2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Objectives: 1.To recognize deductive reasoning and use it to arrive at a true conclusion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Believing Where We Cannot Prove Philip Kitcher
Advertisements

Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Lecture 6 1. Mental gymnastics to prepare to tackle Hume 2. The Problem of Induction as Hume argues for it 1. His question 2. His possible solutions 3.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning. Ohio Content Standards.
SECTION 2-5 Angle Relationships. You have now experienced using inductive reasoning. So we will begin discovering geometric relationships using inductive.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
How to do a Proof Using Uno!. What does it mean to prove something? PROOF (pruf) –noun 1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce.
Chapter 2.1 Common Core G.CO.9, G.CO.10 & G.CO.11 Prove theorems about lines, angles, triangles and parallelograms. Objective – To use inductive reasoning.
Chapter 1 Logic Section 1-1 Statements Open your book to page 1 and read the section titled “To the Student” Now turn to page 3 where we will read the.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.
Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?
Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
2.4 Ms. Verdino.  Biconditional Statement: use this symbol ↔  Example ◦ Biconditional Statement: The weather is good if and only if the sun is out 
Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
CHAPTER 1 INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING. 1.1 – MAKING CONJECTURES A conjecture is a testable expression that is based on available evidence, but is.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
WARM UP. DEDUCTIVE REASONING LEARNING OUTCOMES I will be able to use the law of detachment and syllogism to make conjectures from other statements I.
Use Inductive Reasoning Objectives 1.To form conjectures through inductive reasoning 2.To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample 3.To avoid fallacies.
2.1 Conditional Statements Ms. Kelly Fall Standards/Objectives: Students will learn and apply geometric concepts. Objectives: Recognize the hypothesis.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Lesson 2 – 5 Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Questions for Today 1.What is the Nature of Science? 2.What are the differences between a theory and a law? 3.What are the differences between inductive.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Line and Angle Relationships 1 1 Chapter.
2.3 Methods of Proof.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
INTEGRATED MATH 3. OBJECTIVES: 1)Recognize the role of inductive reasoning in making conjectures and recognize the limitations of inductive reasoning.
Logic Puzzle.
3/15/ : Deductive Reasoning1 Expectations: L3.1.1: Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning, identifying and providing examples of each.
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
Section 2-4 Deductive Reasoning.
OTCQ True or False An Isosceles triangle has 2 congruent sides and no congruent angles. An Equiangular triangle has three angles that measure 70◦. A right.
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.
What makes a Good Argument?
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
2-1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Splash Screen.
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Splash Screen.
M1 Lesson 4.4 January 21, 2009 Deductive Reasoning.
Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.
Reasoning and Proofs Deductive Reasoning Conditional Statement
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
To solve problems by looking for a pattern
2-1: Logic with Inductive Reasoning
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Objectives: 1.To recognize deductive reasoning and use it to arrive at a true conclusion.

History When the architects designed this school building, they were approached by an ancient secret society whose members make up numerous Texas dignitaries. They convinced the architects to add several secret passages and hidden conference rooms to their design plans.

History Sometimes when I stay after school late into the evening grading papers, planning lessons, and contacting parents, I hear strange and inauspicious sounds emanating from behind one of my walls.

Conspiracy? Thus, it is my conjecture that one of the secret society's hidden passages lies between the walls of Room 701 and 703. This is a bold and perhaps conspiratorial conjecture, but I am confident that it is true. (You should hear the sounds--Oh, my!)

Stop Making Fun of Me! I have told few people of my theory, and they unanimously dismiss my conviction with ridicule. (Then they ask me if I frequently watch re-runs of the X- Files with the notion that the story lines are largely nonfiction!)

Redemption To convince the skeptics and to redeem my reputation, I need absolute and conclusive proof that there exists a hidden passage between these classrooms.

Proof The Principle of Laplace: The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportional to its strangeness.

In Other Words… “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -Carl Sagan

Example 1 In your group, come up with a nondestructive method for proving or disproving the extraordinary claim that there’s a secret tunnel between 701 and 703.

Example 2 In the Sudoku puzzle shown, what number must be written in the blue box? Why? ?

Deductive Reasoning The process of demonstrating that if certain statements are accepted as true, then other statements can be shown to follow from them.

Deductive Reasoning premisesassumptions The “accepted” statements are sometimes premises or assumptions, and all deductive arguments must have them. Deductive reasoning uses logical inference to build on these assumptions. Unlike inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning will always lead to the truth as long as the assumptions are true.

Example 2 All humans have skeletons is a reasonable assumption. So, since Mrs. DeZeeuw is a human, what must be true about her?

Deductive Reasoning

Inductive vs. Deductive 1.We use inductive reasoning to investigate and discover things about our world. 2.Since the conjectures we make using our inductive reasoning are based on our fallible observation skills, we can be wrong. 3.We can search for a counterexample to disprove our conjectures. 4.In mathematics, we use our deductive reasoning to prove our conjectures beyond all uncertainty.

Example 4 Follow along as with an excerpt from The Adventure of the Dancing Men by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, paying particular attention to the deductions made by Sherlock Holmes. Click here

Flavors of Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning comes in a variety of flavors: 1.Law of Detachment 2.Denying the Consequent 3.Law of Syllogism

Law of Detachment SymbolsExample If Watson had chalk on his fingers, then he had been playing billiards. Watson had chalk between his fingers upon returning from the club. Therefore Watson had been playing billiards.

Denying the Consequent SymbolsExample If Watson wished to invest his money in S. African securities with Thurston, then he would have had his check book when playing billiards with Thurston. Watson did not have his checkbook when he played billiards with Thurston. Therefore Watson did not wish to invest his money in S. African securities with Thurston.

Law of Syllogism SymbolsExample If I eat pizza after midnight, then I will have nightmares. If I have nightmares, then I will get very little sleep. Therefore, if I eat pizza after midnight, then I will get very little sleep.

Example 5 Use one of the laws of deductive reasoning to make a valid conclusion. If two segments have the same length, then they are congruent. You know that BC = XY. Law of Detachment

Example 6 Use one of the laws of deductive reasoning to make a valid conclusion. If x > 5, then x 2 > 25. If x 2 > 25, then x 2 > 20. Therefore, x>5 so x 2 >20 Law of Syllogism

Example 7 Use one of the laws of deductive reasoning to make a valid conclusion. If a polygon is regular, then it is both equilateral and equiangular. Pentagon ABCDE is not equilateral or equiangular. Denying the Consequent