Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) of 2013 Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) of 2013 Public Assistance Program Alternate Procedures Pilot Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Advertisements

Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate 1 Credit Resolution Initiative GOHSEPs focus is on proactively working with applicants to: – Identify.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Introduction to Recovery
Disaster Cost Reimbursement Assistance IDAHO BUREAU OF HOMELAND SECURITY.
1 DEBRIS MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW PRESENTER: GREG KELLER, Disaster Recovery Branch Grants Administrator/Public Assistance Officer (614)
 Ron Campbell University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Emergency Management Coordinator 24 years of experience in emergency management including more.
Public Assistance Alternative Procedure Pilot Program Debris
Public Assistance Program Overview
Texas Department of Public Safety WHAT’S NEW IN MITIGATION BIG CHANGES in the FEMA HMA Grant Programs.
Joe Turner, PE Disaster Recovery Engineer. DIVISIONS AND DISTRICTS.
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY The Legislative Sunset Review Process Darwin Gamble, Senior Legislative Analyst OPPAGA February.
The Sandy Recovery Improvement Act at 1 Year Old Evan Rosenberg, J.D. Donald Kunish, C.E.M. Recovery Chief, FDEM Client Service Mgr., Leidos Prepared for.
CEAC PWOI Spring Conference Stafford Act Changes PL February 28, 2013 Jerry Quinn Copyright Gerard J. Quinn & Associates 2013.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
1 October 2004 Flood FEMA-1575-DR-HI October 2004 Flood FEMA-1575-DR-HI Applicants’ Briefing.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 4a – Disasters and Decisions.
Michael Warren Senior Emergency Services Coordinator HMEP GRANT ADMINISTRATOR (916) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Regulatory Compliance Costs and the Impact on Small Airports Findings of ACRP Report 90 and Application to [INSERT NAME OF AIRPORT]
North Carolina Emergency Management Recovery Disaster Recovery Updates.
Connecticut Applicants’ Briefing DR-SAMPLE ###-CT Declared Date #### Incident Period DATE ####
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Division of Homeland Security & Emergency Management Al Cavallo Brief Disaster Assistance Overview with an emphasis on Tribal Roads Declaration Process.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate Public Assistance Grant Program Donated Resources.
COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES TxDot Grant Fund Project.
Recent Changes to the Stafford Act Evan Rosenberg, Bureau Chief of Recovery Florida Division of Emergency Management July 23, 2013.
___________________________________________________________________________________ _______ State Agricultural Response Team PETS Act Reimbursement Issues.
1 Hagerty Consulting Coordinated Response to Disaster A Panel Discussion for the National Community Development.
Robert M. Worley II Director, Education Service VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Department of Veterans Affairs 2013 CCME Annual Symposium February 26,
STATE OF FLORIDA RESOURCE AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Suzanne Adams, Chief Finance and Administration State.
1 Recent Accomplishments and Opportunities for 2007 ~WEROC~ Kelly Hubbard WEROC Emergency Manager Municipal Water District of Orange County WACO, January.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
Mitigation Focus-Public Assistance Briefing for Hurricane Sandy
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
OSHA Training Institute 1 Regional Planning and Assistance OSHA Training Institute – Region IX University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Extension.
The New Public Assistance ProgramOV-1 Objectives  Describe the purpose of the New Public Assistance Program  Identify the components of the New Public.
FEMA Programs I Session Name: FEMA Programs I Coastal Hazards Management Course Slide 31.1.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
State of Louisiana Mitigation Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Governor’s Office of Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness.
1 ID-XX-20XX DR-XXXX FMAG-XXXX Applicant Brief and Kickoff Meeting IDAHO BUREAU OF HOMELAND SECURITY.
Third Party In-Kind Contributions as Match for FHWA Planning Funds Michigan Transportation Planning Association Conference Flint, Michigan July 15, 2011.
How an Electric Utility can get ready for FEMA Marci Lopez P.E.
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE APPLICANT BRIEFING FEMA DISASTER DR-1997.
Texas Department of Public Safety Public Assistance Disaster Closeout.
July 14, Rural Electric Cooperatives Procurement/Contracting Guidance Roger Jones Region VIII Disaster Assistance Division.
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Adoption & Approval Process prepared for: Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared by:
2011 HSGP Grant Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke Mr. Mike Curtis April 30, 2012.
1 EMS/Fire Department Consolidation Treatment of Pension and Service Under the Police/Fire, CSRS, and 401(a) Plans.
Page 1 Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited. Page 1 FEMA Claims – For Non- Profit Entities Recovering from FEMA after a.
McClain County Multi- Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Image from
Hurricane Response. FEMA FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) It is a government agency that deals with preparation and the after math of natural.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas’ Homeland Security & Preparedness Agency Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 Public Assistance.
1 Iowa Emergency Management Association Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department Emergency Management Program Development Course EMERGENCY.
PART 200 § Eligible & Ineligible Activities PART 200 § Eligible & Ineligible Activities 1 Capital Fund Rule – §
Nassau County Disaster Debris Management Plan Debris Planning Team Meeting 1, April 24.
Public Assistance New Policies. 2 Important Changes in Policy  Host-State Evacuation and Sheltering  SOP - Direct Reimbursement for Host- State Evacuation.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
Integrity Innovation Accountability Commitment to Excellence Teamwork Values Item 8C Ord. No. 889-A; Amending the Fiscal Year Annual Budget
DEPARTMENT ADVISORY NO. 2 Series of 2009 Guidelines on the Adoption of Flexible Work Arrangements.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
FEMA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE - A PRIMER
Board of Early Education and Care Planning and Evaluation Committee
Tribal Shares Fundamentals
Randy Brawley Preparedness Analyst & Planning Officer FEMA Region IX
Oklahoma Department of Emergency Managment
Declarations and Disaster Assistance ID
Presentation transcript:

Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) of 2013 Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) of 2013 Public Assistance Program Alternate Procedures Pilot Program Public Assistance Division Federal Emergency Management Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security

On January 29, 2013, President Obama signed into law the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 (P.L ) (SRIA). Sandy Recovery Improvement Act 2 FEMA is implementing the Alternate Procedures as a pilot program, as described in the law.

Alternate Procedures Pilot Program  The FEMA Administrator may waive notice and comment rulemaking and applicants may apply these alternative procedures to: Future major disasters Current disasters for projects where construction has not yet begun  Applicants must elect to participate in the pilot and can select alternative procedures on a project by project basis 3

Alternative Procedures shall further the goals of: 1.Reducing the costs to the Federal Government of providing such assistance 2.Increasing flexibility in the administration of such assistance 3.Expediting the provision of such assistance to applicants 4.Providing financial incentives and disincentives for the timely and cost-effective completion of projects with such assistance 4

Two Main Sections of the Pilot Program 5 Alternate Procedures Pilot Program Debris Removal Permanent Work

Debris Removal Debris Removal Sections will be available to applicants as a list of choices. Applicants can choose to implement all of the provisions, select provisions, or none of the provisions regardless of receiving reimbursement on actual costs or a grant based on an estimate. The available provisions are: Capped Grant on the basis of an estimate Sliding Scale Debris Recycling Force Account Labor Pre-Incident Debris Management Plans 6

Capped Grant on the Basis of an Estimate FEMA, the grantee, and the applicant will conduct a survey of disaster related debris and will come to an agreement on an estimate for how much it will cost to remove that debris. Applicants will be allowed to keep any funds that they did not use for debris related operations and be allowed to put that money towards the purchase of new equipment or for enhancing their future debris removal operations, such as training and planning. If applicants spend more money than the federal grant allows for, the additional costs will be the responsibility of the applicant. If the FEMA/Grantee/Applicant team cannot agree on an estimate within 60 days following the kickoff meeting, FEMA will only reimburse the applicant on actual costs. 7

Sliding Scale The Sliding Scale provision enables applicants to receive an increased federal cost share for the rapid removal of debris. An applicant cannot utilize this provision if receiving a grant on the basis of an estimate. 8 Days from End of Incident Period Federal Cost Share 0 – 3085% 31 – 9080% 91 – 12075% %

Debris Recycling FEMA will now allow applicants the choice of retaining any revenue from recycling disaster related debris without an offset to the federal grant. Costs to sort debris as part of a recycling program are eligible for reimbursement. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA.gov) may provide guidance on recycling programs. 9

Force Account Labor FEMA will begin to reimburse straight or regular time salaries and benefits for employees of an eligible applicant involved in conducting or administrating debris and wreckage removal. FEMA will continue to pay overtime for employees as well. 10

Applicants who have developed a debris management plan prior to the disaster will receive a one-time 2% financial incentive on the first disaster following the plan adoption. Subsequent disasters will be funded at the normal cost share. FEMA provides guidance on the development of a debris management plan, including templates. 11 Pre-Incident Debris Management Plans

Permanent Work Applicants will decide project by project if they will utilize the alternate procedures or remain in the actual cost program. The provisions of the alternate procedures will come in a package deal and only available to projects which receive a grant on the basis of an estimate. 12

Permanent Work Applicants who choose alternate procedures may:  Consolidate projects across categories of work  Keep any unspent funds under the grant  Not receive a reduction in funding when choosing to do an alternate project, and  Have access to a 3rd party expert panel to have cost estimates validated where the federal share is in excess of $5 million 13

Consolidate Projects Applicants who choose to receive a grant on the basis of an estimate will be allowed to keep any funds that they did not use on that project. They will then be allowed to put that money towards hazard mitigation activities or for enhancing their future public assistance operations, such as training and planning. FEMA, the grantee, and the applicant will determine the grant amount by combining cost estimates on all of the projects that are to be consolidated. Applicants will not have the ability to move funding from one grouping of consolidated projects to another. 14

Unspent Funds (Under Runs) 15 Applicants who choose to receive a grant on the basis of an estimate will be allowed to keep any funds that they did not use on that project. Acceptable Uses of unspent funds: Hazard mitigation projects on damaged facilities or otherwise eligible facilities Activities to improve PA program operations such as training or planning Alternate or improved projects defined by current PA policy

Alternate Project Reduction If an applicant choses to receive their federal grant on the basis of an estimate, as part of the pilot program, FEMA will provide the applicant with the entire federal cost share. Alternate projects require approval from FEMA before construction begins. 16

3rd Party Expert Panel Applicants will have the ability to have their own cost estimate, or a cost estimate prepared by FEMA, to be reviewed by a third party expert panel. The panel will be comprised of design, engineering, construction, cost estimating and industry professionals that are independent of FEMA, the grantee, and the applicant. The expert panel will only review estimates where the federal cost share is projected to be in excess of $5 million. Decisions by the panel will be final and will be used as the basis of funding for the grant. 17