Jets from stellar tidal disruptions by supermassive black holes Dimitrios Giannios Princeton University HEPRO3, Barcelona, June 30.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ubiquitous UV murmurs of sleeping supermassive BHs Dani Maoz With: Neil Nagar, Heino Falcke, Andrew Wilson.
Advertisements

The Science of Gamma-Ray Bursts: caution, extreme physics at play Bruce Gendre ARTEMIS.
Suvi Gezari California Institute of Technology & The GALEX Team California Institute of Technology, Laboratoire Astrophysique de Marseille Xi’an AGN 2006.
Ryo Yamazaki (Osaka University, Japan) With K. Ioka, F. Takahara, and N. Shibazaki.
ACTIVE GALAXIES and GALAXY EVOLUTION
“Do I have your attention…?”
Active Galactic Nuclei Very small angular size: point like High luminosity: compared to host galaxies Broad-band continuum emission: radio to TeV Strong.
Modeling the X-ray emission and QPO of Swift J Fayin Wang ( 王发印) Nanjing University, China Collaborators: K. S. Cheng (HKU), Z. G. Dai (NJU), Y.
Tidal Disruption from Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Merging Galaxies: Before & After the Coalescence Shuo Li NAOC Collaborated with Rainer Spurzem,
Probing Dormant Massive Black Hole Binaries at Galactic Nuclei Fukun Liu Astronomy Department & KIAA, Peking University, Beijing, China Probing Strong.
Tidal Disruptions of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes Suvi Gezari (Caltech) Chris Martin & GALEX Team Bruno Milliard (GALEX) Stephane Basa (SNLS)
Wednesday, November 19, Years of Chandra: Chandra and the X-ray View of TDEs, Peter Maksym 1 Chandra and the X-ray View of Tidal Disruption Events.
QUASARS Monsters of the ancient Universe Professor Jill Bechtold Steward Observatory Tucson Amateur Astronomers, Dec. 6, 2002.
CO J =1-0 + J =3-2 map (Oka+ 1999, 2007) Galactic Center Kunihiko Tanaka (1), Tomoharu Oka (1), Shinji Matsumura (1), Kazuhisa Kamegai (2), Makoto Nagai.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 17. You can imagine galaxies rotating slowly and quietly making new stars as the eons pass, but the nuclei of some.
Class 24 : Supermassive black holes Recap: What is a black hole? Case studies: M87. M106. MCG What’s at the center of the Milky Way? The demographics.
G.E. Romero Instituto Aregntino de Radioastronomía (IAR), Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, University of La Plata, Argentina.
The Ultra-luminous X-Ray Sources Near the Center of M82 NTHU 10/18/2007 Yi-Jung Yang.
Isolated BHs. 2 Early works Victorij Shvartsman «Halos around black holes» Soviet Astronomy – Astronom. Zhurn (1971) In this paper accretion onto isolated.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Physics of Galactic Nuclei, Ringberg.
The general theory of relativity is our most accurate description of gravitation Published by Einstein in 1915, this is a theory of gravity A massive object.
Wide field X (& UV ?) Identify transients, distribute alerts Candidate X (&UV)-transients SN breakouts XRF ’ s LL GRBs Unknown (eg BH-Stellar disruptions)?
Multi-Messenger Astronomy of Tidal Stellar Pablo Laguna Center for Relativistic Astrophysics School of Physics Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA Amaldi 11, Gwangju,
The Milky Way and Other Galaxies Science A-36 12/4/2007.
Christopher | Vlad | David | Nino SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES.
High-energy emission from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators: K. S. Cheng(HKU),
Stellar Disruptions of Super Massive Black Holes Ron Caplan March 7, 2003.
Theory of TeV AGNs (Buckley, Science, 1998) Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University.
Black holes: do they exist?
 Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei  Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)  Up to many thousand times more luminous than the entire.
Jets and lenses. 2 Plan and reviews Reviews astro-ph/ High-Energy Aspects of Astrophysical Jets astro-ph/ Extreme blazars astro-ph/
COLOR STUDY OF BLAZARS Robert Filgas Supervisor: RNDr. René Hudec, CSc., AÚ AV ČR.
BLACK HOLES: FROM STARS TO GALAXIES – ACROSS THE RANGE OF MASSES Felix Mirabel European Southern Observatory. Chile (on leave from CEA. France) In last.
Quasars, black holes and galaxy evolution Clive Tadhunter University of Sheffield 3C273.
Black Hole Chaos The Environments of the most super- massive black holes in the Universe Belinda Wilkes, Chandra X-ray Center, CfA Francesca Civano, CfA.
Accreting flows at (sub) millimeter wavelengths P. Ivanov P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute.
Supermassive Black Holes at the Centers of Galaxies Singles and Pairs using X-rays to study black holes disruption of stars by massive black holes pairs.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves, Darach.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
1 High Energy Radiation from Black Holes Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos Chuck Dermer Naval Research Laboratory Govind.
The peak energy and spectrum from dissipative GRB photospheres Dimitrios Giannios Physics Department, Purdue Liverpool, June 19, 2012.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 14:. Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus).  “active galactic.
Observational Signatures of Planets Around the Black Hole at theMilky Way Center (SgrA*) Proto-Planetary Disk as the Source of the G2 Gas Cloud Hypervelocity.
The nature of the longest gamma-ray bursts Andrew Levan University of Warwick.
Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei
Active Galactic Nuclei Chapter 25 Revised Active Galactic Nuclei Come in several varieties; Starburst Nuclei – Nearby normal galaxies with unusually.
Active Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes Chapter 17.
Reconstructing the past activity of the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre R. Terrier, APC Paris M. Clavel, A. Goldwurm, M. Morris, G. Ponti,
BH Astrophys. Ch4 Intermediate Mass Black Holes. Outline 1. The definition Possible candidates: 2. ULXs (Ultra-luminous X-ray sources) in star-forming.
Exploring an evidence of supermassive black hole binaries in AGN with MAXI Naoki Isobe (RIKEN, ) and the MAXI
Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus). → “Active Galactic Nuclei” (= AGN) Up to many thousand.
Evolution of massive binary black holes Qingjuan Yu Princeton University July 21, 2002.
Tidal Disruption Events
Lecture 16 Measurement of masses of SMBHs: Sphere of influence of a SMBH Gas and stellar dynamics, maser disks Stellar proper motions Mass vs velocity.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei
Evidence from AGN for Binary Black Holes
TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey
서울대학교 물리천문학부 천문학전공 초기우주천체연구단 윤용민
Virgo cluster survey with MXT
UV/Optical Detections of Candidate Tidal Disruption Events by GALEX and CFHTLS Gezari et al Looking for detections of stellar material accreting.
Quasars, Active Galaxies, and super-massive black holes
NRAO-CV Lunch Talk June 2017
Cygnus X-1 is a Black Hole Binary
ACTIVE GALAXIES and GALAXY EVOLUTION
Dongyue Li 2018/4/27 Ref: Saxton et al Esquej et al. 2008, 2012
Galaxies With Active Nuclei
Galaxies With Active Nuclei
by S. van Velzen, G. E. Anderson, N. C. Stone, M. Fraser, T. Wevers, B
Presentation transcript:

