CTG Masterclass AVMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NORMAL & ABNORMAL LABOUR
Advertisements

FETAL MONITORING ANTE AND INTRAPARTUM
Fetal Health Surveillance (FHS) Part 2 – Electronic Fetal Monitoring*
Kathleen Simpson, PhD, RNC
Fetal Monitoring Review Questions Ana Corona 2009.
ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING (EFM) / CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY(CTG).
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring
Prof William Stones Aga Khan University NON REASSURING FETAL STATUS.
DR HANAA ALANI Intrapartum fetal monitoring. The intrapartum period is probably the most dangerous and traumatic period of our lives – a time associated.
Medico-Legal Issues related to Intrapartum CTG
Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.
Perinatal Asphyxia S.Arulkumaran Professor & Head
รองศาสตราจารย์ นายแพทย์ อติวุทธ กมุทมาศ
Done by: Teacher: Ibtesam Jahlan
CTG Interpretation and Management
Fetal Monitoring Basics Expanded
Ben Lloyd Consultant Paediatrician Royal Free Hospital, London
Fetal Assessment Fred Hill, MA, RRT. Ultrasound Ultrasound.
NUR 134 M. Johnston, RN-BC, M.Ed.. Types of Monitoring Auscultation- listen to fetal heart rate (FHR) Electronic Fetal Monitoring – use of instruments.
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Why perform fetal monitoring Identify the fetus in distress To avert permanent fetal damage or death.
Cardiotocography as a Test of Fetal Well Being Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD December 2014.
NUR 134 M. Johnston, RN-BC, M.Ed.. Types of Monitoring Auscultation- listen to fetal heart rate (FHR) Electronic Fetal Monitoring – use of instruments.
FETAL MONITORING REASONS TO MONITOR THE FETUS ANTENATAL: 1. MATERNAL INDICATIONS e.g. obstetric cholestasis 2. FETAL INDICATIONS e.g. reduced fetal movements,
Acid base balance & Perinatal Implications S Arulkumaran Professor Emeritus Obstetrics & Gynaecology St George’s University of London.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Does Pathological CTG Related to Abnormal Umbilical Cord Blood pH? Dr. Rima Anggrena Dasrilsyah, Dr.
Monitoring in Labour. Discuss fetal heart rate patterns using Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring (CEFM) tracings.Discuss fetal heart rate patterns.
Fetal Monitoring Introduction 1600’s Kilian proposes the use of fetal heart rate to diagnose fetal distress 1893 criteria for determining fetal distress.
Fetal Well-being and Electronic Fetal Monitoring
INTRAPARTUM ASSESSMENT
Building capacity in the maternity sector PMMRC Conference 2015 Title: How can health professionals use audit research to reduce morbidity and mortality?
Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
Fetal Monitoring and Fetal Assessment A few new techniques and protocols!
An Introduction to Cardiotocography – “CTG”
Dr. Anjoo Agarwal Professor Dept of Obs & gyn KGMU, Lucknow
Fetal Monitoring Ann Hearn RNC, MSN Electronic Fetal Monitoring Standard of Care “Nurses who care for women during the childbirth process are legally.
Understanding Cardiotocography – “CTGs” Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May 2015.
RCOG cardiotocographic (CTG) classification Normal A CTG where all four features fall into the reassuring category. Suspicious A CTG whose features fall.
Chapter 16 CTG Dr Areefa Albahri. 2 FHR as a screening test Intrapartum FHR monitoring is a screening test that provides information to alert the clinician.
Fetal Assessment During Labor
intrapartum Fetal Monitoring
Fetal Wellbeing Dr Hsu Chong NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Obstetrics & Gynaecology Warwick Medical School.
Fetal Distress in labor Dr.Maysara Mohamed. What is fetal distress? Fetal distress is the term commonly used to describe fetal hypoxia. Hypoxia may result.
Chapter 18 Fetal Assessment During Labor
Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance UNC School of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship Case Based Seminar Series.
2015 FIGO CONSENSUS GUIDELINES ON INTRAPARTUM FETAL MONITORING
Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring
Antenatal Assessment of Fetal Well-being
 Prolonged pregnancy  Decreased fetal movements  Hypertension in pregnancy  Diabetes in pregnancy  Fetal growth restriction  Multiple gestation.
Fetal HR Tracings.
How to read a CTG? Dr Pradeep S Dr Sabitha US.
O&G in a nutshell Dr Laura Lee.
Intrapartum CTG.
From NeoReviews Strip of the Month June 2014
CTG.
Assessment Of Fetal Wellbeing In labour
بسم الله الرحمان الرحیم
Prolonged Pregnancy.
Electronic fetal monitoring vs intermittent auscultation
Intrapartum CTG.
Dr U S SABITHA Assistant professor Dept of OBGyn PESIMSR, KUPPAM
Basics of CTG Dr G Shree Lakshmi MS, MRCOG
Fetal Monitoring and Fetal Assessment
Understanding Cardiotocography – “CTGs”
CTG.
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Midwives Training 2019 Hola.  Screening tool  predict fetal hypoxia  Analyse FHR changes during labour  Timely intervention  prevent HIE.
Fetal Distress Dr. Mahboubeh Valiani Academic Member of IUMS
Presentation transcript:

CTG Masterclass AVMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference 2012 Professor Tim Draycott, Consultant Obstetrician Health Foundation Improvement Science Fellow

Birth care not always easy

Introduction Cerebral Palsy Pattern of injury Relationship with low Apgar score Standard of care Intermittent Auscultation Electronic Fetal Monitoring Interpretation Action required Cases

