Nuclear Accident at Fukushima Daiichi NPP A collection of images and data by Toro Laszlo Member of the Council of the RSRP National Institute of Public.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Accident in Japan: A Summary
Advertisements

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
FUKUSHIMA, DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT AND CONSEQUENCES TO THE ENVIRONMENT Dragoslav Nikezic Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
n.ogv
Meltdown alert at Japan reactor Technicians are battling to stabilise a third reactor at a quake-stricken Japanese nuclear plant, which has been rocked.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
Contamination of food imports into the United States in the early days after the Fukushima accident Robert L. Metzger, Ph.D. Radiation Safety Engineering,
Nuclear Energy. How does a nuclear reactor work? Is it a major energy source worldwide? Is it Green? Problems – Waste Disposal – Accidents Future – Research.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rap? CHAPTER 27 NUCLEAR FUTURE.
Nuclear Power.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Tsunami in Tohoku, Japan JEREMIAH, ARSEN, JORDAN, NICK W.
Tohoku Japan Earthquake By: Millie, Casey, McKinzie, Abbey In the 65 years after the end of World War II, this is the toughest and the most difficult crisis.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
IT’S NOT OVER YET! THE FUKUSHIMA FACILITY IS STILL LEAKING RADIATION INTO THE AIR DAY 14 MARCH 25, 2011 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
J.M. Navarrete, G. Espinosa, J.I. Golzarri, G. Müller, M.A. Zúñiga, M. Camacho NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO ID 38: MARINE SEDIMENTS AS A RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION.
Ivan Li and Kyle Krogman.  Nuclear reactor meltdown on March 11 th 2011 near Fukushima, Japan  An earthquake and the following tsunami knocked out electrical.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Containment Isolation, actuation logic, Description Supporting Material
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon MC252 drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico caused the rig to sink.
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team 07: Belsheim Joshua Francis Travis He Jiayang Moehling Anthony Ziemkowski Micah 1.
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team Alpha Student1 Name, Student2 Name, Student3 Name, Student4 Name, Student5 Name.
SEARCH AND RESCUE, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE AFTER JAPAN’S EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI DISASTER THE DAYS AND WEEKS FOLLOWING THE MARCH 12 TH EARTHQUAKE /
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Fukushima Dai-ichi - LinkLink. Boiling Water Reactor – Video LinkVideo Link.
Nuclear Disasters A Historical Look.
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Nuclear Power Plant Meltdown Zach, Luke, and Nick.
THE MARCH 11, 2011 EARTHQUAKE- TSUNAMI DISASTER IN JAPAN REMEMBERING: PART 1 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
Chernobyl Sydney Curley.
To explain how earthquakes are created To discover their impact and how people responded in Japan How close did we come to nuclear meltdown? Key terms:
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Agenda Background Update on Fukushima Daini Update on Fukushima Dai-ichi – Summary of Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi Summary of Radiation and Reports.
RECOGNIZING THE “FUKUSHIMA 50” AND THEIR VALIANT EFFORT DAYS MARCH 12 th –17 TH Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
A BRIGHT SPOT AFTER A YEAR OF BAD NEWS FOLLOWING JAPAN’S MARCH 11, 2011 CATASTROPHE February 2, 2012 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works. Pressurized Water Reactor - Nuclear Power Plant.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations Lecture 2-2 Lessons Learnt from Occupational.
FUKUSHIMA Nuclear Disaster By Miss Dammarell & Mrs. Schwartz.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Coal-Fired Plant Coal is conveyed to boiler In primary water loop, water is boiled into steam Steam is sent through turbine Turbine spins the generator,
2011 Pan American Health Organization Módulo NUCLEAR EMERGENCY IN JAPON 30 March 2011 Pablo Jiménez Regional Advisor in Radiological Health NUCLEAR.
The March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan: A Nuclear Perspective Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD Associate Chair of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics.
Fukushima: the continuing crisis Dr Ian Fairlie Consultant on Radiation in the Environment London, United Kingdom
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY MEHB513 SEM 2,2014/2015 GROUP PROJECT : EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XV In-plant accident management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Fukushima Overview.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 05 April p.1
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 22 April p.1
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 01 June p
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

Nuclear Accident at Fukushima Daiichi NPP A collection of images and data by Toro Laszlo Member of the Council of the RSRP National Institute of Public Health Regional Centre of Public Health Timisoara

Accident cause 11/03/2011, 2:46 p.m. local time (7 hours earlier Romanian time) near the Japanese island of Honshu was an earthquake of 9 on the Richter scale. The quake had an impact on section of north-east coast of Japan where they are located a series of nuclear power plants (NPP). Nuclear reactors have been shut down properly.

NPP DAIICHI before the earthquake

Schema reactorului cu apa in fiebere al NPP DAIICHI

Remanent heat in DAIICHI NPP Aszodi, 2011

Event description Units 4-6 in shut down status for periodic maintenance and refuelling Units 1-3 were stopped automatically after the quake Reactor buildings and the containment successfully resist to the earthquake All reactor were dissconnected from the external AC supply Backup sources (diesel generators) started At approximately one hour after the earthquake tsunami hit the site –destroyed fuel tanks of the diesel generators –flooded the diesel generator building (10m protection wall was not sufficient) Mobile generators were sent to the site in a short time but they ran out of fuel Hydrogen Explosion Unit 1 Evacuation of population from the area of 20km Daiichi NPP and 10km Daina NPP (approx person On-site radioactivity increased

