1 16 June 2011, Lisbon (P) MEPAG J. L. Vago, Michael Meyer, and iJSWG Team 2018 Joint Rover Objectives NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Session 5: Focused DiscussionsMissions in Definition Possible Next Decade Major In-situ Exploration Missions: AFL and Deep Drill Andrew Steele, David.
Advertisements

Welcome to the 30 th MEPAG Meeting! February 24-25, 2015 Lisa Pratt, MEPAG Chair Murray Formation Slopes of Mt. Sharp Pahrump Hills Curiosity: MSSS / JPL.
Mars Pathfinder Mission Breakthrough on the Surface of Mars.
1 MEPAG 16 June 2011, Lisbon (P) J. Vago D. McCuistion Joint Mars Programme Report Joint Rover ?
Mars Invasion: Spirit, Opportunity, Mars Express Meghan McGovern.
Modern Exploration Global Surveyor.  Objectives:  High resolution imaging of the surface  Study the topography and gravity  Study the role of water.
Instrument Adron-RM for ExoMars 2018
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
Mars Exploration By Jacob Stinar. Water on Mars.
Ken Farley, Project Scientist Ken Williford, Deputy Project Scientist
Modern Exploration Mars Pathfinder  “NASA’s Mars Pathfinder mission – the first spacecraft to land on Mars in more than 20 years and the first ever to.
Mars Program Update James L. Green Acting Director, Mars Exploration Program NASA Headquarters May 13, 2014 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
M.C. De Sanctis, F. Altieri, E. Ammannito, T. Di Iorio, S. De Angelis, A. Frigeri, P. Cerroni and the Ma_Miss team Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Planetologia,
Mars Exploration Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California.
Status of ESA’s Mars Activities MEPAG meeting Washington DC, May 2014
The Mars Science Laboratory Ashwin R. Vasavada Deputy Project Scientist Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech Copyright 2012 California Institute of Technology.
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
Overview of the MELOS-1, Mars exploration program in Japan MEPAG meeting 2014 Hirdy Miyamoto (U of Tokyo) on behalf of Takehiko Satoh (MELOS-1 working.
MEPAG in Lisbon, Portugal (16-17 June 2011) MELOS Mars Exploration MELOS : Japan’s Mar Exploration Plan for 2020’s T. Satoh (JAXA) and MELOS Working Group.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Mars Exploration Directorate.
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY File name: MSLOutcomes_v11.ppt Potential MSL Outcomes and Discovery Response Joy Crisp, David Beaty,
VdG:ISME - July Vasco da Gama In Situ Mars Explorer.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
IMARS History and Phase II Overview Presented to MEPAG 13 May 2014 L. May, NASA HQ NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted.
Titan Saturn System Mission Workshop - Paris, Mar 17-19, 2008 MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for Enceladus Titan Saturn System Mission Workshop - Paris, Mar 17-19,
ESWT # Rover operations concept
Mars Geochemistry and Future Experiment Needs Mark A. Bullock August 7, 2002.
Artist’s render of MSL on Mars.
Curiosity Rover.
Mars in the Planetary Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman, Planetary Science Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman,
Workshop on Martian Phyllosilicates: Recorders of Aqueous Processes? MEPAG, March 4, 2009 J-Pierre Bibring IAS Orsay, France ias.fr NOTE ADDED.
Goals Document: Recent Updates and Future Plans MEPAG #26 4 October 2012 Vicky Hamilton, Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This.
Mars Exploration Program Response to: Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade Michael Meyer MEPAG June 2011 Lead Scientist, Mars.
Evaluating New Candidate Landing Sites on Mars: Current orbital assets have set the new standard for data required for identifying and qualifying new Mars.
Scientific Overview of Mars Sample Return Philip Christensen NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared by Arizona State University. The content.
PREDECISIONAL FOR PLANNING AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1 Humans to the Martian System Preliminary Summary of Strategic Knowledge Gaps P-SAG (jointly sponsored.
Laplace Meeting - Frascati, April 2008 MSSL/UCL UK Penetrators for Europa MSSL/UCL UK Professor Andrew Coates on behalf of UK Penetrator Consortium.
Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration.
PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Mars Exploration Rover Science Goals Determine whether Life ever arose on Mars Characterize the Climate of Mars Characterize the Geology of Mars Prepare.
Interlude  Viking mission operations ended in the early 1980s  Viking missions gave scientists the most complete picture of Mars to date. What does this.
Goals for this Meeting: Day 1 Day 2 Update the community on progress in the exploration of Mars, including NASA and the European Space Agency (missions.
Science investigations in the framework of expedition to Europa
1 st Mars 2020 Landing Site Workshop - Introduction John Grant and Matt Golombek NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER:
Enabling Capabilities A Robotic Field Geologist Access to a site mapped from orbit Long life, mobility, capability to explore a local region Remote sensing.
July 29, MEPAG Goals Committee Update Jeffrey R. Johnson Chair, MEPAG Goals Committee USGS Astrogeology Science Center Flagstaff,
MEPAG Meeting October 4, 2012 Monrovia, CA Dave Des Marais, MEPAG Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
NAI Mars Focus Group Videocon Science and Landing Site Priorities for the Mars 2003 Mission Presentations by: n Ronald Greeley (ASU) & Ruslan Kuzmin (Vernadsky.
MEPAG: Action Items, Forward Planning Jack Mustard, MEPAG Chair MRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared.
Jim Bell Cornell University The Planetary Society July 30, 2009 Mars Exploration : Rationale and Principles for a Strategic Program Preliminary.
Workshop proposal to ISSI Quantifying the Martian Geochemical reservoirs.
The ionosphere of Mars and its importance for climate evolution A community white paper for the 2009 Planetary Decadal Survey Paul Withers
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
Japanese mission of the two moons of Mars with sample return from Phobos Hirdy Miyamoto (Univ Tokyo) on behalf of MMX team NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER:
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
The Year in Review 2016 Humans to Mars Report. Mars Science Paving the Way Notable Discoveries – The Past 5 Years Mars was once a habitable environment.
Mars 2020 Rover Mission The Mars 2020 mission addresses high-priority science goals for Mars exploration, including key questions about the potential for.
A Summary of MEPAG’s Recent Thinking Re: MSR Science
Project and Workshop Objectives
Summary of GPR Systems for Mars Exploration
Curious about Curiosity?
Title (do not change font or font size for any of the chart elements)
Presentation transcript:

