The Field of View of a Thin Lens Interferometer Baseline=2B F F=range from array center to detector  ’’  Nulled here. B B 2Bsin  Bsin  2 Channels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ATST Imager and Slit Viewer Optics Ming Liang. 2 Optical layout of the telescope, relay optics, beam reducer and imager. Optical Layouts.
Advertisements

ARCTIC Post-PDR Optical Design Study
November 20, 2003University of Colorado The Off-Plane Option Study Results Potential Capabilities Webster Cash University of Colorado.
 In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.  From the previous figure we see that the.
The Wave Nature of Light
Fundamental of Optical Engineering Lecture 4.  Recall for the four Maxwell’s equation:
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers
990901EIS_Opt.1 The Instrument: Optical Design Dr. John T. Mariska Data Coordination Scientist Naval Research Laboratory
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers A Brief Guide to Understanding and Obtaining the Proper Resolution of the 785 Raman System.
Announcements Exam 2 is scheduled for two weeks from today (April 2) but, due to all the missed days it will be pushed back one week to April 9 Homework:
All these Sky Pixels Are Yours The evolution of telescopes and CCD Arrays: The Coming Data Nightmare.
LXO/MagEX Meeting Greenbelt, 24/10/07 Telescope Baseline Configuration: Imaging Capability (Micropore Optic) Telescope Field of View ~ 30° x 30° Angular.
All these Sky Pixels Are Yours The evolution of telescopes and CCD Arrays: The Coming Data Nightmare.
Interference & Diffraction
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Generation-X telescope: Measurement of On-Orbit Adjustment Data Dan Schwartz, R. J. Brissenden, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, T. Gaetz, D. Jerius, M. Juda, P.
Astronomical Spectroscopy
Ch 25 1 Chapter 25 Optical Instruments © 2006, B.J. Lieb Some figures electronically reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle.
An X-ray Interferometry Technology Roadmap Keith Gendreau NASA/GSFC Webster Cash U. Colorado.
Lecture 14 Images Chapter 34. Law of Reflection Dispersion Snell’s Law Brewsters Angle Preliminary topics before mirrors and lenses.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction.
Goal: To understand diffraction Objectives: 1)To learn about the results of Young’s Double Slit Experiment 2)To understand when you get maxima and minima.
SXT Soft X-Ray Telescope Onboard the Yohkoh Satellite SXT.ppt.
1 Fabry-Perot Interferometer Fri. Nov. 15, Spectroscopy applications: Fabry- Perot Interferometer Assume we have a monochromatic light source.
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
Diffraction: single slit How can we explain the pattern from light going through a single slit? w screen L x.
Effective lens aperture Deff
Optics for Wide Field X-ray Imaging
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Optics and Telescopes. Optics and Telescopes: Guiding Questions 1.How do reflecting and refracting telescopes work? 2.Why is it important that professional.
Chapter 36 Diffraction In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
The Second International Workshop on Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and their sources INR, Moscow, April 14-16, 2005 from Extreme Universe Space Observatory.
MAXIM Webster Cash University of Colorado. Capella ”
Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for 2-D GRIN Profile Measurement Instrument Overview Sample Preparation Measurement Uncertainty University of Rochester Gradient-Index.
Difference of Optical Path Length Interference Two waves One wave Many waves Diffraction.
20 OCT 2003SOLAR ORBITER MEETING1 Optical Design Activities at RAL Kevin Middleton Optical Systems Group Space Science & Technology Dep’t. Rutherford Appleton.
Multiple interference Optics, Eugene Hecht, Chpt. 9.
MAXIM Periscope ISAL Study Highlights ISAL Study beginning 14 April 2003.
1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Single, multiple slit(s) & Circular aperture Fri. Nov. 22, 2002.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Telescopes. Light Hitting a Telescope Mirror huge mirror near a star * * * small mirror far from 2 stars In the second case (reality), light rays from.
Silicon Optics for Wide Field X-ray Imaging Dick Willingale et al. – SPIE August 2013 Silicon Optics for Wide Field X-ray Imaging Dick Willingale University.
Optical principles of diffraction focussing, Preparing the way to space borne Fresnel imagers NiceSeptember 23-25, Fresnel Imagers Observatoire.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
Periscope Configuration
Interference and Diffraction. Conditions for Interference Coherent Sources - The phase between waves from the multiple sources must be constant. Monochromatic.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y APS Formation Sensor.
The Field Camera Unit Results from technical meeting S. Scuderi INAF – Catania.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
X-ray Interferometer Mirror Module ISAL Study Pre-work Overview.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Webster Cash Keith Gendreau and The Maxim Team MAXIM The Black Hole Imager.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
MAXIM Pathfinder IMDC Study 13 May Science Team Keith Gendreau Code 662 GSFC Webster CashUniversity of Colorado Ann ShipleyUniversity of Colorado.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
“Whether they ever find life there or not, I think Jupiter should be considered an enemy planet.” Jack Handy HW2 is due on Wednesday. How’s that going?
Interference Requirements
Interference of EM Waves
Phys102 Lecture 25 The Wave Nature of Light; Interference
Observational Astronomy
Example: 633 nm laser light is passed through a narrow slit and a diffraction pattern is observed on a screen 6.0 m away. The distance on the screen.
Phys102 Lecture 25 The Wave Nature of Light; Interference
Fraunhofer diffraction from Circular apertures:
Presentation transcript:

The Field of View of a Thin Lens Interferometer Baseline=2B F F=range from array center to detector  ’’  Nulled here. B B 2Bsin  Bsin  2 Channels in Phase here Pathlengths from “in phase” positions: Top Channel 2Bsin  +(F-Bsin  )/cos  ’ Bottom Channel (F+Bsin  )/cos 

