Intraoperative Aberrometry Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Sciences University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mark Packer, MD Financial Disclosure Consultant –Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. –Advanced Vision Science, Inc. –Bausch & Lomb, Inc. –Candeo Clinical/Science.
Advertisements

Toric and Modern IOL Technology
Sharper Vision Centers
1 Comparison of bitoric with monotoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Laser. By Mohamed Abdul-Rahman.
1 Uday Devgan MD Los Angeles You can download my slides for free at
Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
Quality Control in Refractive Surgery
M. NOURI FESHARAKI MD In modern phaco surgeons no longer seek to avoid inducing ast. but rather must address to reduce significant pre-existing cylinder.
Steve Schallhorn MD Myth Busters in Patient Selection for LASIK Steve Schallhorn MD.
Tarek Abdel-Wahab, MD Clear Vision Center Cairo,Egypt Clinical Consultant of Schwind and technolase.
In modern phaco surgeons no longer seek to avoid inducing ast. but rather must address to reduce significant pre-existing cylinder. Patients have now.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.
Astigmatism Following 2 IOL Injection Techniques: Wound Assisted Versus Wound Directed Jay J. Meyer, MD Hart B. Moss, MD Kenneth L. Cohen, MD University.
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
Cataract Surgery Using Biaspheric IOLs in Patients With Corneal Irregularities James P. Gills, MD St. Luke’s Cataract & Laser Institute Tarpon Springs.
Brian S. Boxer Wachler, MD Ten Year Followup of First Reported Case of Intacs for Keratoconus in North America BEVERLY HILLS, CA.
Clinical evaluation of foldable acrylic phakic IOL (fP) implantation ASCRS, San Diego, 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director,
Evaluation & Surgical Correction of Astigmatism
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.
Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)
Hyun Seung Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary’s hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Changes in Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS. Corneal and Refractive Surgery Service, The Dubai Mall Medical Center, Dubai- U.A.E. Tel: ; Mob
Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,
March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:
LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.
M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.
Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.
«ASTANA VISION», ASTANA city, Republic of KAZAKHSTAN Igor Remesnikov, Vladimir Kim Refractive and visual outcomes after Femto-SubBowman’s Keratomileusis.
REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.
The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.
2006 年中國上海 COOC 會議 Six Months International Experience with New Iris Registration Technology & its Impact on Clinical Outcomes David Chao-Kai Chang M.D.
Factors which Influence Accommodative Amplitude in Crystalens HD Patients Uday Devgan, MD, FACS Devgan Eye Surgery, Los Angeles, CA FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES:
King Saud University College of Medicine
Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D., M.B.A. ASCRS Boston 2010 No financial interests Vector Analysis for Astigmatism Management in Cataract Surgery.
Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,
بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم. Limbal relaxing incisions versus penetrating limbal relaxing incisions for the management of astigmatism in cataract surgery Sara.
Jae Lim Chung MD, MBA 1,3 ; Jin Pyo Hong MD 2,3 ; Kyoung Yul Seo MD, PhD 3 ; Eung Kweon Kim MD, PhD 3 ; Tae-im Kim MD, PhD Noo Ne Eye Hospital, Seoul,
iTrace Dynamic Laser Refraction: Clinical Application
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.
Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.
Management of Astigmatism - An overview
Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.
Comparing Factors Affecting Surgically Induced Astigmatism
Custom Topographic Neutralizing Technique (TNT) with Topographically-Guided (TG) laser to correct complications David T.C Lin Simon Holland ASCRS 2010.
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
Presbyopia CT Zyoptix Hyperopia Advanced (Rochester) Nomogram Scott MacRae MD Professor of Ophthalmology Professor of Visual Science University of Rochester.
Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
1 Bimanual Microincision Cataract Surgery with Stellaris Advanced Flow Module Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Science.
Intrastromal Ring Segments for Keratoconus: A Retrospective Review Brad Feldman MD, Alan Carlson MD, Terry Kim MD, Natalie Afshari MD, Ricardo Santaella.
Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.
Eun Chul Kim, M.D. , Man Soo Kim,M.D.
Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront
Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.
Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes of Torsional versus Traditional Phacoemulsification Systems on Dense Cataracts Bonnie An Henderson MD, Kelly J Grimes.
Comparison in Reduction of Preoperative Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery with Toric IOLs versus Limbal Relaxing Incisions Alexander Chop PhD MD (no.
Ashkan M. Abbey, BA, Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD, George D
Preoperative Distribution of Higher Order Aberrations in Patients Undergoing LASIK Perry S. Binder, MS MD.
Practice Styles and Preferences of US ASCRS members – 2010 Survey
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
Stephen G Slade, MD The Laser Center of Houston Houston, Texas
Presentation transcript:

Intraoperative Aberrometry Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Sciences University

Mark Packer, MD Financial Disclosure (*stock options) Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. Advanced Vision Science, Inc. Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Inc. Carl Zeiss Surgical, Inc. Celgene, Inc. GE Healthcare Haag-Streit USA Ista Pharmaceuticals LensAR, Inc.* Rayner Intraocular Lenses, Ltd. Surgiview LLC* Transcend Medical, Inc.* TrueVision Systems, Inc.* WaveTec Vision Systems* April 1, 2010