Low Apgars and CP Base Excess ≤12 likely to be normal Apgar score <7 Odds ratio for CP after low (<7) Apgar scores at 5 minutes in tern infants is 3.72 Proportion of CP in the population that could be attributed to a low Apgar score (<7) at 5 minutes is 10.9% At least 50% of Low Apgar scores could be prevented with better care

Recurring Themes Failure to perform EFM Failure to recognise CTG abnormalities Failure to respond to CTG abnormalities: Fetal blood sampling Expedite delivery

Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegic Hemiplegic Ataxic Proportion CP Spastic Diplegic 26% Hemiplegic 35% Ataxic 4% Athetoid (Dyskinetic) 7-15% Spastic Tetraplegic 18-20%

..and Clinical Negligence Proportion CP Intrapartum Spastic Diplegic 26% <1% Hemiplegic 35% 0% Ataxic 4% Athetoid (Dyskinetic) 7-15% 80% Spastic Tetraplegic 18-20% 45% +

Clinical Negligence Standard of care Breach in duty of care Midwives Obstetricians Paediatricians Did that breach cause the injury ?

Causation Athetoid Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy Acute profound hypoxia Spastic Tetraplegic Cerebral Palsy Chronic partial ischaemia

Athetoid CP Profound acute hypoxia - ‘lack of oxygen’ Uterine Rupture VBAC Cord Prolapse Abruption

Hypoxia Oxygen sensitive parts of body Kidneys Heart Brain

MRI findings Areas of brain with high metabolic rate Deep grey matter Posterior parts of lentiform nuclei Ventro-lateral nuclei of thalami Hippocampus

MRI

Spastic Tetraplegic CP Mechanism of injury less established Prolonged period of mild – moderate hypotension Cord Compression Head Compression Watershed areas of brain

Chronic Partial Ischaemia Low blood pressure in cerebral arteries Perfusion at peripheries reduced Lawn Sprinkler

MRI Findings

Intrapartum Monitoring fetal heart rate in labour Intermittent Auscultation Cardiotocograph Baseline rate Baseline variability Accelerations Decelerations Introduction only

Intermittent Auscultation Normal Labour The RCOG EFM guideline recommends: In the active stages of labour, intermittent auscultation (IA) should occur after a contraction, for a minimum of 60 seconds, and at least. every 15 minutes in the first stage every 5 minutes in the second stage Failure to perform IA as above is substandard care

When to change to EFM ?

Cardio-tocography Abdominal palpation Maternal pulse Name/number/time/paper speed Technically adequate Documentation (actions & opinion) Interpret in light of clinical setting

Reassuring CTG 4 Features: Baseline rate 110-160 Baseline variability - 5bpm or more Accelerations No decelerations

Intrapartum Standard of care NICE EFM May 2001 NICE Intrapartum Guideline Sept 2007 Pre 2001 – FIGO guidance published in 1987

NICE EFM

Coalface

Classification

Actions - Suspicious

Action - Pathological

NICE IP ‘Guide’line

New Sticker

Antenatal Sticker

Dr C BRAVADO Discuss risk Contractions Baseline Rate Accelerations Variability Decelerations Outcome

However………. DrCBravado not consistent with: Electronic Fetal Monitoring Guideline, published in 2001 NICE Intrapartum Guideline in 2007 Therefore its use is substandard care

Breach of Duty Assessment of CTG Classification into NICE category Documentation, each hour Appropriate action for CTG category

Causation – CP Template Fetal, umbilical arterial cord, or very early neonatal blood: pH <7.00 & base deficit >12 mmol/l Severe or moderate neonatal encephalopathy in infants >34 weeks Spastic quadriplegic or dyskinetic CP Exclusion of other identifiable causes

CP Template contd Sentinel hypoxic event Sustained fetal bradycardia or poor variability in the presence of late or variable decelerations Apgar scores of 0-3 beyond 5 minutes (previously <7). Onset of multi-system involvement within 72 hours of birth.

Causation and timing Paediatric expert Use of umbilical artery base excess: Algorithm for the timing of hypoxic injury Ross and Gala. Am JOG. 2002 >10% infants born with Base Excess ≥16 will have cognitive defects at 1 yr Almost all infants born with base excess ≤ 12 are normal

Timing of Injury Normal Labour Abnormal CTG Fetus enters labor with a base excess of –2 mmol/L 1 mmol/L per 3 to 6 hours in normal first stage of labour 1 mmol/L per hour of second stage Abnormal CTG 1 mmol/L per 30 minutes with repetitive typical severe variable decelerations 1 mmol/L per 6 to 15 minutes in subacute fetal compromise 1 mmol/L per 2 to 3 minutes with acute, severe compromise (eg, terminal bradycardia)

Timing A guide, not an exact science At what time would delivery have avoided injury ? Work backwards through trace Intermittent Auscultation

Pitfalls Cord Gas better than expected Venous sample Complete cord compression MRI Other causes Chronic Partial May not have sentinel event

Conclusion Breach of duty of care Use NICE EFM & IP Template Action also defined by national guidance Causation ACOG & International consensus template

Problem ? 50% adverse outcomes preventable with better care CESDI – 4th Annual Report. 1997 CEMD – Why Mothers Die. 1998 CEMACH – Saving Mothers Lives 2007 UK Apgar <7 at 5 mins Ranges from 0.4% of term infants to 1.96% 5 fold variation ! Have a think about the references in the 2nd section – Why Mothers die was produced by CEMD which was superseded by CEMACH. How about this ?

Neonatal Outcomes 5’ Apgar p=0.00042 (Chi2 test for trend) HIE p=0.0176 (Chi2 test for trend)

National Results

Thankyou www.prompt-course.org tdraycott@gmail.com