Jets from stellar tidal disruptions by supermassive black holes Dimitrios Giannios Princeton University HEPRO3, Barcelona, June 30

Galactic centers: some are active, most are dormant starburst galaxies Baldwin, Phillips & Terlevich 1981 Kormendy & Richstone 1995; Kauffmann et al AGN M87; NASA/Hubble Ghez et al Sgr A* NGC 3115 Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope

Rare glimpses to quiescent SMBHs from tidal disruption of a star RtRt When a wandering star finds itself within it is tidally disrupted For solar type star  Rate of TDEs~ yr -1 gal -1 Rate of TDEs~ yr -1 gal -1 (e.g. Magorrian & Tremaine 1999)

Tidal Disruption of a Star by a Supermassive Black Hole (Rees 1988; Phinney 1989; Evans & Kochanek 1989) 1. Disruption Figures Courtesy of Linda Strubbe 2. Fall-Back 3. Circularization and Accretion

Thermal “Flares” from Accretion Disk (Optical, UV, X-ray) (e.g. Rees 1988; Ulmer 1997; Ayal et al. 2000; Strubbe & Quataert 2009, 2010) ~10 Candidate Detections So Far by - ROSAT All-Sky Survey (Komossa 2002) - XMM Slew Survey (Esquej et al. 2007) - Galex Deep Imaging (Gezari et al. 2009) - SDSS Stripe 82 (van Velzen et al. 2010) - PTF (Cenko et al. 2010) Galex D1-9 Gezari et al. 2008

Where there is accretion to BH, there are jets! A substantial fraction of gravitational energy may be channeled into relativistic jets  Non-thermal signatures from TDEs gamma-ray bursts jets in galactic centersstellar binaries M87; NASA/Hubble

“Radio transients from Stellar Tidal Disruptions by Massive Black Holes” Giannios & Metzger 2011 t jets? energy released energy in jets Supernova or GRB!

Radio Transients by Stellar Tidal Disruptions by Massive Black Holes Prediction: radio synchrotron emission peaking at t peak ~ 1 – a few years: Jet Interaction with ISM Giannios & Metzger 2011 Blind radio surveys may detect tens of TDEs per year Giannios & Metzger 2011

And then came the … Event

GRB A/Swift  /X-ray IR-Optical Radio Triggered Swift BAT on March 28, 2011 Triggered BAT 3 more times over next few days Remains bright in X-rays IR and Radio Brightening Host galaxy at z = 0.35 (Levan et al. 2011; Bloom, Giannios et al. 2011; Burrows et al. 2011) Levan et al NOT a (normal) GRB - low luminosity - duration ~ months NOT a normal AGN - no evidence for AGN or past activity

Compact Host Galaxy at z = 0.35 Not an AGN Within < 150 pc of galactic center  SMBH origin ~100 s variability and bulge mass M b < M  L X > erg s -1 > 100 L Edd  super-Edd accretion and/or beaming Levan et al  M BH < 10 7 M 

“Mini Blazar” Hypothesis synchrotron self-absorption  R radio > cm  v ej ~ c  external shock from ISM interaction (Giannios & Metzger 2011) X-ray variability  R X ~ c  t X  2 ~ 3 x (  /10) 2 cm  “internal” process (e.g. shocks, reconnection) t ~ 3 days X-rays radio Bloom, Giannios et al. 2011; see also Burrows et al. 2011, …

jets from TDEs: (Rough) energetics and rates observed (0.3-10) keV fluence E x,iso ~2 x erg ▫~ x 3 for likely bolometric corrections ▫~ x 2 for radiative efficiency of flow  E k,iso ~ erg or E k,true ~ erg depending on beaming Rates very uncertain: 1 event in 7 years of Swift operation (Ω fov =4π/7 sr); observable out to z~  R obs ~ gal -1 yr -1 or R true ~ – gal -1 yr -1  ~3-30% of ALL TDEs accompanied by powerful jets?

Predictions X-ray emission will continue to fade over the next few months (no later re-brightening/repetition) If jet turns off, thermal disk emission may become visible (?) GHz Radio emission will remain bright for ~ years relativistic motion observable with VLBI (?) Updated X-ray light curve

Implications Detections: Future TDE detections with blind radio surveys Giannios & Metzger 2011 Jet physics: B fields responsible for accelerating AGN jets can be generated in situ (e.g. via disk dynamo) TDE jets may accelerate UHECRs (Farrar & Gruzinov 2009), but production rate may be insufficient Sw blazar optical/UV/ X-ray IR/radio