District Level of Implementation of UMTSS… The First Year Tooele County School District UMTSS Conference June 12, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
The Venice Tide Barrier Project The Bailong Elevator.
TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS FINAL PRESENTATION Mona Salem.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
A Collaborative Approach to Planning for DDM’s Kristan Rodriguez, Ph.D Chelmsford Public Schools.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
 Iowa Reading Research Center (Superintendents’ Meetings 2014) Iowa Department of Education & Iowa Reading Research Center, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Leadership Terry Holliday, Ph. D., Superintendent.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Response to Intervention North Santiam School District August 25, 2009.
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Developing an Online Course: A Road Map for the Process English Language Arts 3-5: Vocabulary.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
North Santiam School District Scaling Up! April 30, 2010 Michael Ann McIlvenny, Associate Superintendent Jeri Harbison, Intervention Coach.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
MAISA Annual Conference June 21, 2012  Leadership and vision  Focused and intentional action  Knowledge and capacity building  Accountable for student.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
The Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework: What’s in it for you? COSA Special Education Fall Conference October 6, 2011 Julie Anderson, ODE Lori Rae Smith and.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
One District’s Collaborative Journey To Common Core Implementation.
Formative Assessments and the Challenges of a Small District McKenzie School District Sally Storm Lane Tompkins Kevin Moore.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making.
BUILDING THE MOSAIC OF DIVISION LEADERSHIP FOR VTSS September 25, 2012 Ebbie Linaburg Assistant Supt. Shenandoah County Public Schools.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Best Practices and Strategies for English Language Arts October 7, 2015 Introductions Pre-assess Objectives & Success Why—ELA Menu What—Content Success.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Long Beach Unified School Distcit
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
PA Core Instructional Frameworks How and Why the Frameworks were Developed.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
ELA/Math Standards Review Panel Presentation to the BESE Assessment Oversight Committee Brooke Clenchy, Sr. Associate Commissioner March 22, 2016.
Fall 2012 The Glen Rock Elementary Report Card Committee.
English Language Arts Instructional Materials Presentation to the School Board - May 2016.
PUSD Reading Intervention Plan Read 180 and System 44 Implementation Plan August 5,2014.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
RCAS Common Core State Standards Secondary BLT November 8, 2011.
Brevard Public Schools
Teaching & Learning Staff and Work Plan
State Board of Education Progress Update
Summer Professional Development
Presentation transcript:

District Level of Implementation of UMTSS… The First Year Tooele County School District UMTSS Conference June 12, 2013

Adding UMTSS to an Existing System

Big Questions we had to answer... Who should be on the district team? Superintendent Assistant Superintendents Board Member Behavior Specialists Special Ed Director Curriculum Directors Assessment Director CTE Director Elementary Principal Secondary Principal Instructional Coach

Big Questions we had to answer... What are the expectations of the members of the district team?  This is an ongoing process.  Some of our biggest concerns have been to bridge each of our department’s goals together into unified goals, to create an environment where each member can freely give input to the process, and to sustain the progress already made in each department.

Big Questions we had to answer... How does UMTSS fit into what we are already doing?  We looked at our current programs and connected the elements together into the UMTSS framework.  It was intentional that our work with UMTSS not be considered “another program”, but to integrate it into what we are already doing.

Big Questions we had to answer... What area should we focus on?  Literacy?  Numeracy?  Behavior? We needed DATA!

Big Questions we had to answer... Once we identified what area we would focus on, how would we choose the schools to work with?  Great question!

Our Big Break Through... We needed a way to measure our schools.  Implementation Goal Criteria Each area (math, ELA, and behavior) created their own criteria template. The templates went through a critique and an evaluation was conducted. We streamlined the formats and overhauled our original templates.  Consensus, Consensus, Consensus It was PAINFUL!

After many discussions... Our Continuums were finalized!

Implementation Continuum We found ourselves using our new tool to rate and evaluate schools.  Poor, Average, Great The wording continuum changed the way we looked at and used the tool.  Beginning Implementation, Progressing, Completely Implemented.

USING THE CONTINUUM

Key Ideas... There were multiple revisions. This is a process. Needed a clear vision of what we wanted schools to look like. Used the word “continuum” to help us avoid the idea of ranking/evaluating/comparison. Used positive vocabulary to keep our continuum from being threatening. Used familiar language of existing initiatives and projects to integrate what we had already accomplished.