A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Toric and Modern IOL Technology

Advertisements

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.

Stratus OCT Non-invasive optical diagnostic techniques that would provide images of high resolution for the measurement and diagnosis of ocular tissues,

Katsuya Yamazoe, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD, Kazuki Hotta, MD, Yoshiyuki Satake, MD, Kenji Konomi, MD, Seika Den, MD, Jun Shimazaki, MD Presented by: Abdulrahman.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.

In-the-Bag Toric IOL for Correction of Astigmatism in Keratoconus and after Corneal Surgery Bart T.H. van Dooren, M.D., Ph.D Ilse E.M.A. Mol, M.D. Department.

A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.

Eltutar, Kadir; Akcetin, Tulay A.; Ozcelik, N. Demet Istanbul Education and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology The authors state that they have.

Multifocal and Toric IOLs: An Update on the Resident Experience M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, Justin W. Charton,

Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.

The authors of this poster have no financial interest in any products and technologies mentioned in this presentation.

M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Southwestern.

Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.

Justin Charton, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K. Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD University of Texas Southwestern Department of Ophthalmology.

Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Brad H Feldman, MD Derek DelMonte,

Hyun Seung Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary’s hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Changes in Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal.

Medical Director - R & D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Speaker, Bausch & Lomb do Brasil Territory Manager.

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master

Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.

Getting the Markings Right

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster Yinfei Xu, Peter S. Hersh, MD, David S. Chu, MD Institutional Affiliations.

INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,

Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,

P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.

Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.

Effect of Aspherical Intraocular Lens on Blue-on-Yellow Perimetry  No eye had intraoperative complications. At 12 months after surgery, all the lenses.

Results of Collagen Crosslinking followed by posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lens implantation in patients with Keratoconus & High Myopia.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.

Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.

Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.

بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم. Limbal relaxing incisions versus penetrating limbal relaxing incisions for the management of astigmatism in cataract surgery Sara.

Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Prevalence of corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery candidates in Bangkok, Thailand Kaevalin Lekhanont, MD, Wadakarn Wuthisiri, MD, Porntip Chatchaipun,

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.

Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,

Clinical Outcomes Post AcrySof Toric IOL Implantation In 231 Consecutive Eyes Johnny L. Gayton, MD, FSEE Eyesight Associates 216 Corder Road 216 Corder.

Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.

Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;

Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.

Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.

F.I. Camesasca, MD Zeiss Invent ZO Aspheric IOL: Long-Term Results of Refractive and Aberrometric Analysis F. I. Camesasca* P. Vinciguerra.

Dissatisfication After Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Taiwan Yu Wei Lin, MD (Presenting Author); Ching-Ju Hsieh; Lin-Chung Woung The authors.

Assessment of Anterior Segment Measurements with Swept Source Anterior Segment OCT Before and After Trabectome Surgery Handan Akil, Mayss Al-Sheikh, SriniVas.

Pseudoexfoliation syndrom and cataract: results and complication frequency in immature and mature cataract surgery Marijana Bilen Babić Department of.

Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

Management of Corneal Astigmatism with Toric IOLs: Optimizing Outcomes

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.

Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.

Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts

Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.

Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.

Authors have no financial interest in any product mentioned herein

Three-Year Follow-up after LASIK in Eye with Extremely Thin Corneal Bed Hidemasa Torii, MD, Kazuno Negishi, MD, Murat Dogru, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD,

The authors have no financial interest

Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR Kerry D Solomon, MD

Roxana Ursea, MD Matthew T. Feng, MD Ovette Villavicencio, PhD

성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.

Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL

Early Experience With Anterior Chamber Phakic IOL

International Vision Correction Research Centre

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi, MD 1, Kazuhiro Watanabe, MD 1, Hidemasa Torii, MD 1, Chiyo Kodama,CO 1, Murat Dogru, MD 2, Kazuo Tsubota, MD 1 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan 2. J&J Ocular Surface and Visual Optics Department, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the devices mentioned in the manuscript.