Purpose To determine the effect of intraoperative wavefront- guided enhancement of limbal relaxing incisions on the rate of postoperative excimer laser enhancement

ORange Aberrometer Talbot moire interferometry Fourier transform Calculation of spectacle correction

Methods Retrospective chart review Patients having limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) at the time of cataract or RLE surgery May 2007 to June 2009 August 2008  ORange – WaveTec, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA

Methods Standardized LRI technique –Sim Ks (EyeSys, Tracey, Inc) –Nichamin nomogram –After IOL insertion (IOP ≥ 25 mm Hg) –10 mm OZ –Ruminson Astigmatic Gauge and Marker (Rhein Medical, Tampa, FL) –90% depth Cornea Gage Plus (Sonogage, Cleveland, OH) Stealth Triamond (Mastel Precision, Rapid City, SD)

Methods Enhancement by extending arcs –measured axis ± 15º of expected (SIA º) –residual cylinder ≥ 1.0 D.

Results - Total 67 eyes of 48 patients –62.6 ± 9.0 years –Mean pre op ∆K = 1.4 –Mean steep axis = 85º –Mean 10 mm pachy = 674 µ Post op MR Cyl at 29 days (n = 66) = 0.42 D Post op MR Cyl at 7 months (n = 34) = 0.59 D

Results – Group 1 37 eyes of 27 patients Not measured with intraoperative aberrometry –63.5 ± 9.0 years –Mean pre op ∆K = 1.5 D (0.51 – 2.64) –Mean steep axis = 83º –Mean pre op 10 mm pachy = 679 µ Post op MR Cyl at 33 days (n =36 ) = 0.48 D Post op MR Cyl at 9 months (n = 20) = 0.53 D

Results – Group 2 Total 30 eyes of 21 patients Measured with intraoperative aberrometry –61.5 ± 9.1 years –Mean pre op ∆K = 1.28 D (0.52 – 3.25) –Mean steep axis = 87º –Mean pre op 10 mm pachy = 668 µ Post op MR Cyl at 24 days (n = 28) = 0.37 D Post op MR Cyl at 5 months (n = 14) = 0.41 D

Mean Preoperative Characteristics Group 1Group 2p-value Age, years ∆K, D Axis, º Pachy, µ

Postoperative Characteristics Group 1Group 2 Mean Sphere Mean MRSE Median UCVA20/2520/25 MR Cyl ≥ 0.75 D10 (27%)7 (23%) ≥ 1.00 D 9 (24%)2 (6.6%) ≥ 1.25 D 4 (11%)1 (3.3%)

Group 1: ∆K v MR Cyl

Group 2: ∆K v MR Cyl

Results – Group 2 Enhanced 8 eyes of 6 patients Enhanced with extended LRIs –62.2 ± 12.5 years –Mean pre op ∆K = 1.75 D (0.87 – 3.25) –Mean steep axis = 82º –Mean pre op 10 mm pachy at steep axis = 655 µ Post op MR Cyl at 29 days (n = 8) = 0.31 D Post op MR Cyl at 6 months (n = 3) = 0.42 D

Group 2 (LRI enhanced): ∆K v MR Cyl

Results – Laser Enhanced 7 eyes of 5 patients (7/67 = 10.5%)

Results – Laser Enhanced Without aberrometry (Group 1)  6/37 = 16.2% 59.8 ± 3.7 years Mean pre op ∆K = 1.70 D (0.76 – 2.32) Mean steep axis = 95º Mean 10 mm pachy at steep axis = 664 µ Before excimer at months MRSE = D (-1.1 – 0.38) MR Cyl = 1.45 D (1.0 – 2.5)

Results – Laser Enhanced With aberrometry (Group 2)  1/30 = 3.3% –58 years –Pre op ∆K = 2.61 D –Steep axis = 78º –Pre op 10 mm pachy at steep axis = 658 µ Before excimer (1 month) MRSE = D MR Cyl = 1.00 D

Laser enhanced: ∆K v MR Cyl

Comparison of Enhanced Eyes Non-ORange w/LASIK enh n = 6/37 (16.2%) ORange w/LASIK enh n = 1/30 (3.3%) ORange w/LRI enh n = 8/30 (26.7%) Age: Mean, SD Pre-Op Delta K 1.70 D ( ) 2.61 D1.75 D ( ) Steep Axis95º78º82º Pre-op 10mm Pachymetry 664 microns658 microns655 microns Post LRI 1.45 D ( ) 1 month (n = 6) 1.00 D 1 month (n = 1) 0.31 D (0.00 – 1.00) 1 month (n = 8) Post LASIK D 7-16 months (n = 6) 0.42D 6 months (n = 3)

Conclusion Intraoperative wavefront guided enhancement of LRIs reduced the rate of postoperative excimer laser enhancement from 16.2% to 3.3%, an odds ratio of 5.71 (p=0.12).

Conclusion Small case-control study indicates a trend Further research (prospective, randomized) indicated to validate effect