Measurement of Geophysical Effects with large scale gravitational interferometers V.N.Rudenko Sternberg Astronomical Institute, MSU GGD Workshop 17-18.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
Data centres and observablesModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems  Seismic networks,
LIGO-G W Measuring Ripples in the Geometry of Space Fred Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory.
F. Frasconi I.N.F.N. Pisa for the Virgo Collaboration TAUP2007 Sendai, September 11-15, 2007 VIRGO EXPERIMENT VIRGO: a large interferometer for Gravitational.
Suspended Mirror control: Learning through Virgo Experience E. Majorana - I.N.F.N. Pisa Aspen GWAD February 16, 2004.
Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade Support for this project was provided by the NASA EPSCoR program.
Laser-interferometer application to broadband observations Akito ARAYA (Earthquake Reseach Inst., Univ. of Tokyo, Japan) Broadband observation …. requires.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Yuji Otake, Akito Araya and Kazuo Hidano
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Long-base Hydrostatic Incline Meter. gravitational antenna.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
Current Progress of Development of Laser Interferometry for LISA-type Mission in China Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University of Science &
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Z B Zhou, Y Z Bai, L Liu, D Y Tan, H Yin Center for Gravitational Experiments, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Optical Gyroscopes for Ground Tilt Sensing in Advanced LIGO The need for low frequency tilt sensing The optics in Advanced LIGO’s suspensions must be very.
Environmental noise studies at VIRGO Environmental contributions to Virgo readout noise (C-runs) many sources identified through coherency analyses with.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Measurement of Geophysical Effects with large scale gravitational interferometers V.N.Rudenko Sternberg Astronomical Institute, MSU GGD Workshop
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation
SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.
IntroductionModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Modern Seismology Lecture Outline Seismic networks and data centres Mathematical background.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
LCGT Technical Review Suspension Point Interferometer for Parasitic Noise Reduction and an Additional IFO S.Miyoki (ICRR, Univ. of TOKYO)
1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.
Experimental evidence for an Optical Spring Experimental set up (LFF) The data and a simple model Evidence of the optical spring, linear data Evidence.
Masaki Ando, Akiteru Takamori, Kimio Tsubono Department of Physics, University of Tokyo Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 1st International.
State College May 2004 LIGO- Mining for IMBH Gravitational Waves Fabrizio Barone Enrico Campagna Yanbei Chen Giancarlo Cella Riccardo DeSalvo Seiji Kawamura.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) the University of Tokyo KAGRA face to face meeting University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan 3 August.
Parity violating gravitational waves Ben Owen May 21, 2009Tests of Case Western Stephon Alexander (  Haverford) Sam Finn Richard O’Shaughnessy.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (DECIGO) 7th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop December 17, International Institute.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
Some Ideas on Coatingless all-reflective ITF Adalberto Giazotto (*) INFN- Pisa (*) Work done in collaboration with G. Cella.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
Filter #7 control April 18, 2016 –, Cascina Paolo Ruggi.
Measurement and Instrumentation
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
8th January 2008 Taitung workshop Sachie Shiomi
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
LIGO, ground-based Gravitational Wave Detectors
Variable reflectivity signal-recycling mirror and control
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Advanced Optical Sensing
Some ideas on advanced Virgo Twins A. Giazotto-INFN Pisa
Status at the Prague meeting
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of Geophysical Effects with large scale gravitational interferometers V.N.Rudenko Sternberg Astronomical Institute, MSU GGD Workshop April 2012, IPGP, Paris (France) Part II : Technical aspects geodynamical measurements with Virgo

Virgo accuracy limits strain  L/L < 10^-16 tilts  < 10^-13 rad inner core oscillation effect Polar mode (а = 1м) 5·10^-14 rad (theory) Translation mode 5·10^-15 rad (measurement)

Sensing of pure gravity field variations

Laser Can we measure Earth Core Movements with Virgo? Virgo Mirrors are suspended with a single wire suspension, hence angle α+β is independent from ground tilt and from Laser beam angle γ. α β γ L R δyδy If α,β> rad, Δy>1m

laser ground GM – guide mirrors FM – front mirror, EM – end mirror DF – driver force IB – injection bench g – tilt deformation g g DF g1g1 g2g2 DF, g art FMEM n GM gravitational signal ! Principle diagram of tilt ground compensation     IB

Conception of angular measurements (Virgo as angular gravity meter) -Laser is not suspended: so land angular deformations (tilts of the norm vector) are transferred to beam deflections ; also there are artificial beam inclinations to lock its position in the mirror’s center ; - all together it composes an “angular noise of the beam” contaminating the gravity plumb line variations. -A. Measurement of the “sum of internal angles” composed by beam with front and end mirrors filters the “angular noise of the beam”, so again the plumb lines are affected only by gravity force variations - B. Measurement of a single angle “beam ^plumb line” presents the principle of conventional tilt meter: variations of the gravity force vector can be measured only at the beam deformational angular noise background; one has to find an additional ability to reduce this noise.

