Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
CLIO Current Status of Japanese Detectors Daisuke Tatsumi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site identification and infrastructure Jo van den Brand Tübingen, October.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1st ET General meeting, Pisa, November 2008 The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site identification and infrastructure Jo van den Brand Tübingen, October.
Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO Gravity waves GW detectors Strain measurement, sensitivity Newtonian Noise How do we throw away your signal.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Towards a Design Study Proposal for a 3rd Generation Interferometric Gravitational- wave Detector Harald Lück London, October 26th 2006.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
G R 1 Ground-based GW interferometers in the LISA epoch David Shoemaker MIT LIGO 20 July 02.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
Einstein gravitational wave Telescope Next steps: from technology reviews to detector design Andreas Freise for the ET WG3 working group , 2nd.
Ambient ground motion and gravity gradient noise Jo van den Brand, Nikhef, Amsterdam on behalf of the design study team Einstein Telescope site selection.
Design study for ET 3rd generation Gravitational Wave Interferometer Work Package 2 Suspension, Thermal noise and Cryogenics Piero Rapagnani
E.T. Design Study & European roadmaps Michele Punturo/Harald Lück.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Australia-Italy Australia 6, October 2005 LCGT project Kazuaki Kuroda LCGT Collaboration Cryogenics for LCGT.
1 DUSEL and Gravitational Waves Vuk Mandic University of Minnesota 03/17/08.
Environmental noise studies at VIRGO Environmental contributions to Virgo readout noise (C-runs) many sources identified through coherency analyses with.
LIGO-G050XXX-00-R Gingin’s Australia-Italia workshop on GW Detection Gravitational Wave Detectors The challenge of Low Frequency G. W. Detection Riccardo.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
T Akutsu 1, S Telada 2, T Uchiyama 1, S Miyoki 1, K Yamamoto 1, M Ohashi 1, K Kuroda 1, N Kanda 3 and CLIO Collaboration. 1 ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, 2 AIST,
Lisbon, 8 January Research and Development for Gravitational Wave Detectors Raffaele Flaminio CNRS/LMA Lyon.
Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation (August 25, 2002, Hawaii USA) Observation run of TAMA GW detector Masaki Ando Department of Science, University.
Behavior of an inverted pendulum in the Kamioka mine R. Takahashi (NAOJ), A. Takamori (ERI), E. Majorana (INFN) GWADW 2010 We are investigating behavior.
LCGT Technical Review Suspension Point Interferometer for Parasitic Noise Reduction and an Additional IFO S.Miyoki (ICRR, Univ. of TOKYO)
Masaki Ando, Akiteru Takamori, Kimio Tsubono Department of Physics, University of Tokyo Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 1st International.
Status of the Japanese Projects Kazuaki Kuroda TAMA/CLIO/LCGT Collaboration ICRR, University of Tokyo LSC-Virgo Meeting 26 July, 2007 G R.
XII-th International School on Particles and Cosmology (April 24, 2003, Baksan Valley, Russia) Observation Runs of TAMA300 Gravitational Wave Detector.
Large-scale Cryogenic Gravitational- wave Telescope, LCGT Keiko Kokeyama University of Birmingham 23 rd July 2010 Friday Science.
State College May 2004 LIGO- Mining for IMBH Gravitational Waves Fabrizio Barone Enrico Campagna Yanbei Chen Giancarlo Cella Riccardo DeSalvo Seiji Kawamura.
Gravitational Waves.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
GWADW - La Biodola 20061/20 Underground reduction of Gravity Gradient Noise. Giancarlo Cella INFN sez. Pisa/Virgo GWADW – La Biodola 2006.
The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p1 Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
The Status of Advanced LIGO: Light at the end of the Tunnels Jeffrey S. Kissel, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April APS Meeting, Savannah, GA April.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
G. Cella I.N.F.N. Sezione di Pisa.  The mass density fluctuates..... ..... and the gravitational field will do the same Direct gravitational coupling.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Harald Lück AEI Hannover. Thank you Science Team! You did a great job!
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Activities in the Homestake mine
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO
THE NEXT GENERATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Local gravity gradient noise
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
Some ideas on advanced Virgo Twins A. Giazotto-INFN Pisa
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Presentation transcript:

Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand

LISA Third generation detector Rüdiger, ‘85  Two order of magnitude compared to initial Virgo  Underground site  Multiple interferometers: – 3 Interferometers; triangular configuration? – 10 km long – 2 polarization + redundancy  Design study part of ILIAS & FP7  Construction: ?

