1Andrea Caliandro Search of Optimized Cuts for Pulsar Detection Andrea Caliandro - INFN Bari DC2 CloseOut May 31 2006 Goddard Space Flight Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 Introduction to the t-statistic
Advertisements

High Energy Gamma Ray Group
LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Likelihood Analysis of LAT Data James Chiang (GLAST SSC – SLAC)
Status report on Light Simulator Claudia Cecchi Francesca Marcucci Monica Pepe Software meeting Udine January
Andrea Caliandro 1 Andrea Caliandro (INFN - Bari) on behalf the FERMI-LAT collaboration PSR J : the youngest gamma-ray pulsar in the Galaxy?
GLAST LAT Project Astrostatistics Workshop, HEAD meeting, 10 September 2004 James Chiang (GSSC/UMBC) 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Challenges.
1 Search for Dark Matter Galactic Satellites with Fermi-LAT Ping Wang KIPAC-SLAC, Stanford University Representing the Fermi LAT Collaboration.
GLAST LAT ProjectDC1 Closeout Workshop, Feb , Statistical Issues in Likelihood Analysis of LAT Data Seth Digel (HEPL/Stanford Univ.) & Guillaume.
February 2004GLAST - DC1 Closeout Meeting GRB Detection & spectral analysis in DC1 Data Nicola Omodei Francesco Longo, Monica Brigida INFN Pisa.
Pulsar modeling and simulations Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Massimiliano Razzano Nicola Omodei LAT Collaboration Meeting (SLAC, August 29 th -
PositronBG_ ppt 1 Positron BG on GLAST/EGRET GLAST Calibration/Analysis VRVS meeting April 17, 2006 Tsunefumi Mizuno Hiroshima University.
C&A 10April06 1 Point Source Detection and Localization Using the UW HealPixel database Toby Burnett University of Washington.
Modular 13 Ch 8.1 to 8.2.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Number of Blocks per Pole Diego Arbelaez. Option – Number of Blocks per Pole Required magnetic field tolerance of ~10 -4 For a single gap this can be.
LECTURE 19 THURSDAY, 14 April STA 291 Spring
06/02/2006 M.Razzano - DC II Closeout Meeting Pulsars in DC2 preliminary results from an “optimized” analysis Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Massimiliano.
Spectral analysis on faint extended sources: problems and strategies. Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Omar Tibolla Padova University DC2 Closeout.
Lab 3b: Distribution of the mean
An Introduction to Statistics. Two Branches of Statistical Methods Descriptive statistics Techniques for describing data in abbreviated, symbolic fashion.
Pulsar searches with known ephemeredes DC2 Closeout, 1 June 2006 David Smith for the Bordeaux 4 1 DC2 Pulsar studies using known ephemeredes David Smith.
Distributions of the Sample Mean
1 Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions. 2 Chapter Outline  Selecting A Sample  Point Estimation  Introduction to Sampling Distributions  Sampling Distribution.
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions Statistics for Business (Env) 1.
Sampling Error SAMPLING ERROR-SINGLE MEAN The difference between a value (a statistic) computed from a sample and the corresponding value (a parameter)
A statistical test for point source searches - Aart Heijboer - AWG - Cern june 2002 A statistical test for point source searches Aart Heijboer contents:
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Random Sampling Approximations of E(X), p.m.f, and p.d.f.
Source catalog generation Aim: Build the LAT source catalog (1, 3, 5 years) Jean Ballet, CEA SaclayGSFC, 29 June 2005 Four main functions: Find unknown.
1 2 nd Pre-Lab Quiz 3 rd Pre-Lab Quiz 4 th Pre-Lab Quiz.
GLAST's GBM Burst Trigger D. Band (GSFC), M. Briggs (NSSTC), V. Connaughton (NSSTC), M. Kippen (LANL), R. Preece (NSSTC) The Mission The Gamma-ray Large.
We fit the high-state data to a model with three free parameters: the normalizations of the three radiation components. The figure below shows the fit.
Fermi LAT Monash University Nov 21, 2009 R.DuboisFermi LAT Science Analysis Tutorial1 Issues in a Nutshell LS5039 Low stats: 4k photons in 1 yr Strong.
Analysis methods for Milky Way dark matter halo detection Aaron Sander 1, Larry Wai 2, Brian Winer 1, Richard Hughes 1, and Igor Moskalenko 2 1 Department.
Chapter 7 Point Estimation of Parameters. Learning Objectives Explain the general concepts of estimating Explain important properties of point estimators.
July 11, 2006Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Probing the covariance matrix Kenneth M. Hanson T-16, Nuclear Physics; Theoretical Division Los.
What can we learn about dynamic triggering in the the lab? Lockner and Beeler, 1999.
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
Sampling and estimation Petter Mostad
GLAST DC-II kick-off, G. Kanbach, Mar 2, Periodicity Search Methods for Gamma-Ray Pulsars Developed and applied to data of SAS-2, COS-B, and EGRET.
The Lag-Luminosity Relation in the GRB Source Frame T. N. Ukwatta 1,2, K. S. Dhuga 1, M. Stamatikos 3, W. C. Parke 1, T. Sakamoto 2, S. D. Barthelmy 2,
44 th Rencontres de Moriond 1 Blind Period Search gamma-ray pulsar by Fermi-LAT F. Giordano Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica and INFN Sez. Bari for the.
Collaboration Meeting Moscow, 6-10 Jun 2011 Collaboration Meeting Moscow, 6-10 Jun 2011 Agustín Sánchez Losa IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València)
Takayasu Anada ( anada at astro.isas.jaxa.jp), Ken Ebisawa, Tadayasu Dotani, Aya Bamba (ISAS/JAXA)anada at astro.isas.jaxa.jp Gerd Puhlhofer, Stefan.
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
ES 07 These slides can be found at optimized for Windows)
Lecture 5 Introduction to Sampling Distributions.
Status of pulsar simulation for DC 2 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Massimiliano Razzano Nicola Omodei GLAST DC2 Software Workshop (Goddard Space.
2005 Unbinned Point Source Analysis Update Jim Braun IceCube Fall 2006 Collaboration Meeting.
Source catalog generation for DC2 Aim (in order of priority): 1.Improve on source detection algorithm and error box. 2.Provide a list of source identifications.
Lecture 8: Measurement Errors 1. Objectives List some sources of measurement errors. Classify measurement errors into systematic and random errors. Study.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Normal Distributions. Probability density function - the curved line The height of the curve --> density for a particular X Density = relative concentration.
CHAPTER 4 ESTIMATES OF MEAN AND ERRORS. 4.1 METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES I n Chapter 2 we defined the mean  of the parent distribution and noted that the.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Status of pulsar simulation for DC 2 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Massimiliano Razzano Nicola Omodei GLAST DC II Software Workshop (Goddard Space.
All-sky source search Aim: Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Selection criteria Algorithms Iteration Simulations Energy information.
GAMMA RAY BINARIES WITH FERMI Chandreyee Maitra Crystal Nuansa Aini Harsha Raichur Partha Sarathi Pal Instructors Robin Corbet, Mariano Mendez.
Chapter 7 Review.
Estimating the Value of a Parameter Using Confidence Intervals
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Jean Ballet, CEA Saclay GSFC, 31 May 2006 All-sky source search
DC2 pulsars analysis: a population point-of-view
Robert Johnson W. Atwood, M. Ziegler, B. Baughman U.C. Santa Cruz and
CHAPTER – 1.2 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Essential Statistics Sampling Distributions
Advanced Algebra Unit 1 Vocabulary
CHAPTER – 1.2 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Presentation transcript:

1Andrea Caliandro Search of Optimized Cuts for Pulsar Detection Andrea Caliandro - INFN Bari DC2 CloseOut May Goddard Space Flight Center

2Andrea CaliandroSummary Have been searched the best ROI & Energy band that maximize the probability for a point source to be periodic –Parameter considered Sky position Flux Observation Time For this work a sample of 900 pulsars and diffuse emission have been simulated 15 times –Each simulation is characterized by a value of flux attributed to all the pulsars and by the Observation time PSR flux: 1e -6, 0.3e -6, 1e -7, 0.3e -7, 1e -8 ph/cm 2 s ObsTime: 1 Week, 2Week, 4Week Finally this search has been tested on the DC2 sky –All the radio loud PSR in the pulsarDB have been analyzed

3Andrea Caliandro Sky Simulation AntiCenter LateralCenter CenterLateral (2,-2) (6, 2) (10, 6) Is taken into account the strip of sky |b|<10 This strip is subdivided in 9 regions –Center2-2, Center2_6, Center 6_10 –Lateral2-2, Lateral2_6, Lateral6_10 –Anticenter2-2, Anticenter2_6, Anticenter6_10 In each region there are 100 psr uniformly distributed –In this way the statistic is the same for each region –This is not a simulation of a real pulsar population Diffuse emission simulation –Galactic diffuse emission –Extragalactic diffuse emission gtorbsim parameter –Pointing strategy: SLEWING –Rocking angle = 35°

4Andrea Caliandro Pulsar Simulation 2 peaks pulse shape –Phase position, width and height are random There is just the constrain for the peak distance to be more than 0.3 phase P = 1s, Pdot = 0s/s, Pddot = 0s/s 2 –These choices are just to simplify the analysis, but do not affect the result (Nel and De Jager,1995) b = 1 E 0 = 10GeV g is a random number distributed as e gaussian N(1.4, 0.2) –These choices are based on the data of the Gamma-ray Pulsars (Nel, De Jager 1995) and how I have chosen the Energy band to investigate –See next slide ScienceTools: CelestialSource/Pulsar

5Andrea Caliandro Energy cut Energy cut: Energy band from the selected Emin value to the maximum observable Energy (200GeV) (gtselect) Binning: 20 MeV 50 MeV 100 MeV 200 MeV 400 MeV 600 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV Binning: 0.25°2° 0.50° 3° 0.75°4° 1°6° 1.5°8° ROI ROI: Disk with Radius R centerd on the source (gtselect) Base Analysis Emin (MeV) Radius (Degrees) Histogram by Cuts Emin (keV) For each source are selected a series of ROI and Energy cut For each of these selection are calculated the Htest and the relative probability (PHtest)

6Andrea Caliandro Htest Algorithm For N>=100 m=20 For N<100 m=N/5 Probability that H could be greater of the found value P(>H) For H<=23 For 23<H<50 For N < 100 If H>=30 For N < 20 If H>=25 For N < 10: For H>=50 (De Jager et al. 1989)

7Andrea Caliandro Single Pulsar Histograms Histograms & Distributions From the Single Pulsar Histograms –Htest & PHtest histograms Are obtained, for each value of PSR flux & Observation Time (i.e. for each simulation) and relative to each Region of the sky –Mean Htest & PHtest Histograms –Simply the normalized sum of the Single Pulsar Histogram –Distribution of the Max Htest Values –Taken by each Htest Single Pulsar Histogram »See next slides –Distribution of the Minimum PHtest Values –Taken by each PHtest Single Pulsar Histogram »See next slides –Cut Distribution for which Htest is Max –From each Single Pulsar Histogram are taken the cuts relative to the max value »See next slides –Cut Distribution for which PHtest is Min –From each Single Pulsar Histogram are taken the cuts relative to the min value »See next slides PHtest Htest PHtest Htest This two histograms are relative to PSRflux=1e -7 ObsTime=4Weeks Region=Lateral2-2

8Andrea Caliandro AntiCenter6_10 AntiCenter2_6 AntiCenter2-2 Lateral6_10 Lateral2_6 Lateral2-2 Center6_10 Center2_6 Center2-2 AntiCenter6_10 AntiCenter2_6 AntiCenter2-2 Lateral6_10 Lateral2_6 Lateral2-2 Center6_10 Center2_6 Center2-2 Htest Cut Distribution for which Htest is Maximum Htest Max Value Distributions AllRegions consider the Regions all together - all 900 psr AllRegions The plots showed in this slide are relative to PSRflux=1e -7 ObsTime=4Weeks

9Andrea Caliandro AntiCenter6_10 AntiCenter2_6 AntiCenter2-2 Lateral6_10 Lateral2_6 Lateral2-2 Center6_10 Center2_6 Center2-2 PHtest AllRegions Cut Distribution for which PHtest is Minimum The plots showed in this slide are relative to PSRflux=1e -7 ObsTime=4Weeks AntiCenter6_10 AntiCenter2_6 AntiCenter2-2 Lateral6_10 Lateral2_6 Lateral2-2 Center6_10 Center2_6 Center2-2 PHtest Min Value Distributions AllRegions consider the Regions all together - all 900 psr

10Andrea Caliandro Htest Max Value Distribution Cut Distribution for which Htest is Maximum Overview on All Regions Htest Distributions Flux 1e-6 ph/cm^2 s Flux 1e-7 ph/cm^2 s Flux 1e-8 ph/cm^2 s (ObsTime = 4Weeks) Cuts Distribution: –Decreasing the Flux The distribution become more broad The peak is displaced toward high Energy Max Value Distribution: –Decreasing the Flux The distribution is less broad The peak is at lower values

11Andrea Caliandro vs Fluence Fluence (ph/cm^2) Htest Emin (MeV) Radius (degree) Overview on All Regions Htest Plots vs Flux Flux (ph/cm^2s) Htest Emin (MeV) Radius (degree) 1Week 2Weeks 4Weeks By Max value Distribution Htest vs Flux and Fluence Mean value of distribution Errors bars: right and left RMS –Htest is proportional to the flux and the fluence By Cuts Distribution Energy Cut Plots Energy coordinate of the Peak of the distribution Errors bars: right and left RMS respect to the Peak –Seems to converge towards Emin=200MeV Radius Plots Radius coordinate of the Peak of the distribution Errors bars: right and left RMS respect to the Peak –The peaks increase toward 1.5°

12Andrea Caliandro PHtest Min Value Distribution Cut Distribution for which PHtest is Minimum Overview on All Regions PHtest Distributions Flux 1e-6 ph/cm^2 s Flux 1e-7 ph/cm^2 s Flux 1e-8 ph/cm^2 s (ObsTime = 4Weeks) This peak is due to the case N 30 ( see slide 6 ) Cuts Distribution: –The behavior is the same of Htest Cuts Distribution –But the positions of the peak aren’t the same of Htest Cuts Distribution This peak correspond to the case N>100 & H>50 (the best one)

13Andrea Caliandro vs Fluence Fluence (ph/cm^2) PHtest (log10) Emin (MeV) Radius (degree) Overview on All Regions PHtest Plots vs Flux Flux (ph/cm^2s) PHtest (log10) Emin (MeV) Radius (degree) 1Week 2Weeks 4Weeks By Min value Distribution PHtest vs Flux and Fluence Mean value of distribution Errors bars: standard RMS –There is a smooth step starting at 2E-2ph/cm 2 ending at 3E-1ph/cm 2 By Cuts Distribution Energy Cut Plots Energy coordinate of the Peak of the distribution Errors bars: right and left RMS respect to the Peak –For low fluence is convenient to cut at Energy greater of 200MeV –For high fluence cut aren’t needed Radius Plots Radius coordinate of the Peak of the distribution Errors bars: right and left RMS respect to the Peak –Radius decrease until 0.25°

14Andrea Caliandro Diffuse Htest HtestPHtest Relative Calculation The described analysis has been performed on the Diffuse Data file alone –Related to each psr sky position, the Htest & PHtest histograms are builded –The Distributions are calculated in two different way Absolute Calculation –The max value is taken from each Htest histogram –The min value is taken from each PHtest histogram Relative Calculation –From the Htest and PHtest histograms is taken the value relative to the Best Cut for the corresponding pulsar Absolute Calculation Diffuse Distribution example for the simulation with ObsTime = 4Weeks and psr Flux = 1e -6

15Andrea Caliandro PHtest with Diffuse line PHtest with Diffuse line AllRegions Diffuse Relative Calculation Diffuse Absolute Calculation Absolute Calculation –The PHtest on the Diffuse is independent from the fluence –We can say that a source is a pulsar with good significance if log10(PHtest)<-2.5 Relative Calculation –The PHtest on the Diffuse is not constant but increase with the fluence –PHtest values under the dotted line means pulsar with good significance –above ~6E -2 ph/cm 2 the PHtest value of pulsar are all good

16Andrea Caliandro PHtest Center Regions Center2_6 Center2-2 Center6_10 over ~1E -1 ph/cm 2 the PHtest value of pulsar are all good

17Andrea Caliandro PHtest Lateral Regions Lateral2_6 Lateral2-2 Lateral6_10 over ~4E -2 ph/cm 2 the PHtest value of pulsar are all good

18Andrea Caliandro PHtest Anticenter Regions AntiCenter2_6 AntiCenter2-2 AntiCenter6_10 over ~5E -2 ph/cm 2 the PHtest value of pulsar are all good

19Andrea Caliandro First Conclusions Max Htest value in Cut Histogram not always correspond to Minimum PHtest value –Infact the distribution are different See slide 10 & 12 Cuts Distribution are too broad to determine a precice value for Energy cut and Radius of the ROI as function of the fluence and the position in the sky region –For low fluence are necessary Energy cut above 100 or 200MeV –For high fluence to have a good PHtest value is enough to take radius not greater than 1.5° or 2° By the PHtest performed on the diffuse we can say that in first approximation a source is a pulsar with good significance if log10(PHtest)<-2.5 –We have also seen that the application of the best cut increase this value in function of the fluence

20Andrea Caliandro DC2 Pulsar Analysis Center2-2 Center2_6 Center6_10 AntiCenter2-2 AntiCenter2_6 AntiCenter6_10 Lateral2-2 Lateral2_6 Lateral6_10 External Best cuts have been searched for all the pulsar in the DC2pulsarDB DC2pulsarDB and LATsourceCatalog have been compared –40 pulsars have been found in the LATsourceCatalog –In this way we also obtain a flux estimation for these pulsars A different analysis has been performed for pulsars with and without flux estimation Distribution of pulsar population in the sky –About 90% of the pulsar population is in the Central and Lateral Region with |b|<6

21Andrea Caliandro DC2 psr with Flux estimation The best ROI radius for all pulsars but 3 is less than 2° Below 1ph/cm 2 the Energy cut are broadly distributed from Emin=50MeV to Emin=1GeV Above 1ph/cm 2 there is a concentration of pulsars without Energy cut Considering the threshold at log10(PHtest)=-2.5 we lost 6 pulsars

22Andrea Caliandro Pulsar not in LAT catalog Distribution of PHtest –There are 23 pulsars below the threshold of log10(PHtest)= have the best possible value of the PHtest Distribution of Cuts –Most of the pulsars have the best ROI radius <2° –and No Energy cut

23Andrea Caliandro Some Light Curve Rad=0.75 Emin=200 Log(P)=-6.8 Nevt=2098 Rad=0.5 Emin=50 Log(P)=-6.3 Nevt=100 Rad=8 Emin=200 Log(P)=-4.4 Nevt=30413 Rad=0.25 Emin=20 Log(P)=-7.4 Nevt=158 Rad=0.25 Emin=20 Log(P)=-7.4 Nevt=143 Rad=0.75 Emin=100 Log(P)=-6.6 Nevt=2223 Rad=0.5 Emin=400 Log(P)=-2.6 Nevt=632 Rad=0.25 Emin=20 Log(P)=-2.9 Nevt=269 Maybe a trick of the simulators?

24Andrea CaliandroConclusions Appling the search of the Energy cut and the ROI radius that minimize the PHtest value we have found 23 pulsars that aren’t in the LATsourceCatalog –The cut found are not standard cut Most of the psr have a best radius <-2° Most of the psr have not Energy cut –Maybe could be useful to build a Science Tools that make this search