Purpose To report a simple method for accurate alignment of the IOL axis for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment OCT. Setting Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Patients 9 consecutive eyes of 7 patients who had cataract extraction and implantation of an acrylic toric IOL (SA6AT3, SA6AT4, or SA6AT5, Alcon, FortWorth, TX) Inclusion criteria – Postoperative visual acuity better than 20/20 Exclusion criteria – previous or coexisting ocular pathology and intra- or postoperative complications. – Eyes with a corneal astigmatism of less than 0.75 D All patients provided written informed consent. The study adhered to the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki. IRB approved this study.

METHODS 1.IOL Power calculation and style selection – Biometry using the IOL Master (Carl Zeiss, Germany) – SRK/T formula – Specific A constant for the toric IOL : – The online Acrysof Toric IOL Calculator ( calculator.com). 2.Preoperative acquisition of corneal topography using the anterior segment OCT (corneal map mode). 3.Determination of the steep meridian of corneal astigmatism from corneal topography. Anterior segment OCT (CASIA, Tomey, Japan)

METHODS (continued) 4.Eye image acquisition after full pupillary dilatation using the anterior segment OCT (anterior segment mode). 5.Selection of the characteristic iris pattern on the peripheral cornea as a reference axis. (Figure 1 in the following page). – The line of the slice plane direction can be freely rotated around the corneal apex by mouse on the CCD image, thus the rotation degree of any point can be displayed on the rotational view. The rotational degree of reference axis including the reference point was measured using this rotational view. 6.Intraoperative marking of the steep axis (Figure 2 in the following page) and implantation of the toric IOL 7.Evaluation of the rotation error of the implanted toric IOL (Figure 3 in the following page)

Figure 1 Preoperative determination of the reference point and the alignment axis using Acrysof Toric Calculator and the anterior segment OCT Reference point 53° Alignment axis 143° 90 degrees CCD image Characteristic iris pattern as a reference point Rotational view

Figure 2 Intraoperative marking of the steep axis and implantation of the toric IOL At the beginning of the surgery, previously determined reference point was marked by a surgical marker-pen under the operating microscope observing the characteristic iris pattern. The zero degree of the Wallace Mendez degree gauge was fit to the reference point, and the alignment axis was marked using the DK axis marker according to the difference between the reference and the alignment axes. 2. Marking of the alignment axis1. Marking of the reference point

Figure 3 Postoperative evaluation of the rotation error of the implanted toric IOL Rotational view Postoperative CCD image (example) Dot marks on the toric IOL

Results Pre-opPost-op(1w) Mean (SD) Age(yrs) 73.3 ( 7.8) Corneal astigmatism(D) 1.97 ( 0.66)1.97(0.43) Subjective astigmatism(D) 2.00(0.67)0.28 ( 0.25) Subjective refraction(D) (Spherical equivalent) -1.50(1.88)0.16(0.48) UCVA (Log MAR) 0.69(0.37)-0.01(0.16) BCVA(Log MAR) 0.16(0.17)-0.09(0.11) Rotation error in the achieved from the target axis of the toric IOL (Degree) N/A1.9 ( 2.0) N/A: not applicable

Discussion Advantages of this method –Simple and accurate –Free from the misalignment related to marking the reference point due to the differences in the head position at the time of topography and the time when the reference point is marked, including cyclorotation of the eye during surgery. –Reference and alignment axis can be marked under the surgical microscope (only 2 step for marking) –Not required to take a photo, or to use image analysis software Limitation of this method –Necessity of an apparatus that can obtain images of iris patterns with the axis scale and the corneal topography at the same time. –Not applicable for an eye without any characteristic iris pattern (rare).

Conclusions The current method enables a simple and accurate marking of reference and alignment axes for toric IOL implantation, and is useful for correct placement of toric IOLs.