Fedora 3.0 and METS: A Partnership for the Organization, Presentation and Preservation of Digital Objects Open Repositories Georgia Tech, Atlanta,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METS Awareness Training An Introduction to METS Digital libraries – where are we now? Digitisation technology now well established and well-understood.
Advertisements

Long-Term Preservation. Technical Approaches to Long-Term Preservation the challenge is to interpret formats a similar development: sound carriers From.
An Introduction to Repositories Thornton Staples Director of Community Strategy and Alliances Director of the Fedora Project.
October 28, 2003Copyright MIT, 2003 METS repositories: DSpace MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology MIT Libraries.
MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology MIT Libraries.
METS: An Introduction Towards a Digital Object Standard Rick Beaubien Library Systems Office U.C. Berkeley.
DRS 2 Metadata Migration June 25, Agenda Introduction Preliminary results - content analysis Metadata options Next steps Questions.
DRS 2 one in a series of periodic updates Harvard University Library Andrea Goethals October 21, 2009 DRS = Digital Repository Service.
Digital Preservation - Its all about the metadata right? “Metadata and Digital Preservation: How Much Do We Really Need?” SAA 2014 Panel Saturday, August.
Workflows for Digital Curation and Preservation Stacy Kowalczyk PASIG Dublin 2012 October 17, 2012.
METS Dr. Heike Neuroth EMANI – Project Meeting February 14 th - 16 th, 2002 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg Göttingen State and University Library (SUB)
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
Depositing e-material to The National Library of Sweden.
1 Extending the Implementation of PREMIS to Geospatial Resources in the Stanford Digital Repository: An Exploration By Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Metadata.
Joachim Bauer Senior System Engineer, CCS
From EAD to METS An overview and history of METS Rick Beaubien UC Berkeley.
Mark Evans, Tessella Digital Preservation Boot Camp – PASIG meeting, Washington DC, 22 nd May 2013 PREMIS Practical Strategies For Preservation Metadata.
R.Jantz, August 31, Two-day forum on PREMIS Preservation Metadata and the Trusted Digital Repositories August 31, September 1 National Library of.
Keeping the pieces together: The Role of METS in the Preservation of Digital Content Robin Wendler Harvard University Library January 16, 2005 [Men in.
METS Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard Metadata Working Group Forum April 19, 2002.
DigiTool METS Profile DigiTool Version 3.0. DigiTool METS Profile 2 What is METS? A Digital Library Federation initiative built upon the work of MOA2.
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation
Incompatible or Interoperable? A METS bridge for a small gap between two digital preservation software packages Lucas Mak Metadata & CatalogLibrarian
A METS Application Profile for Historical Newspapers
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC’s Digital Archive – Disseminating with METS Jay Goodkin Software Engineer Digital Collection and Preservation.
Metadata standards, tools and processes for audio preservation at the British Library: An overview of new systems for audio description, preservation and.
METS Intro & Overview Mets Opening Day Germany May 7, 2007 Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Stanford University Libraries.
METS-Based Cataloging Toolkit for Digital Library Management System Dong, Li Tsinghua University Library
Implementing an Integrated Digital Asset Management System: FEDORA and OAIS in Context Paul Bevan DAMS Implementation Manager
How to build your own Dark Archive (in your spare time) Priscilla Caplan FCLA.
ESIP 2009 Summer Meeting, UC Santa Barbara, CA, July 7 – 10, Stanford Digital Repository PREMIS & Geospatial Resources Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich InfoAnalytics.
Metadata: Essential Standards for Management of Digital Libraries ALI Digital Library Workshop Linda Cantara, Metadata Librarian Indiana University, Bloomington.
Gathering Audio Metadata for the Monterey Jazz Festival Concerts OLAC 2006 By Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Stanford University Libraries.
An Introduction to METS Morgan Cundiff Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Archival Information Packages for NASA HDF-EOS Data R. Duerr, Kent Yang, Azhar Sikander.
Implementor’s Panel: BL’s eJournal Archiving solution using METS, MODS and PREMIS Markus Enders, British Library DC2008, Berlin.
Implementation of PREMIS in METS Rebecca Guenther Sr. Networking & Standards Specialist, Library of Congress PREMIS Implementation Fair San.
Digital Preservation: Current Thinking Anne Gilliland-Swetland Department of Information Studies.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Preservation Metadata Standards PREMIS & METS Taylor Surface, OCLC.
PREMIS Implementation Fair – SF 2009 PREMIS use in Rosetta Yair Brama – Ex Libris.
METS: Implementing a metadata standard in the digital library Richard Gartner Oxford University Library Services
Introduction to metadata
ETD2006 Preserving ETDs With D.A.I.T.S.S. FLORIDA CENTER FOR LIBRARY AUTOMATION FC LA PAPER AUTHORS: Chuck Thomas Priscilla.
PREMIS Implementation Fair, San Francisco, CA October 7, Stanford Digital Repository PREMIS & Geospatial Resources Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Knowledge.
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES. How PREMIS can be used  For systems in development as a basis for metadata definition  For existing repositories as a checklist.
Metadata for digital preservation: a review of recent developments Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath ECDL2001, 5th European Conference.
VITAL at the National Library of Wales Glen Robson
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
PREMIS at the British Library Markus Enders, The British Library PREMIS Implementation Fair, San Fransisco, CA 07 October 2009.
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation (FCLA)
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
The NLW Digital Asset Management System Paul Bevan DAMS Implementation Manager
The library is open Digital Assets Management & Institutional Repository Russian-IUG November 2015 Tomsk, Russia Nabil Saadallah Manager Business.
The Care and Feeding of Digital Collections Amy Jackson March 14, 2005.
Implementing PREMIS in DigiTool Michael Kaplan ALA 2007 Update.
Fedora Metadata The Basics 9/9/2008. Mini Glossary Fedora: ‘ Flexible Extensible Digital Repository Object Architecture;’ asset repository, metadata architecture.
Institutional Repositories July 2007 DIGITAL CURATION creating, managing and preserving digital objects Dr D Peters DISA Digital Innovation South.
NLW. Object Classes Class 1  1 MARC Record  1 Image  No METS Class 2  1 MARC Record  Many images  No METS Class 3  1 MARC Record  Many.
Cedars work on metadata Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath Cedars Workshop Manchester, February 2002.
Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Metadata Coordinator, Stanford University 1 Metadata for the NGDA: Developing a Shared Approach Joint UCSB / Stanford meeting.
2/26/2004 Dan Swaney 1 Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects A review.
Developing a Dark Archive for OJS Journals Yu-Hung Lin, Metadata Librarian for Continuing Resources, Scholarship and Data Rutgers University 1 10/7/2015.
and Transmission Standard overview – and case study
FLORIDA CENTER FOR LIBRARY AUTOMATION
Exercise: understanding authenticity evidence
Fedora Metadata The Basics 9/9/2008.
An Open Archival Repository System for UT Austin
Introduction to METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard)
Presentation transcript:

Fedora 3.0 and METS: A Partnership for the Organization, Presentation and Preservation of Digital Objects Open Repositories Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA Thursday, May 21, 2009 Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Stanford University Libraries Patrick Yott, Brown University

2 Topic Outline Task = How to integrate existing practice (METS) with Fedora content models METS at a gallop Context for Fedora use at Stanford Fedora / METS mechanisms to facilitate digital object registry / digital library stacks / preservation repository functions

3 Task = Integrating existing practice with Fedora METS as standard, adaptable mechanism for organizing, linking MD & content Few differentials among content encodings, so relatively automated creation Capabilities for: Using identifiers to facilitate linking / locating among object / component files, and tracking among systems / repositories Collecting, typing both assigned and generated MD Describing physical & logical structure of D.O. at desired level of granularity

4 METS at a gallop… Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard XML specification used in many digital libraries as means to package content & MD of all types Often used for OAIS SIPs, DIPs, AIPs Flexible Limited requirements to validate schema Has some built-in capability for use with Fedora

5 METS at a gallop… Requirements to validate: 1 layer within a structure map Capabilities: File inventory & grouping Describing structures Organizing metadata types Descriptive Administrative Associating behaviors Linking between structural maps Declaring specializations via profiles Typical content types encoded: Still images, text, audio, video Typical Institutions using: National libraries, research libraries archives, museums, govt agencies (internationally)

6 Context for Fedora at Stanford Digital Object Registry (Fedora repository) (DOR) Digital Library Stacks (DL) Stanford Digital Repository (SDR)* SUL Digitization Labs Publisher / Vendor Deposits Donor Collections * probable Fedora repository for MD management]

7 DOR Functions (from MD POV) Accession into digital management environment Registration of D.O. with IDs for linking / consumption by other services, repositories Facilitation of D.O. management, versioning of MD for D.O. and for components Source of record for: non-preservation, administrative MD link to sources of descriptive MD (e.g., online catalog(s), EADs) D.O. resolvable location

8 DL Functions (from MD POV) Link digital format of D.O. to analog, if any Identify formats, copies of D.O. For descriptive MD, enable connections among: search & discovery systems D.O. / component delivery /rendering

9 SDR Functions (from MD POV) Maintain provenance of D.O. (trail of ownership, creation, modification) Keep record of significant preservation related events Links to storage location (s)

10 Fedora Content Models for [Google] scanned books [1] Fedora content models= [Google] scannedBook MD Datastreams = RELS-EXT (has Model) dorAdmin (has list of key IDs) descMD (DC & MODS) ContentMD (fileSec & structMap) File listing File grouping by format, use AdminMD (including techMD & premisObject MD) RightsMD ProvenanceMD

11 Fedora Content Models for [Google] scanned books [2] Fedora content models= Page (scanned book page) MD Datastreams = RELS-EXT (hasModel) descMD = DC Content datastream = file / bitstream

12 DOR functions enabled: METS Identifies D.O. as managed unit Inventories component files/bitstreams of D.O. Organizes components into groups for various purposes Outlines physical and/or logical structure of D.O. Types & links metadata with D.O. & components Fedora: xmlContent datastream includes: mets:fileSec Parsable mets:fileGrp Consumable mets:structMap & attributes (e.g., LABEL) ID/IDREF links RightsMD datastream ProvenanceMD datastream

13 DL functions enabled METS Allows inclusion or reference to “source” MD, e.g., analog catalog record Groups and sequences component files into groups for presentation Provides labeling information to facilitate presentation of D.O. (e.g., page number) Fedora descriptiveMD datastream includes MODS, other content standard descriptive MD Actionable content datastream via mets:fileGrp USE Consumable content datastream via mets:structMap & attributes (e.g., SEQ, ORDER, TYPE)

14 SDR functions enabled METS Allows inclusion of “preservation” metadata such as: Fixity, validation info ID generation / retention throughout workflow, if desired References to storage location, logging MD Changes to filenames Descriptions, recording of significant events, dates & rights agreements Fedora Admin datastream includes: mets:techMD for file/format specific MD premisObject to record original filenames, references to location info, etc. ProvenanceMD datastream includes: mets:digiprov / premisEvent to record significant preservation events (validation, format migration, etc.) Rights datastream links to Service Level Agreement

15 Key MD Management functions enabled for DOR: Takes advantage of Fedora’s versioning for both MD streams and DO/component files during creation, use Enables creation & tracking of locally and publicly persistent IDs Allows SIP, DIP creation at different points in DO’s lifecycle (i.e. to SDR, DL)

16 Key Management functions enabled for SDR: Retention of SIP as received from data provider while also allowing Derived “lightweight” AIP containing only MD necessary for reconstruction of package or component files within Referenced preservation MD that can be versioned separately from AIP

17 The view from Brown University …