Late Breaker Track B WELBB04 HLA-B*35:05 and CCHCR1 Screening Reduces Nevirapine-associated Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in Thailand: A Prospective Multicenter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supported by grants from: National Human Genome Research Institute (ELSI) HG/AG (The REVEAL Study); National Institute on Aging AG (The MIRAGE.
Advertisements

Monica Gandhi MD, MPH Associate Professor and Women’s HIV Clinic provider, HIV/AIDS Division San Francisco General Hospital/ UCSF Safe Poz Love, U.S. Positive.
Delay from Testing HIV Positive until First HIV Care for Drug Users: Adverse Consequences and Possible Solutions Barbara J Turner MD, MSEd* John Fleishman.
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
A case series of ART-associated gynaecomastia reported to the National HIV & TB Healthcare Workers (HCW) hotline Christine Njuguna. Division of Clinical.
Most deaths among children enrolled in two program settings in Cambodia occur within the first 6 months after enrolment. Early mortality rates were more.
Routine HIV Screening in Health Care Settings David Spach, MD Clinical Director Northwest AIDS Education and Training Center Professor of Medicine, Division.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Presenter : Dr T. G. Nematadzira on behalf of The IMPAACT PROMISE 1077BF/1077FF Team Efficacy and Safety of Two Strategies to Prevent Perinatal HIV Transmission.
Results of the CARINEMO ANRS randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of nevirapine vs efavirenz for treatment of HIV-TB co-infected patients.
HLA-B*5701 and Abacavir Alec Walker October 2014.
Single-Dose Perinatal Nevirapine plus Standard Zidovudine to Prevent Mother to Child Transmission of HIV-1 in Thailand NEJM July 15, 2004 Lallemant et.
Fatal and Non-fatal Hepatic Failure in HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected Persons Enrolled in Kaiser Permanente California (KP), a Large Managed Care Organization.
Late and Low Compliance with Hepatitis B Serology Screening among HIV-infected Patients in a Resource-limited Setting: An Issue to Improve HIV Care Abstract.
Transition Program of HIV-infected adolescents to Adult HIV care in Buenos Aires, Argentina S. Arazi Caillaud 1, D. Mecikovsky 1, A.Bordato.
Management and Development for Health (MDH)
Impact of HSV-2 suppressive therapy with daily acyclovir on HIV-1 disease progression: a randomized placebo- controlled trial in Rakai, Uganda Steven J.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
HIV and STI Department, Health Protection Agency - Colindale HIV and AIDS Reporting System HIV in the United Kingdom: 2012 Overview.
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES AT THE BOTSWANA- BAYLOR CHILDREN’S CLINICAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE: A REPORT TO THE WHO TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP ON PEDIATRIC CARE.
Immunomodulation of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy Sasipha Tachaboon 1, Khajohn Tiranatanakul.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are independently associated with hypertension: the effect of lipoatrophy but not lipohypertrophy on hypertension is independent.
HBV related complications in HIV positive patients during HAART therapy Irina Magdalena Dumitru*, E. Dumitru*, S. Rugina*, Roxana Carmen Cernat**, Simona.
Glomerular lesions in HIV-1-infected patients: evolution from 1996 to 2007 on 88 consecutive renal biopsies. Clara Flateau, François-Xavier Lescure, Emmanuelle.
Results Compliance with Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines in the HIV Clinic: A Quality Improvement Tool E. Patrozou M.D., E. Christaki M.D., L. Hicks.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Lipid profile in children randomized to immediate versus deferred nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy in the PREDICT study Kanjanavanit S, Puthanakit.
INTRODUCTION A previous cohort study from our unit suggested a benefit for the use of efavirenz compared to nevirapine in a group of patients initiating.
Outcomes of Antiretroviral Treatment Programs in Rural Lesotho: Health Centers and Hospitals Compared Niklaus Labhardt, Motlalepula Sello, Mamokone A.
Validation and Refinement of a Prediction Rule to Identify Children at Low Risk for Acute Appendicitis Kharbanda AB, Dudley NC, Bajaj L, et al; Pediatric.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 30 June - 3 July 2013 Longitudinal Study of Bone Mineral Density and Vitamin D Levels Among Perinatally HIV-infected.
1 Antiretroviral Regimen and Pharmacogenetic Determinants of Tenofovir-associated Change in Creatinine Clearance in ACTG Protocol A5142 (NWCS 291) Miguel.
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
HIV Testing in Acute Care Settings Rich Rothman, MD, PhD, FACEP CDC, DHHS, OraSure Technologies, Abbott  Historical.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 30 June - 3 July 2013 MOPDB0101 Cardiovascular abnormalities and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) among HIV-infected.
Long-Term Comparison of Nevirapine Versus Efavirenz When Combined with Other Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral-Naïve Persons- The NNRTI.
Weekly Alendronate Safe and Effective at Increasing Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on: McComsey GA, Kendall.
Estimating the population impact of homelessness on HIV viral suppression among people who use drugs Brandon DL Marshall, 1 Beth Elson, 1 Sabina Dobrer,
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Effect of ART on malaria parasitaemia and clinical episodes in adults in rural Uganda: A population-based cohort study Billy N. Mayanja 1, Kathy Baisley.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
CD4 trajectory among HIV positive patients receiving HAART in a large East African HIV care centre Agnes N. Kiragga 1, Beverly Musick 2 Ronald Bosch, Ann.
Neurologic Effects Associated With Efavirenz Generally Mild, Transient Slideset on: Clifford DB, Evans S, Yang Y, et al. Impact of efavirenz on neuropsychological.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
Previous SVR With Interferon-Based Therapy for HCV Lowers Risk of Hepatotoxicity in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on:
Slideset on: Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Use of Azithromycin and Death from Cardiovascular Causes Whitney Shirley University of Georgia Pharm.D. Candidate 2014.
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Presented to the AIDS 2016 Conference
undetectable (undetectable-6.25)
Participants 18year old+
Tolerability of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) in an HIV infected cohort
Table 3. Predictors of Nevirapine Reactions at Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation From: Strategies for Nevirapine Initiation in HIV-Infected Children Taking.
Providing ARVs to children in resource limited settings
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Tolerability of Isoniazid Preventive therapy Among HIV infected Cohort in Nigeria Folajinmi Oluwasina Strategic Information Unit AIDS Healthcare Foundation,
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Management and Development for Health (MDH)
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Ensuring ART for TB patients: experience from Thailand
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Melissa Herrin, Jan Tate ScD, MPH & Amy Justice, MD, PhD
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
High acceptability and feasibility of same-day antiretroviral therapy services among HIV-positive adolescents in Bangkok, Thailand Pich Seekaew, MPH PREVENTION.
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
Presentation transcript:

Late Breaker Track B WELBB04 HLA-B*35:05 and CCHCR1 Screening Reduces Nevirapine-associated Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in Thailand: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (NCT ) Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul, MD, MHS, Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, MD, MSc, PhD, Natta Rajatanavin, MD, Angkana Charoenyingwattana, BSc (Pharm), MSc, Archawin Rojanawiwat, MD, PhD, Wittaya Wangsomboonsiri, MD, Weerawat Manosuthi, MD, Pacharee Kantipong, MD, Anucha Apisarnthanarak, MD, Wilawan Sangsirinakakul, MD, Pawinee Wongprasit, MD, Romanee Chaiwarith, MD, MHS, Woraphot Tantisiriwat, MD, MPH, Michiaki Kubo, MD, PhD, Yusuke Nakamura, MD, PhD, Taisei Mushiroda, PhD, Wasun Chantratita, PhD, Somnuek Sungkanuparph, MD 7 th IAS, Kuala Lumpur (July 3, 2013)

Background  Nevirapine (NVP) is the main component of the regimen for the treatment of HIV infection NVP-based regimen is recommended by EACS and resource-limited settings guidelines including Thailand  NVP-associated cutaneous adverse reaction (NVP-CAR) is a major drug adverse reaction Prevalence ~15-20%  The associations of NVP-CAR and variations in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region class I have been reported in Thais HLA-B*35:05 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CCHCR1

 HLA-B*35:05 was observed in 17.5% of patients with rash vs. 1.1% of NVP-tolerant patients  OR (95% CI , P= )  Sensitivity 17.5%  Specificity 98.9% Chantarangsu S et al. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2009;19:

Chantarangsu S et al. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:341–8.  ∼ 550,000 markers  CCHCR1 significantly associated with rash  OR 2.59 (95% CI , P=0.007)  Receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 76.4%

Objective  This study was designed to determine the effectiveness of prospective genotypes-based screening to prevent NVP-CAR in HIV-infected Thai patients

Patients and Methods

Study Methods  Prospective multicenter randomized study  9 hospitals in Thailand  Study period: April 2009-April 2012  We randomly assigned patients to undergo prospective HLA-B*35:05 and CCHCR1 SNPs genotyping group and control group (standard-of-care group)

Study Methods Prospective-screening group  Exclusion of patients with HLA-B*35:05 and CCHCR1 carrier from using NVP and initiated efavirenz (EFV)- based regimen Control group  NVP usage without prospective genotypic screening End point committee  NVP-CAR was reviewed by central end point committees composed of a clinical immunologist, a dermatologist and an infectious disease specialist Patients were followed for 6 months after ART initiation

Patient Selection Criteria  Age years old  Confirmed to be infected with HIV-1  Naïve to ART  Eligible for ART according to Thai national guidelines  Agreed to withholding other drugs and other medications which do not prescribed by the investigators 14 days prior to ART initiation and during the study  Not a pregnant woman or in a lactation period  AST/ALT <5 ULN

Results

Study Flow Chart 1,137 patients were enrolled Control group N=549 Prospective-screening group N= patients did not receive randomization 10 patients withdrew consent 4 patients had a protocol violation 10 patients were lost to follow-up 10 patients were not treated owing to investigator’s decision Randomized by gender and CD4 strata N=1,103

Baseline Characteristics CharacteristicsProspective- screening group (N= 554) Control group (N=549) All participants (N=1,103) Male sex, n (%)328 (59.2)338 (61)661 (59.9) Median (IQR) age, years38 (31-45)36.5 (31-43)37 (31-44) HIV exposure, n (%) Heterosexual 420 (75.8)424 (77.2)844 (76.5) Homosexual 102 (18.4)96 (17.5)198 (18.0) Injecting drug use 18 (3.2)13 (2.4)31 (2.8) Blood transfusion 7 (1.3)6 (1.1)13 (1.2) Other/unknown 13 (2.3)15 (2.7)28 (2.5) Median (IQR) body weight, kg 54.7 ( )55 (48-62) History of drug allergy, n (%) 78 (14.1)76 (13.8)154 (14.0)

Baseline Characteristics (continued) CharacteristicsProspective- screening group (N= 554) Control group (N=549) All participants (N=1,103) Median (IQR) baseline CD4 count, cells/mm (35-220)121 (40-229)116 (37-225) Median (IQR) plasma HIV RNA, copies/mL 44,400 (12, ,300) 57,390 (14, ,800) 50,580 (13, ,000) HIV subtype, n (%) AE515 (93.8)493 (89.0)1,008 (91.4) B32 (5.8)58 (10.4)90 (8.1) Others2 (0.4)3 (0.6)5 (0.5) Positive HLA-B*35:05, n (%)19 (3.4) -- Positive CCHCR1, n (%) 78 (14.1)-- Positive both HLA-B*35:05 and CCHCR1, n (%) 17 (3.1)--

Antiretroviral Regimens Control group Prospective-screening group

Results CharacteristicsProspective- screening group (N= 554) Control group (N=549) All participants (N=1,103) NVP-CAR*, n (%) 73 (13.2)99 (18.0)172 (15.6) Grade 1 and 2 29 (5.2)39 (7.1)68 (6.2) Grade 3 and 4 44 (7.9)60 (10.9)104 (9.4) Hepatitis*, n (%) 44 (7.9)47 (8.6)91 (8.3) Grade 1 and 2 23 (4.2)28 (5.1)51 (4.6) Grade 3 and 4 21 (3.8)19 (3.5)40 (3.6) *Division of AIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric adverse events

Relative Risk: Overall and By Subgroup GroupRelative risk 95% confidence interval P-value Overall Sex Male Female CD4 cell count, cells/mm 3 < >

Strength of the Study  First randomized trial regarding personalized prescription of NVP  Point of care genotypic testing is effective preventive intervention for NVP-CAR  NVP can be initiated safely for those who less likely to develop NVP-CAR from the result of genetic testing

Limitations  HLA-B genotype testing may be limited by facility and resource  HLA-B*35:05 is not common in other populations except Southeast Asian and Southern Americans  Additional genetic risks remained to be discovered

Conclusion  HLA-B*35:05 and CCHCR1 SNPs genotypic screening reduced the risk of NVP-CAR  Our results support the use of genotypes- based screening in a clinical setting to prevent NVP-CAR among naïve HIV-infected Thai patients

Acknowledgement  Research grant from Pharmacogenomics Projects, the collaboration between Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University and Thailand Center of Excellence of Life Sciences (TCELS)  All study patients

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Tests CharacteristicsHLA-B*35:05CCHCR1Combined Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive predictive value (%) Negative predictive value (%) Relative risk % confidence interval P-value6.02 x

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Tests CharacteristicsCarbamazepineAllopurinolAbacavirNevirapine SJS/TENS/ DRESS SJS/TENS/ DRESS Clinical hyper- sensitivity CARs/ DRESS Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive predictive value (%) Negative predictive value (%) Positive likelihood ratio5.37N/A 7.39 (HLA-B*35:05) 1.89 (CCHCR1) Negative likelihood ratio0.07N/A 0.86 (HLA-B*35:05) 0.88 (CCHCR1) Relative risk2.27 (overall) 95% confidence interval P-value0.0021

Incidence of NVP-CAR

Results of Genetic Testing

Incidence of NVP-CAR

Standard of careGenetic testing Comparisons of strata by arms

Study Team Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul, MD, MHS, 1 Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, MD, MSc, PhD, 2 Natta Rajatanavin, MD, 1 Angkana Charoenyingwattana, BSc (Pharm), MSc, 3 Archawin Rojanawiwat, MD, PhD, 2 Wittaya Wangsomboonsiri, MD, 4 Weerawat Manosuthi, MD, 5 Pacharee Kantipong, MD, 6 Anucha Apisarnthanarak, MD, 7 Wilawan Sangsirinakakul, MD, 8 Pawinee Wongprasit, MD, 9 Romanee Chaiwarith, MD, MHS, 10 Woraphot Tantisiriwat, MD, MPH, 11 Michiaki Kubo, MD, PhD 12 Yusuke Nakamura, MD, PhD, 13 Taisei Mushiroda, PhD, 13 Wasun Chantratita, PhD, 14 Somnuek Sungkanuparph, MD 1 1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand 2 Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand 3 Thailand Center of Excellence for Life Sciences, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Sawanpracharak Hospital, Nakornsawan, Thailand 5 Department of Internal Medicine, BamrasnaraduraInfectious Disease Institute, Nonthaburi, Thailand 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand 7 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pratumthani, Thailand 8 Department of Internal Medicine, Maharaj Nakornratchasima Hospital, Nakornratchasima, Thailand 9 Department of Medicine, Buriram Hospital, Buriram, Thailand 10 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 11 Department of Preventive Medicine and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand 12 Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medicine Sciences, Yokohama, Japan 13 Laboratory for Pharmacogenomic, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medicine Sciences, Yokohama, Japan 14 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand