Tentative Exploration by SAIC on Regulating the Abuse of IPR to Exclude and Restrict Competition Yang Jie September 16, 2013 State Administration for Industry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIRLINE VIEWS ON THE PROPOSED GATS TOURISM ANNEX Richard Smithies Director, Policy Analysis Government & Industry Affairs - IATA SYMPOSIUM ON TOURISM SERVICES.
Advertisements

IDRC Forum in KyotoApril 13, Challenges in Enforcing Chinese Antimonopoly Law Prof. Dr. Wang Xiaoye Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
China’s Approach to Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property Under its Anti-Monopoly Law Xinzhu Zhang Research Centre for Regulation and Competition.
Restraints to competition organized by the State Prevent, control, assess, suppress? Bruno Lasserre, Chairman, Conseil de la concurrence American Bar Association,
Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States Due process in competition law Michaela Nosa Antimonopoly Office of the SR.
中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会 National Development and Reform Commission Delightful Progress of China’s Anti- Price Monopoly Work Xu Kunlin, Director General of Price.
Fair Trading Commission Overview of Competition Law The Experience of Barbados Competition law and Policy Training Workshop March 30-31, 2011 The Savannah.
Business and Government #3 Today I will: Take notes and be fascinated! So I can: Explain how government, by establishing laws and regulations, can improve.
A. Junaidi Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition ASEAN Competition Conference, November 2011.
C OMPETITION LAW IN NIGERIA Daniel Bwala. Background There is no specific Competition law in Nigeria at the moment. However there are laws or rules in.
UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES IN VIETNAM Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam – 12 Sept 2012.
Understand the prospects of China's competition law related for intellectual property from the perspective of technical standards Wang-xiao ye Researcher.
UNFAIR COMPETITION PRACTICES Cao Xuan Quang – Deputy Head of Unfair Competition Division EXPERIENCES FROM VIETNAM Viewpoints in this presentation do not.
The Interface between S ector Regulation and Competition Law —The China’s choice Shiying Xu Professor,East China University of Political Science and Law.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
GLOBAL VS NATIONAL IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: BUSINESS MODELS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT MODELS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT IN RUSSIA) IP and.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
“Commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights” - Skopje, April 2009 UNECE ‘Recommendation M’ on the Use of Market Surveillance.
Mergers and Acquisitions: China's New Anti- Monopoly Law Edward Lehman Managing Director – Lehman, Lee & Xu Gerson Lehrman Group.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
1 On the Conspiracy Requirement of Cartels --through the analysis of a practical case Wen-Hsiu,Lee Fair Trade Commission of Taiwan April 5, 2006.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
Erlinda M. Medalla April 27-28, 2006 Hanoi Understanding Competition Policy.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE International Competition Network 6 th Annual Conference Moscow 2007 Application Experience of International Competition Network.
China IP’s Challenge Since joining the World Trade Organization (2001), China has strengthened its legal framework and amended its IPR laws and regulations.
© Haihong Liu, SISU Law School Nov Shan Zhai.
Hearing on Retail Industry: Developments and Impact CCMI Hearing Brussels 24 September 2008.
ABA China Inside and Out September , Beijing The interface between competition law and intellectual property Nicholas Banasevic, DG Competition,
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Unfair Trade Practices: Conceptualisation, Significance and Regional Perspectives March 11, 2011.
© SOUTH-WESTERNCONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS: LESSON 3.21 LESSON 3.2 Regulating the Private Sector  Explain how government, by establishing laws and regulations,
EU Discussion Paper on Exclusionary Abuses Michael Albers European Commission DG Competition 54th Antitrust Law Spring Meeting Washington DC, 30 March.
1 Session 1 Perspective for More National Space Legislation - Report of the Rapporteur - Dr. Michael Gerhard, DLR Project 2001 Plus Symposium, Cologne,
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices Twomey Jennings.
The Third Revision of the Chinese Patent Law State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C Dec
New Development of China’s Anti-monopoly Regulations on the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights WANG Xianlin Shanghai Jiao Tong University KoGuan Law.
China’s Legal Regulation on the Abuse of Market Power by Large Retailers WANG Xianlin Shanghai Jiao Tong University KoGuan Law School St.Petersburg
1 The Relationship Between the Antitrust Law and the Intellectual Property Protection Wang Xianlin, Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Standards and competition policy EU-China Workshop on Application of Anti-monopoly Law in Intellectual Property Area Changsha, 11. – 12. March 2010 Peter.
IPR Acquisition and Concentration IPR Acquisition and The Business Concentration Professor Huang Yong UIBECLC Dalian,June 10,
Identification of Abuse of dominant market position involving IPR Wang Xianlin, KoGoan Law School of Shanghai Jiaotong University Dalian,June 11,2010.
Legal Framework of China Regulating the Abuse of Intellectual Property in License He Zhonglin IP Tribunal of Supreme Court Da Lian, June 10, 2010.
Sangmin Song, Director, Anti-Monopoly Div., KFTC MRFTA & IP Rights 1.
The Definition of the Relevant Market Lecturer: Professor Huang Yong Law School of UIBE UIBECLC Dalian, China,June 11, 2010.
COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW 1 2 EXTANT COMPETITION LAW OF INDIA MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 BROUGHT INTO FORCE IN 1970.
The Public Tendering and Bidding (招投标) Law of the People's Republic of China Effective since January 1, 2000.
The Relationship Between Intellectual Property Rights Abuse and Monopoly Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
Identification of Monopoly Agreement involving Intellectual Property Rights Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
JUFE Yu Ling 1 Part 2 Antimonopoly Law: Chinese Perspective Part 2 Antimonopoly Law: Chinese Perspective.
Prof. Frederick Abbott UNDP Consultant
competition rules in inland transport
Wang Xianlin, Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Five Years Anti-monopoly Work of SAIC Retrospect and Prospect
International Distribution Institute
Reforming the Regulatory Process
When Competition Law Meets Telecom Regulation: the Chinese Context
Environmental Considerations in European Competition Law
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
“Revisiting Abuse of Dominance & IPRs: Emerging Jurisprudence of the Indian Competition Law” “Plenary 2: A comparative perspective to IPR and Competition:
THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ECONOMY
Government Role in the Economy
Government and Business
“The Interest to Promote Competition Vs
Presentation in the Launch Meeting of the 7-UP Mark II/ Mekong Project 23-24/4/2004, Hanoi, Vietnam Truong Quang Hoai Nam Director General - Legal Department.
COMPETITION POLICY AND IP
THE GOALS OF COMPETITION LAW AND THE ROLE OF LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Tentative Exploration by SAIC on Regulating the Abuse of IPR to Exclude and Restrict Competition Yang Jie September 16, 2013 State Administration for Industry and Commerce Anti-monopoly and Anti-unfair Competition Enforcement Bureau

Government Fair Competition Innovation Development Support

The Formulation of Guidelines for AML Enforcement in IPR Field In 2009, SAIC launched the research and formulation of Guidelines for AML Enforcement in IPR Field — Analyze and study the practice of foreign competition agencies, relevant guidelines and regulations; — Carry out on-site Investigation and Survey; — Seek for comments on the Guidelines (draft for comments)

Main Contents of the Guidelines It provides three explicit basic principles on the enforcement of anti-trust law on intellectual property rights of the enforcement agency in China: — The protection of IPR and the enforcement of the anti-trust law share a common purpose, namely to encourage innovation and to protect fair competition in the market, as well as to safeguard the interests of consumers and social public. The behavior of exercising intellectual property shall neither be exempted under the Anti-monopoly Law because of the protection of the Intellectual Property Law nor be special reviewed by the Anti-monopoly Law; — The four kind of monopoly behaviors provided by the Anti- monopoly Law does not include the abuse of IPR to eliminate or restrict competition; — The IPR shall be equally treated with other property rights by the enforcement of the Anti-monopoly Law; the possession of IPR itself shall not amount to the presumption of dominant position in the relevant market.

Main Contents of the Guidelines It has established the analysis principles and framework of enforcement of the Anti-monopoly Law on IPR. It has carried out the anti-trust analysis respectively on the exercises of general type on the IPR and the exercises of several certain types of intellectual property rights.

Processes of establishing the Rules of the Administration for Industry and Commerce on the Prohibition of Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights for the Purposes of Eliminating or Restricting Competition At the end of 2012, SAIC initiated the work to draft up the Rules of the Administration for Industry and Commerce on the Prohibition of Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights for the Purposes of Eliminating or restricting Competition In March 2013, SAIC formed the current Rules (Draft for comments)

It has clarified the legislative purpose, explained the related concepts, and determined the factors to identify the impact on competitions by the exercise of IPR; It prohibits the implementation of the monopoly agreement during the exercise of IPR and provides relevant regulations of the rules of presumption and safe harbor; It prohibits the abuse of dominant market position during the exercise of IPR, and respectively provides specific circumstances of refusing the permission of IPR, as well as tying and unreasonable restrictions related to IPR; Main Contents of the Rules (Draft for Comments)

It provides the standards to determine whether certain exercises of intellectual property rights amount to related monopoly behavior; It provides the basis, principles and specific rules of penalty performed by the industrial and commercial authorities to investigate and punish the one who eliminate and restrict competition. Main Contents of the Rules (Draft for Comments)

Thank You !