1 16 June 2011, Lisbon (P) MEPAG J. L. Vago, Michael Meyer, and iJSWG Team 2018 Joint Rover Objectives NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by, NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. This document is being made available for information purposes only, and any views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology.

2 Programme Building Blocks ESA and NASA have agreed to embark on a joint Mars robotic exploration programme:  Initial missions have been defined for the 2016 and 2018 launch opportunities;  Missions for 2020 and beyond are in a planning stage;  The joint programme’s ultimate objective is an international Mars Sample Return mission. ESA and NASA have agreed to embark on a joint Mars robotic exploration programme:  Initial missions have been defined for the 2016 and 2018 launch opportunities;  Missions for 2020 and beyond are in a planning stage;  The joint programme’s ultimate objective is an international Mars Sample Return mission ESA-led mission Launcher:NASA – Atlas V 431 Orbiter:ESA Payload:NASA-ESA EDL Demo:ESA 2018 NASA-led mission Launcher:NASA – Atlas V 541 Cruise & EDL:NASA Rover:Joint, ESA-NASA

3 The Joint Mars Executive Board (JMEB) has appointed the following two working groups: Joint Engineering Working Group (JEWG): Propose an affordable design for the 2018 rover; Identify contributions from each partner to joint rover. Interim Joint Science Working Group (iJSWG): To rapidly provide inputs needed by the JEWG Propose a first set of joint science objectives for the 2018 Joint Rover: Identify science requirements (must-have) stemming from previous ExoMars and MAX-C missions; Identify science opportunities (important/desirable) arising from single rover platform design. Define an envelope for the rover’s Reference Surface Mission to estimate nominal mission duration. Composition: Mark SephtonImperial College (UK) François RaulinLISA (F) Abby Allwood JPL (USA) Michael MeyerNASA (USA) Mitch SchulteNASA (USA) Dave BeatyJPL (USA) Jorge VagoESA (EU) With contributions from:Sharon Laubach and Charles Whetsel (JPL), Damien Loizeau and Pietro Baglioni (ESA). A full fledged JSWG will be formed shortly with the goals to further develop: – Mission requirements to allow implementing science objectives; – Strawman payload: Incorporate Pasteur payload + identify new instruments capabilities; – Rover Reference Surface Mission Scenario. JEWG and iJSWG

2018 TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES  Sample coring, acquisition, and encapsulation TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES  Sample coring, acquisition, and encapsulation SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES  To identify, document, acquire, and cache samples in a manner suitable for collection by a future Mars Sample Return Mission;  To investigate geological sequences of a few km extent, documenting geological and geochemical variations at various scales. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES  To identify, document, acquire, and cache samples in a manner suitable for collection by a future Mars Sample Return Mission;  To investigate geological sequences of a few km extent, documenting geological and geochemical variations at various scales. 4 Previous 2018 Objectives TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES  Surface mobility with a rover (having several kilometres range);  Access to the subsurface to acquire samples (with a drill, down to 2-m depth);  Sample acquisition, preparation, distribution, and analysis. TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES  Surface mobility with a rover (having several kilometres range);  Access to the subsurface to acquire samples (with a drill, down to 2-m depth);  Sample acquisition, preparation, distribution, and analysis. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES  To search for signs of past and present life on Mars;  To characterise the water/subsurface environment as a function of depth in the shallow subsurface. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES  To search for signs of past and present life on Mars;  To characterise the water/subsurface environment as a function of depth in the shallow subsurface.

(merged) Objectives TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES  Surface mobility with a rover (having several kilometres range);  Access to the subsurface to acquire samples (with a drill, down to 2-m depth);  Sample acquisition, preparation, distribution, and analysis;  Sample encapsulation. TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES  Surface mobility with a rover (having several kilometres range);  Access to the subsurface to acquire samples (with a drill, down to 2-m depth);  Sample acquisition, preparation, distribution, and analysis;  Sample encapsulation. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES  To search for signs of past and present life on Mars;  To characterise the water/subsurface environment as a function of depth in the shallow subsurface;  To determine the landing site’s geological context, investigating geological and geochemical variations at various scales.  To identify, document, acquire, and cache samples in a manner suitable for collection by a future Mars Sample Return Mission. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES  To search for signs of past and present life on Mars;  To characterise the water/subsurface environment as a function of depth in the shallow subsurface;  To determine the landing site’s geological context, investigating geological and geochemical variations at various scales.  To identify, document, acquire, and cache samples in a manner suitable for collection by a future Mars Sample Return Mission. += Analyse surface and subsurface samples and cache them ExoMars MAX-C

Objectives The iJSWG has identified the following mission objectives for the 2018 Joint Rover: A. Landing Site Access The rover shall land on, or be able to reach, a location possessing high exobiology interest for past life signatures; B. In-Situ Investigations The rover shall be able to conduct an integral set of measurements at multiple scales: 1. Geology The rover shall be able to analyse the landing site’s geology; 2. Exobiology The rover shall search for surface and subsurface organic molecules and physical and chemical biomarkers; C. Sample Acquisition and Encapsulation The rover shall have the ability to collect surface rock cores and granular material, such as regolith, and move them into a sample cache; D. Surface Mission The mission duration, operations approach, rover, ground and orbital capabilities shall allow pursuing the missions in-situ and caching functions. The iJSWG has identified the following mission objectives for the 2018 Joint Rover: A. Landing Site Access The rover shall land on, or be able to reach, a location possessing high exobiology interest for past life signatures; B. In-Situ Investigations The rover shall be able to conduct an integral set of measurements at multiple scales: 1. Geology The rover shall be able to analyse the landing site’s geology; 2. Exobiology The rover shall search for surface and subsurface organic molecules and physical and chemical biomarkers; C. Sample Acquisition and Encapsulation The rover shall have the ability to collect surface rock cores and granular material, such as regolith, and move them into a sample cache; D. Surface Mission The mission duration, operations approach, rover, ground and orbital capabilities shall allow pursuing the missions in-situ and caching functions. 6

Objectives Expanded A. Landing Site Access The rover shall land on, or be able to reach, a location possessing high exobiology interest for past life signatures; i.e. gain access to an appropriate geological environment for the preservation of potential ancient biomarkers. The landing site shall include multiple targets enabling the in-situ characterization of surface and subsurface geology and exobiology, and the preparation of a cache of carefully selected, diverse samples from well documented environments for return to Earth. B. In-Situ Investigations The rover shall be able to conduct an integral set of measurements at multiple scales: beginning with a panoramic assessment of the geological environment, progressing to smaller-scale investigations on surface outcrops and soils, and culminating with the collection of well-selected surface and subsurface samples. 1. Geology The rover shall be able to analyse the landing site’s geology to provide sufficient information for the science team to document the geological context, to achieve the in-situ scientific objectives, and to select the materials to cache in support of returned sample science. 2. Exobiology The rover shall search for surface and subsurface organic molecules and physical and chemical biomarkers. The rover shall test the hypothesis that organics are better preserved at depth. The Rover shall have the ability to acquire samples from the subsurface, down to 2-m depth, and deliver these samples to its Analytical Laboratory Drawer (ALD) for processing and scientific analysis. C. Sample Acquisition and Encapsulation The rover shall have the ability to collect surface rock cores and granular material, such as regolith, and move them into a sample cache. The collected material shall be appropriately encapsulated and sealed for long-term storage on the surface of Mars, and for transport back to the Earth at a later date. D. Surface Mission The mission duration, operations approach, rover, ground and orbital capabilities shall allow pursuing the missions in-situ and caching functions needed to achieve the science objectives. A. Landing Site Access The rover shall land on, or be able to reach, a location possessing high exobiology interest for past life signatures; i.e. gain access to an appropriate geological environment for the preservation of potential ancient biomarkers. The landing site shall include multiple targets enabling the in-situ characterization of surface and subsurface geology and exobiology, and the preparation of a cache of carefully selected, diverse samples from well documented environments for return to Earth. B. In-Situ Investigations The rover shall be able to conduct an integral set of measurements at multiple scales: beginning with a panoramic assessment of the geological environment, progressing to smaller-scale investigations on surface outcrops and soils, and culminating with the collection of well-selected surface and subsurface samples. 1. Geology The rover shall be able to analyse the landing site’s geology to provide sufficient information for the science team to document the geological context, to achieve the in-situ scientific objectives, and to select the materials to cache in support of returned sample science. 2. Exobiology The rover shall search for surface and subsurface organic molecules and physical and chemical biomarkers. The rover shall test the hypothesis that organics are better preserved at depth. The Rover shall have the ability to acquire samples from the subsurface, down to 2-m depth, and deliver these samples to its Analytical Laboratory Drawer (ALD) for processing and scientific analysis. C. Sample Acquisition and Encapsulation The rover shall have the ability to collect surface rock cores and granular material, such as regolith, and move them into a sample cache. The collected material shall be appropriately encapsulated and sealed for long-term storage on the surface of Mars, and for transport back to the Earth at a later date. D. Surface Mission The mission duration, operations approach, rover, ground and orbital capabilities shall allow pursuing the missions in-situ and caching functions needed to achieve the science objectives. 7