The Field of View of a Thin Lens Interferometer: Approximations Baseline=2B F F=range from array center to detector  ’’  Nulled here. Pathlengths from “in phase” positions: Top Channel 2Bsin  +(F-Bsin  )/cos  ’ Bottom Channel (F+Bsin  )/cos  APPROXIMATIONS: DeflectionAngles of each Channel:  ’~  Cos Approximation: cos  ~ 1-  2 /2 Taylor Expansion: q/(1+dx) ~ q(1-dx) Also Assumed: Internal workings of both lenses are identical! OPD between top and bottom channels: OPD ~B  2 sin 

OPD between top and bottom channels: OPD ~B  2 sin   FOV =  2 B)  = F 2 /(10B 3) Q: Given the OPD between the channels, what is the condition to NOT seriously distort a fringe on the detector? A: OPD <  Note that this condition also defines the field of View for an interferometer of this type. NOTE: This FOV calculation makes no assumptions about maximum graze Angles. Therefore, at most, the FOV will be ~0.5 degrees due to graze restrictions.

Designing a Mission 1: Baseline, Focal Length, FOV, and Formation Tolerances are derived. What angular resolution at what wavelength do you want?  res  What is the smallest X-ray pixel size(  m) you can imagine? s The baseline (2B) needs to be: 2B =  res The Focal Length (F) needs to be: F =  s/  res The FOV will be: FOV = 4/5  (s/ ) 2  res Tightest Formation Flying Tolerance between optics s/c = s. “Lateral” Longitudal Formation Flying Tolerance between optics s/c = 4/5  (s/ ) 2  res B

Some Typical Numbers 1 “MAXIM Pathfinder” 100  as Science (5x radians)  Angstroms S=10  m  F=20 km  2B= 2 m  FOV=2.5 arcseconds  Long. Control=0.7 mm “Full MAXIM” 1  as Science (5x radians)  Angstroms S=10  m  F=2000 km  2B= 200 m  FOV=25 mas  Long. Control=7  m

Designing a Mission 2: What angular resolution at what wavelength do you want?  res  What is the smallest X-ray pixel size(  m) you can imagine? s The baseline (2B) needs to be: 2B =  res The Focal Length (F) needs to be: F =  s/  res The FOV will be: FOV = 80  (s/ ) 2  res Tightest Formation Flying Tolerance between optics s/c = s. “Lateral” Longitudal Formation Flying Tolerance between optics s/c = 80  (s/ ) 2  res B The Difference Here is That we will have fringes 10x bigger than the CCD pixel Size.

Some Typical Numbers 2 “MAXIM Pathfinder” 100  as Science (5x radians)  Angstroms S=10  m  F=200 km  2B= 2 m  FOV=250 arcseconds  Long. Control=7 cm “Full MAXIM” 1  as Science (5x radians)  Angstroms S=10  m  F=20000 km  2B= 200 m  FOV=2.5 arcseconds  Long. Control=700  m

Mirror Module Dimensions The Mirror modules are pairs of flat (better than /100) mirrors. One mirror is fixed, the other has pitch (~mas) and yaw (arcminute) control. The module also has the ability to adjust the spacing of the mirrors at the nm level to introduce ~ angstrom pathlength control. Thermal control consistent to maintain optical figure (~0.1 degrees). There is structure to hold the module together.

The Mass of Glass 1: If a mirror length is “m”, and the graze angle is “g”, then the width of the mirror is m*sin(g)- in order to have square effective areas for each module. The effective area of one module will be: A module = (r*m*sin(g)) 2 Where r is the reflectivity off one mirror. m msin(g) Some Numbers: r~0.8 g~2 degrees sin(g)~1/30 => A module ~ m 2 /1400

The Mass of Glass 2: The “1/6” rule suggests that the thickness of the mirror be about 1/6th the length in order to preserve figure. If the density of the mirror is , then the mass of the glass of one module is: M glass =  m 3 sin(g)/3 m msin(g) Some Numbers:  ~2.5 g/cc sin(g)~1/30  M glass ~ m 3 /16 grams  (m in cm) m/6

The Mass of Glass 3: The ratio of mass to effective area becomes: Mass/area = r 2 m  /(3sin(g)) m msin(g) Some Numbers:  ~2.5 g/cc sin(g)~1/30 m/6 Mirror Length (cm) Area/Module (cm 2) Glass Mass Per Module (kg) Number of Modules to get 1000 cm 2 area. Total mass of glass to get 1000 cm 2 (kg) NOTE- this mass estimate is for glass only. There may be some scaling of masses for structure and actuators- but that is not considered here.

Actuator Requirements: The pitch control should be to the some fraction of the diffraction spot size.  (m*sin(g))~30 /m ~ 6 mas for m=100 cm, 62 mas for m=10cm ~ 30 nm of control for anysize mirror. The range of pitch control should be able to accommodate the range of baselines over the range of focal lengths.  max ~ B/F =  s) ~ 1 arcsecond of range ~ 5x10 -6 m of linear range for a mirror of length m. where s=CCD pixel size

What would one of these modules look like? m msin(g) m/6 Gap~msin(g) Yaw ontrol Pitch Control msin(g) 3/2m+d m/3 + msin(g) 2(w+gap)+msin(g) By 2(w+gap)+msin(g)+m/3+actuator+encoder ASSUME: w+gap~5 cm Encoder+encoder~5cm Sin(g)~1/30 -->(10cm+m/30)x(15cm+m/3+m/30) -->m=30cm-> 13cmx26cm

Packing into a Rocket