Raw strain data from “inverted pendulum” LVDT sensors were processed by LSM-fitting with theoretical tidal curve. It results in estimations of - f - virgo transform (scale) factor, -  - delay time (phase shift), -  l – deform. shift (“lock to lock”) Virgo strain data

Theoretical curve, experimental curve (raw data) and drift curve for North arm during 13 days VSR-2

Sun semi-diurnal S2: 720 min, e-5 Hz Sun diurnal S1: 1440 min, e-5 Hz (+P1+…sK1,mK1) Moon diurnal O1: 1549 min, e-5 Hz Moon semi-diurnal M2: 745 min, e-5 Hz (+M2+…N2) relative amplitude d = (a obs /a the ) ; phase shift ΔΦ≈2Ωτ experimental estimates d = 1.15 ± 0.03, ΔΦ = deg. 1nstr →1/3 mm

Sun semi-diurnal S2: 720 min, e-5 Hz Sun diurnal S1: 1436 min, e-5 Hz (P1+…sK1,mK1) Moon diurnal O1: 1549 min, e-5 Hz Moon semi-diurnal M2: 745 min, e-5 Hz (M2+…N2) (1 nstr → 1 mm/3 )

Main tidal harmonics estimates: periods and amplitudes VSR-2

Tilt of North arm end mirror in compare with theoretical curve

Angular rotation of BMS mirror (ITF input) along the vertical (normal to beam) axis

Angular effect of the inner core oscillations (amplitude 1 m) Plumb line deflection : 10^{-10} rad., τ = 3.5 h ~ 10^{4} sec. →10^{-8} Hz^{-1/2} A. “single angle measurement”: Virgo mirror’s angle noise: 10^{-7}-10^{-8} rad. Hz^{-1/2} Mutual angle of two plumb line deflection: 10^{-13} rad B. “sum of internal angles measurement”: Virgo angle noise depends on the level of beam angular noise depression; the required level 10^{-11} rad. Hz^{-1/2} Method of extracting the right “sum angle variable” has to be addressed (!)

polar inner core oscillation mode estimate

Smylie D.E. inner core translation modes forecast

inner core translation modes detection with super conducting gravimeter net (!?)

time evolution of the sample of deformation noise standard A 1/2 =  I in mHz^{-1/2} 5 months series VSR-2 measured time evolution of variance of deformation noise; estimate for upper limit core oscillation amplitude (  g)min  g 0 (Δa) min / L ≈ 2, 8 μGal. (in two orders worse the GSGresult)

Literature. -A.V. Kopaev, V.N. Rudenko, Spectroscopy of vibrations of the Earth by means of gravitational-wave -interferometers, JETP Letters 59 (N9), pp , V.N. Rudenko, Gravitational free mass antenna as an angular gravity gradiometer. -Phys. Letters A, 223, p , Bradaschia C., Giazotto A., Rudenko V.N. et al. A possibility of the Earth gravity field measurements - by free mass gravitational antenna. Frontier Science Series, v. 32, p , 2000,Univ. Acad. Press.Inc., Tokyo. -Rudenko V.N., Serdobolskii A.V., Tsubono K.. Atmospheric gravity perturbations measured - by a ground-based interferometer with suspended mirrors, Class. Quantum Grav., v. 20, № 2, p , Grishchuk L.P., Kulagin V.V., RudenkoV.N., Serdobolskii A.V Gravitational studies with laser beam detectors - of gravitational waves”, Class.Quantum Grav. v.22, (№2995), р , Gusev A.V., Rudenko V.N., Yudin I.S., Registration of slow geophysical perturbations with gravitational wave interferometers. Measurement Techniques, Vol.59, N4., 2011 english trans. Springer Science+Business Media,

Items to be studied first Alignment technique details: (nonlinear alignm., linear alignm, drivers, marionette etc.) Injection bench tilt compensation Vertical mirror’s shift control circuits Tidal calibration: Δα T ~3 10^{-8} rad, [ 10^{-5}rad.Hz^{-1/2}] the point is an accuracy of the tidal reconstruction δα = ε Δα, ε = 0.1; 0.01;…. 0,003 (core effect)

Current Problems Tidal calibration of the Virgo instrument - new software for “mixed (strain + tilt) tidal perturbations”…? - reconstruction of the phase information after feed back “lock off” ? - filtering a “gravity signal” from deformations and beam jitters..? - filtering of vertical shifts..?

Sorry for attention!