CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roma, 22/11/01CMS Software & Computing Workshop - E. Longo 1 Calibrazioni del calorimetro: esperienze (L3) e prospettive Egidio Longo.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
ECAL Spike Plot Approval ECAL Anomalous Signal Plots Approval Adi Bornheim for ECAL
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology On behalf othe CMS ECAL Collaboration High-resolution, high-granularity.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.
Crystals and related topics J. Gerl, GSI NUSTAR Calorimeter Working Group Meeting June 17, 2005 Valencia.
1 Laser Monitoring: Offline Transparency Correction in CMSSW Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 13 July 2007.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
CMS Alignment and Calibration Yuriy Pakhotin on behalf of CMS Collaboration.
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory VPTs for the CMS experiment B W Kennedy CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory St Petersburg, 26 April.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
CMS ECAL 2006 Test Beams Effort Caltech HEP Seminar Christopher Rogan California Institute of Technology May 1, 2007.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Shashlik type calorimeter for SHIP experiment
PANDA electromagnetic calorimeters Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group INSTR08 28 Feb - 05 Mar 2008.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
David BAILLEUX US CMS on behalf of the Caltech group Laser Monitoring System - Electronics review 20 March Overview Overview Laser control Laser.
Light Calibration System (LCS) Temperature & Voltage Dependence Option 2: Optical system Option 2: LED driver Calibration of the Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
ANL, MAR-2014Ivo Polák, FZU, Prague1 Activity on Compass 2 detector with Calibration at Prague Ivo Polák, on behalf of Prague’s group Compass.
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Diamond Sensor Diamond Sensor for Particle Detection Maria Hempel Beam Impact Meeting Geneva,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter US CMS JTERM III 12 January 2009 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology.
DOE Review Adi Bornheim California Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 CMS ECAL Status, Test Beams, Monitoring and Integration.
1 US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, WBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota US-CMS L2 ECAL Manager.
Sept. 17th, 2008 Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Turin, Italy 1 Installation, Commissioning and Performance of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) Electronics.
LHC The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is an accelerator with 27 km circumference. Being built on the France- Switzerland border west of Geneva. It will start.
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter: status, performance with cosmic and first LHC data Cristina Biino* - INFN Torino 11th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
CMS ECAL DCS 10.Oct S.Zelepoukine ICALEPCS CMS ECAL DCS 1 The Detector Control System for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS Experiment.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
TTF - ECAL Plenary in CMS week ECAL Stability Contacts: Marc Dejardin, Julie Malcles (laser)
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
Software for the CMS Cosmic Challenge Giacomo BRUNO UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium On behalf of the CMS Collaboration CHEP06, Mumbay, India February 16,
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
Sergey BarsukElectromagnetic Calorimeter for 1 Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the LHCb experiment Perugia, Italy March 29 – April 2, 2004 ECAL CALO Sergey.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Studies of the effect of the LHC cycle on
Studies of the effect of the LHC cycle on
On behalf of the Caltech Laser Group
Status ECAL Laser Monitoring
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
Presentation transcript:

CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle, Particle, Space Physics, Detectors and Medical Physics Applications, Villa Olmo, Como, Italy High-resolution, high-granularity scintillating crystal calorimeter 75,848 lead-tungstate (PbWO 4 ) crystals Crystals of the short radiation length, small Molière radius, and speed as a scintillator. Gap Events FilterFarm/HLT Laser Farm Disk Buffer OMDS DB ORCOFF DB Offline Reconstruction CMS Point 5 Offline CMS DAQ GT LASER Raw APD/PN Corrected APD/PN Repackage Laser Data ORCON DB Laser Monitoring Dataflow: Laser monitoring data will be taken during the LHC “abort gap” events, 3ms every 90  s. Gap events will arrive at the Filter Farm, containing, among other data, the ECAL laser event data, which will be sorted and then analyzed in a PC farm to extract APD/PN values. The data is then inserted into the OMDS database located at Point 5, and then transferred to the ORCON/ORCOFF database. During the transfer procedure, corrections will be applied. The laser APD/PN ratios, reference values, and scale factors necessary to implement the transparency correction will be stored in the offline database, and the correction is applied in the offline reconstruction. The Laser Monitoring System Overview At the LHC design luminosity, the CMS detector will be exposed to a very harsh radiation environment. The PbWO 4 crystals are radiation hard up to a high integrated dosage, but suffer from dose-rate dependent radiation damage. Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) The design energy resolution of the ECAL has a constant term of 0.5%, and to maintain this, in situ calibration and monitoring of the crystals must be performed. The monitoring light source consists of three pairs of lasers (Nd:YLF pump laser and Ti:Sapphire laser), with diagnostics, two 3x1 optical switches, a 1x88 optical switch, a monitor and a PC based controller. Commissioning at CMS Point 5 Two laser systems (blue/green and IR/red) have been installed and commissioned in the CMS underground cavern at Point5, and first laser data has been collected. Exposure at the level of LHC luminosity (dose-rates of 15 rad/hour at cm -2 s -1 ) causes a decrease in crystal transparency due to radiation induced absorption. Although the crystals will self-recover during periods in absence of radiation, this recovery takes places on the order of a week. Therefore, changes in crystal transparency, and therefore calorimeter response, due to radiation damage must be corrected for to maintain the energy resolution of the detector. The CMS ECAL utilizes a laser monitoring system to monitor the light output of the crystals. With this system, we can measure the change in transparency of each crystal continuously during LHC running, with very high precision. Performance from Test Beam Results The laser monitoring system has been commissioned at a test beam facility at CERN, where the performance was evaluated over periods of months. The stability of the system has been exhibited to be on the order of 0.1%; with such performance, even small changes in transparency can be monitored with precision. Test Beam Data Recovery Damage Electron Response (APD/PN) Laser Response (APD/PN) E(t)/E(t 0 ) = [L(t)/L(t 0 )]  Energy Resolution Before and After Correction APD VPT The wavelength of the Ti:S laser is tunable, and two wavelengths are available from each laser. Four wavelengths, 440, 495, 709, and 796 nm, are available using the 3x1 optical switch. The selected wavelength is sent to each ECAL element using the 1x88 optical switch. Light Distribution System In 2006, a software feedback system was implemented so that the stability of the pulse intensity and FWHM are maintained at the level of a few percent, with a pulse timing jitter of less than 2 nm observed in laser runs lasting for over 2,000 hours test beam data. Laser Specifications: 2 wavelengths per laser Pulse width, FWHM < 40ns to match ECAL readout Pulse jitter< 3ns for sychronization with LHC Pulse rate~100 Hz, scan of full ECAL 20min Pulse intensity instability~few% Pulse energy1 mJ/pulse at monitoring wavelength (equivalent to 1.3 TeV in dynamic range) Laser Stability APD/PN RMS Before and After Correction RMS(APD/PN) Pulse ShapeAPD Amplitude EventTime sample ADC counts