Conditions of Use & Acknowledgement This information may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any reselling or sub-licensing is expressly forbidden. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Please acknowledge the USDA Forest Service and University of Washington for use of any or all slides. Dr. Kathleen Wolf December 2012
Local Economics How Trees and Vegetation Connect to Property Values & Retail Green Cities: Good Health science summaries USDA Forest & University of Washington
Green Cities: Good Health City Life & Nearby Nature living in urbanized areas > 80% of U.S. population > 50% of all people in the world urban nature & greening = parks, gardens, trees, small landscapes, the urban forest, natural areas December 20123
Green Cities: Good Health Science about Nature Benefits environmental services air quality stormwater management energy savings economic value & savings social benefits public health (eg. physical activity) mental health & function children in nature December 20124
Green Cities: Good Health Social Benefit Local Economics December monetary values are important in community decision making ‘what is not counted does not count’ urban vegetation rarely produces marketable goods, yet can provide many measurable services and benefits nonmarket valuation methods can represent natural assets
The Source?
Green Cities: Good Health Research Portal database of research articles > 2,200 peer reviewed articles sorted into benefits themes providing web-based products December
Green Cities: Good Health
Datasheet December research highlights one page briefing print & share
Green Cities: Good Health Acknowledgements December Sponsors: University of Washington USDA Forest Service Natl Urban & Community Forestry Advisory Council NGO partners Thanks to University of Washington students: Katrina Flora, B.A. Mary Ann Rozance, M.S. Project Director: Kathleen Wolf, Ph.D.
back to …. Local Economics quality canopy cover & landscape are tied to higher economic values in communities.....
Green Cities: Good Health research highlights Residential & Homes Having larger trees in yards & as street trees can add from 3-15% to home values in neighborhoods. Wolf, 2007, Arborist News Average market effect of street trees on all house values across Portland, OR (population 590,000) Donovan and Butry, 2010, Landscape and Urban Planning = total value of $1.35 billion potentially increasing city’s annual property tax revenues $15.3 million December
Green Cities: Good Health research highlights Homes Near Parks Homes adjacent to naturalistic parks & open spaces are valued 8-20% higher than similar properties Positive price effect declines to near zero about ½ mile away Crompton, 2001, PAS Report 502 December
Green Cities: Good Health research highlights Retail & Shoppers Shoppers claim to spend 9-12% more for goods & services in central business districts having high quality tree canopy. Wolf, 2005, Journal of Forestry CBDs with high quality trees? Shoppers claim they will travel greater distance, for a longer time & spend more time once arriving Wolf, 2005, Journal of Forestry; Wolf, 2003, Journal of Arboriculture December
Conclusion City trees & urban greening provide many intangible services & benefits Quality outdoor environments are part of livable cities The economic values of parks, trees, and gardens are measurable Planting, management & stewardship are good public investments
Green Cities: Good Health For more information: December Green Cities: Good Health Project Support: University of Washington USDA Forest Service Project Director: Kathleen Wolf, Ph.D., Research Social Scientist, University of Washington
Article Database....