Determine impurity level in relevant batches1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Advertisements

Stability Studies - Evaluation of Outcomes and Development of Documentation For Regulatory Submissions Bob Seevers.
Analytical Method Development and Validation
Statistical Evaluation of Dissolution for Specification Setting and Stability Studies Fasheng Li Associate Director, Pharmaceutical Statistics Worldwide.
2-4 ICH Quality Guidances: an overview
Finished Pharmaceutical Product Specifications
Stability data required by WHO-PQP Mercy Acquaye.
Impurities in New Drug Substances ICH Topic Q3A (R) – Revised Guidelines in Oct الشوائب في الأدوية الجديدة.
Batch Reworking and Reprocessing
Specifications Breakout Session I&II
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs): The Big Picture of a Long-term Commitment Elizabeth Pollina Cormier,
World Health Organization
API Stability Testing WHO PQ Requirements Presented by Rutendo Kuwana Accra, Ghana December 2009.
Quality Assurance & Quality Control In Pharma Industry
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
Office of New Drug Chemistry, OPS, CDER, Food and Drug Administration Establishing Dissolution Specification Current CMC Practice Vibhakar Shah, Ph.D.
Pharmaceutical Product Quality Assurance Through CMC Drug Development Process Presented by Darlene Rosario (Aradigm) 21 October 2003 Meeting of the Advisory.
Assessing Quality-by-Design A CMC Review Perspective
VALIDATION OF RAW MATERIALS
Regulatory requirements on Medicine Stability Guidelines relevant for Stability testing Sultan Ghani.
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
Challenges and Opportunities in Enhancement of the CMC Section of NDAs: Quality – by - Design Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
Slide 1 of 18D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Post approval changes- Variations Mercy Acquaye. Presentation Outline Introduction to Guidance Classification of changes Approval of changes Definitions.
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
ITFG/IPAC Collaboration CMC Specifications Technical Team ITFG/IPAC TECHNICAL TEAM: CMC SPECIFICATIONS Presented by: Bo Olsson, PhD 26 April 2000 Rockville,
ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Dossier Requirements for Generic Medicines.
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Stability of FPPs- Conducting, Bracketing, Matrixing Sultan Ghani.
Predicting Physical Stability in Q1A(R) Chi-wan Chen, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Chemistry Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration.
What Impact should ICH Q8 have on ICH Q6A Decision Trees?
HELM AG Module 3 Christa Clasen Ankara, 6./7. April 2006.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Stability Trials ASEAN Guidelines. The Objective of a stability study To determine the shelf life, namely the time period of storage at a specified condition.
1 FDA Guidance for Industry: ANDAs: Impurities in Drug Substances Published by US FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research June 2009.
Prof. Dr. Marlina, MS., Apt..  Referenced in the current USP, the Antimicrobial Effectiveness Test demonstrates the effectiveness of the preservative.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Excipient Variability Sources, Importance and Potential Impact Chris Moreton, Ph.D Past Chair IPEC-Americas Partner – FinnBrit Consulting
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Pharmaceutical Quality Control & current Good Manufacturing Practice PHT 436 Lecture 11 1.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Impurities in Drugs author: srikanth N
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
VICH Guidelines: Stability Testing of New Veterinary Drug Substances and Medicinal Products Mai Huynh U.S. FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine Washington.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
HOLD-TIME STUDIES.
STABILITY ?.
Physico-chemical Control of Dosage Forms
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
World Health Organization
Gastrointestinal Absorption: Role of the Dosage Form
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
Quality by Design.
World Health Organization
Quality guidelines on impurities
Quality guidelines on impurities
GL 51 – Statistical evaluation of stability data
GL8 (R) – Stability testing for medicated premixes
Presentation transcript:

DECISION TREE #1: ESTABLISHING ACCEPTANCE CRITERION FOR A SPECIFIED IMPURITY IN A NEW DRUG SUBSTANCE Determine impurity level in relevant batches1 Is impurity also a degradation product? Estimate maximum increase in impurity at retest date using data from relevant accelerated and long-term stability studies YES Determine mean + upper confidence limit for the impurity (Let this = A) NO Is A or B greater than the qualified level? Determine maximum likely level as: A + increase in degradation product at appropriate storage conditions. (Let this = B) NO Acceptance criterion = A or B (as appropriate) YES Acceptance criterion = qualified level or establish new qualified level2 1 Relevant batches are those from development, pilot and scale-up studies. 2 Refer to ICH Guideline on Impurities in New Drug Substances Definition: upper confidence limit = three times the standard deviation of batch analysis data

