ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand X-ray Bursters with ESTREMO Looking for burst lines: investigating the NS EOS Superbursts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RHESSI Investigations of the Neupert Effect in Solar Flares Brian R. Dennis AAS/SPD Meeting 6 June 2002.
Advertisements

RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Clusters as calibration tools S. Molendi (IASF-MI)
The Neutron Star Equation of State- Electromagnetic Observations Frits Paerels Columbia University GWPAW, UW Milwaukee, January 26, 2011.
Low Mass X-Ray Binaries and X-Ray Bursters NTHU Yi-Kuan Chiang 2007/12/13.
Ryo Yamazaki (Osaka University, Japan) With K. Ioka, F. Takahara, and N. Shibazaki.
Suzaku studies of SFXTs The X-ray Universe 2011 The University of Tokyo M.Sasano K.Nakajima, S.Yamada, T. Yuasa, K.Nakazawa, K. Makishima.
S.Mereghetti - Simbol-X: The hard X-ray Universe in focus - Bologna -15/5/20071 Studying the Galactic Ridge Emission with SIMBOL-X Sandro Mereghetti IASF.
Gravitationally Redshifted Absorption Lines in the X-Ray Burst Spectra NTHU Lu, Ting-Ni.
GRB afterglows as background sources for WHIM absorption studies A. Corsi, L. Colasanti, A. De Rosa, L. Piro IASF/INAF - Rome WHIM and Mission Opportunities.
Detailed Plasma and Fluorescence Diagnostics of a Stellar X-Ray Flare Paola Testa (1) Fabio Reale (2), Jeremy Drake (3), Barbara Ercolano (3), David Huenemoerder.
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes. Gamma Ray Astronomy Beginning started as a small budget research program in 1959 monitoring compliance with the 1963 Partial.
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
Boston, November 2006 Extragalactic X-ray surveys Paolo Tozzi Spectral analysis of X-ray sources in the CDFS.
The all-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission Kn ö dlseder, J., Jean, P., Lonjou, V., et al. 2005, A&A, 441, 513.
MOS 3x3 mode slow slew survey Richard Saxton October 2006.
Matteo Guainazzi Science Operations & Data Systems Division Research & Scientific Support Department “Stellar-mass, intermediate-mass and supermassive.
July 2004, Erice1 The performance of MAGIC Telescope for observation of Gamma Ray Bursts Satoko Mizobuchi for MAGIC collaboration Max-Planck-Institute.
RXJ a soft X-ray excess in a low luminosity accreting pulsar La Palombara & Mereghetti astro-ph/
RXTE and Observations of GC Transients C. B. Markwardt (NASA/GSFC)
Swift Kyoto GRB Conference BAT2 GRB Catalog Prompt Emission Properties of Swift GRBs T. Sakamoto (CRESST/UMBC/GSFC) on behalf of Swift/BAT.
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
Gamma-Ray Telescopes. Brief History of Gamma Ray Astronomy 1961 EXPLORER-II: First detection of high-energy  -rays from space 1967 VELA satelllites:
1 The XENIA mission The XENIA mission Cosmic chemical evolution of baryons Dieter H. Hartmann C. Kouveliotou, M. C. Weisskopf, J.W. den Herder, L. Piro,
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study on Key Properties of PoGO by Geant4 Simulator January 28, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno History of changes:
Swift/BAT Census of Black Holes Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
Collaborators: Michael Muno (UCLA) Frederick Baganoff (MIT) Yoshitomo Maeda (ISAS) Mark Morris (UCLA) George Chartas (Penn State) Divas Sanwal (Penn State)
Magnetars are strongly magnetized neutron stars with surface magnetic fields of ~10 14 G. Based on observational and theoretical studies, 7 soft gamma.
