Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Advertisements

Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
Dispersion Modeling Jim McGraw Program Development Supervisor.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Impact Area 1-hour standards. SILs used to determine when a proposed source’s ambient impacts warrant a comprehensive (cumulative) source impact analysis.
AMTAC April 12 th, 2011 Meredith Kurpius EPA R9 1.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Classification of Air Pollutants
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Exceptional Events: Lessons Learned Eric C. Massey, Director Air Quality Division Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Phoenix, AZ July 5, 2011Credit:
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department Performance Test Specifics Rob Arpino Environmental Engineering Specialist.
Tribal Minor New Source Review Registrations Kaushal Gupta, Environmental Engineer, Air Permits Section USEPA Region 5 Air & Radiation Division Tribal.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Toxics Rule Changes Stakeholder Meeting March 20,
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
Environmental and Clean Air Regulations M IDSTREAM E NERGY L AW C ONFERENCE : M EETING THE D EMAND FOR I NFRASTRUCTURE H OUSTON, T EXAS December 7, 2012.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
EPA Region 9 Meredith Kurpius August 19, Status of Tribal Air Monitoring Value of tribal monitoring Used to protect public health on tribal land.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
September Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515)
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
Wingra Engineering, S.C.1 Evaluation of Gas Turbine Air Quality Impacts from a Community Perspective Steven Klafka, PE Wingra Engineering, S.C Electric.
Dispersion Modeling Challenges for Air Permitting Justin Fickas Christine Haman Jake Stewart.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Compliance Challenges in Meeting 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) NAAQS Sube Vel, GHD Co-speaker: James VanAssche, GHD.
Using Measurements and Modeling to Understand Local and Regional Influences on PM 2.5 in Vicinity of the PRGS.
1 Agricultural Programs for Controlling Particulate Matter Pollution Ira Domsky, Deputy Director Air Quality Division presented to Western State Air Resources.
Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
West Pinal PM 10 Nonattainment Area Construction Dust Rule DECEMBER 9, 2015 JOSH DEZEEUW ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGER 1.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Copyright © 2007 Exceptional Events and Data Collection in the Vicinity of the West 43 rd Avenue Monitor MAG Regional Council April.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits
Department of Environmental Quality
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Registrations.
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Presentation transcript:

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 1 Barbara Roach Non-Title V Permit Engineer Maricopa Quality Air Quality Department (602)

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 2 Collocated Rock Products Plants Interim modeling procedure for two or more “collocated sources” Procedure does not include “clustered sources” “Clustered sources” operate independently but are located in close proximity to each other

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 3 Definition of Source “Any building, structure, facility, or installation that may cause or contribute to air pollution.” [Rule 100 § 200] All pollution-emitting equipment that belong to same industrial grouping, located on contiguous or adjacent property, and under common control are considered one source.

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 4 Definition of Collocation Collocated sources will meet the following criteria: Operate under common control –site management with decision making authority over operations – contract for service – a support/dependency relationship (over 50% of production) – same owner

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 5 Definition of Collocation Are located on contiguous or adjacent property Have the same major Industrial Grouping (SIC code) –Support activities are part of the same industrial grouping even if they have two different SIC codes (e.g. sand & gravel mining, SIC code 14 and asphalt production, SIC code 29)

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 6 Todd Martin Non-Title V Permit Engineer Maricopa Quality Air Quality Department (602)

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 7 Dispersion Modeling Permittee shall conduct a dispersion model analysis for PM-10 Purpose: Determine whether source will contribute to a violation of any National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS): –Annual PM-10 standard = 50 µg/m 3 –24 hour PM-10 standard = 150 µg/m 3 Modeling: –Is performed on the air emissions from the entire facility –Covers releases occurring during normal business operation; it does not cover catastrophic or accidental releases –Takes background concentrations into consideration, to understand possible cumulative effects

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 8 Modeling Process A screen model may be run to determine the maximum off site concentration Incorporate background concentrations from nearest Maricopa County monitoring station –Background = Annual average –Available on MCAQD web site (Air Monitoring) If the modeled concentrations are greater than the NAAQS, then more refined modeling may be performed (AERMOD)

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 9 Modeling Guidelines EPA Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W, November 2005) ADEQ Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Arizona Air Quality Permits (December 2004)

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 10 AERMOD Modeling Process Submit a modeling protocol to the Department –Project background –Regional characteristics (model parameters) Geology Metrology Facility layout Emission profiles for each source of PM-10 Stack parameters Other modeling assumptions used MCAQD Approval of Protocol

Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our most basic resource 11 Dispersion Model Analysis Ambient PM-10 impact is based on: 1.Annual: The highest estimated annual average concentration determined from annual averages of individual years; 2.24-Hour: The highest, second-highest estimated concentration; 3.Add: The annual average PM-10 concentration from nearest monitoring station 4.Compare result with NAAQGS If model indicates an exceedance of NAAQGs, MCAQD reserves the right to deny the Permit Application