DECISION TREE #2: ESTABLISHING ACCEPTANCE CRITERION FOR A DEGRADATION PRODUCT IN A NEW DRUG PRODUCT Does degradation occur during product manufacture? Estimate maximum increase in degradation product at shelf life using data from relevant accelerated and long-term stability studies. (Let this = D) NO YES Determine maximum likely level as drug substance acceptance criterion2. ((A or B) + C + D) Estimate maximum increase in degradation product during manufacture from relevant batches1. (Let this = C) Is maximum likely level greater than the qualified level? NO Acceptance criterion = maximum likely level. YES Acceptance criterion = qualified level or establish new qualified level3 or new storage conditions or reduce shelf life. 1 Relevant batches are those from development, pilot and scale-up studies. 2 Refer to Decision Tree 1 for information regarding A and B. 3 Refer to ICH Guideline on Impurities in New Drug Products.

No Acceptance Criterion Required DECISION TREE #3: SETTING ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DRUG SUBSTANCE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION No drug substance particle size acceptance criterion required for solution dosage forms. Is the drug product a solid dosage form or liquid containing undissolved drug substance? NO YES 1. Is the particle size critical to dissolution, solubility, or bioavailability? 2. Is the particle size critical to drug product processability? 3. Is the particle size critical to drug product stability? 4. Is the particle size critical to drug product content uniformity? 5. Is particle size critical for maintaining product appearance? If NO to all If YES to any No Acceptance Criterion Required Set Acceptance Criterion

DECISION TREE #4: INVESTIGATING THE NEED TO SET ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR POLYMORPHISM IN DRUG SUBSTANCES AND DRUG PRODUCTS Drug Substance Conduct polymorphism screen on drug substance. Can different polymorphs be formed? NO 1. No further action YES Characterize the forms: e.g., - X-ray Powder Diffraction - DSC / Thermoanalysis - Microscopy - Spectroscopy 2. GO TO 2. Do the forms have different properties? (solubility, stability, melting point) NO No further test or acceptance criterion for drug substance YES Is drug product safety, performance or efficacy affected? NO YES Set acceptance criterion for polymorph content in drug substance 3. GO TO

DECISION TREE #4: INVESTIGATING THE NEED TO SET ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR POLYMORPHISM IN DRUG SUBSTANCES AND DRUG PRODUCTS Drug Product - Solid Dosage Form or Liquid Containing Undissolved Drug Substance N.B.: Undertake the following processes only if technically possible to measure polymorph content in the drug product. 3. Does drug product performance testing provide adequate control if polymorph ratio changes (e.g., dissolution)? Establish acceptance criteria for the relevant performance test(s). YES NO Monitor polymorph form during stability of drug product. Does a change occur which could affect safety or efficacy? NO No need to set acceptance criteria for polymorph change in drug product. YES Establish acceptance criteria which are consistent with safety and/or efficacy.

CONTAINING CHIRAL DRUG SUBSTANCES DECISION TREE #5: ESTABLISHING IDENTITY, ASSAY AND ENANTIOMERIC IMPURITY PROCEDURES FOR CHIRAL NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND NEW DRUG PRODUCTS CONTAINING CHIRAL DRUG SUBSTANCES Consider the need for verifying chiral identity in drug substance release and/or acceptance testing. YES Is the new drug substance chiral1? NO Chiral identity, assay and impurity procedures are not needed. AND RACEMIC YES AND ONE ENANTIOMER Needed for drug substance specification:2 -chiral identity3 -chiral assay4 -enantiomeric impurity5 Needed for drug product specification6: -chiral assay4 -enantiomeric impurity5 1 Chiral substances of natural origin are not addressed in this Guideline. 2 As with other impurities arising in and from raw materials used in drug substance synthesis, control of chiral quality could be established alternatively by applying limits to appropriate starting materials or intermediates when justified from developmental studies. This essentially will be the case when there are multiple chiral centers (e.g., three or more), or when control at a step prior to production of the final drug substance is desirable. 3 A chiral assay or an enantiomeric impurity procedure may be acceptable in lieu of a chiral identity procedure. 4 An achiral assay combined with a method for controlling the opposite enantiomer is acceptable in lieu of a chiral assay. 5 The level of the opposite enantiomer of the drug substance may be derived from chiral assay data or from a separate procedure. 6 Stereospecific testing of drug product may not be necessary if racemization has been demonstrated to be insignificant during drug product manufacture and during storage of the finished dosage form.