Requirements The iJSWG has identified the following mission requirements for the 2018 Joint ExoMars-C Rover: Requirements:Are mandatory. Opportunities:Important/desirable additional science capabilities – not mandatory. Implementation of opportunities depends on importance and availability of resources —to be decided by JMEB. Not all opportunities have the same importance. Landing: Requirements:- MSL-like in terms of altitude and hazards negotiation; - Latitude: –15° to +25° (ExoMars was –5 to +25); Opportunities:- Add hazard avoidance capability to increase choice of landing sites (very important); - Extend landing site latitude to –25° or more (less important). Instruments: Requirements:- Fly the entire Pasteur payload; - Fly robotic arm with corer + RAT; - Fly caching system; - Add mineralogy instrument to mast (e.g. IR spectrometer); - Contact instruments on robotic arm to include: Close-up imager (like CLUPI), mineralogy (e.g. ext. Raman), elemental analysis (e.g. Mössbauer or APXS). Opportunities:- Carbon identification instrument on robotic arm (less important); - Ability to cache subsurface drill samples (very important); - Ability to pass robotic arm samples to Analytical Laboratory Drawer (less important). Mission lifetime: Requirements:- Nominal mission: 1 Mars year (680–700 sols). Note:Constructing a credible reference mission scenario in line with science objectives may preclude long traverses associated with “go-to” landing sites. The iJSWG has identified the following mission requirements for the 2018 Joint ExoMars-C Rover: Requirements:Are mandatory. Opportunities:Important/desirable additional science capabilities – not mandatory. Implementation of opportunities depends on importance and availability of resources —to be decided by JMEB. Not all opportunities have the same importance. Landing: Requirements:- MSL-like in terms of altitude and hazards negotiation; - Latitude: –15° to +25° (ExoMars was –5 to +25); Opportunities:- Add hazard avoidance capability to increase choice of landing sites (very important); - Extend landing site latitude to –25° or more (less important). Instruments: Requirements:- Fly the entire Pasteur payload; - Fly robotic arm with corer + RAT; - Fly caching system; - Add mineralogy instrument to mast (e.g. IR spectrometer); - Contact instruments on robotic arm to include: Close-up imager (like CLUPI), mineralogy (e.g. ext. Raman), elemental analysis (e.g. Mössbauer or APXS). Opportunities:- Carbon identification instrument on robotic arm (less important); - Ability to cache subsurface drill samples (very important); - Ability to pass robotic arm samples to Analytical Laboratory Drawer (less important). Mission lifetime: Requirements:- Nominal mission: 1 Mars year (680–700 sols). Note:Constructing a credible reference mission scenario in line with science objectives may preclude long traverses associated with “go-to” landing sites. 8

9 Science Exploration Scenario Study sample: Survey analysis Detailed analysis Analytical Laboratory Analytical Laboratory Determine the rover’s geological context: Survey site at large scales Examine surface outcrops and soils at sub-mm scales Panoramic Instruments Panoramic Instruments Close-Up Instruments Close-Up Instruments Collect a subsurface (or surface) sample Scale Cache Sample Cache Sample

Where to Search Penetration of organic destructive agents ExoMars exobiology strategy: Identify and document the appropriate type of outcrop; Collect samples below the degradation horizon and analyze them. Subsurface UV Radiation ~ 1 mm Ionising Radiation ~ 1.5 m Oxidants~ 1 m 10

Robotic Arm 11 a)Includes a Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT) and a corer capable to collect rock core and granular material samples; b)Accommodates contact instruments for studying outcrops and soils: Required: Imaging, mineralogy, and elemental analysis (e.g. CLUPI, External Raman, Mössbauer); Opportunity:Instrument to identify carbon presence. c)Robotic arm sampling transfer capabilities: Required: Be able to transfer collected samples to the caching system; Opportunity:Be capable to receive samples from the subsurface drill and pass them on to the caching system (very important); Be able to transfer samples to the Analytical Laboratory Drawer (less important).

Pasteur Selected Payload 12

Caching System 13 a)Can receive surface (and subsurface) samples from the robotic arm; b)Encapsulates samples; c)Each sample is stored in its own, dedicated container; d)Protects samples from surface degradation conditions; e)Design minimizes sample temperature excursions, but through passive means, i.e. no cooling; f)Can be deposited on the Martian surface for later retrieval by MSR mission.

 MSL: powerful rover; large 2-D mobility.  ExoMars-C: next-generation instruments; 3-D access; sample caching. Following on the results of MSL, ExoMars-C is the logical next step in international Mars surface exploration Operational Mars Express Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (Italian SHARAD) Mars Odyssey MAVEN Mars Exploration Rovers Mars Science Laboratory ESA-NASA ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter Towards Mars Sample Return International Cooperation Programme Station Network ESA EDL Demonstrator New International Context Joint ExoMars-C Rover