Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 12: SNEDEKER ET AL.: PROSODY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prosody and Verb Placement Research question: Do Explicit Prosody and Verb Placement modulate listeners PP-attachment preferences in the processing of.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 2 THE NATURE OF LEARNER LANGUAGE
Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 5: GIVEN AND NEW INFORMATION.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Production: Models cont.
Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 6: EFFECTS OF DISFLUENCY ON REFERENCE COMPREHENSION.
Eye Movements and Spoken Language Comprehension: effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution Spivey et al. (2002) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
Sentence Processing III Language Use and Understanding Class 12.
Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 12: BRANIGAN ET AL.: PRIMING.
18 and 24-month-olds use syntactic knowledge of functional categories for determining meaning and reference Yarden Kedar Marianella Casasola Barbara Lust.
The Interaction of Lexical and Syntactic Ambiguity by Maryellen C. MacDonald presented by Joshua Johanson.
Shallow Processing Eva M. Fernández Queens College & Graduate Center City University of New York.
Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity Kjelgaard & Speer 1999 Kent Lee Ψ 526b 16 March 2006.
Spoken Word Recognition 1 Language Use and Understanding.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
9/22/10Psyc / Ling / Comm 525 Fall 10 Semantic Priming (Phenomenon & Tool)...armkitchentree Related prime >doctoractor < Unrelated prime nurse floor...
Begin by writing the prime factorization of each number.
Phonological Priming in Spontaneous Speech Production Katrina Housel H uman L anguage P rocessing L ab.
Using disfluency to understand, um, sentences... with PP-attachment ambiguities Jennifer E. Arnold and Kellen Carpenter, UNC Chapel Hill Background 1)
Copyright c 2006 Oxford University Press 1 Chapter 2 Your Communication in Groups Verbal communication Words and meanings Concrete vs. abstract words Patterns.
Kinds of evidence Positive Evidence:example utterances that occur in the input Which model the grammatical utterances in the language. Negative Evidence:correction.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
Analysing Syntax 1 Lesson 8B.
Bilingual Dictionaries
Prosodic analysis: theoretical value and practical difficulties Anne Wichmann Nicole Dehé.
The Nature of Learner Language
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
SIGDIAL 2007, Antwerpen1 Measuring Adaptation Between Dialogs Svetlana Stoyancheva Amanda Stent SUNY, Stony Brook.
Multiple constraints in action
1 Lexicon, experimental Oct 22, Psycholinguistic ways of examining the lexicon/syntax Three things we will look at: a. Mental Lexicon b. Collocates.
Dianne Bradley & Eva Fern á ndez Graduate Center & Queens College CUNY Eliciting and Documenting Default Prosody ABRALIN23-FEB-05.
Language, Mind, and Brain by Ewa Dabrowska Chapter 2: Language processing: speed and flexibility.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part3.
La Technologie des Mouvements Oculaires en Linguistique Expérimentale Rachel Shen.
GCSE English Language Unit 3 Speaking & Listening
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Comprehension: Sentence comprehension.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Acquisition: Bilinugalism.
Interactions between Language and Stuttering NU/SFA Workshop for Fluency Specialists July, 1996 J. Scott Yaruss, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of Pittsburgh.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Production & Comprehension: Conversation & Dialog.
Understanding the Function. WHY? What is the purpose of the statement? Why did the speaker say x?
Explication (of a literary work) Critical Analysis.
Assessment of Morphology & Syntax Expression. Objectives What is MLU Stages of Syntactic Development Examples of Difficulties in Syntax Why preferring.
1 Chapter 4 Syntax The sentence patterns of language Part I.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics A Crash Course in Linguistic Theory Part II.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Conversation & Dialog: Language Production and Comprehension in conjoined action.
Must be something you can __________________________________. Cannot be an __________________ such as which flowers do you like better, roses or daises?
Linguistic Essentials
Background: Speakers use prosody to distinguish between the meanings of ambiguous syntactic structures (Snedeker & Trueswell, 2004). Discourse also has.
Recent Models of Stuttering Western Illinois University February 7, 1997 J. Scott Yaruss, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of Pittsburgh.
Linguistic Development Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D
Unit 4: REFERRING EXPRESSIONS
Making it stick together…
User Responses to Prosodic Variation in Fragmentary Grounding Utterances in Dialog Gabriel Skantze, David House & Jens Edlund.
Lexical, Prosodic, and Syntactics Cues for Dialog Acts.
Syntactic Priming in Sentence Comprehension (Tooley, Traxler & Swaab, 2009) Zhenghan Qi.
Revision Lecture Cognitive Science. Past papers What is the answer to the question? The answer will nearly always involve: “How amazing it is that people.
Speakers‘ overestimation of their effectiveness The study of Keysar & Henly (2002):Keysar & Henly (2002): It has been shown that people who tap a popular.
Chapter 11 Language. Some Questions to Consider How do we understand individual words, and how are words combined to create sentences? How can we understand.
Building awareness and concern for pronunciation by Joanne Kenworthy - Teaching English Pronunciation FONETICA Y FONOLOGIA II - ALEXANDRA NAIR ZUÑIGA.
LISTENING: QUESTIONS OF LEVEL FRANCISCO FUENTES NICOLAS VALENZUELA.
Chapter 7 Semantics and Pragmatics
Language, Mind, and Brain by Ewa Dabrowska
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
STYLE SHIFTING, CODE-SWITCHING Joan Swann
The interactive alignment model
Saidna Zulfiqar bin Tahir STATE UNIVERSITY OF MAKASSAR
Turn-taking and Disfluencies
Comparative Studies Avesani et al 1995; Hirschberg&Avesani 1997
Linguistic Essentials
Presentation transcript:

Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 12: SNEDEKER ET AL.: PROSODY

Coming up Midterm review questions will be ed by tomorrow Midterm review questions will be ed by tomorrow

Referential Context for Experiment 1

Instrument Demonstration

Modifier Demonstration

Instrument Context Experiment 2, Speaker Only

Modifier Context Experiment 2, Speaker Only

Ambiguous Context Experiment 2, All Listeners

Nicole Dobrowolski’s presentation

Audience Design Do speakers design their utterances for their addressees? Do speakers design their utterances for their addressees? One example of this would be if speakers were to try to make their utterances as easy to understand as possible, for example by avoiding ambiguity. One example of this would be if speakers were to try to make their utterances as easy to understand as possible, for example by avoiding ambiguity.

Do speakers use prosody to disambiguate? Possibility one: No, prosody comes from the syntax. Possibility one: No, prosody comes from the syntax. Tap [] the frog with the flower. Tap [] the frog with the flower. Tap the frog [] with the flower. Tap the frog [] with the flower. Evidence: some studies have found that speakers produce the same range of prosodic patterns whether the context disambiguates the utterance or not. (Warren et al., 2000; Kraljic & Brennan, 2003) Evidence: some studies have found that speakers produce the same range of prosodic patterns whether the context disambiguates the utterance or not. (Warren et al., 2000; Kraljic & Brennan, 2003)

Do speakers use prosody to disambiguate? Possibility #2: Yes, they use prosodic cues as a mechanism to facilitate the comprehension of difficult ambiguities Possibility #2: Yes, they use prosodic cues as a mechanism to facilitate the comprehension of difficult ambiguities Evidence: Snedeker et al. show that speakers produce these cues more when the referential context doesn’t help disambiguate. Evidence: Snedeker et al. show that speakers produce these cues more when the referential context doesn’t help disambiguate.

Referential Context and ambiguity Tap the frog with the flower. Tap the frog with the flower. Tap the frog that has the flower. Tap the frog that has the flower. Tap the frog by using the flower. Tap the frog by using the flower. Modifier reading -- “with the flower” modifies “the frog” (I.e., tells you something about it Modifier reading -- “with the flower” modifies “the frog” (I.e., tells you something about it Instrument reading -- “with the flower” tells you what instrument to use to do the action. Instrument reading -- “with the flower” tells you what instrument to use to do the action.

Referential context When would a speaker most likely say “the frog with the flower” (with the modifier reading)? When would a speaker most likely say “the frog with the flower” (with the modifier reading)?

Lexical Bias Some verbs are more likely to occur with an instrument PP than others. Some verbs are more likely to occur with an instrument PP than others. Also affects syntactic ambiguity resolution Also affects syntactic ambiguity resolution Tap the frog with the stick. Tap the frog with the stick. Choose the frog with the flower. Choose the frog with the flower. Find the frog with the stick. Find the frog with the stick.

Reading for next time: Branigan et al. Big question: what is the production system like? Big question: what is the production system like? How do we retrieve words? (Dell) How do we retrieve words? (Dell) How do speakers make prosodic choices? (Snedeker et al.) How do speakers make prosodic choices? (Snedeker et al.) How do speakers make choices about the grammatical form of the utterance? (Branigan et al.) How do speakers make choices about the grammatical form of the utterance? (Branigan et al.)

Choices in grammatical form He gave you an apple. He gave you an apple. He gave an apple to you. He gave an apple to you. You were given an apple by him. You were given an apple by him. An apple was given to you by him. An apple was given to you by him. To you he gave an apple. To you he gave an apple. Priming effect: speakers tend to use forms that they have recently used. Priming effect: speakers tend to use forms that they have recently used. Question: Does priming also occur BETWEEN speakers? (not just within the same speaker) Question: Does priming also occur BETWEEN speakers? (not just within the same speaker)