March 23, 2010 Enrollment Committee Update Facilities & Governmental Relations Joe Dixon, Assistant Superintendent Jessica Mears, Facilities Planner Darryl Taylor, Facilities Planner Board of Education Audrey Yamagata-Noji, Ph.D., President Rob Richardson, Vice President José Alfredo Hernández, J.D., Clerk John Palacio, Member Roman Reyna, Member Jane A. Russo, Superintendent

22 October 27 th BOE meeting - Discussion item January 19 Special Study Session –Approval of Committee formation and composition Background / Recap

3  Deputy Supt. - Dr. Cathie Olsky (Tony Wold backup)  Human Resources – Chad Hammit  Elem. Ed. – Asst. Supt. Herman Mendez  Secondary Ed. – Asst. Supt. Alex Ayala  Elementary Principal – Manuel Fuentes Esqueda Elementary  Intermediate Principal – Jeff Bishop Sierra Intermediate  High Principal – Greg Rankin Godinez Fundamental High Committee Composition  Special Education – Diane Blevins  3 SAEA Representatives for Teachers  3 CSEA Representatives for Classified Staff  9 Parents

4 February 11 th – Purpose, roles, responsibilities, and background March 4 th – K-6 Analysis, Part 1 March 11 th – K-6 Analysis, Part 2 Next meeting March 25 th – K-6 discussion, Part 3 Committee Meetings

55 February 11 th Meeting Committee Background Enrollment Committee Purpose and Process Study Area Zones Density Maps Boundary Maps Classroom Utilization Measure G Projects Enrollment Projections Physical Constraints Walking Distances Grade Level Configurations

6 March 4 th Meeting Staff K-6 Discussion Lunch schedules PE schedules Restrooms Parking & student drop-off Acreage / density Current / planned P2P projects Fundamental lottery Intermediate sites’ excess capacity Transition support Additional staff may be required = additional cost Impact to K-6 schools – students leave mid-year (ex. Taft)

7 March 4 th Meeting Committee’s Input What’s the impact on QEIA schools What’s the impact on test scores, curriculum, & textbooks What’s the impact on non-instructional/specialized spaces, e.g. music rooms, parent support, etc. What’s the impact on special ed. & preschool programs Cluster 6 th graders Larger elementaries = more discipline problems Best to wait until Measure G completed? Temporary/abrupt changes are disruptive for students & staff; make sure we’re looking long-range Is it equitable to implement K-6 only at some schools? There will always be a transition point so quality of instruction should be the key decision factor Would help retain students for an additional year that might otherwise leave the district (i.e. Santiago)

88 March 11 th Meeting K – 6 Analysis Classroom capacity Measure G projects Enrollment projections Parent surveys Neighboring district comparison Considerations: staffing impacts, restrooms, parking, lunch schedules, fundamental lottery, etc. Feasibility: districtwide vs. site specific

9 Parent Surveys 9 K-6 Configuration Districtwide for 3 Years Elementary School Current 5th Grade Enrollment Average 6th Grade Enrollment # of CRs Required # Empty CRs Current Feasibility? Portables Required to Implement Number of Lunch Periods Sites able to Accommodate Additional Lunch Adequate Parking Need for Additional Restrooms Carr Adams839030N33No Yes Diamond939943N13NoYesNo Harvey657035Y02NoYesNo King Y04YesNoYes Martin N34NoYesNo Sepulveda667436Y03NoYesNo Lathrop Edison N33NoNo ParkingYes Franklin847530N33NoNo ParkingYes Kennedy Y03No Lowell Y05Yes No Madison Y04Yes No Pio Pico Y05No Yes McFadden Esqueda132 43N13Yes No Greenville N13Yes Jefferson Y04YesNoYes Monroe667633Y03NoYesNo Thorpe Fundamental N13Yes Washington Y05YesNo

10 Parent Surveys 10 K-6 Configuration Districtwide for 3 Years - cont’d Elementary School Current 5th Grade Enrollment Average 6th Grade Enrollment # of CRs Required # Empty CRs Current Feasibility? Portables Required to Implement Number of Lunch Periods Sites able to Accommodate Additional Lunch Adequate Parking Need for Additional Restrooms Sierra Davis N43No Yes Garfield N13No Yes Hoover887731N23NoYesNo Muir Fundamental Y04YesNo Remington655923Y02NoYesNo Roosevelt Y03YesNo Walker959630N33No Spurgeon Fremont N43YesNo ParkingYes Jackson Y04Yes No Lincoln Y04YesNo Monte Vista96 30N34No Yes Romero-Cruz (4-5) Y02Yes Willard Heninger Y03No Yes Heroes929331N25NoYesNo Santiago Y03Yes No Wilson N43NoYesNo Total 3,8273, (Yes) /16 (No)37 15(Yes) /19 (No) 17 (Yes) /17 (No) 14 (Yes) / 20 (No)

11 Carr Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders Feasible Feeders Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Adams N Diamond N Esqueda N Martin N Monte Vista N Harvey Y Jackson Y King Y Sepulveda Y Washington Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 5

12 Lathrop Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders Feasible Feeders Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Edison N Esqueda N Franklin N Martin N Walker N Kennedy Y Lowell Y Madison Y Pio Pico Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 4

13 McFadden Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders Feasible Feeders Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Adams N Diamond N Esqueda N Jefferson Y Monroe Y Sepulveda Y Taft 3562n/a797Y Washington Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 5

14 Sierra Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders Feasible Feeders Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Davis N Garfield N Hoover N Walker N Kennedy Y Remington Y Roosevelt Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 3

15 Spurgeon Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders Feasible Feeders Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Fremont N Monte Vista N Jackson Y King Y Lincoln Y Romero-Cruz Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 4

16 Willard Intermediate School 6th Grade 6-8 Enrollment 7-8 Enrollment Estimated Teacher/CR Impact All Feeders Feasible Feeders Elementary Feeder Schools 6th Grade Feeding into Carr Total 6th Grade K-5 Enrollment K-6 Enrollment Current Feasibility? Heroes N Wilson N Heninger Y Lowell Y Romero-Cruz Y Roosevelt Y Santiago Y Total # of elementary schools that can implement K-6 5

Board of Education Direction Next Steps 17