Poisoning the Well Fallacy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MULTIPLE CHOICE The Crucible.
Advertisements

Straw Man Allison & Summer.
Ad Hominem Fallacy By: Lucas Cook and Sydney Hyatt.
Ad Hominem- Poisoning the Well Sydney Collier and Shelby Wood.
Ad Hominem Poisoning The Well Nathan Anderson Kaylie Young Emily Walker.
The Crucible Act IV Quiz Review.
Study Guide Questions Act II
The Crucible $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Characters?
Poisoning the Well Fallacy By : Katie Emmitt, Corey Faller, Chelsee Wooten.
The Crucible Review.
Katilyn Wyatt and DeAnna Mabe. Definition Using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion. X is true because Y says so. Therefore,
Crucible Bellringer #159/5/12 Directions: Use your notes from yesterday to fill in the blanks below. 1. ___________________is a contrast between what the.
By Madison Kerley and Rachel Haynes.  Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument.
 Giles begins shouting  He has evidence to save his wife.
The Crucible Act II.
The Crucible Poisoning the Well By: Jewelia Lindsey & Ann Kauffman.
Jeopardy Review Game. Characters Identifying Key Events Notable Quotable Characters Fact or Fiction
Characterization Judge Hathorne: “This is contempt, sir, contempt!” (182) Deputy Governor Danforth: “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the.
THIS IS With Hosts... Your Name the character Plot Who said it? Why did they say it? EmptyPlot II.
The Crucible Act III.
Logical Fallacy Brett Willis Kaylee Britt. Appeal to Ridicule Definition: a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument”.
Act IV Study Guide Questions
The Crucible Act 1 Summary
Post Hoc Perri Collier Myles King. Post Hoc Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc also manifests itself as a.
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
By: Sammi Jo Johnson and Melissa Shirley
The Crucible Act III March 15, 2011.
Appeal To Fear and Scare Tactics Krissy Cross. Definition   X is presented. It causes fear. Therefore Y (which has some relationship to X) is true.
Focus Questions The Crucible: Act I.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
The Crucible Act II. Elizabeth urges John to go to Salem to tell the court that Abigail’s story is a hoax. People fear Abigail’s power to accuse them.
False Dilemma/ Either-Or/ False Dichotomy: is a fallacy in which a person uses the following pattern of reasoning. 1. Either Claim X is true or claim Y.
Tone What tone is developed between Elizabeth and John in the opening scene of Act II? What tone is developed between Elizabeth and John in the opening.
APPEAL TO RIDICULE By: Whitney Miles.
Post Hoc First period. Definition A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier. A fallacy.
Appeal to Ridicule Mattie Bruton Hannah Weedman. Definition of Fallacy AKA: Appeal to Mockery, The Horse Laugh. Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which.
Da Straw Man! Dalton Stephens Nick Cairo. What is Straw Man? The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position.
Post Hoc Billy Estes. Post Hoc Explained Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc occurs when a faulty assumption.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
The Crucible Act III and IV. The details create a mood that is gloomy and forbidding Abigail threatens Danforth when she says, “Think you be so mighty.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
Dec. Week Three Dec First Hour Only 3: IDENTIFY three characters. For each, list 3-5 things you currently know or think you know about them.
1. How much time has passed since Act I? 8 Days.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: McKinley King Zoe Brownfield. Argument from Authority/ False Authority  Asks audiences to agree with the assertion of a writer based simply on his.
Students will understand what causes the flaws in the justice system in Act III.
Ad Hominem April Reprogle Brian Hodges Kayce Russell.
ACT BY ACT Summaries. SUMMARY- ACT 1 Setting: home of Rev Parris. Parris is praying over Betty who is in a coma. Abigail enters. Susanna says the Doc.
CharactersCourtAccusationsQuotesMisc
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
Ad Hominem BY: MADDIE COSTLOW. Definition  Ad hominem means “against the man”. As the name suggests, it is a literary term that involves commenting on.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
“I'll find her! Let me fly! Mama! No!”. “A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between."
Circular Reasoning. What is Circular Reasoning? A fallacious form of argument in which someone assumes that parts (or all) of what a person claims to.
Poisoning the Well By Tessa Britt and Tracey Resner.
The Crucible Acts I & II Review Women of Salem Say what? Act I Act IIMen of Salem
The Crucible Act III. Martha Corey is on trial It is clear they don’t believe Martha is not a witch – they think everyone accused is guilty Giles disrupts.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
Act III Important Stuff.  The setting of Act III is ___________________________________________________.  P. 83: Note Miller’s description of the Meeting.
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
Act III Comprehension Questions
Act II Comprehension Questions
Appeal to Ridicule By:Cassidy Patriarca.
Appeal to Ignorance A fallacy based on the assumption that a statement must be true if it cannot be proved false.
Welcome! The Topic For Today Is… The Crucible
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
Presentation transcript:

Poisoning the Well Fallacy Haley Fisher Kori Renick Sydney Wininger

Description of Poisoning the Well This sort of “reasoning” involves trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it true or false) about the person. This “argument” has the following form: Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented. Therefore any claims person A makes will be false. This sort of “reasoning” is obviously fallacious. The person making such an attack is hoping that the unfavorable information will bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they will reject any claims he might make.

Universal Example Donald Trump presses for President Obama’s birth certificate on The View: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51855.html

Examples from the Crucible: 1.) Act 3: pg. 211 Cheever: He plow on Sunday, sir. Danforth: Plow on Sunday! Cheever: I think it be evidentee, John. I am an official of the court, I cannot keep it. Proctor: I-I have once or twice plowed on Sunday. I have 3 children, sir, and until last year my land gave little. Giles: You’ll find other Christians that do plow on Sunday if the truth be known 2.) Act 2: pg. 199 Hale: How comes it that only two [sons] are baptized. Proctor: I like it not that Mr. Parris Should lay his hand upon my baby. I see no light of God in that man. I’ll not conceal it.

Examples continued. . . 3.) Act 2: pg.198 4.) Act 3: pg. 208 Hale: Good, then. In the book of record that Mr. Parris keeps, I note that you are rarely in the church on Sabbath Day. Proctor: No, sir, you are mistaken. Hale: Twenty-six time in seventeen month, sir. I must call that rare. Will you tell me why you are so absent? 4.) Act 3: pg. 208 Danforth: Who is this man? Parris: Giles Corey,sir, and a More contentious-

Parris: The Devil’s book? He come with a book? Examples continued. . . 5.) Act 3: pg. 226 Mary Warren: He come at me by night and everyday, to sign, to sign, to- Danforth: Sign what? Parris: The Devil’s book? He come with a book? Mary Warren: My name, he want my name. “I’ll murder you,” he says, “if my wife hangs! We must go and overthrow the court,” he says.

Citations The Nizkor Project. Fallacy: Poisoning the Well. Nizkor, 2009. Web. 13 April 2011. “Trump’s Birther Point.” The View. ABC.KABC-TV, Los Angeles. 23 March 2011. Television. gfanimate. “Witch Stirring Pot.” 2009. Microsoft Clip Art file.