Complex network of the brain I Small world vs. scale-free networks Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer-to-Peer and Social Networks Power law graphs Small world graphs.
Advertisements

Complex Network Theory
1 Analyzing Kleinberg’s Small-world Model Chip Martel and Van Nguyen Computer Science Department; University of California at Davis.
Small-world networks.
P2P Topologies Centralized Ring Hierarchical Decentralized Hybrid.
Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks.
CS 599: Social Media Analysis University of Southern California1 The Basics of Network Analysis Kristina Lerman University of Southern California.
Weighted networks: analysis, modeling A. Barrat, LPT, Université Paris-Sud, France M. Barthélemy (CEA, France) R. Pastor-Satorras (Barcelona, Spain) A.
1 Evolution of Networks Notes from Lectures of J.Mendes CNR, Pisa, Italy, December 2007 Eva Jaho Advanced Networking Research Group National and Kapodistrian.
Networks. Graphs (undirected, unweighted) has a set of vertices V has a set of undirected, unweighted edges E graph G = (V, E), where.
Network Models Social Media Mining. 2 Measures and Metrics 2 Social Media Mining Network Models Why should I use network models? In may 2011, Facebook.
Small-World Graphs for High Performance Networking Reem Alshahrani Kent State University.
Small Worlds Presented by Geetha Akula For the Faculty of Department of Computer Science, CALSTATE LA. On 8 th June 07.
Networks FIAS Summer School 6th August 2008 Complex Networks 1.
Network Statistics Gesine Reinert. Yeast protein interactions.
Peer-to-Peer and Grid Computing Exercise Session 3 (TUD Student Use Only) ‏
Small World Networks Somsubhra Sharangi Computing Science, Simon Fraser University.
Complex Networks Structure and Dynamics Ying-Cheng Lai Department of Mathematics and Statistics Department of Electrical Engineering Arizona State University.
Social Networks: Advertising, Pricing and All That Zvi Topol & Itai Yarom.
1 Algorithms for Large Data Sets Ziv Bar-Yossef Lecture 7 May 14, 2006
Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks Albert, Jeong, Barabási (presented by Walfredo)
Peer-to-Peer and Social Networks Random Graphs. Random graphs E RDÖS -R ENYI MODEL One of several models … Presents a theory of how social webs are formed.
Complex network of the brain I Small world vs. scale-free networks
Optimization Based Modeling of Social Network Yong-Yeol Ahn, Hawoong Jeong.
(Social) Networks Analysis III Prof. Dr. Daning Hu Department of Informatics University of Zurich Oct 16th, 2012.
Topic 13 Network Models Credits: C. Faloutsos and J. Leskovec Tutorial
Graph Theory in 50 minutes. This Graph has 6 nodes (also called vertices) and 7 edges (also called links)
Author: M.E.J. Newman Presenter: Guoliang Liu Date:5/4/2012.
Jure Leskovec, CMU Eric Horwitz, Microsoft Research.
Jure Leskovec Computer Science Department Cornell University / Stanford University Joint work with: Eric Horvitz, Michael Mahoney,
Section 8 – Ec1818 Jeremy Barofsky March 31 st and April 1 st, 2010.
Network properties Slides are modified from Networks: Theory and Application by Lada Adamic.
1/f, Fractal, Chaos, and Small world in the brain Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Small World Problem Christopher McCarty. Small World Phenomenon You meet someone, seemingly randomly, who has a connection to someone you know – Person.
Small-world networks. What is it? Everyone talks about the small world phenomenon, but truly what is it? There are three landmark papers: Stanley Milgram.
Using Graph Theory to Study Neural Networks (Watrous, Tandon, Conner, Pieters & Ekstrom, 2012)
Gennaro Cordasco - How Much Independent Should Individual Contacts be to Form a Small-World? - 19/12/2006 How Much Independent Should Individual Contacts.
Online Social Networks and Media
Social Network Analysis Prof. Dr. Daning Hu Department of Informatics University of Zurich Mar 5th, 2013.
Complex network of the brain II Hubs and Rich clubs in the brain
Professor Yashar Ganjali Department of Computer Science University of Toronto
Complex Network Theory – An Introduction Niloy Ganguly.
Lecture 10: Network models CS 765: Complex Networks Slides are modified from Networks: Theory and Application by Lada Adamic.
Complex Network Theory – An Introduction Niloy Ganguly.
Most of contents are provided by the website Network Models TJTSD66: Advanced Topics in Social Media (Social.
What Is A Network? (and why do we care?). An Introduction to Network Theory | Kyle Findlay | SAMRA 2010 | 2 “A collection of objects (nodes) connected.
Social Networking: Large scale Networks
1 Friends and Neighbors on the Web Presentation for Web Information Retrieval Bruno Lepri.
March 3, 2009 Network Analysis Valerie Cardenas Nicolson Assistant Adjunct Professor Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging.
Performance Evaluation Lecture 1: Complex Networks Giovanni Neglia INRIA – EPI Maestro 10 December 2012.
Analyzing Networks. Milgram’s Experiments “Six degrees of Separation” Milgram’s letters to various recruits in Nebraska who were asked to forward the.
Teachers Teaching With Technology 2010 Annual Meeting - Atlanta, GA Ray Barton, Olympus High, SLC, UT.
Information Retrieval Search Engine Technology (10) Prof. Dragomir R. Radev.
Class 4: It’s a Small World After All Network Science: Small World February 2012 Dr. Baruch Barzel.
Netlogo demo. Complexity and Networks Melanie Mitchell Portland State University and Santa Fe Institute.
Complex network of the brain II Attack tolerance vs. Lethality Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Topics In Social Computing (67810) Module 1 Introduction & The Structure of Social Networks.
Algorithms and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Computer Science and & Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan Network Biology.
Complex network of the brain II Hubs and Rich clubs in the brain Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Complex network of the brain I Small world vs. scale-free networks Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Cmpe 588- Modeling of Internet Emergence of Scale-Free Network with Chaotic Units Pulin Gong, Cees van Leeuwen by Oya Ünlü Instructor: Haluk Bingöl.
Hiroki Sayama NECSI Summer School 2008 Week 2: Complex Systems Modeling and Networks Network Models Hiroki Sayama
Lecture 1: Complex Networks
Topics In Social Computing (67810)
Network Science: A Short Introduction i3 Workshop
The Watts-Strogatz model
Peer-to-Peer and Social Networks Fall 2017
Peer-to-Peer and Social Networks
Lecture 9: Network models CS 765: Complex Networks
Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks
Presentation transcript:

Complex network of the brain I Small world vs. scale-free networks Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST

Vertex (node) and edge (link) Any system can be expressed as a network with nodes and links.

Examples of complex networks: geometric, regular Eileen Kraemer

Examples of complex networks: semi-geometric, irregular Eileen Kraemer

Structural metrics: Average path length

Structural Metrics: Degree distribution(connectivity)

Structural Metrics: Clustering coefficient A clustering coefficient is a measure of the degree to which nodes in a graph tend to cluster together.

Milgram’s experiment: Six degrees of separation Milgram's experiment was designed to measure these path lengths by developing a procedure to count the number of ties between any two people. Milgram's experiment developed out of a desire to learn more about the probability that two randomly selected people would know each other, as one way of looking at the small world problem. An alternative view of the problem is to imagine the population as a social network and attempt to find the average path length between any two nodes.

Milgram’s experiment: Procedure Milgram chose individuals in an U.S. city (Omaha) to be the starting points and Boston, Massachusetts, to be the end point of a chain of correspondence. Letters were initially sent to "randomly" selected individuals in Omaha. The letter detailed the study's purpose, and basic information about a target contact person in Boston. It additionally contained a roster on which they could write their own name, as well as business reply cards that were pre- addressed to Harvard. Upon receiving the invitation to participate, the recipient was asked whether he or she personally knew the contact person described in the letter. If so, the recipient could forward the letter directly to that person. (Knowing someone "personally" was defined as knowing them on a first-name basis.)

Milgram’s experiment: Procedure If the recipient did not personally know the target person, the recipient was to think of a friend he knew personally who was more likely to know the target. He was then directed to sign his name on the roster and forward the letter to that person. A postcard was also mailed to the researchers at Harvard so that they could track the chain's progression toward the target. When and if the package eventually reached the target person in Boston, the researchers could examine the roster to count the number of times it had been forwarded from person to person. (Additionally, for packages that never reached the destination, the incoming postcards helped identify the break point in the chain.)

Milgram’s experiment: Results Six degrees of separation In one case, 232 of the 296 letters never reached the destination because the recipients refulsed to participate in this study. However, 64 of the letters eventually did reach the target contact. Among these chains, the average path length fell around ‘five and a half or six.’ Hence, the researchers concluded that people in the United States are separated by about six people on average.

Six degrees of Kevin Bacon

Kevin Bacon game: Six degrees of Kevin Bacon

Kevin Bacon Game

D. J. Watts and Steven Strogatz (June 1998). "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks". Nature 393 (6684): 440–442.

A small-world network is a type of mathematical graph in which most nodes are not neighbors of one another, but most nodes can be reached from every other by a small number of hops or steps.

Scale-free network

The scale-free nature of the web of sexual contacts. They analyze data gathered in a 1996 Swedish survey of sexual behavior. The survey--involving a random sample of 4781 Swedish individuals (ages yr)--used structured personal interviews and questionnaires to collect information. The response rate was 59 percent, corresponding to 2810 respondents. Connections in the network of sexual contacts appear and disappear as sexual relations are initiated and terminated. To analyze the connectivity of this dynamic network, whose links may be quite short lived, we first analyze the number k of sex partners over a relatively short time window- -the twelve months prior to the survey.

Preferential attachment (Albert-Lazlo Barabasi) A preferential attachment process is any of processes in which links are distributed among a number of nodes according to how much they already have links, so that those who are already wealthy receive more than those who are not. (The rich get richer)

Preferential attachment (Albert-Lazlo Barabasi)

Models Erdös-Rényi  Homogeneous – Each possible link exists with probability p Scale-free  Heterogeneous – The network grows a node at a time – The probability  i that the new node is connected to node i is proportional to know many links node i owns (preferential attachment)

Brain and complex network (graph) theory Undirected graph Directed graph Weighted graph Boccaletti et al., 2006Liu, 2008  Node (vertex) : Brain region or voxel, channel of EEG/MEG  Link (edge) : Functional or anatomical connection between nodes  Network analysis can reveal structural and functional organization of the brain (Liu, 2008)

Constructing Brain Networks Bullmore and Sporns, 2009

Brain is a small-world network  high clustering coefficient (C) – high resilience to damage in local structures  low average path length (L) – high level of global communication efficiency  Brain functional network has small-world structure, while this property may be disrupted in damaged brain such as AD (vulnerability to damages, decreased communication efficiency between distant brain regions … ) Watts and Strogatz, 1998 high C high C low C high L low L low L

Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting state functional connectivity in the human brain van den Heuvel et al., Neuroimage, 2008 normal, resting-state, voxel-based(N=10,000), zero-lag temporal correlation, bandpass-filtered ( Hz), unweighted, small-world and scale-free : optimal network organization balance between maximum communication efficiency and minimum wiring AD, damage modeling, weighted graph, efficiency

A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs ( Achard et al., The Journal of Neuroscience, 2006) MODWT (Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform) at 6 frequency scales healthy young subjects, resting-state, Parcellation (90 region-based), unweighted, small-world, NOT scale-free resilient to targeted attack than SF network AD, voxel-based, weighted, efficiency, region attack

Alzheimer vs. Healthy subjects

Why does the brain process information so quickly?