LISA Scientific justification for 3 rd generation ITF Primordial gravitational waves Production: fundamental physics in the early universe - Inflation, phase transitions, topological defects - String-inspired cosmology, brane-world scenarios Spectrum slope, peaks give masses of key particles & energies of transitions A TeV phase transition would have left radiation in 3G band

LISA Introduction Features of 3 rd generation ITF Sensitivity below m/sqrt(Hz) Ultra-low frequency cut-off Vibration isolation Sensitive in range 0.1 – 10 Hz Multiple sites for signal correlation Advanced optical schemes (squeezed light) Cryogenic optics Underground sites 10 kilometer arms

LISA Ultra Low Frequency: 1Hz 3 rd generation 1 Hz cutoff 1 st - 2 nd generation 10 Hz cutoff One more decade at low frequency

LISA Isolation requirements Required Hz: at least with ground noise.  Ultra soft vibration isolation – Long pendulums (50, 100 m) – Very good thermal stabilization  Active platforms – Very low noise sensors – Very good thermal stabilization – Very low tilt noise  Very quiet site

LISA Site identification process Even pressure fluctuations due to weather are a relevant source of gravity gradient noise [11]. V. N. Rudenko, A. V. Serdobolski, K. Tsubono, “Atmospheric gravity perturbations measured by a ground-based interferometer with suspended mirrors”, Class. And Quant. Grav., vol. 20, pp Seismic measurements at LNGS

LISA LIGO Site selection criteria

LISA LIGO Site evaluation criteria

LISA LIGO Site evaluation criteria

LISA Seismic noise attenuation

LISA Not only seismic noise…  Direct action of wind on buildings  Strong correlation between mirror motion and wind speed at f < 0.1 Hz  Detector operation more difficult in windy days, duty cycle affected  Even more difficult in the future, with high finesse cavities

LISA Underground interferometers  LISM: 20 m Fabry-Perot interferometer, R&D for LCGT, moved from Mitaka (ground based) to Kamioka (underground)  Seismic noise much lower: 10 2 overall gain 10 3 at 4 Hz

LISA LISM at Mitaka LISM at Kamioka limit by isolation system Interferometer operation becomes much easier underground. Noise reduced by orders of magnitude S.Kawamura, ‘02 Hz Displacement spectrum m/RHz

LISA Large-scale Cryogenic Gravitational-wave Telescope: LCGT

LISA CLIO – Prototype for LCGT

LISA LISM in Kamioka

LISA ILC, NLC, Tesla, VLHC, Muon Source – Site requirements

LISA ILC, NLC, Tesla, VLHC, Muon Source – Site requirements

LISA Isolation shortcircuit Newtonian noise Figure: M.Lorenzini SEISMIC NOISE

LISA Seismically generated Newtonian noise

LISA Newtonian noise estimate Cella-Cuoco, 98

LISA NN reduction  Surface waves give the main contribution to newtonian noise  Surface movement dominates the bulk compression effect Surface waves Compression waves Courtesy: G.Cella Surface waves die exponentially with depth: GO UNDERGROUND!

LISA NN reduction in caves Reduction factor Cave radius [m] Spherical Cave G.Cella 5 Hz 10 Hz 20 Hz 40 Hz NN reduction of 10 Hz with a 20 m radius cave 10 6 overall reduction (far from surface) (Compression waves not included) 10 2 less seismic noise x 10 4 geometrical reduction

LISA 1 st generation 2 nd generation 3 rd generation Newtonian noise Ground surface Underground

LISA NN from compression waves  In a spherical cave NN is reduced as  1/R 3  Beam direction is more important. Credit: R. De Salvo ELLIPSOIDAL? MAKE LARGE CAVERN

LISA A possible design Upper experimental hall Credit: R.De Salvo m well to accomodate long suspension for low frequency goal Ellipsoidal/spherical cave for newtonian noise reduction 10 km tunnel

LISA Site identification process Gran Sasso Salt mines

LISA Complementarity with LIGO, VIRGO and LISA Rotating Neutron Stars Vast range in wavelength (8 orders of magnitude) LIGO/VIRGO LISA Frequency [Hz] 3 rd ITF

LISA Summary  Expected features of 3 rd generation ITF – Triangular configuration – Advanced optical schemes – Low-frequency isolation and suspension – Cryogenic optics – Multiple underground sites  Design study – Develop preliminary ideas – Define site identification process