HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
ICF & HIPAA waivers Human Subject Protection Office UConn Health Center Monika Haugstetter, MHA, RN, MSN & HSPO/IRB Staff.
Mr. Caputo Unit #1 Lesson #7
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Understanding Research Ethics Dr Meera Warrier Research Development Coordinator Academic Practice
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Letter of Information & Consent Process Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Ethical Issues in Research and Scholarship Ethical Issues in Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.

8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
Research Ethics An Overview of Research Ethics and the Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
PROF. CHRISTINE MILLIGAN SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND MEDICINE LANCASTER UNIVERSITY Ethics and Ethical Practice in Research.
Ethics and Politics of Social Research
Ethical Issues in Research
An Overview of Research Ethics & The Tri-Council Policy Statement 2
Research Ethics Western University Non-Medical Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Protecting Human Participants in Research. Research with Humans 2 Contact Information Susanne Santi Senior Manager, Research Ethics 1027 Needles Hall.
What you need to know about the Saint Leo IRB review process.
The Office of Research Ethics October 11, 2013 Office of Research Ethics.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
The Office of Research Ethics September 10, 2012 MClSc Physical Therapy Student Orientation Office of Research Ethics.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Research Ethics Research Methods Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
John Russell Chair, Langara College Research Ethics Board Chair, Langara Department of Philosophy Talk for Langara PD Days April 24, 2013 (Revised May.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Getting Your Research Through IRB (UCHS) Review Elaine Wethington, Chair Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects (Ithaca)
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
5-6-1 Unit 6: Ethical considerations After completing this unit, you should be able to: Understand the basic ethical principles of working with.
Lecture 6: More on Ethics. Respect for Dignity of Persons Respecting the rights of individuals Respecting the rights of individuals Non-discriminatory.
Lecture 6: More on Ethics. Respect for Dignity of Persons Respecting the rights of individuals Respecting the rights of individuals Non-discriminatory.
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2011 Part 2.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Research ethics Rachel H. Ellaway
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Dining with Diabetes IRB Training 2017.
Research Ethics: a short guide for PhD students 2017/18
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Research Ethics and Integrity Officer
Elements of a Successful Informed Consent
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS

TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS) as the minimum standard Tri-Council: SSHRC, NSERC, CIHR ٠ major national funding bodies

UVIC ETHICS Human Research Ethics Board (HREB) Guidelines and Application on Office of Research Services (ORS) Website:

COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Follow HREB Guidelines Complete all sections; * if irrelevant, answer “N/A” Use lay-language, not jargon Handwritten applications not accepted

SUBMIT APPLICATION Call us if you have questions Supervisory committee to review Signatures required 1 original signed and 3 copies

ATTACHMENTS Attach all pertinent documents, such as:  Recruitment materials, e.g., script(s), letter(s)  Consent form(s)  Research instruments  Approval from external organizations  Request to Use Deception form  Human Tissues form

APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS Typically 4 – 6 week process First assess risk (see TCPS) Then assign review process Minimal risk:  Expedited – Staff and Chair  Review – 2 HREB members, staff and Chair Not minimal risk: HREB

TCPS DEFINITION OF “MINIMAL RISK The research can be regarded as minimal risk if potential participants can reasonably expect to regard the possible harms implied by participation in the research to be no greater than those encountered by the participant in those aspects of his or her everyday life that relate to the research.

NOTICE OF REVIEW Notice of review sent Revisions often required Revisions received 2 nd Notice of review? Approval Certificate of Approval

RECRUITMENT Participants have the right to know why they are being asked to participate and how you obtained their names. If third parties or organizations assist with recruitment, it must be done in ways that conform to privacy regulations.

“Free and informed consent lies at the heart of ethical research involving human subjects” (TCPS p. 2.1)

POWER-OVER RELATIONSHIP To be ethical, participation must be voluntary. If potential participants are in a power-over relationship with the researcher, they may not feel entirely free to participate or not. Potential participants may also perceive positive inducements for their participation (e.g., gaining advantages or earning favour).

MITIGATING POWER-OVER  third-party recruitment  third party data collection  exclude those over whom the researcher has a direct power-over relationship  complete anonymity

CONSENT  Consent is a process, not just a form  Full disclosure (unless need to use deception)  Time to consider and ask questions  Voluntary and able to withdraw at any time  On-going consent

Recording Consent  signed  verbal – recorded  implied

Consent form template

RISKS Participants have the right to be fully informed of any risks associated with their involvement in the study, including:  Psychological/emotional: e.g., increased sadness, anxiety, fear, depression, loss of privacy and re-traumatization  Social: e.g., loss of status, respect, alienation, social stigma  Physical: e.g., pain, scarring, infection  Economic: e.g., threats of job Measures to prevent/minimize risks and respond to harms.

ANONYMITY Anonymity means that there is no way the researcher can ever link the data to the participant. Anonymity can range from full to none. It depends on the study.

CONFIDENTIALITY Confidentiality refers to the protection of the participants’ identity (anonymity) and the protection, access, control and security of his or her data and personal information during recruitment, data collection, dissemination of data and findings and storage.

LIMITS TO CONFIDENTIALITY Participants must be made aware of limits to anonymity and confidentiality in the consent process. Confidentiality may be breached when: the law requires it (eg disclosure of child abuse) or there is a reasonable expectation of harm occurring to the participant or others

CONTACT US Office of Research Services (READ) University Centre, Room A240 University of Victoria PO Box 3025 STN CSC Victoria, BC V8W 3P2 Leah PotterTheresa Hunter Human Research Ethics AssistantHuman Research Ethics Coordinator