Is the drug substance/excipient sterile? Does drug substance/excipient synthesis/processing involve steps which inherently reduce microorganisms? Does scientific evidence demonstrate that reduction steps result in microorganism levels < acceptance criteria limits (and the absence of compendial indicator organisms) in the drug substance/excipient? Provide supporting data. Microbial limits acceptance criteria and testing may not be necessary. No further microbial limits testing or acceptance criteria are necessary. Test each lot for microbial limits and freedom from compendial indicator organisms. Test lots on a skip-lot basis for microbial limits and freedom from compendial indicator organisms. Establish microbial limit acceptance criteria as per the harmonized pharmacopeial monograph. DECISION TREE #6: MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF DRUG SUBSTANCE AND EXCIPIENTS Is the drug substance/excipient capable of supporting microbial growth or viability? Are monitoring microorganism/indicator levels consistently below acceptance criteria levels? Provide supporting data. Microbial limits acceptance criteria and testing may not be necessary. NO YES Establish microbial limit acceptance criteria as per the harmonized pharmacopoeial

DECISION TREES #7: SETTING ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DRUG PRODUCT DISSOLUTION 1. What type of drug release acceptance criteria are appropriate? Establish drug release acceptance criteria. Extended release: multiple time points Delayed release: two stages, parallel or sequential Is the dosage form designed to produce modified release? YES NO Is drug solubility at 37 ± 0.5°C high throughout the physiological pH range? (Dose/ solubility < 250 mL (pH 1.2 - 6.8)) NO YES Is dosage form dissolution rapid? (Dissolution > 80% in 15 minutes at pH 1.2, 4.0, and 6.8) NO Generally single-point dissolution acceptance criteria with a lower limit are acceptable. YES NO Has a relationship been determined between disintegration and dissolution? Generally disintegration acceptance criteria with an upper time limit are acceptable. YES Continued on next page.

DECISION TREES #7: SETTING ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DRUG PRODUCT DISSOLUTION 2. What specific test conditions and acceptance criteria are appropriate? [immediate release] Does dissolution significantly affect bioavailability? (e.g., have relevant developmental batches exhibited unacceptable bioavailability?) YES Attempt to develop test conditions and acceptance criteria which can distinguish batches with unacceptable bioavailability. NO Do changes in formulation or manufacturing variables affect dissolution? (Use appropriate ranges. Evaluate dissolution within pH 1.2 - 6.8) YES Are these changes controlled by another procedure and acceptance criterion? YES NO NO Adopt appropriate test conditions and acceptance criteria without regard to discriminating power, to pass clinically acceptable batches. Adopt test conditions and acceptance criteria which can distinguish these changes. Generally, single point acceptance criteria are acceptable.

DECISION TREES #7: SETTING ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DRUG PRODUCT DISSOLUTION 3. What are appropriate acceptance ranges? [extended release] Are bioavailability data available for batches with different drug release rates? NO Is drug release independent of in vitro test conditions? YES YES NO Can an in vitro / in vivo relationship be established? (Modify in vitro test conditions if appropriate.) Use all available stability, clinical, and bioavailability data to establish appropriate acceptance ranges. NO YES Use the in vitro / in vivo correlation, along with appropriate batch data, to establish acceptance ranges. Are acceptance ranges >20% of the labeled content? Provide appropriate bioavailability data to validate the acceptance ranges. YES NO Finalize acceptance ranges.

Is the drug product a dry dosage form (e.g. solid oral or dry powder)? Do production lots consistently meet microbial limits acceptance criteria? Establish preservative chemical acceptance criteria and perform preservative effectiveness validation of product containing less than or equal to the minimum specified preservative concentration, or demonstrate the inherent antimicrobial activity of the drug product. Establish microbial limit acceptance criteria as per the harmonized pharmacopoeial monograph. Perform microbial limits testing on a lot-by-lot basis. Microbial limits acceptance criteria and testing may not be necessary. Does the drug product contain antimicrobial preservatives or possess inherent antimicrobial activity? Perform skip-lot testing for microbial limits, or provide scientific justification for no routine microbial limits testing. DECISION TREE #8: MICROBIOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES OF NON-STERILE DRUG PRODUCTS YES NO Does scientific evidence demonstrate growth inhibitory properties of the drug product?