Permanency Values & Roundtable Orientation Florida PRT Initiative 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Florida Partnership Florida DCF and Casey Family Programs.
Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Permanency – Why Now? DCF Family Services Things.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Foster Care Redesign: Region 3b
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
  Shane’s Story.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
AMS 2030 – Executive Strategy Introduction to AMS Council.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
QSR/Practice Overview © Human Systems & Outcomes, Inc., 2010 Reviewing & Refining Our Practice: Applying Disciplined Inquiry to Case Practice to Improve.
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
“Yes We Will”: From Placements to Permanency – The 2020 Vision Catalyst for CARE 9 th Annual Child Placement Conference November 12-14, 2008 Dr. Page Walley,
Permanency Roundtables -Texas Style! October 2012 Jenny Hinson, Division Administrator for Permanency Carol Self, Lead Permanency Program Specialist.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
Child Welfare Practice Model
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
6/10/02 Independent Living Resource Center at the Hunter College School of Social Work The Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 Strengthening the System’s.
Quality Parenting Initiative A Cross Sector Partnership.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
The New Mexico Experience Practice Model Peer Network Webinar September 10, 2012.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
A New Vision Of Permanency April 2006 Jeff Griffin Will Ortiz.
What We Are Learning About How to Improve Results: The Evolution of the Initiative’s Theory of Change and Partnerships with Communities and States Leonard.
Overview of the Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Ready by 21 is a trademark of the Forum for Youth Investment, core operating division of Impact Strategies, Inc. The SCPA uses the Forum.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education Advisory Council Indigenous Leaders Forum Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
ASSH Overview and Scrutiny Panel 30 th July 2008 Transforming Social Care – The Change Agenda.
Judge Sheri Roberts, Juvenile Court Newton County November 15, 2011 GA CASA Conference 1.
Part I (AAP QI) - Results Ruth S. Gubernick, MPH Quality Improvement Advisor Florida Pediatric Medical Home Demonstration Project Learning Session 3 December.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.
Kentucky Permanency Roundtables Partnership with Casey Family Programs Presentation developed in partnership with: Barry Salovitz, MSW, Senior Director,
The CSEFEL and State Implementation Partnerships An Overview.
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
NC State Board of Education Global Education Strategic Plan LEP Coordinators Meeting September 29, 2015.
: The National Center at EDC
Adoption Selection: Caseworker, Local or Central Committee Developed by Portland State University Center for Improvement of Child and Family Services Child.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Better Outcomes for Young People January 28, 2016 Allegheny County.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. County Name Welcome!! And…Congratulations on receiving your full licensure!! Give yourselves a round of applause.
Collaboration: A Different Approach Working with Aboriginal Families in Calgary Hazel Bergen, Program Director Mahmawi-atoskiwin Carmen Esch, Associate.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Every Child Every Month
209: Visitation: The Heart of Permanency Planning
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
CBC Implementation Updates
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Permanency Values & Roundtable Orientation Florida PRT Initiative 1

To safely reduce the number of children in foster care by 50 percent by the year Casey Family Programs 2020 Vision

Expedite legal permanency for the child Stimulate thinking and learning about ways to accelerate permanency Identify and address systemic barriers to expedited permanency Roundtable Goals

Permanency Roundtables: The ultimate goal of a Permanency Roundtable is to develop an aggressive, innovative permanency action plan for the child or sibling group

Overview of the Permanency Roundtable Process

A professional case consultation that is: –structured –in-depth –non-blaming AND –relentless What is a Permanency Roundtable?

A Multi-Level Strategy Micro Level PROFESSIONAL CASE CONSULTATION “Real-Time” Learning Lab PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Macro LevelSYSTEMS IMPROVEMENT Permanency Roundtables

Permanency Roundtable Values URGENCY relentless insistence on permanency – no excuses TEAMING team supports the worker to expedite permanency solution-focused and NON-BLAMING concrete assistance with implementing action plan tasks OUTCOMES learning and accountability leads to positive outcomes OPTIMISM developing creative strategies in a demanding, yet supportive environment leads to increased hope and energy

Facilitator Permanency Consultant Master Practitioner Scribe Caseworkers Supervisors Roundtable Team Members

I.Welcome and overview II.Present the case III.Clarify and explore IV.Brainstorm V.Create permanency action plan VI.Debrief roundtable Roundtable Phases

5 Key Brainstorming Questions 1.What will it take to achieve permanency? 2.What can we try that we tried before? 3.What can we try that hasn’t been tried? 4.How can we engage the youth in permanency planning? 5.How many things can we do concurrently?

Implementation and Current Outcomes of PRTs In Florida

Implemented in First 3 sites in November )Partnership for Strong Families »Gainesville (added Cold Case component in 2012) 2)Family Support Services of North Florida »Jacksonville 3)Childnet »Ft. Lauderdale Focused on older youth with goal of APPLA History of PRT Initiative in Florida

Expanded to additional 3 Sites in CBC of Central Florida Orlando 2.Community Partnership for Children Daytona 3.Kids Central Ocala History of PRT Initiative in Florida

2013 Expansion 1.Eckerd Community Alternatives Tampa 7 CBCs now conducting PRTs in Florida Current Status of PRT Initiative in Florida

Population has changed to look at younger teens and other populations, such as youth with the goal of adoption or reunification (in addition to APPLA) Some sites include youth in follow-up PRTs and invite additional outside providers such as group homes and GALs There has been a culture shift where workers are “thinking outside the box” before the PRT Policies have been created to require PRTs before a case can be changed to APPLA/Courts also requiring How PRTs Have Evolved

CBCs meet together quarterly to discuss successes, challenges and systemic barriers Systemic Barriers are being identified and “busted” Outcomes are being tracked for 2012 (up to 24 months after a PRT) and 2013 CLS have been added to the initiative to conduct “cold case staffings” on PRT cases which adds another set of eyes and a thorough review of the case Future of PRTs in Florida

In 2012, a total of 180 PRTs were conducted in Florida Cohort 1 (1 st Quarter of 2012) PRTs completed between January 2012-March month outcomes –Number of youth that had a PRT: 46 –Number that achieved permanency: 5 youth, 10.9% –Youth with new adult connections: 16 youth, 53.3% 2012 Outcomes for PRTs

Cohort 2 (2nd Quarter of 2012) PRTs completed between April 2012-June month outcomes –Number of youth that had a PRT: 75 –Number that achieved permanency: 20 youth, 26% –Youth with new adult connections: 15 youth, 32.6% Cohort 3 (3rd Quarter of 2012) PRTs completed between July 2012-September month outcomes –Number of youth that had a PRT: 42 –Number that achieved permanency: 1 youth, 2.4% –Youth with new adult connections: 9 youth, 23.7% 2012 Outcomes for PRTs