Small Events Detection A.Fludra 1, D. Haigh 1,2, D. Bewsher 1, V. Graffagnino 1, P.R. Young 1 1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 2 Birmingham University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Advertisements

Physical characteristics of selected X-ray events observed with SphinX spectrophotometer B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, M. Siarkowski Space Research Centre,
Probing Magnetic Reconnection with Active Region Transient Brightenings Martin Donachie Advisors: Adam Kobelski & Roger Scott.
Large amplitude transverse oscillations in a multi-stranded EUV prominence centre for fusion, space and astrophysics J. M. Harris C. Foullon, V. M. Nakariakov,
Spatial and temporal relationships between UV continuum and hard x-ray emissions in solar flares Aaron J. Coyner and David Alexander Rice University June.
Nonlinearity of the force-free parameter over active regions. M.Hagino and T.Sakurai National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Solar Observatory.
Coronal Responses to Explosive Events Adria C. Updike Smith College / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Amy Winebarger and Kathy Reeves, Center.
Solar flare hard X-ray spikes observed by RHESSI: a statistical study Jianxia Cheng Jiong Qiu, Mingde Ding, and Haimin Wang.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
SH13A-2240 Automatic Detection of EUV Coronal Loops from SDO-AIA Data Alissa N. Oppenheimer¹ ( ), A. Winebarger², S. Farid³,
Temporal Separation of AIA 131 Å and GOES 1-8 Å Peak Flux in Solar Flares Daniel Herman Reed College ‘15 Advisors: Dr. Kathy Reeves & Dr. Trae Winter 8/14/2014.
ALFVEN WAVES IN A POLAR CORONAL HOLE FROM HINODE/EIS OFF LIMB OBSERVATIONS Bemporad A. & Abbo L. –
Ryan Payne Advisor: Dana Longcope. Solar Flares General  Solar flares are violent releases of matter and energy within active regions on the Sun.  Flares.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
Coronal Boundaries of Active Regions Derived From Soft X-ray Images.
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI and SXI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL) Fall 2003 AGU Meeting.
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
D.B. Jess, 1 M. Mathioudakis, 1 D.S. Bloomfield, 1 V. Dhillon, 2 T. Marsh 3 1 Astrophysics and Planetary Science Division, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy,
Sunspot Studies in Oslo Nils Brynildsen, Per Maltby, Terje Fredvik and Olav Kjeldseth-Moe Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics University of Oslo.
Changes of Magnetic Structure in 3-D Associated with Major Flares X3.4 flare of 2006 December 13 (J. Jing, T. Wiegelmann, Y. Suematsu M.Kubo, and H. Wang,
CDS Session NAM Dublin April Active Region Loop Studies in Oslo Olav Kjeldseth-Moe and Terje Fredvik Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics University.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Andrzej Fludra Algorithm for automatic detection of coronal dimming as a tool for predicting CME’s Danielle Bewsher & Richard Harrison Presented by Andrzej.
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
Solar Origin of energetic particle events Near-relativistic impulsive electron events observed at 1 AU M. Pick, D. Maia, S.J. Wang, A. Lecacheux, D. Haggery,
Analysis of Coronal Heating in Active Region Loops from Spatially Resolved TR emission Andrzej Fludra STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1.
Adriana V. R. Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie COROT /11/2005.
Co-spatial White Light and Hard X-ray Flare Footpoints seen above the Solar Limb: RHESSI and HMI observations Säm Krucker Space Sciences Laboratory, UC.
First Results on Solar Irradiance Variability from PROBA2/LYRA/SWAP R. Kariyappa (guest investigator), S. T. Kumar, M. Dominique, D. Berghmans, L. Dame,
RHESSI Microflares Steven Christe 1,2, Säm Krucker 2, Iain Hannah 3, R. P. Lin 1,2 1 Physics Department, University of California at Berkeley 2 Space Sciences.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Solar Atmosphere A review based on paper: E. Avrett, et al. “Modeling the Chromosphere of a Sunspot and the Quiet Sun” and some others [Alexey V. Byalko]
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Observations of Moreton waves with Solar-B NARUKAGE Noriyuki Department of Astronomy, Kyoto Univ / Kwasan and Hida Observatories M2 The 4 th Solar-B Science.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
Modelling the radiative signature of turbulent heating in coronal loops. S. Parenti 1, E. Buchlin 2, S. Galtier 1 and J-C. Vial 1, P. J. Cargill 3 1. IAS,
Measurement of the Reconnection Rate in Solar Flares H. Isobe 2004/12/6 Taiyo-Zasshikai.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
1 Automatic flare detection and tracking of active regions in EUV images. Véronique Delouille Joint work with Jean-François Hochedez (ROB), Judith de Patoul.
Intrinsic Short Term Variability in W3-OH and W49N Hydroxyl Masers W.M. Goss National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro, New Mexico, USA A.A. Deshpande,
Joint Planning of SOT/XRT/EIS Observations Outline of 90 Day Initial Observing Plans T. Shimizu, L Culhane.
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
Determining the Heating Rate in Reconnection Formed Flare Loops Wenjuan Liu 1, Jiong Qiu 1, Dana W. Longcope 1, Amir Caspi 2, Courtney Peck 2, Jennifer.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Algorithm Preparation and Data Availability 1. Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London. 2. Physics and Astronomy Department, University.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
Flare Irradiance Studies with the EUV Variability Experiment on SDO R. A. Hock, F. G. Eparvier, T. N. Woods, A. R. Jones, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Inherent Length Scales and Apparent Frequencies of Periodic Solar Wind Number Density Structures Nicholeen Viall 1, Larry Kepko 2 and Harlan Spence 1 1.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
1 SEP sources investigations with PHI aboard Solar Orbiter (SO) R. Bucik, D.E. Innes, J. Hirzberger, S.K. Solanki first ever investigations of the SEPs.
Sweet Solar SAP: Boiling Down the Thermal Energy Content of Supra-Arcade Plasma Ashley Armstrong Advisor: Dr. Kathy Reeves Solar REU Summer 2012.
ESDO: UK Access to the Solar Dynamics Observatory 1. Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London. Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey SM2.
Detection of slow magnetoacoustic waves in open field regions on the Sun Dr. Eoghan O’Shea¹ Dr. Dipankar Banerjee², Prof. Gerry Doyle¹ 1. Armagh Observatory,
Differential Rotation of coronal BP and Source Region of their Magnetic Fields H. Hara NAOJ 2011 Jun 29 Leverhulme – Probe the Sun 1 st Workshop at MSSL.
CME – Flare Relationship A survey combining STEREO and RHESSI observations S. Berkebile-Stoiser B. Bein A.Veronig M. Temmer.
Nanoflare Properties in the Solar Corona
E.C. Auden1, J.L. Culhane1, Y. P. Elsworth2, A. Fludra3, M. Thompson4
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Studying Transition Region Phenomena with Solar-B/EIS
A study of the unification of quiet-Sun transient-event phenomena
Solar flare distributions: lognormal instead of power law?
Solar flare distributions: lognormal instead of power law?
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Differential Emission Measure
Solar flare distributions: lognormal instead of power law?
Solar flare distributions: lognormal instead of power law?
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Solar flare distributions: lognormal instead of power law?
Presentation transcript:

Small Events Detection A.Fludra 1, D. Haigh 1,2, D. Bewsher 1, V. Graffagnino 1, P.R. Young 1 1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 2 Birmingham University, UK

eSDO: Virtual Observatory Access to SDO Data UK’s Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (PPARC) has funded the eSDO project to prepare algorithms for the analysis of SDO data and make them available to the solar community using the virtual observatory (poster 26 - Culhane et al. More details in a talk by Elizabeth Auden in session S6 on Friday). ‘Small Events Detection’ will be one of ten eSDO algorithm packages.

Aschwanden et al. 2000, ApJ, 535, 1047 What are Small Events? - Size Any event smaller than 20’’ - 30’’, down to AIA pixel size. Length: 4’’ – 30’’Area: 4 – 500 arcsec 2

Benz & Krucker, 2002, ApJ,Aschwanden et al. 2000, ApJ, 535, 1047 What are Small Events? - Energy Range Nanoflares: – erg Microflares: – erg

Why study Small Events? Is the quiet Sun corona heated by nanoflares? If γ>2, small-scale events provide the dominant contribution to the heating of the corona. Some recent analyses give γ<2, suggesting nanoflares cannot heat the quiet sun corona.

Past research on small event detection: Krucker and Benz, 1998, ApJ, 501, L213 Berghmans, Clette and Moses, 1998, A&A, 336, 1039 Benz and Krucker, 1999, A&A, 341, 286 Parnell and Jupp, 2000, ApJ, 529, 554 *Aschwanden et al. (I) 2000, ApJ, 535, 1027 Aschwanden et al. (II) 2000, ApJ, 535, 1047 Harra, Gallagher and Phillips, 2000, A&A, 362, 371 Aschwanden and Parnell, 2002, ApJ, 572, 1048 Benz and Krucker, 2002, ApJ, 568, 413 *Bewsher, Parnell and Harrison, 2002, Sol. Phys., 206, 21 * marks algorithms selected for testing. This talk presents first results from Bewsher et al. method.

