FALs and MDC. Before the Collaborative Activity: Meet as a grade level to collaboratively plan in advance the administration of the pre- assessment As.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Framework for Instruction
Advertisements

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Lines and Linear Equations Projector Resources.
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Model Of Explicit Instruction
SVMI Concept Development Lesson Common Core State Standards- Mathematics (CCSS-M) Conference Mariana Alwell Professional Development Provider Silicon Valley.
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
Checking For Understanding
Introduction to the Math Design Collaborative Sept 9, 2014 Sponsored by Ohio HSTW, NE Region and Northwestern School District West Salem, Ohio.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study 1. Sharon Mack, Irene Stone and Gemma Fay 3 rd Years Problem Solving as a “Means” not an “End” Normally we teach.
FALs 2.0: Spanning Math Content and Concepts Geoff Krall | New Tech Math Coach.
Effective Questioning in the classroom
Fiction Book Location: A Five Part Unit for Second Graders
COMPONENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE WRITING PROGRAM
3.4d- Relationship between 2D and 3D objects CCSS.
Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Lines and Linear Equations Projector Resources.
2D Representations of 3D ObjectsProjector Resources 2D Representations of 3D Objects Projector Resources.
Thank you for joining us for Small Group Instruction The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
Common Core Where have we been and where we are going…
Teaching for Learning Christa Lemily 8 th Grade Math South Warren Middle School.
SVMI C ONCEPT D EVELOPMENT L ESSON September 16, 2013 Santa Clara County Office of Education Region 5 Mathematics Network Conference.
Instructional Elements Key Components to the Lesson.
November 30 th, 2012 National Council of Teachers Mathematics Regional Meeting - Chicago, IL Productive Struggle to Grow Stronger Mathematics Students.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
SREB, MDC, FALs, LMNOP… Coaching Implications Collaborative Work NCDPI DST Math Instructional Coaches August 25, 2014.
Using Assessments and Data to Improve Student Learning Day 2 1.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Company LOGO Embedding Mathematics into Advanced Careers 1 New Jersey Entrepreneurship Summer Teacher Training Institute July 31, 2013 Facilitator: Kenna.
Math-It’s Elementary February 2013 Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for meeting the Kentucky Core Academic.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
Dr. Sande Caton. Assessments Why do we assess our students? Individually, write at least three ideas you have about assessments With one or two colleagues.
STUDENTS USING ASSESSMENTS TO FOCUS THEIR LEARNING Pam Wilson, NBCT July 21, 2012 #TMC12, St. Louis, MO.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
POWER POINT CONTENT Slide 2: Pre-Assessment Task Directions Slides 3-4: Whole-Class Introduction Slide 5: Collaborative Activity Instructions – Day 1 Slide.
Academic Seminar – Week 6
Formative Assessment Lessons Map.mathshell.org. Mathematics Assessment Project Classroom Challenges Lessons that support teachers in formative assessment.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Evaluating Statements About Number OperationsProjector Resources Evaluating Statements About Number Operations Projector Resources.
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Representing 3D Objects in 2DProjector resources Representing 3D Objects in 2D Projector Resources.
Southern Regional Education Board An Introduction to the Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC) Jason Adair
Transition to College Algebra Day 2: Content Training.
Academic Seminar – Week 6 Lesson Plans & Formative Assessment Graphs.
Defining Lines by Points, Slopes and EquationsProjector resources Defining Lines by Points, Slopes and Equations Projector Resources.
Equations of Circles 1Projector Resources Equations of Circles 1 Projector Resources.
Conceptual Change Theory
Joan Gillis, Capital Area Intermediate Unit
Math 6-8: The Standards in Practice: A Common Core Lesson
Joan Gillis, Capital Area Intermediate Unit
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Workshop Model of Instruction
Representing Data with Frequency Graphs
The Learner Centered Classroom
Comparing Lines and Linear Equations
Mathshell in Practice Ready Made Quality Group Work 6-8
Introduction to the Math Design Collaborative
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Representing the Laws of Arithmetic
Discourse Measurement
Representing Data with Box Plots
2D Representations of 3D Objects
Discourse Measurement
Representing Quadratic Functions Graphically
McNeese State University Professional Development Opportunity
Lesson 21: Timed writing About this lesson
Lines and Linear Equations
Bellwork 8 minutes 7 minutes 9 minutes 10 minutes 12 minutes
Prepared for EDTPA CONFERENCE MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY
Representing Data Using Frequency Graphs
Presentation transcript:

FALs and MDC

Before the Collaborative Activity: Meet as a grade level to collaboratively plan in advance the administration of the pre- assessment As a grade level, discuss the connections between the content standards and SMP and what students should know and be expected to demonstrate during the FAL

Before the Collaborative Activity (con’t): Materials ready – having students cut-out the day of the collaborative activity takes too much time Actually administer the pre-assessment Groups based on pre-assessment not convenience Development of feedback questions based on actual misconceptions on pre-test

Before the Collaborative Activity (con’t): Work the task and anticipate areas of misconceptions and strengths before implementing the collaborative activity Reference the standards but do not pre-teach the actual collaborative activity or go over the pre-assessment Establish and review rules of collaboration

Pre-Assessment 2/3 into the unit 10 to 15 minutes the day(s) before the collaborative activity No prior teaching or “helping” students Recommended to complete in pen Meet with other grade level teachers to determine trends in conceptual misunderstanding; develop feedback questions based on results of pre-assessment

Pre-Assessment Complete the Pre-Assessment individually (5 minutes) screen-online- countdown/?ns=../../s/7.mp3&nslen=1&cou ntdown=00:05:00 screen-online- countdown/?ns=../../s/7.mp3&nslen=1&cou ntdown=00:05:00

Lesson Feedback Questions Collaboratively developed based on trends from the Pre-Assessment results Should apply to misconceptions or information they previously did not have Should be written in the language of the standards

Feedback Questions (con’t) Should connect the concepts and learning goals from the Collaborative Activity to the Feedback Question Sample questions are included for each FAL Questions must come from student work

Feedback Questions (con’t) Questions must be answerable; if you can’t answer don’t list Questions must be directly related to conceptual (mis)understanding Not too many Students should individually complete and a class discussion or individual mini- conferences should follow

Feedback Questions Develop feedback questions (3 minutes) screen-online- countdown/?ns=../../s/2.mp3&nslen=1&cou ntdown=00:03:00 screen-online- countdown/?ns=../../s/2.mp3&nslen=1&cou ntdown=00:03:00

Feedback Questions

Lesson Introduction Whole Class Discussion

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Flowing Liquid P-13

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Flowing Liquid P-14

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Liquid flowing out of the top prism 1 P-15

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Liquid flowing out of the top prism 2 P-16

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Liquid flowing out of the top prism 3 P-17

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Liquid flowing out of the top prism 4 P-18

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Liquid flowing out of the top prism 5 P-19

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Liquid flowing out of the top prism 6 P-20

Lesson Introduction Whole class discussion: introduce the lesson but do not explicitly teach or answer questions related to the Pre-Assessment ask guiding questions of individual students and the class as a whole to ensure students understand the context of the problem projector resources are included to guide this process

Frame the collaborative activity Lesson Introduction

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Working Together P-23 1.The graphs represent the flow of a liquid either out of the top prism or into the bottom prism of the container. 2.Take it in turns to match two cards that represent the movement of water in the same container. 3.Place the cards next to each other, not on top, so that everyone can see. 4.When you match two cards, explain how you came to your decision. 5.Your partner should either explain that reasoning again in his or her own words, or challenge the reasons you gave. 6.Some graphs are missing information, such as a scale along an axis. You will need to add this scale. You both need to be able to agree on and explain the match of every card.

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Graphs P-24

Lesson Introduction (con’t) Framing the collaborative activity: explain the directions consider modeling the collaborative process of taking turns, justifying ideas, and explaining the reasoning behind a specific rationale give students one minute to read and process the task before beginning the activity

Collaborative Activity Complete the collaborative activity.

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Working Together P-27 1.The graphs represent the flow of a liquid either out of the top prism or into the bottom prism of the container. 2.Take it in turns to match two cards that represent the movement of water in the same container. 3.Place the cards next to each other, not on top, so that everyone can see. 4.When you match two cards, explain how you came to your decision. 5.Your partner should either explain that reasoning again in his or her own words, or challenge the reasons you gave. 6.Some graphs are missing information, such as a scale along an axis. You will need to add this scale. You both need to be able to agree on and explain the match of every card.

Lines and Linear EquationsProjector Resources Sharing Work P-28 1.If you are staying at your desk, be ready to explain the reasons for your group’s graph matches. 2.If you are visiting another group, copy your matches onto a piece of paper. 3.Go to another group’s desk and check to see which matches are different from your own. If there are differences, ask for an explanation. If you still don’t agree, explain your own thinking. 4.When you return to your own desk, you need to consider as a group whether to make any changes to your own work.

Collaborative Activity usually completed in homogenous pairs based on Pre-Assessment results teacher facilitates throughout the activity and creates experts to share their work with struggling students hands-on learning; do not rely on lecture or paper/pencil computations only Ok for students to grapple with the work but do not let it lead to frustration or shutting down … constantly monitor groups!

Collaborative Activity (con’t) try not to make specific suggestions that move students toward a specific solution; rather ask questions to help students reason together the purpose of this structured group work is to ensure students engage with each other’s explanations and take responsibility for each other’s understanding

Plenary Discussion scribe student’s name and his/her response elicit response that go beyond answers; look for conceptual understanding or misunderstandings, justifications, or thought organizations

Plenary Discussion use high order thinking strategies to allow students to “think outside the box” students should be encouraged to expound on previous responses monitor and mini-conference with individual groups and students as needed

Post-Assessment same or very similar to Pre-Assessment; clean copy also give students back their individual Pre- Assessments do not grade; do go over for growth and gains in understanding

Post-Assessment make sure they do not merely copy from their Pre- Assessments they are allowed to use their notes, etc… from the Collaborative Activity and Feedback responses should also address: what did you learn; how did you feel; what could the teacher have done differently

Post-Assessment Class Analysis Worksheet

Lessons Learned

During the Collaborative Activity: Frame the collaborative activity – explicitly tell the students what and why Utilize a timer – benefits both you and the students Do not use as a teaching opportunity, rather guided discovery Group size – pairs work best If several groups are experiencing the same dilemma, bring together as a whole group to discuss Create experts to assist other groups

During the Collaborative Activity (con’t): Encourage and model correct usage of the vocabulary of the standards Always prompt with leading questions, not right or wrong answers Utilize actual student work, both correct and incorrect ; but do so in a non-threatening manner If time runs out, make sure to bring back together for closing – not just “we’ll pick up here tomorrow”

After the Collaborative Activity: Don’t give post-assessment without having plenary discussion Plenary discussion usually gets omitted; this is a vital component of clarifying student misconceptions Post and reference feedback questions Involve students and script their responses Let them “see” their growth Collaboratively meet as a grade level to discuss areas of concern and success

Five Strategies of Formative Assessment Clarifying and sharing learning intentions and criteria for success: basically letting the students in on what’s going on Engineering effective discussions, questions, activities, and tasks that elicit evidence of learning Providing feedback that moves students forward Activating students as instructional resources for one another Activating students as owners of their own learning