Coping with Electronic Records Setting Standards for Private Sector E-records Retention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Validate a Vendor Purchased Application
Advertisements

Data Quality Considerations
What is GARP®? GARP® is an Acronym for Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles ARMA understands that records must be.
Records Management for UW-Madison Employees – An Introduction UW-Madison Records Management UW-Archives & Records Management 2012 Photo courtesy of University.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)HIPAA.
Today’s Schools face:  Numerous State and Federal Regulations  Reduced Technology Funding  More Stringent Guidelines for Technology Use.
Reviewing the World of HIPAA Stephanie Anderson, CPC October 2006.
HIPAA: FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING PATIENT SECURITY.
GMP Document and Record Retention
Information Systems Audit Program (cont.). PHYSICAL SECURITY CONTROLS.
The Islamic University of Gaza
Security Controls – What Works
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
Internal Control Concepts Knowledge. Best Practices for IT Governance IT Governance Structure of Relationship Audit Role in IT Governance.
Stephen S. Yau CSE465 & CSE591, Fall Information Assurance (IA) & Security Overview Concepts Security principles & strategies Techniques Guidelines,
Chapter 9 Information Systems Controls for System Reliability— Part 2: Confidentiality and Privacy Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing.
Welcome! Records Management July 21, Good Management of Records Serve as evidence of relationship between City and its citizens Document current.
HIPAA COMPLIANCE IN YOUR PRACTICE MARIBEL VALENTIN, ESQUIRE.
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS By Group 5 members: Kinal Patel David A. Ronca Tolulope Oke.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT City of Oregon City “ That was then… this is now!”
Department of Commerce Records Management Training.
Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance Congress and Best Practices Forum 21 CFR Part 11 Considerations November 14, 2002.
Instructions and forms
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Effectively Integrating Information Technology (IT) Security into the Acquisition Process Section 5: Security Controls.
Records Survey and Retention Schedule Recertification 2011.
Project co-financed by European Union Project co- financed by Asean European Committee for Standardization Implementing Agency1 GMP Workshop Kuala Lumpur.
Creating and Maintaining Proper Systems for Electronic Record Keeping
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
HIPAA COMPLIANCE WITH DELL
“ Technology Working For People” Intro to HIPAA and Small Practice Implementation.
Other Laws (Primarily for E-Government) COEN 351.
FDA Docket No. 2004N-0133 Themes for Renewal of 21 CFR Part 11 Rule & Guidance by Dr. Teri Stokes, GXP International
David N. Wozei Systems Administrator, IT Auditor.
Copyright ©2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Health Information Technology and Management Richard.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Proposed Rule: Security and Electronic Signature Standards.
How Hospitals Protect Your Health Information. Your Health Information Privacy Rights You can ask to see or get a copy of your medical record and other.
Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles ® Registered Trademark of ARMA International.
Ecords Management Records Management Paul Smallcombe Records & Information Compliance Manager.
Understanding the IT environment of the entity. Session objectives Defining contours of financial accounting in an IT environment and its characteristics.
PwC 21 CFR Part 11 – A Risk Management Perspective Patrick D. Roche 07 March 2003, Washington D.C.
1 Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines Jane Horvath Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
S4: Understanding the IT environment of the entity.
1 MD&M East 98 Conference New York June 1998 Presentation by Daniel E. Worden PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 6 The Privacy and Security of Electronic Health Information.
FDA Public Meeting on Electronic Records and Signatures June 11, 2004 Presentation of the Industry Coalition on 21CFR Part 11 Alan Goldhammer, PhD Chair.
E-records and the law John D. Gregory Policy Division Ministry of the Attorney General May 14, 2007.
Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
The Culture of Healthcare Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security Lecture d This material (Comp2_Unit9d) was developed by Oregon Health and Science University,
Paperless Government and the Law John D. Gregory Ministry of the Attorney General June 5, 2009.
DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
03/08/1999UT Austin: GSLIS LIS Information Management LIS /8/99 Martha Richardson.
ISO DOCUMENT CONTROL. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 
Hall, Accounting Information Systems, 8e ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 “HIPAA” Public Law
IT Audit for non-IT auditors Cornell Dover Assistant Auditor General 31 March 2013.
21 CFR PART 11.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance
Audit Trail LIS 4776 Advanced Health Informatics Week 14
Internal Control Principles
Electronic Records Management Program
Managing the IT Function
Final HIPAA Security Rule
County HIPAA Review All Rights Reserved 2002.
בקרה תוך שימוש ב 21CFR Part 11 / אילן שעיה סמארט לוג'יק
HIPAA Security Standards Final Rule
Good Spirit School Division
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
Presentation transcript:

Coping with Electronic Records Setting Standards for Private Sector E-records Retention

Agenda E-SIGN records retention requirements Where to begin Developing performance standards Approaches and examples

E-SIGN’s E-records Provisions

Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign) P.L Use of e-signatures and e-records in Interstate and foreign consumer, commercial or business transactions E-signature provisions Effective on October 1, 2000 E-record retention provisions Effective March 1, 2001 Can be postponed until June 1, 2001 if regulations are “announced, proposed, or initiated” by March 1, 2001

E-SIGN Record Retention Standards Records retention requirements for private entities can be met with electronic records States can promulgated performance standards To assure records’ accuracy, integrity, and accessibility Need not be technology neutral if they: Serve an important governmental objective Substantially related to the achievement of that objective

E-SIGN Record Retention Standards States can require retention of a record in a “tangible printed or paper form” if: Compelling government interest related to law enforcement national security and such requirement is essential to attaining such interest

Time Frames March 1, 2001 E-Sign allows private parties to use e-records to satisfy retention requirements Date can be postponed to June 1, 2001 If an agency announces or initiates e-records retention performance standards by March 1, 2001

Where to begin?

Where to Begin? Review and evaluate existing record retention and management requirements What are they based on (law, regulation, policy)? Are the requirements necessary to perform agency functions? What is the extent of the agency’s authority? What are the agency’s regulatory needs and goals Audit Consumer protection and oversight Protection of state interests

Where to Begin? Evaluate the agency’s ability to review and analyze regulated parties’ e-records Do you have the technical capability to handle e-records? Does your staff have the necessary skill?

Where to begin? Reach out to regulated parties to discuss e- record formats that meet their and the agency’s needs What are the capabilities of the regulated parties? Do standards and best practices already exist? Decide if regulations are the appropriate approach or guidelines will suffice Base on factors specific to your state As needed, announce or initiate e-record retention rulemaking by March 1, 2001

Developing Standards

Developing standards Focus on your desired outcomes and critical points Receiving, Capturing and Creating E-Records Maintaining Accessible, Authentic, and Complete E-Records Maintaining Secure, Reliable and Trustworthy E- Records Systems

Receiving, Capturing and Creating E-Records Creation or capture of adequate records Standards for record’s structure, content, and format Procedures and processes for the receipt, creation, processing, and filing of e-records Authenticated and identified records Measures or standards to authenticate senders and determine the integrity of e-record Measures or standards for secure transmission and processing of e-records

Maintaining Accessible, Authentic, and Complete E-Records Integrity of e-records Information management standards Standards for controlled storage or filing systems to ensure e-records’ integrity and accessibility Retain in an accessible form for legal retention periods Search and retrieval standards Retention standards Produce and supply authentic copies in useable formats including hard copy

Maintaining Secure, Reliable and Trustworthy E-Records Systems System performs in an accurate, reliable, and consistent manner Standards for system management policies and procedures System performance tests Audit trails of system activity

Maintaining Secure, Reliable and Trustworthy E-Records Systems Protect e-records to enable their accurate and ready retrieval Standards and controls for the accuracy and timeliness of input/output Media controls and standards Backup standards

Maintaining Secure, Reliable and Trustworthy E-Records Systems Limit system access to authorized individuals for authorized purposes System security policy and program Physical, environmental, security controls Identification and authentication standards Access control standards

Approaches and Examples

Approaches Detailed regulations Include both outcomes and specific implementations in regulations Outcome focused regulation Limited but targeted regulations Limited regulations supported by specific guidelines

Example - Detailed regulations HIPAA Security Standards 45 CFR Part 142 Administrative Procedures - to establish and enforce security policies Physical Safeguards - to protect physical computer systems, buildings and equipment from hazards and intrusions Technical Security Services - to protect, control and monitor access to data Technical Security Mechanisms - to protect and restrict access to data transmitted over a network

Approaches – Outcome focused regulations FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records Controls for closed systems Validation of systems to ensure accuracy, reliability, consistent performance Ability to conclusively discern invalid or altered records. Ability to generate true copies of records in both human readable and electronic form Suitable for inspection, review, and copying by the agency Protection of records to enable their accurate and ready retrieval throughout the records retention period Limiting system access to authorized individuals

Approaches – Outcome focused regulations Controls for closed systems (cont.) Use of time stamped audit trails to document record changes Record changes don’t obscure previously recorded information. Audit trail documentation retained for as long as the subject e- records and are available for agency review and copying Use of operational checks, authority checks, device (e.g., terminal) location checks Confirmation that system staff have the education, training, and experience to perform their assigned tasks Written policies which hold individuals accountable and liable for actions initiated under their electronic signatures Use of appropriate systems documentation controls

Example – Targeted regulations Minnesota Dept. of Health Nursing Homes Chap Use an electronic health information system: Policies and procedures for password protection Contractor must maintain the confidentiality of all information Audit trails for the source and date of all entries and deletions Backup systems must be implemented and maintained Preventative maintenance of system Plan for preparing, securing, and retaining archived of data Procedures for preparing and securing daily, weekly, and monthly archived copies of data Protection from unauthorized use of active and archived records

Example – Limited regulations Minnesota Dentistry Board Chapter 3100 Subp. 14. Electronic recordkeeping The requirements that apply to paper records apply to electronic recordkeeping When electronic records are kept, a dentist must keep either a duplicate hard copy record or use an unalterable electronic record.

Conclusion Focus on Regulatory goals and desired recordkeeping outcomes Processes and systems Utilize accepted and implementable standards Use regulations to regulate and guidelines to assist Stay current and periodically revisit regulations and guidelines Communicate with the regulated community