The cooling-flow problem
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
Outburst of LS V detected by MAXI, RXTE, Swift Be X-ray Binary LS V INTRODUCTION - Be X-ray Binary consists of a neutron star and Be star.
Probing the neutron star physics with accreting neutron stars (part 2) Alessandro Patruno University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Extreme soft X-ray emission from the broad-line quasar REJ R.L.C. Starling 1*, E.M. Puchnarewicz 1, K.O. Mason 1 & E. Romero- Colmenero 2 1 Mullard.
CEA DSM Dapnia SAp Diego Gotz - Hard X-ray tails in Magnetars 15/05/ Hard X-ray Tails in Magnetars A Case Study for Simbol-X Diego Götz CEA Saclay.
Fe XXV Kα Fe I Kα S XV Kα Strong Fe XXV Kα, S XV Kα, and Fe I Kα  the GCXE consists of High Temperature Plasma (HP), Low Temperature Plasma (LP), and.
The X-ray view of absorbed INTEGRAL AGN
The X-ray mirrors Giovanni Miniutti Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge SIMBOL-X May -Bologna.
Sgr B2 Galactic Center Survey with Chandr Radio Arc 1 Sgr A East : Young SNR 2 The GC Hot Plasma : 10keV 3 Sgr B2, Radio Arc : Molecular Clouds ~2 x 1.
Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array What can NuSTAR do for thermonuclear X-ray bursts? Jérôme Chenevez 1, J. Tomsick 2, D. Chakrabarty.
Gamma-Ray Burst Working Group Co-conveners: Abe Falcone, Penn State, David A. Williams, UCSC,
Finding Black Hole Systems in Nearby Galaxies With Simbol-X Paul Gorenstein Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The Slow Slew Survey Richard Saxton / Pedro Rodriguez November 2006.
Jérôme Chenevez INTEGRAL monitoring of unusually Long X-ray bursts Maurizio Falanga Erik Kuulkers Søren Brandt Niels Lund Andrew Cumming Duncan Galloway.
A relation to estimate the redshift from the X-ray afterglow light curve Bruce Gendre (IASF-Roma/INAF) & Michel Boër (OHP/CNRS)
A deep view of the iron line and spectral variability in NGC 4051 James Reeves Collaborators:- Jane Turner, Lance Miller, Andrew Lobban, Valentina Braito,
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of optimized fast scintillator length for the astronomical hard X- ray/soft gamma-ray polarimeter PoGO November 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
R. M. Kippen (LANL) – 1 – 23 April, 2002  Short transients detected in WFC (2–25 keV) with little/no signal in GRBM (40–700 keV) and no BATSE (>20 keV)
1 st SIMBOL-X workshop, Bologna, May 14-16, 2007 Microquasars as seen with SIMBOL-X J. Rodriguez (CEA/SAp & AIM; France)
for Lomonosov-GRB collaboration
The unusual X-ray spectrum of MCG
Catching Blazars in their ordinary life
The Crab Light Curve and Spectra from GBM: An Update
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
observations of GW events Imma Donnarumma, on behalf of the AGILE Team
The Space Density of Compton Thick AGN
WFM/eXTP: sensitivity and sky visibility trade off Jean in 't Zand, with help of Margarita Hernanz, Søren Brandt, Laura Alvarez, Yuri Evangelista, Riccardo.
Monitor of All sky X-ray Image (MAXI)
XMM-NEWTON reveals a dipping black-hole X-ray binary in NGC 55
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
EPIC observations of two GRB afterglows
Insight-HXMT observations on type-I &type-II X-ray bursts
GRB and GRB Two long high-energy GRBs detected by Fermi
Swift observations of X-Ray naked GRBs
Magnetars with Insight-HXMT
Presentation transcript:

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand X-ray Bursters with ESTREMO Looking for burst lines: investigating the NS EOS Superbursts as peculiar thermonuclear flashes XrB population study (not a main driver) XrB spectroscopy (not a main driver) -> requirements for advanced XrB studies

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand Cottam, Paerels & Mendez: absorption lines in the burst spectra of EXO (28 events average, XMM/RGS)

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand Lines -> redshift -> determination of M/R ratio -> guess on the NS EOS Fe XXV, XXVI (n=2-3) and O VIII (n=1-2) with redshift z=0.35 -> in agreement with normal nuclear matter (some exotic models excluded) M = M sun, R = 9-12 km Better / updated NS atmosphere models (taking into account also burst effects) are expected

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand Looking for Bursts lines: 1) normal bursts: look at the longer bursts (eg GS , KS , H , 4U the latter 2 being Eddington-limited bursters ) GS is the best candidate + easy trigger + most frequent bursts (1/3h) + pretty long events (~120 s) + GS 1826 shows quasi-periodic bursts (other pointings possible between consecutive events) - need for fast slew (<20 s not to miss the first phase) - need for low energy sensitivity in WFGC (~4 keV)

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand Looking for Bursts lines: 2) superbursts: + very long bursts (hours, excellent statistics) + no real need for quick repointing (a few minutes is ok) + WFGC low energy threshold can be higher (5 keV) as more statistics available and integrating on larger timebins + less WFGC sensitivity needed - tricky trigger, possibly manual (high persistent intensity sources) - rare events (1-2 per year for 5-10% Edd sources) - LEO gaps interfering with the burst light curve and affecting count statistics

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand Requirements on the WFGC low energy threshold for burst detection For bursts with BB kT 99% of photon flux is below 20 keV For kT>2.0 keV, you get >85% of photons with LET=2 keV, >50% for LET=5 keV and >10% for LET=10 keV (so going down to 2 keV from 5 keV leads to an improvement of 35% only) For a 1 Crab (2-10 keV) 2.0 keV burst I 5-20 keV = 0.9 c/s/cm 2 For a 1 Crab (2-10 keV) 2.5 keV burst I 5-20 keV = 2.3 c/s/cm 2 In general, A eff = 5 x sqrt(bkg) / sqrt(tri x delta-T) x I 5-20 keV. => For a 2.5 keV burst, A eff =70 cm 2 ; for tri=0.5 A eff = 100 cm 2 Detect triggers  monitor sensitivity should be able to detect 2 keV black body spectrum with bolometric flux of erg s -1 cm -2 within 1 s, e.g. 100 cm 2 at 40 x 40 sq deg monitor sensitivity should be able to detect 2 keV black body spectrum with bolometric flux of erg s -1 cm -2 within 1 s, e.g. 100 cm 2 at 40 x 40 sq deg Have X-ray bursters in field of view, for instance through considerable exposure on Galactic center Have X-ray bursters in field of view, for instance through considerable exposure on Galactic center

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand fallout science (depending on the pointing strategy): 1) XrB population study by WFGC: burst recurrence time vs bolometric luminosity, burning regimes big FOV, best sensitivity and energy response for a 40x40 ever. => Improving the nice results of BeppoSAX-WFC. Nothing like that since BeppoSAX! 2) Spectroscopy of bursters: refinement of spectral models (e.g. Compton tails & breaks, double Compton – see Thompson et al.)

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand Burst Spectroscopy: 3 main spectral stases with INTEGRAL Simple Comptonized emission fits quite well the keV spectra of INTEGRAL bursters Fitted electron kT’s range from ~3 to ~20 keV, possibly clustered in 2-3 ranges of values, likely related to the source state: –kT e ~ 3 keV, bursters in soft state, no evidence for hard tail, emission drops at < 50 keV (4U , 4U , possibly H ) –kT e ~ 6-10 keV, bursters in a sort of intermediate state, emergence of a hard Compton tail at keV (GX 3+1, SLX , GX 354-0, H ) –kT e > 15 keV, bursters in very hard state, Compton hard tail extended well above 100 keV, up to 200 keV (GS , 4U )

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand kT = 3.0 ± 0.1 keV  = 17 ± 10  2  (dof) = 1.0 (18)  = 2.15  erg cm -2 s -1 kT = 12.1 ± 1.4 keV  = 4.6 ± 0.6  2  (dof) = 1.0 (21)  = 8.7  erg cm -2 s -1 kT = 28 ± 5 keV  = 1.1 ± 0.2  2 (dof) = 1.3 (17)  = 11.5  erg cm -2 s -1

ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand What XrB community wants (requirements for ESTREMO): WFGC: - bandpass: Emin = 3-4 keV, ok if Emin < 5 keV Emax up to 200 keV for bolometric studies - spectral resolution 15-20% FWHM - detector area: a few hundred cm 2 - timing: 1 ms - field of view: at least 40 deg fwzr (to trade off with the X-ray BGD) - source.location.accuracy. 1 arcmin - sensitivity: 500 mCrab in 1 s (normal burst trigger) much less for superbursts - slew speed: 1-2 deg/s, if combined with dedicated observation programs (e.g. Galactic Bulge) NF telescope: - bandpass: keV - spectral resolution: 3 1 keV, even less for fast rotators - area: as large as possible.. - timing 0.1 ms (ms oscillations in bursts) - maximum countrate: 10,000 (pile up?) - field of view: none - angular resolution: none