CDS Quiet Sun Brightenings ‘Quiet’ Sun areas show thousands of short-lived intensity enhancements CDS NIS in O V 630 A line  5 arc min  Movie duration: 2 hours Advantage of using O V observations for testing SED algorithms: -15 s time cadence and long series - high variability in the transition region Sit & stare time series Time

CDS time series in one of 71 pixels, with 2500 exposures and 15 s cadence. Note that previous TRACE & EIT nanoflare studies dealt with frames with s cadence.

Peak detection

Algorithm from Bewsher et al. 2000, Sol. Phys. I. Peak detection : Stage 1. Identify maximum peak (*) in time series Stage 2. Identify minimum troughs (□) on either side of peak. Intensity jump between peak and troughs is greater than n ε ε, so peak is kept. Stage 3. Identify largest peaks (*) on either side of original peak, and minimum troughs (□) on either side. If intensity jumps are larger than n ε ε, so those peaks are kept. Stage 4. Identify next largest peaks (*)on either side of (*) peaks and their minimum troughs (□). If none of the intensity jumps from peaks to troughs are greater than n ε ε, peaks are neglected and time series is not investigated further. II. Pixel Grouping Adjacent pixels that peak within +/- nΔt (n=0, 1, 2,…) are grouped together to form an event. All 8 neighbour pixels are examined around each pixel already classified as part of the event. The lightcurves of the pixels are integrated over all the pixels in an event to produce an `event' lightcurve.

III. Check! A check is made to see if each ‘event' still meets the same criteria as for individual pixels, i.e. its peaks and troughs are identified and compared in the same way as discussed in Section I. If a peak is identified in the summed `event' intensity, and this peak is still greater than above the troughs, then the event is counted. IV. Picking Troughs The nearest minimum (NM) trough on either side of the peak is identified. Look at all other troughs between the NM trough and the peak and calculate increase in intensity between troughs and small peaks in between. If change in intensity is less than 2ε, then the NM trough is correct. If the change in intensity is greater than 2ε, then the nearer trough is correct. Finally, the intensity difference between the peak and the corrected trough is checked to ensure that they meet the criteria for an ‘event’, i.e. that the intensity increase is still greater than n ε ε.

Example results from CDS sit & stare time series 4’’x240’’ slit 71 spatial pixels (3.4’’) 15 s cadence 10 hour run 2500 exposures Threshold: high, large peaks only Min event size = 1 pixel time coincidence of +/- 3 steps Result: 52 events distance Time

distance Time Threshold: 3x lower, 255 events Example 2:

Example of individual events in the CDS sit & stare time series

Example of detected events in CDS rastered images 60 rasters, 10 min cadence. Time coincidence requirement: Δt=0  240’’ 

Example of a detected event in the CDS rastered image

DISCUSSION (1) How many nanoflares can we expect: Krucker & Benz, 1998, ApJ Let.: 7’x7’ field of view, 42 minutes. Energy range 8x10 24 – 2.8x10 26 erg >3 sigma = 11,150 events. > 5sigma = 2600 events Aschwanden et al. 2000: 173 A, >3 sigma = 3130 events 195 A: >3 sigma = 900 events Parnell and Jupp, 2000 (TRACE 7’x7’ fov): >3sigma = 11,700 pixels = 4500 events in 80 minutes Our estimate: CDS: ~1,500 events/hour in a 4’x4’ fov. Expect 50,000 – 100,000 events/hour on the entire disk

DISCUSSION (2) Should we catalogue all small events? Down to what energy and size? Should we catalogue events in each AIA channel separately, or attempt to identify the same events in different channels? Data products: What event parameters should be stored for each AIA channel: start/peak/end time, coordinates of all pixels, area, duration, peak intensity, total intensity How can individual event parameters be used? Time evolution of individual events – heating phase, decay phase Are statistical frequency distributions of these parameters sufficient?

DISCUSSION (3) Analyse full disk or a central part of disk? (can events near the limb merge and spoil statistics?) Analyse 24-hours/day or shorter samples (1-hour/day, 1- hour/week etc.)? Frequency distributions of event energies: Conversion of signal (DN/s) to event energy, through Te and emission measure (and Ne). What statistical significance level should we adopt for event detection? 3σ ? Cosmic ray removal, solar rotation correction, other issues?

DISCUSSION (4) What constitutes an ‘event’ – every act of energy release even if occurring within a bigger event? Example: