AN OPEN-SOURCE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATIC POLICY-BASED COLLABORATIVE ARCHIVAL REPLICATION Using the SafeArchive System The SafeArchive System coordinates six.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Community Approach to Preservation: Experiences with Social Science Data ASIST Summit 2010 Jonathan Crabtree April 9, 2010.
Advertisements

The Dryad Data Repository Ryan Scherle 1, Hilmar Lapp 1, Amol Bapat 2, Sarah Carrier 2, Jane Greenberg 2, Peggy Schaeffer 1, Todd Vision 1,3, Hollie White.
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DigCCur2007 Symposium, Chapel Hill, N.C., April 18-20, 2007 Co-operation for digital preservation.
Pulling it all together… with thanks to Sheila Anderson.
The Data-PASS Partnership: Collaboration, Agreements, and More Myron Gutmann ICPSR University of Michigan.
Libraries in the New Research Environment Joyce Ray NAS/BRDI Symposium Associate Deputy for Libraries June 3, 2010.
Background Chronopolis Goals Data Grid supporting a Long-term Preservation Service Data Migration Data Migration to next generation technologies Trust.
Sustainable Preservation Services for Archivists through Distributed Custody Caryn Wojcik State of Michigan Records Management Services.
ISO & OAI-PMH By Neal Harmeyer, Amy Hatfield, and Brandon Beatty PURDUE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH REPOSITORY.
Micah Altman MIT Libraries Jonathan Crabtree Odum Institute UNC Chapel Hill Prepared for Aligning Digital Preservation across Nations Amsterdam 2013 Website:
Replicated & Distributed Storage Technologies : “Impact on Social Science Data Archive Policies” IASSIST 2010 Ithaca, New York Jonathan Crabtree June.
A Community Approach to Preservation: “Experiences with Social Science Data” Community Approaches to Digital Preservation 2009 Jonathan Crabtree February.
Chronopolis: Preserving Our Digital Heritage David Minor UC San Diego San Diego Supercomputer Center.
The Visibility Information Exchange Web System is a database system and set of online tools originally designed to support the Regional Haze Rule enacted.
Robust Tools for Archiving and Preserving Digital Data Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Mike McGann Institute for Advanced Computer Studies Department of.
16 months…. The Visibility Information Exchange Web System is a database system and set of online tools originally designed to support the Regional Haze.
NARA – Roper Center Collaboration: USIA Office of Research Surveys Michael Carlson National Archives and Records Administration Marc Maynard.
Richard MARCIANO Chien-Yi HOU School of Information and Library Science (SILS) Sustainable Archives & Leveraging Technologies Group (SALT) University of.
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008
Beyond HIPAA, Protecting Data Key Points from the HIPAA Security Rule.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) A Guide for Wisconsin State Agencies.
Data-PASS Shared Catalog Micah Altman & Jonathan Crabtree 1 Micah Altman Harvard University Archival Director, Henry A. Murray Research Archive Associate.
Keeping your Archive Safe (and on TRAC) with SafeArchive and LOCKSS Thu-Mai Christian [Slides] Micah Altman Jonathan Crabtree [Project Directors]
Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists: The H-Net Archive H-Net Mapped to the OAIS Model Preservation AssessmentPreservation improvementsOverview How H-Net.
Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners, March 14, 2014 The National Digital Stewardship Alliance Agenda Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners Meeting Abigail.
International Council on Archives Section on University and Research Institution Archives Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Preserving Electronic.
Trends & Challenges in Digital Object Storage Infrastructure: Notes from the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) Infrastructure Working Group.
NDSA Update: TRAC Review Project and DPOE Nancy Y McGovern, MIT Libraries 1 st NDSR-NE on May 10, 2013.
USING METADATA TO FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING AND CERTIFICATION ABOUT THE PRESERVATION PROPERTIES OF A PRESERVATION SYSTEM Jewel H. Ward, Hao Xu, Mike C.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) SC Department of Archives and History.
Digitization Panel August 12, 2010 Christopher C. Brown, coordinator Mike Culbertson, Colorado State U. James Mauldin, GPO.
Open Access Symposium 2015 Open Access, the Law, and Public Information Mary Alice Baish UNT Dallas College of Law May 19, 2015 National Plan for Access.
Module 9 Configuring Messaging Policy and Compliance.
Bryan Beecher University of Michigan Director, Computing & Network Services E: W:
Trustworthy Repositories, Organizations & Infrastructure Micah Altman, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University Jonathan Crabtree,
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Micah Altman Associate Director, Harvard-MIT Data Center Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University Bryan Beecher Director of Computing.
November 2004 NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries Beth Dulabahn Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress November 7,
Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative.  9:00-9:45 - Session 1: Digital Preservation Overview  9:45-11:00 - Session 2: Policy & Planning Overview.
The Canadian Information Network for Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities Tim Au Yeung and Mary Westell Libraries.
Katherine Skinner, Executive Director, Educopia Institute ESOPI 2013 Chapel Hill, NC April 19, 2013.
Session 3.  Now you know WHY to make policies and WHAT they should contain…  But HOW do you implement policies?  And then HOW do you implement a program.
Digital Preservation Ontario Consortium of University Libraries (OCUL) Caitlin Tillman OCUL IR Chair With notes from Kathy Scardellato, OCUL Executive.
Report on Preservation of ETDs: The LOCKSS Prototype The work of Kamini Santhanagopalan Virginia Tech Graduate Student in Computer Science Reported at.
Data-PASS Partners: Plans for Moving Forward Marc Maynard The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research University of Connecticut July 2010.
EUDAT receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme - DG CONNECT e-Infrastructures. Contract No The pan-European.
NDSR Boston webinar: Digital Preservation Introduction Presenter: Nancy Y McGovern October 2015.
1 BCS, Oxfordshire, 19 February, 2004 WEB ARCHIVING issues and challenges Deborah Woodyard Digital Preservation Coordinator.
Chronopolis – MetaArchive Improving and Strengthening Inter-Institutional Preservation.
Millman—Nov 04—1 An Update on Digital Libraries David Millman Director of Research & Development Academic Information Systems Columbia University
Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists as Scholarly Resources: The H-Net Archives Lisa M. Schmidt
From Access to Archive Transforming Scholars Portal into an E-Journal Archive.
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
Strategic Repurposing for Sustainable Access. Mission Statement The North Carolina State Archives, Archives and Records Section is part of the North Carolina.
Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS). Identity and Access (IDA) – An IDA infrastructure should: Store information about users, groups, computers and.
Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Metadata Coordinator, Stanford University 1 Metadata for the NGDA: Developing a Shared Approach Joint UCSB / Stanford meeting.
A SCRIPT FOR ARCHIVING DIGITAL RESEARCH DATA IMPROVING ACCURACY AND EFFICIENCY IN THE DATAVERSE NETWORK ABSTRACT SUMMARY Rachel Carriere, Thu-Mai Christian,
Katherine Skinner, Martin Halbert & Matt Schultz Educopia Institute and MetaArchive Cooperative NDSA Infrastructure Committee
Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative, Digital Preservation Policy Planning Workshop Boston College, Boston, MA October 26, 2010.
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008 Lesson 8.
Digital Preservation Initiatives in the United States A Summary Deanna B. Marcum.
Discover ScholarSphere A repository service collaboration between the University Libraries and ITS.
A Peer-to-Peer Approach to Review Compliance with Trustworthy Repository Audit and Certification (TRAC) Introduction A trusted digital repository has been.
Dr. Helen R. Tibbo University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Moving on : Repository Services after the RAE
Trustworthiness of Preservation Systems
An Overview of Data-PASS Shared Catalog
Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Sangchul Song
Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager
DDI-Lifecycle and Colectica at the UCLA Social Science Data Archive
Presentation transcript:

AN OPEN-SOURCE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATIC POLICY-BASED COLLABORATIVE ARCHIVAL REPLICATION Using the SafeArchive System The SafeArchive System coordinates six (6) primary activities to give curators the ability to easily define preservation policy, examine the content of the preservation network, and generate regular audit reports that support best practices. Policies  Collaborating institutions author a replication policy with SafeArchive tools. Content  Institutions make collections of content available through the web. Replication  LOCKSS caches harvest the collections from their original source repositories and coordinate peer-to-peer to monitor and maintain network integrity. Monitoring  SafeArchive monitors the state of the network and compares it to the stated replication policy. Auditing  SafeArchive produces an audit trail of operational and audit reports, and alerts collaborating institutions when formal policies are not met. Enforcement  SafeArchive provisions replication as necessary to enforce policy compliance. The Need for Policy-Based Replication Verified geographically-distributed replication of content is an essential component of any comprehensive digital preservation plan. The requirement has emerged as a necessity for recognition and certification as a trusted repository—in order to be fully trusted, an organization must have a managed process for creating, maintaining, and verifying multiple geographically distributed copies of its collections. This requirement has been embodied in Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification (TRAC), the subsequent TRAC-based ISO Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories, and in other best practices. Overview of the SafeArchive System SafeArchive automates high level replication policies (e.g., TRAC/ISO 16363), and helps institutions to collaborate in preserving digital content. GUI-based tools are designed for librarians and archivists–not systems administrators. The system coordinates and audits existing groups of public or private LOCKSS peers. Without requiring a single authority, this allows a group of institutions to establish actionable and mutually verifiable policies governing the replication of content and interest to those institutions. Operationally, system users can: Analyze any LOCKSS network Check that collections are replicated, valid, and up-to-date Create formal replication policies Replicate content from web sites or digital repository systems, such as The Dataverse Network® Audit the network for current and historical TRAC/ISO compliance Automatically manage and repair a LOCKSS network based on a specific replication policy SafeArchive provides the reliability of a top-down replication system with the resiliency of a peer-to- peer model. The SafeArchive project is a collaborative effort of the Data-PASS Partners: The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan; the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut; the Howard W. Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; U.S. National Archives & Records Administration (NARA); and the Institute of Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University. It is managed through the Institute of Quantitative Social Science and works in collaboration with the LOCKSS project at Stanford University. The project is sponsored by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), under award #LG How the SafeArchive System Works The Network Monitor gathers the information on each cache necessary to support policy reporting and auditing. Curators specify replication policies for LOCKSS networks, which they input into a web-based questionnaire using the SafeArchive user interface. The Audit Schema Manager outputs the policies into a machine-readable XML-based schema. A comparison tool then produces a machine-readable diff.XML difference report that enumerates discrepancies between the actual and desired states. All changes to the policy schema instance and the diff.XML reports are versioned and stored permanently to provide a complete history of compliance. The Report Generator uses network and diff.XML data to create formatted reports containing both “audit” summaries that reflect policy compliance, and “operational” information used for diagnostics and performance analysis. The Preservation Enforcer allows the system to make “adjustment” requests to individual LOCKSS caches to initiate or discontinue content harvesting. If content needs to be retrieved from the system, the LOCKSS Management Tool coordinates the location of the appropriate cache and restores the content (future development). Micah Altman | Jonathan Crabtree Thu-Mai Christian | Nancy McGovern Content Policies Auditing Monitoring Replication Enforcement