Search Incident & Protective Sweeps Chimel: Search Incident Objectives: –Protect the police from danger – Preserve evidence Types of arrests –The arrest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARIZONA V. GANT -If you are viewing this presentation on a Windows PC, press F5 to begin. -If you are viewing this presentation on a Mac, simultaneously.
Advertisements

Terry v. Ohio and NY City Stop and Frisk Policy
Search and Seizure (for Peace Officers). Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that persons, houses, rights and effects.
When is it legal to search?
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Chapter 5 Arrests and Searches Without Warrants.
Chapter Eight – Motor Vehicle Stops, Searches and Inventories Rolando V. del Carmen.
Arrest, Search, and Seizure
Changing Lanes: New Directions in Vehicle Search Law The Gant Opinion & Inventory Law Joseph Hoelscher (210) Blakely Mohr (210) S.
Criminal Procedure Class Three. ARREST AND THE WARRANT CLAUSE.
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence.
Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CLASS FOUR. Today’s Topics Search Incident to Arrest Pretext Arrest Plain View and Plain Touch Automobile Searches Exigent Circumstances.
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
The Courts and the Constitution
The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.
Review of Exceptions to Warrant Rule Vehicles Open fields Anything with consent Abandoned property Inventory Plain view.
1 Spring 2010 Road Show Training Maine Chiefs of Police Association LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO VEHICLE STOPS Brian MacMaster Office of the Attorney General.
The Fourth Amendment What are Your Rights? Search and Seizure:
Terry Search/Stop & Frisk © Grounds –Lawful stop based on Reasonable Suspicion that criminal activity has just occurred, is occurring, or will occur in.
Arrest © Probable Cause Terry Stop is not necessarily an unreasonable seizure An Arrest occurs when the subject submits or PO takes actual physical control.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Policing Legal Aspects Go to this Site. Due Process Most Due Process requirements are in either: –evidence and investigation –arrest –interrogation All.
Search Incident to Arrest MNPD Training Academy Recruit Session 42 David Veile.
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
Chapter Four Other Search & Seizure Issues All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure. The 4 th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against.
Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and other Evidence Obtaining Physical and other Evidence.
Criminal Justice-- Investigations Chapter 12—Due Process Rights of Suspects under 4 th & 5 th Amendments.
Search Warrants And My Right To Privacy. How Much Privacy Do You Have?
The Fourth Amendment and the Home By Laura Zajac.
Authority of the Police Chapter Two All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
Searches and the Bill of Rights. General concerns regarding crime scene searches and seizure of evidence Was the search itself legal? Was the search itself.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Six: Warrantless Arrests and Searches This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
Instructions for using this template. Remember that where I have written “Answer” is the prompt the students will see, and where I have “Question” should.
THEFT BURGLARY THEFT VIOLENT CRIME THEFT CAR THEFT THEFT BURGLARY THEFT.
Chapter 8: Investigative Constitutional Law Consent LawTech Custom Publishing, Inc. Copyright 2010.
Navarette v. California Argued January 21, Fourth Amendment Text The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
Investigative Constitutional Law Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Investigative Constitutional Law.
Chapter 8: Investigative Constitutional Law Consent Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 7 (Chapter 9 – The Exclusionary Rule)
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7 Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest, Hot Pursuit Criminal Justice Procedure.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and.
Criminal Investigation: Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure Chapter 12 Law and Government.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
Criminal Procedure Practice Exam 11:30 am – 12:30 pm: Practice Exam 12:30 pm – 1:00 pm: Review DO NOT OPEN YOUR EXAM BOOKLET UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO.
Is there a state action? (i.e. search by police, not private party) Is the search conducted by a state or federal actor? 4 th amendment doesn’t apply to.
Search Warrants How and why can police search and seize?
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Automobile Searches: exceptions to the warrant requirement Criminal Justice.
What are our rights and how do we protect them?. How do we balance our personal rights against the right of society to be safe and secure?
Turn in any late work. Get a book.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Chapter 3 Searches.
Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
The Fourth Amendment and the Home
Search and Seizure Part II.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Thinker The first ten amendments are also known as:
Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
Bell Work (Think of your response and be prepared to share)
Search and Seizure Part II.
Authority to Detain and Arrest; Use of Force
Search and Seizure Part II.
Authority of the Police
Office of the Attorney General
Presentation transcript:

Search Incident & Protective Sweeps

Chimel: Search Incident Objectives: –Protect the police from danger – Preserve evidence Types of arrests –The arrest must be _____________ Does the doctrine apply to arrests where the arrestee is not likely to be dangerous or have weapons? [U.S. v. Robinson]

–Yes, e.g., person has revoked driver’s license is arrested. –Some states have enacted stricter safeguards under their state constitutions. When must the search occur? Contemporaneous requirement Remember the objectives of this exception to the warrant requirement.

Scope of search Lunge or grab area a.Area within immediate control of arrestee b.How about: arrest made in living room; search of light fixture two feet away turned up marijuana? c.How about: light fixture is 10 feet away? d.How about: arrestee is handcuffed and placed on the couch, and the fixture, 5 feet away, is searched?

Immediate control factors:  Is arrestee restrained?  What is ratio of officers to arrestees?  How far away is the arrestee?  How accessible is the area or container?  Are police positioned so as to block off the area?

Person arrested in his car: passenger compartment and all its contents can be searched [NY v. Belton] But if the arrest occur outside the car, suspect’s car can be searched only if suspect can reach the car OR the car contains evidence relate to the offense of arrest. [Gant]

Buie: Protective Sweep Same objectives as Terry Police must have articulable facts and rational inferences from those facts = reasonable belief –That what? That someone else is in the house who could endanger the police –Cf. Chimel: the threat posed by the arrestee –Buie: threat posed by others who may be in the house

What are articulable facts? How about:  Routine policy to sweep to make sure others are not in the house?  Not knowing whether there are others in the house?  Arrestee is especially violent?  Police heard footsteps and a thud when arrested person initially came to open the door?

Probable cause not required Reasonable suspicion is required The inspection is cursory Where? –Anywhere a person may be found How long? –Only as long as needed to dispel the danger –No longer than it takes to arrest and leave! That’s all