Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basics of mm interferometry Turku Summer School – June 2009 Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory, Sweden.
Advertisements

BEAM FORMING NETWORKS ( BFN’s ) EE 525 Antenna Engineering.
Summer 2013 © Tim Pratt REU June 2013 Antennas Tim Pratt, Instructor
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Arecibo Observatory, 2009 Jan. 12.
Front-end, Back-end, correlators
Chalmers University of Technology Development of a Coolable Decade Bandwidth Eleven Feed System for SKA & VLBI 2010 Radio Telescopes Per-Simon Kildal Chalmers.
FDWAVE : USING THE FD TELESCOPES TO DETECT THE MICRO WAVE RADIATION PRODUCED BY ATMOSPHERIC SHOWERS Simulation C. Di Giulio, for FDWAVE Chicago, October.
Outline We will see main families of antenna used to create a radiated radio wave: wire antennas (dipole, monopole Yagi) slot antennas (half or quarter.
Prof. Ji Chen Notes 21 Introduction to Antennas Introduction to Antennas ECE Spring 2014.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, EVLA Hardware Testing Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001.
SIW 2003 The antenna element Ravi ATNF, Narrabri 1.The role of the antenna in a Fourier synthesis radio telescope 2.The Compact array antenna.
Satellite Communications A Part 2
Introduction to antennas
Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate source emission from other sources… (directional gain… dynamic.
Antennas Lecture 9.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2009/09/04): Single pixel feeds Theory: Brightness function Beam properties Sensitivity,
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Union College, 2005 July 06.
Lindgren Quadridge Feeds S. Weinreb and W. Imbriale SKA Antenna Working Group May 6, 2009.
Radio Telescopes. Jansky’s Telescope Karl Jansky built a radio antenna in –Polarized array –Study lightning noise Detected noise that shifted 4.
National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center © Germán Cortés M 2008 SKA TDP Antenna Optics By Germán Cortés M. Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853, USA National.
9. Radiation & Antennas Applied EM by Ulaby, Michielssen and Ravaioli.
Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
AuthorMeeting Title Date 1 EVLA Systems PDR Receivers/Feeds Daniel (Mert) MertelyEVLA System PDR:Receivers/Feeds 28 November, 2001.
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
Ankit Jain B.Tech 5 th Sem (ECE) IIIT Allahabad. High Gain ( db) Low cross polarization Reasonable bandwidth, Fractional Bandwidth being at least.
FAA/NASA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Jeff Dickman Chris Bartone June 20, 2003 A New Anechoic Chamber for Nearfield Antenna.
Antennas The primary elements of a synthesis array M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001.
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Sensitivity Joan Wrobel.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier.
P.Napier, Synthesis Summer School, 18 June Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier Interferometer block diagram Antenna fundamentals Types of antennas.
Radio Astronomy Techniques Preethi Pratap MIT Haystack Observatory.
Spectral Line Calibration Techniques with Single Dish Telescopes K. O’Neil NRAO - GB.
R. HaywardEVLA Feeds CDR - System Requirements 17 Feb EVLA Feeds CDR System Requirements.
Radio Interferometry and ALMA T. L. Wilson ESO. A few basics: Wavelength and frequency  -1 temperature max (mm) ~ 3/T(K) (for blackbody) Hot gas radiates.
US SKA TDP DVA-1 June 28-29, 2012Dish Verification Antenna No. 1 Critical Design Review, Penticton, BC Overview Of DVA-1 Optics Lynn Baker Bill Imbriale.
Proposed Versatile 1.2 to 14 GHz Radio Telescope Receiver S. Weinreb, JPL/Caltech, Draft July 5, 2005 Contents 1.Introduction and intended applications.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
SKA Dishes, CSIRO February 2013 SKA Dish Verification Antenna #1 Gary Hovey Astronomy Technology Program – Penticton 12 February 2013.
Electromagnetic Design of Broadband Antenna Feed Systems for the Northern Cross Radio Telescope (Bologna, Italy) Designed Broad Band Antenna Feed Systems.
BASIC ANTENNA PARAMETERS
Thoughts on the Design of a WVR for Alan Roy (MPIfR) the Twin Telescope at Wettzell.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop Socorro, June 10-17, 2008 Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon.
Radio Telescopes and Radiometers
A Modular K-Band Focal Plane Array for the Green Bank Telescope Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 9/28/2007.
The Design And Simulation of 7mm Ortho-mode Transducer Microwave Receiver Room Yunwei Ning.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory Sept – Indiana University How do Radio Telescopes work? K. Y. Lo.
Chapter 3 Antenna Types Part 1.
Antenna II LN07_Reflector Antennas 1 /34 Reflector Antennas.
Q, Ka, K, Ku & X-Band Receivers
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2011/09/22): Single dish systems Theory: basic properties, sky noise, system noise, Aeff/Tsys,
SPIE – June 25, The Details….. SPIE – June 25, Previous Focus Tracking Curves.
Rick PerleyEVLA Front-End CDR – On the Sky Tests April 24, EVLA Front-End CDR On the Sky Tests.
Rick PerleyEVLA Feeds CDR 17 February Performance of the L-Band Feed Rick Perley.
Brent WilloughbyEVLA Front-End CDR – WVR Option 24 April EVLA Front-End CDR Water Vapor Radiometer Option.
RADAR ANTENNA. Functions of Radar Antenna Transducer. Concentrates the radiated energy in one direction (Gain). Collects echo energy scattered back to.
Fundamentals of the GBT and Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV March 2016 ©Associated Universities,
Hanyang University 1/21 Antennas & RF Devices Lab. antenna arrays and automotive applications Kim Tae Won.
Hanyang University 1/15 Antennas & RF Devices Lab. MODERN ANTENNA HANDBOOK by CONSTANTINE A.BALANIS ch Jeong Gu Ho.
Antennas in Radio Astronomy
Phased Array Feeds SKANZ 2012 John O’Sullivan
Introduction to Using Radio Telescopes
Bob Zavala US Naval Observatory
Polarization Calibration
Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier
Feed & Front End PDR—Sys. Reqts
Parabolic Reflector Antenna Dr Jaikaran Singh. Contents General Properties Parabolic Reflector Antenna Reflector Type Cylindrical Parabolic Reflector.
ANTENNA’S MURRAY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB – KJ7HRI PRESENTS
Presentation transcript:

Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon

Outline Context Types of antennas Antenna fundamentals Reflector antennas – Mounts – Optics Antenna performance – Aperture efficiency – Pointing – Polarization Receivers 2 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Importance of the Antenna Elements Antenna amplitude pattern causes amplitude to vary across the source. Antenna phase pattern causes phase to vary across the source. Polarization properties of the antenna modify the apparent polarization of the source. Antenna pointing errors can cause time varying amplitude and phase errors. Variation in noise pickup from the ground can cause time variable amplitude errors. Deformations of the antenna surface can cause amplitude and phase errors, especially at short wavelengths. 3 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

4 4.8 GHz (C-band) Interferometer Block Diagram Antenna Front End IF Back End Correlat or Key Amplifier Mixer X Correlator Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

5 Types of Antennas Wire antennas – Dipole – Yagi – Helix – Small arrays of the above Reflector antennas Hybrid antennas – Wire reflectors – Reflectors with dipole feeds Yagi Helix

6 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop Basic Antenna Formulas Effective collecting area A(, ,  ) m 2 On-axis response A 0 =  A  = aperture efficiency Normalized pattern (primary beam) A(, ,  ) = A(, ,  )/A 0 Beam solid angle  A = ∫∫ A(, ,  ) d  all sky A 0  A = 2 = wavelength, = frequency

What determines the beam shape? f(u,v) = complex aperture field distribution u,v = aperture coordinates (wavelengths) F(l,m) = complex far-field voltage pattern l = sin  cos , m = sin  sin  F(l,m) = ∫∫ aperture f(u,v)exp(2  i(ul+vm))dudv f(u,v) = ∫∫ hemisphere F(l,m)exp(-2  i(ul+vm))dldm For VLA:  3dB = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D, D = reflector diameter in wavelengths Aperture-Beam Fourier Transform Relationship 7 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Antenna Mounts: Altitude over Azimuth Advantages – Cost – Gravity performance Disadvantages – Zone of avoidance – Beam rotates on sky 8 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Parallactic angle Beam Rotation on the Sky 9 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Antenna Mounts: Equatorial Advantages – Tracking accuracy – Beam doesn’t rotate Disadvantages – Cost – Gravity performance – Sources on horizon at pole 10 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Prime focus Offset Cassegrain Beam Waveguide Reflector Optics Cassegrain focus Naysmith Dual Offset 11 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Reflector Optics: Limitations Prime focus – Over-illumination (spillover) can increase system temperature due to ground pick-up – Number of receivers, and access to them, is limited Subreflector systems – Can limit low frequency capability. Feed horn too large. – Over-illumination by feed horn can exceed gain of reflector’s diffraction limited sidelobes Strong sources a few degrees away may limit image dynamic range Offset optics – Support structure of offset feed is complex and expensive 12 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Prime focus Cassegrain focus (GMRT) (AT) Offset Cassegrain Naysmith (VLA) (OVRO) Beam Waveguide Dual Offset (NRO) (GBT) Reflector Optics: Examples 13 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Feed Systems VLA EVLA GBT 14 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Antenna Performance: Aperture Efficiency On axis response: A 0 =  A Efficiency:  =  sf   bl   s   t   misc  sf = Reflector surface efficiency Due to imperfections in reflector surface  sf = exp(  (4  / ) 2 ) e.g.,  = /16,  sf = 0.5  bl = Blockage efficiency Caused by subreflector and its support structure  s = Feed spillover efficiency Fraction of power radiated by feed intercepted by subreflector  t = Feed illumination efficiency Outer parts of reflector illuminated at lower level than inner part  misc = Reflector diffraction, feed position phase errors, feed match and loss rms error  Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 15

Surface of ALMA Vertex Antenna Surface measurements of DV02 made with holography Measured surface rms =10um Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 16

Primary Beam l=sin(  ), D = antenna diameter in contours:  3,  6,  10,  15,  20,  25, wavelengths  30,  35,  40 dB dB = 10log(power ratio) = 20log(voltage ratio) VLA:  3dB = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D Voltage radiation pattern, |F(l,m)|  Dl Antenna Performance: Aperture Efficiency 17 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Subreflector mount Quadrupod El encoder Reflector structure Alidade structure Rail flatness Azimuth encoder Foundation Antenna Pointing: Practical Considerations 18 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Pointing: ALMA Vertex Antennas All-sky optical pointing on DV07 completed April 1-14 All-sky results (spec = 2” RMS) – 0.77 ± 0.12” RMS at OSF – 0.84 ± 0.13” RMS scaled to AOS All-sky and offset pointing within specifications! Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 19 DV07 pointing residuals: Mangum, N. Emerson, Mundnich & Stenvers

Pointing Accuracy  = rms pointing error Often  <  3dB /10 acceptable, because A(  3dB /10) ~ 0.97 BUT, at half power point in beam A(  3dB /2   3dB /10)/A(  3dB /2) =  0.3 For best VLA pointing use Reference Pointing.  = 3 arcsec =  3dB 50 GHz   3dB Primary beam A(  ) Antenna Performance: Pointing 20 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Antenna can modify apparent polarization properties of the source: Antenna structure – Symmetry of the optics – Reflections in the optics – Curvature of the reflectors Quality of feed polarization splitter – Constant across the beam Circularity of feed radiation patterns – No instrumental polarization on-axis, – But cross-polarization varies across the beam … Antenna Performance: Polarization 21 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

VLA 4.8 GHz cross-polarized primary beam Off-Axis Cross Polarization Cross-polarized aperture distribution Cross-polarized primary beam Field distribution in aperture of paraboloid fed by electric dipole 22 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

Reference received power to the equivalent temperature of a matched load at the input to the receiver Rayleigh-Jeans approximation to Planck radiation law for a blackbody P in = k B T  (W) k B = Boltzman’s constant (1.38* J/ o K) When observing a radio source, T total = T A + T sys – Tsys = system noise when not looking at a discrete radio source – T A = source antenna temperature Receivers: Noise Temperature 23 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

T A =  AS/(2k B ) = KS S = source flux (Jy) SEFD = system equivalent flux density SEFD = Tsys/K (Jy) EVLA Sensitivities Receivers: SEFD 24 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop

EVLA Q-Band (40-50 GHz) Receiver 35dB GHz Noise Diode Pol LNA Old New x3 Dewar NRAO CDL 35dB LNA NRAO CDL Dorado 4IWC45-1 Pamtech KYG2121-K2 (w/g) Noise/COM NC 5222 ENR > 20 dB Isolator Mica T-610S GHz PA8207-2F GHz Magic-T MDL 22TH12B RCP LCP T Cal 0  3 dBm Variable Attenuator NRAO DC-Block Inmet 8055H GHz Isolator MICA T-708S GHz 24dB Atlantic Microwave AMC 1233 Septum Polarizer & Cal Coupler Isolator Dorado 4IWN45-1A (UG38 → UG599) Tripler/Mixer Assembly Spacek 3XM L/R RF=40-50 GHz Post-AmpModule Caltech 3XM L/R RF=40-50 GHz Limiting LO Amplifier Norden N GHz P Out = 21.0 ± 0.5 dBm for ±6 dBm input x3 DC-Block Inmet 8055H GHz Isolator MICA T-708S GHz 24dB Isolator Dorado 4IWN45-1A (UG38 → UG599) Tripler/Mixer Assembly Spacek 3XM L/R RF=40-50 GHz Post-AmpModule Caltech 3XM L/R RF=40-50 GHz Integrated 18 dBm LO Splitter MAC Tech GHz Remove Some New T Cal 25 Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop