to date, and really the definition of a CME itself, is in the visible light portion of the spectrum

Polarized brightness The ability to use polarization techniques to separate the K-corona signal from other signals may be provided The benefits – Automatic rejection of most of the F-corona (in the FOV in question) – Narrower scattering function – Total brightness can still be computed and the difference between B and pB is effectively an additional view (well, maybe 2.5d instead of 2) But is anybody out there really using it to great effect? It adds to the cost of the instrument, so I need a good reason to have it.

Pointing Knowledge The line of sight pointing knowledge shall be 24 arc-sec. The direction of solar north shall be known to within 1 degree In order to accurately characterize a CME for input to Enlil, I need to know where the Sun is pretty accurately. That’s trivial to do, as we get plenty of stars to calibrate against. So, this is overspecified, but not a big deal.

Flux Resolution The measurement precision (or flux resolution) shall be ≤1x B/Bsun/pixel in the outer part of the FOV. In the inner part of the FOV the flux resolution shall be ≤2x B/Bsun/pixel. Need to have sufficient resolution to identify CME leading edge Differs across FOV as the background (and CME brightness) both vary with radial distance

Straylight The straylight measured at the focal plane at the midpoint of the FOV shall not exceed 5x B/Bsun Need to keep straylight manageable. If it’s constant, it’s easy to remove. Requirement assumes it’s not constant, so we have to beat it down.

Sampling Frequency A cadence of at least one full FOV image in 15 minutes As noted, cadence is a strong function of FOV. Higher cadences, with same FOV, offer advantages – Easier to separate overlapping CMEs – More images to pick ‘best’ ones for analysis – Provides margin against even faster CMEs A cadence of at least one full FOV image in 10 minutes

Inner/Outer FOV Cutoff The field of view (FOV) shall be an annulus, centered on the Sun. The inner radius of the annulus shall be 3.0 solar radii. The outer radius of the annulus shall be at least 17 solar radii. The inner FOV is set ‘high’ because – CME’s are still evolving (self-similar expansion assumption has not yet set in) – Makes straylight rejection easier – Not too high, though, as overlapping CME’s still need to be distinguished as individuals The outer FOV needs to be far enough out to allow enough images of the fastest CME. – We bias towards larger fields of view as we want the CME asymptotic speed. Acceleration in the low corona is not important.

Maximum CME Speed 3400 km/s A ‘derived’ requirement This is the fastest CME in the LASCO era – Linear speed for 10 November 2004 West Limb CME

# of CME Images 3 The minimum number of CME images needed is 2, to derive direction, width, and speed Setting it to 3 gives us some margin You’d really like to have more – That drives cost 4

Measurement Range The measurement range shall be ≤1x B/Bsun at the outer radius of the FOV. The measurement range shall be ≥2.6x10 -9 B/Bsun at the inner radius of the FOV. Driven by K+F+CME Depends on the inner/outer FOV cutoff

Flux Measurement Accuracy The data shall be calibrated to an absolute accuracy of 10% at the midpoint of the FOV. Need isn’t there today, as all inputs are morphology driven Mass inputs to models are clearly needed and we need calibration accuracy sufficient to meet those needs

Data Latency Data latency from the time an exposure finishes to the time of delivery to NOAA/SWPC shall not exceed 15 minutes This matches the image cadence, meaning we don’t require on-board storage. Operations assumes constant telemetry This plays into lead time for extreme events. Data latency from the time an exposure finishes to the time of delivery to NOAA/SWPC shall not exceed 10 minutes