Event description Lowering the internal pressure led to hydrogen explosion at unit 3 Injection of sea water into the reactor vessel without cooling units at unit 1-3 Variable on-site radioactivity Increased radioactivity at Onagawa NPP (north of Daiichi) revealed that comes from Daiichi NPP

Event description Cooling with seawater stopped at Unit 2 (unknown cause), variable water level in the reactor Hydrogen Explosion at Unit 2 Cooling with sea water stopped at all units due to lack of fule and water source Fire then explosion in the spent fuel storage pool at unit 4 (relatively fresh fuel) Restart seawater injection in the reactor wessel at all units Significant radioactive emission Housing on the area of km Risk of melting the core and damage of the containment at Unit 2

Daiichi NPP after hidrogen explosion

Event description Fire in spent fuel storage pool at Unit 4, cooling water evaporation Water level decrease at Unit 5, taking water from Unit 6 Unsuccessfull attempts to feed with cooling water and boric acid the spent fuel storage pool at Unit 4 Possible melting (at least partially, 50%) of the core at Units 1 and 3 Fill with water the reactor vessel of the Unit 2 Lowering water levels in the spent fuel pool at Units 3 and 4 Increasing temperature in the spent fuel pool at unit 5 and 6 Cooling with water canons from the police departement

Daiichi NPP after hidrogen explosion(16.03.)

Event description Radioactivity observed outside of the site –Fukushima: μSv / h (30 km from the NPP) –In two places increasing dose 80 to 170, and 26 to 95 μSv/h –Other directions 1-5 μSv/h Begining actions to connect a cable for AC supply to unit 2 Continue attempts for cooling Unit 4 with water from helicopters (without succes) then with water canons One of the diesel generators from Unit 6 supplies Unit 5 for cooling spent fuel storage pool and the reactor wessel

Event description An auxiliary transformer connected to external power source Actions to connect units 3 and 4 to AC power Actions to connect units 5 and 6 to AC power A backup generator from unit 6 repaired Continue seawater injection into the reactor vessel at Units 1-3 Cooling unit 3 with water canons provided by police and fire departement units (civil defense, fire rescu units from Tokioand U.S. army), unit 3 is considered cooling enough Considering additional cooling the spent fuel pools from Unit 4 At 5 AM, starting pump C of the shutdown cooling system of unit 3, used to cool the spent fuel storage pool. Restart cooling Unit 4 with water cannons, in collaboration with civil defense.

Event description Continue works connect to the power supply units 3 and 4. Continue cooling units 3 and 4with water cannons Continue filling the spent fuel storage pools Water injection is continued in reactor vessels of units 1-3

Event description Three holes are driven in the roof of reactor building units 5 and 6 to prevent hydrogen accumulation At around light gray smoke is observed from the southpart of the 5th floor of Unit 3 Parameters of the reactor vessel and containment are not change significantly Increase of radioactivity is subsequently found that returns to lower levels later For security reasons work is stoped and personnel withdraw from unit 3 Smoke changing color to white and slowly disappears Ends connecting a cable from the main transformer of the temporary substation. It begins to restore power supply of units 3, 4, 5 and 6 It restores the power supply from diesel generator of Unit 5 March 21 the presence of radioactivity in seawater is detected near southern discharge channel near of the Daiichi NPP Cobalt, iodine and cesium is identified in seawater

Concentration in sea water (Bq/l) 21.mar22.mar Co-5859,516,7 I I Cs Cs Cs

Event description Ends cable connecting the power supply to unit 2, the supply of of the entry side starts White smoke seen in Unit 2, until the morning of it disappears White smoke at unit 3, disappears Continue water cooling units 2, 3 and 4, at unit 4 a concrete pumping device is used to fill the spent fuel storage pool Iodine and cesium is detected in the air at the site sampling points

Event description Begins the injection of sea water in unit 2 using the normal cooling system Continue injecting sea water into unit 1 and 3 The power supply of units 1-6 is restored, the main control rooms are connected to the AC supply It began work on restoring power supply of the systems of all units Continue injecting seawater in the spent fuel storage pool of units 3 and 4 At 16.20, a gray smoke is observed at unit 3, for security workers from the control room and around Unit 3 are evacuated Smoke changes in white and disappears slowly Subsequently found that radioactivity is increasing and decrease more slowly to the initial values End of water feed of the spent fuel storage pool of Unit 4

Green smoke at Unit 3 (23.03.)

Dose rates on the NPP site– sampling point MP6 (μSv/h)

Dose rates on the NPP site– sampling point MP4 (μSv/h)

Dose rates on the NPP site– sampling point MP1 (nSv/h)

Dose rates in Ibaraki prefecture (μSv/h)

Dose rates in prefectures (μSv/h)

I-131 and Cs-137 in tape water (mBq/kg)

Fall out (kBq/m 2 )

Possible dispersion of the cloud

Dose rates on the NPP site

Romanian situation Radioactive cloud will not reach or will reach a very low concentration (m or μBq/m3) due to long distance (high dilution) From the event will not result a Chernobyl type contamination: –Much lower emission time and intensity –Emission composition totally different, less a few orders of magnitude –Much greater distance There is a "crisis cell" at the regulator, CNCAN Press release on the website of the Ministry of Health and the Romanian Society of Radioprotection The population is warning: –Stable iodine administration is not necessary –Risks of stable iodine administration without medical suprevision There are no radiological risk for potential tourists to the Far East Urgent measures are not necessary

Daiichi NPP one minute before explosion at Unit 3

Daiichi NPP three minutes after explosion at Unit 3

Infrared photos of Daiichi NPP